Warning; We are not a politically correct site. Don't like us? Don't read.

Friday, April 28, 2017

Guy Stands Up For Blind Kid Who Was Getting Bullied

"Honor is the only thing a man can give himself and the only thing he can loose by his own action."
"No man can call himself a man that does not make the world better."

If real men do not step up...Then who?

Sons of Anarchy - Don't ever sit on another man's bike

Word of advice...this is not a made for TV rule...lol.

Thursday, April 27, 2017

This just makes one sick...Mom Sees Blisters On Baby’s Feet, Furious To Learn Babysitter’s Sick Secret

Mom Sees Blisters On Baby’s Feet, Furious To Learn Babysitter’s Sick Secret
A mother from Bladensburg, Maryland, was getting her 6-month-old child ready for the day when she noticed her baby’s feet were swollen and had blisters all over. After quickly taking her child to the pediatrician, she was left furious to learn her babysitter’s sick secret.
As if choosing a babysitter isn’t a stressful enough experience for parents, stories like this one will make them question everything. When one set of parents finally decided on Ismelda Ramos-Mendoza to care for their six-month-old daughter, they were completely unaware that they would soon regret their choice.
After Ramos-Mendoza babysat one night, the young mother found her daughter’s feet red, swollen, and covered in blisters. As any parent would, she immediately took her child to the doctor. As soon as the pediatrician saw the infant’s feet, the Bladensburg police were contacted to report obvious marks of abuse on the innocent child, leaving the mother horrified to learn that the marks were a result of the child’s feet getting burnt.
As soon as police arrived, the parents told them of their suspicions; that their daughter may have been injured while in the care of Ramos-Mendoza. When investigators began to interview the babysitter, she admitted that the child’s feet “may have rubbed across a tortilla,” according to Washington Post. However, she incriminated herself when she later admitted that she had placed the baby’s feet on the grill or pan she was cooking tortillas on out of “frustration.”
Apparently, the infant had been crying too much and the only solution the sick babysitter could come up with was to burn the child’s feet. Sadly, the child suffered severe injuries to her feet, leaving them severely red, swollen, blistered, and painful. In fact, when police officers saw the baby’s injuries, they described them as “heart-wrenching.” Ramos-Mendoza was arrested and initially held without bond. She has since been charged with child abuse, assault, and reckless endangerment.
When someone agrees to be a babysitter, they’re being trusted by that child’s guardian to keep them safe while they are away. If for any reason a childcare provider feels like the job isn’t the right fit for them, whether they are finding themselves frustrated or perhaps feeling like losing their control, then babysitting isn’t the career for them. The solution, however, is simple. Quit. No matter how frustrated one becomes, taking out that frustration on a child is never acceptable.
Clearly, Ramos-Mendoza shouldn’t be around kids and will undoubtedly never be trusted to watch anyone’s children ever again. It takes a sick individual to purposely place a distressed 6-month-old baby’s feet on a hot pan with the intent to cause harm. It’s disgusting to think that she not only kept her actions a secret but tried to excuse her behavior, saying she did it over a little bit of “frustration.” Thankfully, the child will recover and will now be safe from her horrible babysitter, who will hopefully get what she deserves before she’s ever able to hurt another child.
As adults we are here to care for the young, this is our first duty as humans, yet once in a while humanity sees things like this. Anyone who does this has an evil character, it's hard to see it but sometimes what your instinct tells you is usually right, maybe we should pay more attention to a gut feeling, specially when it comes to the safety of children.
Anyone who puts children's live at risk or promotes the harming of kids has failed as a human being. 
Animals do this, but then animals don't have a conscience, do they.
For example, a lion will kill anothers cubs so he can procreate, a female squirrel will infanticide her litter for the meat when food is scarce, their excuse is that they are...animals...
Some humans do and or promote somewhat the same thing, they call it late term abortions.
Some are so without a conscience they can hurt kids without a second thought.
This is not a gender issue, but according to feminism, only men bad, when they do this they also are responsible for harming kids, by not admitting evil does not have a gender.

Wednesday, April 26, 2017

LIMBAUGH: Fox News Is Not Gonna Be The Way It Is For Long

Leftist Wives Of Liberal Murdoch Sons Blamed For Firing Of Bill O’Reilly…TRASH Trump On Social Media.

Interesting... like them of not, if Fox news falls to the left...what's left to oppose them?
Opposition viewpoints, is important to a debate and the protection of free speech, if you only see one side, you can be...manipulated.

Tuesday, April 25, 2017

Silencing free speech by using the fool.

The warnings are there.
Recent history is full of instances where free speech was curtailed by higher ups using mindless thugs and idiots to achieve their eventual goals...

Here's a couple of head scratchers....
Anti-woman Saudi Arabia takes place on UN Women’s Right Commission???
“Electing Saudi Arabia to protect women’s rights is like making an arsonist into the town fire chief. It’s absurd,” Hillel Neuer, the UN Watch chief, said

Trudeau (I am a feminist) on Muslim prayer in schools: Canadians have to move ‘beyond mere tolerance towards acceptance’
Acceptance. Acceptance of Sharia supremacists brutalizing women who don’t wear hijab. Acceptance of rampant female genital mutilation. Acceptance of never knowing when you leave your house if you will return, or be the latest casualty of the latest jihad massacre.......................
Canadian Imam contradicts Trudeau: “Islam will never become a part of liberal secularism”

Heck they don't even like dogs.

The point is this, someone down the line is "using" some people and some religion as a blessing in disguise to entice low minded snowflakes to do their bidding, and these are too stupid to see it...
Whether pushing one religion in schools and neighborhoods, all the while telling us for decades religion has no place in government and in schools...or promoting some ideals (sharia laws) that are against western values...something strange is going on....
None of us have any problem with what someone does in their own homes, but seems like some are been used to curtail free speech while pushing aside Christianity, which by the way is a heck of a lot more tolerant...

Then there is those snowflakes on college campuses...all dressed in black, following a road which was used before...
We have see this in the past, where the fool is been used to destroy free speech, to control the population.
Mussolini's black shirts,
Hitlers brown shirts,
Mao's red guard...

What I don't understand is all of a sudden, the elitist is pushing one over the other, the policy of division seems to be the flavor of the month, does this go further than what is really going on, are there dark forces at work here?
We got along just fine before, there always were different ways of life in the west, they understood they where in a new land with our own way of life and if they wanted to fit in, to be free to express themselves, unlike the places they escaped from, they had to accept things where done differently and had to adapt, just like we would have to if we went to their country.

How about...
The Antifa movement...(Berkley is Just the beginning if this is not nipped in the butt for what it is, an attack on free speech)
Antifa is short for ant-fascist...now who in the heck used fools for their own benefit? Yes...fascists...
Take a good look at the colors of the antifa movement...Black, as in black shirts...
Do they even know what fascism is? National "SOCIALISM"....not national capitalism, but national "SOCIALISM", which most of them identify themselves as....SOCIALISTS. The path they seem to be emulating has never worked and ended up bad for everyone, even those who where fools enough to follow it.
So who is the fascist here?

Is it the fool who is the most dangerous in the short term, or the person who sees it, yet says to him or herself, it does not affect me...giving it time to grow to a point where it is...irreversible?

The N.C. Chronicles is an opinion web site, we offer info and links for you to investigate and be up-to-date on what is going on, things you will never see in the main stream media...

Monday, April 24, 2017

A country without a national identity cannot survive

Trudeau’s Dangerous “Anti-National” Agenda Must Be Stopped

The idea that some have, who believe they are special and can change the nature of a nation is moronic at best...
The political idealism of one usually dies off with that person...
Case in point...barack hussein obama, replaced by Donald J. Trump.

This one person thinks he can change the nature of Canada, that we are now, because of him, global citizen, throw taxpayer money to foreign nations like a drunken sailor would to the local bordello,
all the while ignoring the necessities of his own nations poor, seniors, disabled, vets, fist nations...so on...
There are global citizens in Canada
You can probably count them on one hand.
Him included.

This money does not belong to the out of touch professional politician, for their own personal pet projects, but to the nation it comes from...
Nationalism is not a disease, it simply means one cares for his or her own first, then offers help where it is needed, as long as this nation is...democratic....and respect the freedoms of it's people...
Otherwise, giving money to totalitarian, non-democratic regimes only emboldens them to stay in power, putting their own money in re-enforcing their military and para-military forces to suppress and control their own people.
Canadians are "not" global citizens as this person tries to push, we are Canadian citizen, the idea he can change the identity of Canadians to fit his own personal beliefs shows how ignorant and separated he is about who we really are....
We don't mind helping, but only after we look after our own....
We're not global citizens, if anything, the recent past on this planet has shown we, as a species, are just not there yet....
We can't have some in the western world pushing for this, while the rest is at war with itself due to their differences in race, tribes, religion, sex, and  everything in between.

If we show them how we live, how peace and prosperity can be achieved, then maybe they will want to have this for themselves, but the only ones who can do this is the population of said country...
Freedom is not free, prosperity cannot be handed to them, they have to go and get it for themselves.

Ever noticed since this globalism crap been pushed by elite, the world seems to be going downhill?

Friday, April 21, 2017

Abortion Kills More Than The Baby

For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Romans 6:23
Pop star Nicki Minaj told Rolling Stone about her abortion: “It was the hardest thing I have ever gone through….It has haunted me all my life.”
Aerosmith singer Steven Tyler talked about his girlfriend’s abortion: “It’s a major thing when you’re growing something with a woman, but they convinced us that it would never work out and would ruin our lives….You go to the doctor and they put the needle in her belly and they squeeze the stuff in and you watch. And it comes out dead. I was pretty devastated. In my mind, I’m going, Jesus, what have I done?”
Steven’s onto something.
God forgives with such unfathomable mercy. Thank you, oh Lord. As more parents acknowledge pain and regret over their abortions, I remind them that God can life that burden. Mothers and fathers wounded by abortion can accept the grace and forgiveness of our loving Father God.
Sweet Freedom in Action
Pray for unwed mothers; encourage them, if you know them personally; and support programs that help mothers realize that there are much better alternatives to abortion, alternatives that offer life, love, and freedom from guilt.
I wonder if the radical feminists and their mangina supporters ever tell a woman that if she gets an abortion, she will be haunted all her life by it? Not to mention the medical issues for years after?

Wednesday, April 19, 2017

Why Do Feminists Want To Be Islamic Sex Slaves?

No matter what one thinks of Alex Jones or info wars, he has a point...
You see a lot of feminists supporting a system that promotes less rights for women...
This is not an ism or a phobia, it`s a viable question.
Feminism as an organization has become a danger to women`s rights.

Tuesday, April 18, 2017

Husband Describes Foul Smell and His Wife Can't Stop Laughing! Hillarious...

Who has been in that position to hold your breath in a line...lol.

Thursday, April 13, 2017

Canadian Journalist on lies and propaganda about Syria

Are we been told both sides of the story, when it comes to Iraq, Libya and now Syria, by the main stream media?
When Trump bomb the Syrian airport, all of them got on the bandwagon, all of them ridiculed anyone who said; "wait a minute, the gas attack might not be as an open and shut case as the anti-Syrian forces says it is".
Msnbc, cnn, abc, nbc, cbs, beat the drums of war like good little propaganda stations. Fox, well, they went beyond that and pushed for more attacks and the removal of Assad...even hinting at a war with Russia...
To them it's republican vs democrats...Lately they seem to have lost their..."fair and balanced". Just like msnbc and cnn did a long time ago.

Do they even understand what such a war would mean for the west or do they really believe they are all powerful and only one side would suffer? Propaganda is refusing to admit both sides, men, women and children, would suffer. When it comes to Syria, when one listens to the msm, only one side suffers, the one they side with... But that is never true, all sides suffer...and they refuse to post, report, and point to that fact...
It is important for the sake of truth and reality to look at both sides, so we do not make the mistakes of the past; "their side is evil, our side is always right...W.A.R., We Are Right.

I really believed, with the advent of the web, people would be more apt to have a more rationalistic view of things, debate and contradict what the msm tells then to believe or how to think.
But it's obvious we still live in a time where, whatever the msm and government report must be the truth, that way of thinking is what caused those horrible wars of the past, started with propaganda,  got out of hand and ended with millions dead. (latest.; Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, remember colin powell at the u.n.'s security council and the pictures?)

Whenever someone tries to point out the one sided reporting like the reporter above, they are as we said, ridiculed or simply ignored, that is how propaganda works.
It's not about taking sides, but making sure, both sides have an equal say, been informed and making sure, if we do take sides, it's not because someone someone told us to, but making our own decisions by knowing the truth and both sides of the story. This is how we can prevent another world war.

I found many pro-Syrian web sites, something you will never see on the main stream media, and it's important, if not for them, but for us to know and be informed, to listen and read what they have to say, because if we only get one side, what does that say of us when we support without knowing how both sides see things...

Here is an example. (there are many other, all speak about this like this one does)
Two years ago, “Majd” wrote these words on a Facebook posting:
” I am Syrian… living in Syria in the middle of everything. We have seen horrors. It was never a revolution nor a civil war. The terrorists are sent by your goverment. They are al Qaeda Jabhat al Nusra Wahhabi Salafists Talibans etc and the extremist jihadists sent by the West, the Saudis, Qatar and Turkey. Your Obama and whoever is behind him or above him are supporting al Qaeda and leading a proxy war on my country.

We thought you are against al Qaeda and now you support them.

The majority here loves Assad. He has never committed a crime against his own people… The chemical attack was staged by the terrorists helped by the USA and the UK,  etc. Everyone knows that here.

American soldiers and people should not be supporting barbarian al Qaeda terrorists who are killing Christians, Muslims in my country and everyone.

Every massacre is committed by them. We were all happy in Syria: we had free school and university education available for everyone, free healthcare, no GMO, no fluoride, no chemtrails, no Rothschild IMF- controlled bank, state owned central bank which gives 11% interest, we are self-sufficient and have no foreign debt to any country or bank.

Life before the crisis was so beautiful here. Now it is hard and horrific in some regions.

I do not understand how the good and brave American people can accept to bomb my country which has never harmed them and therefore help the barbarian al Qaeda. These animals slit throats and behead for pleasure… they behead babies and rape young kids.

They are satanic. Our military helped by the millions of civilian militias are winning the battle against al Qaeda. But now the USA wants to bomb the shit out of us so that al Qaeda can get the upper hand.

Please help us American people. They are destroying the cradle of civilization. Stop your government.

Impeach that bankster puppet you have as president… support Ron Paul or Rand or anyone the like who are true American patriots. but be sure of one.thing..if they attack and I think they will….it will be hell.

Be sure that if it were to be a world war, many many will die. Syria can and will defend itself and will sink many US ships. Iran will go to war..Russia and China eventually if it escalates… and all this for what ? For the elites who created al Qaeda through the US government and use it to conduct proxy wars and destabilize countries which do not go along with their new world order agenda !!?

American people…you gotta regain control of your once admirable country. Now everyone hates you for.the.death you bring almost everywhere.

Ask the Iraqis…the Afghans…the Pakistanis…the Palestinians…the Syrians…the Macedonians and Serbs…the Libyans…the Somalis…the Yemenis ….all the ones you kill with drones everyday. Stop your wars, Enough wars. Use diplomacy..dialogue…help..not force.”

Here is another;
What do evil dictators  look like?  What do they talk like?  Just how wicked is an evil dictator’s wife ?  Should she be toppled along with her husband?  Who am I talking about? President Assad of Syria and his wife, Asmas Al Assad.

These are the same ones boy Rubio, McCain, Lyndsay Graham, Ryan, the Bush’s, Obama, Kerry and Hillary all want to topple down to bring peace to Syria. That is THE LIE  they are and have been shouting.  What they really want to do is take over Syria in order to hurry along their New World Order agenda.  The media whores push the establishment narrative that president Assad of Syria is evil and a corrupt dictator. They fear that when you realize who these people really are, you will be sorry you ever believed any lies told about them, let alone what they have conspired to do against them and all the citizens of Syria.

The real truth is – President  Assad and his wife Asmas Al Assad, care about their people. Syria has been invaded with Islamic radicals that have terrorized their nation. We should be helping Assad, not the radical rebels who have infiltrated in the same manner the US manufactured ISIS has infiltrated throughout the entire region.  President Assad is fighting terrorists.

Meanwhile before Obama’s push to topple Assad and take over Syria, the media wrote wonderful stories about President Assad and his wife Asmas.  Vogue magazine issued a wonderful story calling Asmas the “Rose of The Desert”.  After Obama’s regime targeted Syria, the media buried any good stories and began a cut throat propaganda campaign to match their new narrative of Assad as an evil dictator.  (You know the drill).  They have taken great lengths to rewrite wonderful stories where they once called Asmas Al Assad wonderful things and were amazed at the good will being done by Asmas to people of all faiths. Now they want you to believe that she was faking her lifetime of caring and sided with her so-called evil husband dictator....
(Read the rest, and watch the videos included)
I found this post originally on a Jewish website,
As you can see not all stories come from pro-Assad -Syria websites, questioning establishment media rhetoric and propaganda comes from all walks of life.

Note; The N.C. Chronicles does not take sides, we do know propaganda flies on both sides, we try to bring you all sides of the story, specially the ones you will never see on the main stream media. This gives you a chance to make up your own mind, for or against.
We don't have to post anti-Syrian stories, you already get those on the news networks.
We do not demonize them, but posting them would just repeat what you already know.
What we need to know is how the other side thinks.

Wednesday, April 12, 2017

The Truth About Trump's Air Strike on Syria; Paul Joseph Watson

I love this guy....

Here's a few facts...
If the Syrian government wins the war, then it's over...If it falls or regime change is victorious...
Just like Iraq  and Libya, there will be a second civil was, because the islamic rebels do not get along and have different objectives.
Think about that for a minute..

The worse thing here is blind support, Trump is not the conservative messiah, establishment politicians, neo-con and member of the council on foreign relations (globalists) are well entrenched in Washington and the military industrial complex would like nothing more than have another war, even against Russians, which would probably involve China.

Trumpism...well it was a good idea, but it's over...took less than 2 months.
We now know that they can say they will change things, or drain the swamp, but reality shows that, it's just not possible, the swamp is just to strong and to entrenched.

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

President V. Putin; Assad's chemical weapons are a "crock of shit"

Not taking anyone's side, not saying they are right or the others are, but if one only gets their news from the main stream media, your not exactly getting the whole picture...
Making one's own decision by listening to what the other side says, prevents propaganda from taking a foot-hold and dictating how we should think..

I still have a problem with "he gassed his people".;
Assad is winning the war
His enemies are surrounded
The west said they could live with him staying is power.
But he's stupid enough to do a gas attack on innocent civilians? Doesn't make sense.
Or maybe he is that stupid???  Who knows.

The rebels on the other hand, majority of which comes from outside the country and all of them are radical fundamentalists, have all to gain by staging this little propaganda coup.

Actually what it looks like is a bomb fell on a chemical depot or the whole thing was fabricated in some way...as we said before, when nerve gas is present, one does not touch anything without gloves and masks...
which they did in the video.

Or maybe we should go to this conspiracy theory coming out of msnbc...
Putin 'Might Have Orchestrated' Syria Strike to Help Trump...WOW.

Whatever the case, we are living in extremely dangerous times, the only ones who can stop all this is an informed population.

Monday, April 10, 2017

Ex-Marine Blows Whistle On Syrian False Flag.. and Syrian gas attack.

To be informed is to prevent ww3 and the extinction of the human race...The weapons they have will not give us a second chance.
It's in the blood, killing is easy as breathing, old men start it, young men fight it, nobody wins...
(I know it's only a movie quote, but real as hell if you put it in context of today's policies.)

Full interview
The use of chemical weapons is a "moral obscenity", according to the holier than thou west...
Well now...is the west's hand clean enough to dictate to others on the inhumanity of chem. weapons?

Agent Orange is a herbicide and defoliant chemical. It is widely known for its use by the U.S. military as part of its herbicidal warfare program, Operation Ranch Hand,[1] during the Vietnam War from 1961 to 1971.[2] It was a mixture of equal parts of two herbicides, 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D. The chemical damaged the health of people who came into contact with it as well as extensively contaminated the environment.

The defoliant caused grievous health consequences for those who came in contact. Up to 4 million people in Vietnam were affected and 1 million people have illnesses. The chemical has damaged the genes, giving descendants with deformities. The US government has documented higher cases of leukemia, Hodgkin's lymphoma as well as various kinds of cancer in veterans. Agent Orange caused enormous environmental damage in Vietnam. Over 3,100,000 hectares (31,000 sq km) of forest were defoliated. Defoliants eroded tree cover and seedling forest stock, making reforestation difficult in numerous areas. Animal species diversity sharply reduced in contrast with unsprayed areas.
Just saying....(they all do it or did it)

Then again..
After Iraq gave up its chem. weapons, they where invaded and millions died...
After Libya gave up it's chem weapons and nuclear ambitions they where bombed back to the stone age.

After Syria gave up it's chem. weapons, all of a sudden another war in the mirror...
See the pattern here or are we all sheople been lead to the slaughter?

As for the recent gas attack in Khan Sheikhoun in Idlib Province, let me see if I get this right, been nothing more than a stupid citizen of the west who should believe everything the main stream media says...
Bashar al Assad, who is wining the war, after some in the west starting to say he doesn't have to go anymore, all of a sudden, jeopardize all this and goes out gasses innocent people?
If you believe that then your one of these...
 Now he (Assad) is either the dumbest person on the face of this planet, or...something else is going on...
(again, he gave up his chem weapons just like Iraq and Libya)
And if that's not enough, why not go to war against...
US investigates possible Russia role in Syria chemical attack
This kind of B.S. happens when you go around picking on less armed nations, having an easy time at it, then convincing yourself your armies are invincible and deciding to take on anyone...
Ask the Germans how that went after 1941 and operation Barbarossa...or the french under Napoleon.

Ever noticed when a western leader is down in the polls or is accused of sexual improprieties, they go out and find either someone to bomb or a war against a country that can't possibly defend itself against overwhelming odds???

Looks to me like Trump is no different and the swamp is safe and secure in Washington doesn't it?
I would have fully supported him if this statement would have been made...instead of jumping the gun.
"Babies, Babies are been killed and as soon as we find out who really did this, they will pay"

UN fears 200 died in coalition airstrike on Mosul
Not a f..... word?

Here's a few realities, 
Syrian government allowed U.N. inspectors to investigate Chem. plants on the territory they controlled...
Now take into consideration, they were not in control of all territories..
NYT Retreats on 2013 Syria-Sarin Claims
The rebels had control of some territory that has chem. plants, which the U.N. inspectors did not inspect.
Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh further demolished the Assad-sarin myth in an article that traced the chemicals back to Turkish intelligence, but the mainstream U.S. media was so hostile to any dissenting view on the Assad-did-it groupthink that Hersh had to publish his findings in the London Review of Books. Later, Turkish police and opposition officials corroborated much of Hersh’s findings – and I’ve been told that U.S. intelligence analysts now agree, at least generally, with Hersh’s conclusions.

Prominent U.S. news personalities, such as MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell, also have cited the old Assad-was-guilty-in-2013 conventional wisdom to buttress their new rush to judgment over the Tuesday incident. Indeed, the 2013 sarin case has become a perfect example of how the major U.S. media often jumps to conclusions and then refuses to back down regardless of the ensuing evidence.

U.N. investigators – under intense pressure from the West to find something that could be pinned on Assad – agreed to blame him for a couple of the chlorine allegations coming from rebel forces and their civilian allies. But the U.N. team did not inspect the sites directly, relying instead of the testimony of Assad’s enemies.

If this fuller history were understood, much greater skepticism would be warranted by the new allegations about Assad ordering a new sarin attack. While it’s conceivable that Assad’s military is guilty – although why Assad would take this risk at this moment is hard to fathom – it’s also conceivable that Al Qaeda’s jihadists – finding themselves facing impending defeat – chose to stage a sarin attack even if that meant killing some innocent civilians.
Al Qaeda’s goal would be to draw in the U.S. or Israeli military against the Syrian government, creating space for a jihadist counteroffensive. And, as we should all recall, it’s not as if Al Qaeda hasn’t killed many innocent civilians before.

If you seen the recent video of people and specially kids, (warning, disturbing scenes)...
having suffered a nerve gas attack...(or poison gas, no one really knows since no inspectors goes there because it's an al qaida controlled territory).
See some of the people handling them without gloves or mask, if it was a nerve agent, they would have fallen sick and even died right there....but there has been no reports of the handlers ever suffering the effect of a nerve agent...MMM!
Not saying it didn't happened, something did, but obviously, propaganda is playing a role in this.

Here is more interesting details...(Now be aware, the mess in the middle east, Iraq, Libya, now Syria) is not about democracy, it's about a religious war, sunnis against shia, the sooner we admit it, the better we are to understand all this crap)
2 Turkish Parliament Members: Turkey Provided Chemical Weapons for Syrian Terrorist Attack
The purpose of the attack was allegedly to provoke a US military operation in Syria which would topple the Assad regime (Turkish Gov. is sunni, Syria's is shia)

Keep in mind, most so called rebels the western powers are supporting are not even Syrian but from outside the country, which makes the whole messy thing...an invasion.
The N.C. Chronicles is an opinion site, we offer information and opinions in order for you to be "informed" since you can no longer depend on the main stream media...

Sometimes it's a good idea to see it from the other side and what they have to say...
Information is how we protect democracy and it's freedoms.

Friday, April 7, 2017

Are the younger female generation moving away from feminist victimization, questioning the old guard’ anti-male rhetoric...Why Feminism Is Bad for Feminism.

Empowerment by Victimization
By Kayla Kibbe, Connecticut College
The philosophy rests on the idea that in order to be equal, you must first accept that you are unequal.
"Kayla" Kibbe, Connecticut CollegeFebruary 21, 2017

It would never have occurred to me that my gender was a limitation had feminism not suggested it.

Growing up, I never cowered beneath the male gaze or struggled in the grips of the patriarchy, and it never occurred to me that being female rendered me a minority in need of protection. I was not raised to be a feminist, and because of that, I was never encouraged to doubt that I was completely equal to men.

In today’s society, women are introduced to this doubt by feminism itself. The movement in its twenty-first century incarnation has become an inherently self-defeating entity. Feminism cannot survive as a movement if women truly believe themselves to be equal. Thus, feminism survives by encouraging women to see themselves as victims, thereby ensuring there remains an adversary, a source of conflict to give life to the crusade.

It is a movement that must undermine its own goals in order to sustain itself by creating victims out of its followers and calling it empowerment. Modern feminism has trapped itself in paradox and lured its followers into a losing battle. If women are truly equal, feminism itself is superfluous.
Thus, for feminism to survive, women can never win. Feminism only wins when women lose. Women can only be empowered if they are victims.

A Time for Feminism

I’m not sure when I first encountered feminism as a named entity. I imagine at some point in my elementary education, I must have had some understanding of the term as a historical movement linked to women’s suffrage, crowded into my mind under the same umbrella that housed vague notions of the Revolutionary War, the Aztecs and Martin Luther King Jr. all mixed up in casual miscellany.
By the time I was in middle school, however, I had apparently encountered enough feminist rhetoric within the media to harbor both an understanding of and an aversion to its role in modern society. Sometime in my early adolescence, I took to calling myself an “anti-feminist.”
This was, admittedly, more an attempt to ruffle feathers than anything else (and a solid one, as both feminists and critics of the movement alike generally tend to reject female “anti-feminism.”) My natural disinclination to feminism, however, did stem from legitimate concerns, although I could not, at that time, fully comprehend what they were.
By high school, I had crafted my manifesto, a speech given to my junior year English class titled “A Time for Feminism” whose first line asserted that the time “is not now.” Mostly I mocked body-positive Barbie dolls while name dropping Mary Wollstonecraft and Virginia Woolf as “true feminists.”
But, behind the heavy-handed jokes and largely groundless literary references (I had never read “A Vindication of the Rights of Woman”), I was starting to establish an argument behind my knee-jerk opposition to modern feminism, namely, that twenty-first century feminism does women more harm than good.
Now that feminism has become a crossroads of politics and pop culture, the movement is often plagued by problematic and even paradoxical rhetoric that ultimately threatens to undermine feminism, past and present.

Women Against Feminism

This, of course, was not and is not a unique idea. In a 2016 article, the controversial neo-masculine publication “Return of Kings” traced the ways in which feminism has met with millennial backlash in recent years. The article specifically highlights the Women Against Feminism movement that gained hashtag status back in 2014.
More significant than the article’s rundown on how “feminism has lost the minds of young women,” however, is its discussion of the feminist rhetoric surrounding these counter-movements. In its critique of the reactionary “confused cats against feminism” meme that grew out of the anti-feminist trend, the article notes:
“When your ideological political movement to free all humanity from, literally, Hitler-inspired hatred and violence of the evil male patriarchy, is reduced to using cats to disparage opponents, your ‘movement’ is dead… period.”
Here, the article highlights something important about modern feminism: its tendency to dissolve into an “imbecility” that ultimately threatens to de-legitimize rather than promote the movement.

Pink Pussyhats

In a previous article for “Study Breaks,” I discuss the danger the increasing intersection of feminism and pop culture poses for the movement.
This trend of pop-feminism tends to inadvertently cast the movement in an unflattering light, leaving it vulnerable to problematic, paradoxical and, as “Return of Kings” pointed out, downright silly rhetoric that ultimately only undermines feminism and calls its intellectual merit into question.
You can’t talk feminism in 2017 without some mention of last month’s Women’s March. An event that received extensive coverage in both news journalism and pop culture publications, the march offered itself as a perfect microcosm of twenty-first century feminism—the good, the bad, and the pussyhats.
For many, the march was a revolutionary demonstration that brought renewed attention and power to feminism. For others, it was a “confused and pointless” exercise that would ultimately only make it “harder, not easier, to fight genuine rights violations under the Trump presidency.”   For many critics, opposition to the Women’s March is not chauvinistic, but stems, rather, from anxieties about the dangers that this magnitude of pop-feminism poses for the integrity of the movement itself.
Intensely promoted by lifestyle publications like “Cosmopolitan” and “Glamour,” and attracting a number of special guest stars who sparked various degrees of controversy, the Women’s March was a breeding ground for the kind of paradoxical feminist rhetoric that leaves the movement vulnerable to criticism.

Take Max Roscoe, the “Return of Kings” contributor whose observations of the march’s “glorification of women being nasty” led him to declare that “American women are proud to be failures.” While the march’s reclamation of “nastiness” was a calculated political move, it ultimately paints feminism in a bad light, hampering the movement with a kind of trivial “I know you are but what am I” rhetoric that leaves it susceptible to attack.
Similarly, paradoxical issues arise with the movement’s famous pink pussyhats. When a movement that prides itself on subverting a tradition of female sexual objectification crafts a signature uniform that reduces womanhood to a tongue-in-cheek pun on the female sex organs, it’s hard to remain convinced by modern feminism. While pink pussyhats, like declarations of nastiness, were an attempt at reclamation, the line between reclamation and self-satire is a fine one, and this kind of cheekiness isn’t doing feminism any favors.

Good Little Victims

The heart of my opposition to feminism, however, does not stem from the heavy-handed, you-go-girl sentiments currently dominating my Twitter feed. Rather, my aversion to the movement in its modern day incarnation comes from an unwillingness to see myself as a victim. Without oppression, there can be no uprising. Thus, feminism depends on women being victims.  It is a movement nourished by its own defeat. Women are indoctrinated into feminism under the belief that they have been oppressed by “the patriarchy.” In the feminist rhetoric dominating Western society, women are taught that various ambiguous foes–society, the patriarchy– pose a constant threat to their independence.
If a woman, like myself, can’t identify any signs of having suffered under this daunting omnipresence of oppression, it is because she has internalized it from a young age. She has been subconsciously infiltrated by this all-powerful villain. Thus, feminism robs women of their ability to even take authority over their own thoughts and opinions, as they have already been corrupted by the patriarchy.

Feminism leaves women entirely at the mercy of the very system it claims to subvert. 

Don’t worry, your failures and insecurities aren’t your fault. How can they be, when your thoughts aren’t even your own? It’s not you, it’s the patriarchy.
In one of the many post-election healing circles that replaced ordinary class time on my campus the week after Decision 2016, a classmate of mine made a statement that epitomized exactly the empowerment-by-victimization paradox that has cemented my left swipe on feminism:
“Women who voted for Trump did it because they hate themselves, because men have conditioned them to hate themselves.”
There you have it: Feminism denies women even the ability to be the agents of their own self-loathing. You can’t even hate yourself of your own accord. As a feminist, you have already completely abandoned any right to your opinions, even about yourself, to the patriarchy.
Modern feminism operates like Munchausen by proxy; its practice demands that women be convinced that they are victims of a diseased society. Convincing women that they have unknowingly been infiltrated by the patriarchy is a barbaric psychological violation, nex tdoor to archaic traditions of Freudian psychoanalysis that sought to convince patients that they had repressed histories as sexual abuse victims.

Anti-Feminism Is the New Feminism

This is what feminism looks like in 2017. The movement has deteriorated into a self-defeating entity, whose biggest enemy is neither society, the patriarchy nor any of the other imagined forces it encourages women to cower beneath, but simply feminism itself.
In an article last year, controversial neo-masculine activist Roosh Valizadeh declared the female anti-feminist a “feminist in disguise.” This was meant as an attack and a warning: Beware the feminist in sheep’s clothing.
While his argument was meant to be disparaging, it holds a kind of perverse truth. Amidst the paradox and cyclical self-destruction that has come to define modern feminism, it seems that the only way to truly embrace female equality is to reject the 21st century wave.  In 2017, feminism is in the hands of the anti-feminists.
Source and credits
Unless one is blinded by the acceptance of the ol'feminist guards anti-male propaganda, most younger generation of ladies are starting to see reality for what it is. Whether madonas "I want to blow up the white house" or ashley judds "I'm a nasty woman" rant, most of the younger generation of women raise an eyebrow to this "crap" and say "REALLY"  knowing far well that this kind of B.S. will get them nowhere.

It's not a matter of, men are in charge, to them anymore, or the evil patriarchy, it's about reality that in this world, men and women who work hand in hand, achieve more than confrontation with each other...

Yes sexism exists, on "both sides", but as a whole, we all want to go forward as a species and one can't do it without the other. We have passed laws and established that we all have the right to our own personal goals without stepping on someone because of their gender.

Now it's time to advance our society, without the old nags (Radical feminists) hatred or self-serving propaganda and make things better for the next generation, not worse by falsely using permanent victimization in order to promote one's hatred, whether for personal advancement in the ranks of that failing movement or hatred of one side or the other politically. 

Sure we can debate, that is a healthy process. but not under the rules of victimization or hatred of one gender over the other.

Feminism under the ol'guard is dead, we are seeing their last hurrah, it's there for all to see...
Men bad, all men rape or achieve power through rape and sexual harassment, bad ol'patriarchy, women who are stay at home mom are slaves, all boys are born rapists, so on. B.S.

From a personal experience, as a father of 2 girls, I found that established  feminists (and their manginas), in schools, politics, social programs, so on, are more of a deterrent to the advancement of the rights of women than men will ever be...I had to fight tooth and nail to see one of my daughters finish school all the while fighting with the lanark women's shelter's corrupt hatred of men, schools anti-male feminist vice principal, even male politicians who where so afraid of them that they could only be described as manginas.
They even used people to try to get to me on a personal basis, they lost every fight. My daughter finished school, apologized for listening to them, the other is a perfect mom, and dad and daughters have a strong bond of family values and mutual respect...that is the way to defeat their twisted man hating agenda...stand together, trust each other and most importantly, fight back. When you take that road, you find that, their self perceived power is weak, it's like the reflection in a mirror, not real.

In closing...
The younger ladies look at the men in their lives and do not see this twisted message the ol'hags push on them, and it's obvious they have had enough and decided to taker back what is theirs... womanhood.

Thursday, April 6, 2017

How did we get to this? Milk the drink of supremacists?

This is where we roll our eyes and say holy sh*t.

Tuesday, April 4, 2017

A Utah couple has been arrested for abusing their foster children, who were allegedly found tied up and locked in a dark room where they were denied water, officials said.

Cops discovered three boys between the ages of 7 and 11 zip-tied to beds at the home of Diane Waldmiller, 41, and Matthew Waldmiller, 40, on Thursday, according to reports.

The officers were responding to a child neglect complaint made through the Division of Child and Family Services, police told the Deseret News.

For 10 to 13 hours at a time, the couple would allegedly lock the children in their room, which had no light bulb and had its windows painted black, the Deseret News reported.

The boys weren’t allowed water and had their mouths and hands duct-taped shut. In addition, their beds had no sheets or blankets, authorities said.

The children were also forced to wear diapers and as a form of punishment, and were made to eat rice doused with salt and cayenne pepper, cops said.

At one point, the boys managed to escape the room to go dumpster diving for food, but their foster parents caught them and punished them by screwing the windows shut, officials said.
Also Thanks to; Men Have No Rights in Canada
What is so sad about this, as adults we are supposed to care for the young, all of us, after all they are our future.
Think about this...
These specific kids had no family, expected to get a new one and be happy, instead they got this crap from these assh*lles... 
If that doesn't put a tear in your eye....
Remember, "everything you do in this life, (specially to children) echoes in the Spirit World"...

If these people are found guilty in a court of law, I wish them the same in prison as they gave these kids.

Monday, April 3, 2017

Feminist’s worse enemy is not men but stay-at-home-moms

The Feminist War Against Motherhood

Mar 29, 2017
On March 21 hard-core feminist Sarrah Le Marquand wrote a shocker of a newspaper opinion piece entitled “It should be illegal to be a stay-at-home mum”. Yes you read that right. In this uber-feminist rant she said this: “Rather than wail about the supposed liberation in a woman’s right to choose to shun paid employment, we should make it a legal requirement that all parents of children of school-age or older are gainfully employed.”
I read it at the time, and shook my head in disbelief. Actually, it was all rather believable as this is standard feminist fare. But I let it go, hoping to later get back to it. Well it is later, so I have. You can read the piece for yourself (see link below). It is mind-boggling.

But as appalling as this is, it is nothing new, as mentioned. Marquand stands in a long line of radical feminists who have made clear their hatred of marriage and family, motherhood and childrearing. Indeed, the feminist movement has long warred against mothers, against homemaking, and against childrearing.
I have been collecting some of their more juicy and jaundiced quotes for quite some time now. Let me present just some of them for your enjoyment and edification:
“The heart of woman’s oppression is her childbearing and childrearing roles.” Shulamith Firestone

“The family has become a catch-all phrase for everything that we, as feminists, condemn in our society. Family equals oppression, patriarchy, psychosis, neurosis, domestic labour, role stereotyping, gender-specific definitions, stifling relationships, fathers, mothers, sisters, brothers, children, financial dependence, marriage, sexual repression, sexual activity, heterosexuality, growing up, living, dying, tradition, delinquency, love, hate, incest, violence, battering and bad eating habits.” Wendy Clark

The family is an “obscene bourgeois institution”. Simone de Beauvoir

“Even if a woman wants to have children, she must think very hard about the conditions in which she will have to bring them up, because child-rearing, at the moment, is real slavery.” Simone de Beauvoir

“No woman should be authorised to stay at home and raise her children . . . Women should not have the choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.” Simone de Beauvior

“In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from families and communally raise them.” Mary Jo Bane

Homemaking women are prisoners in “comfortable concentration camps”. Betty Friedan

“Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women’s movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage.” Sheila Cronan

“The nuclear family must be destroyed… Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process.” Linda Gordon

Nice of them to spill the beans. It sure ain’t pretty. So Marquand has simply soaked up all this poison and hate and now regurgitates it as she rages against stay-at-home mums. What a pity people can become so frenzied in their animus against motherhood.
This story is so shocking that it even resulted in US commentator Al Mohler spending some time yesterday discussing the story: www.albertmohler.com/2017/03/27/briefing-03-27-17/
Other overseas writers have spoken out about this, including Suzanne Venker. I have previously reviewed one of her important books: billmuehlenberg.com/2004/08/30/a-review-of-seven-myths-of-working-mothers-by-suzanne-venker/
She says this about Marquand and her toxic ideas:
In her new book, “Free Women, Free Men,” Paglia explains that feminists have zero regard for procreation. “Feminist ideology has never dealt honestly with the role of the mother in human life,” she writes.
Indeed it hasn’t. The truth is, women change when they have children. They care less about what they do for a living and more about how their children are faring. They also realize they’re needed at home in a visceral and primal way.
Fathers care just as much about their children, of course, and they too are needed at home. But men and women are different. Men have a visceral need to provide for and protect their families, whereas women are more invested in the home. Naturally, this is a major roadblock for so-called gender equality. Feminists need women to care less about the home and their kids than they do.
And women aren’t listening.
According to Pew Research Center, approximately 30 percent of married mothers with children at home are not employed. Of the remaining 70 percent who are employed, at least half of those mothers work part-time or far less than their husbands do. Even mothers who do work full-time do not put in the kind of overtime men typically do.
Asked what they value most in a job, working mothers say they’re more concerned with having a flexible schedule than they are with more pay or prestige.
Even the ‘breadwinner moms’ we heard so much about in 2013 don’t represent what feminists wish they did. Single mothers represent 63 percent of this group, which makes the share of married breadwinner moms considerably smaller than people were led to believe. It has jumped considerably—from 4 percent in 1960 to 15 percent in 2011—but it hardly represents the norm.
That’s why feminists are so frustrated. They can’t get women to do what they want.
The stubborn fact is that a woman’s desire to work for pay, once she has children, is not synonymous with a man’s. Even today, parents “split up paid and domestic work along gendered lines because that’s what most of them want to do,” writes Ashley McGuire of Institute for Family Studies.
If feminists like Le Marquand don’t like this fact, that’s too bad—but they’ll have to take it up with Mother Nature. A quick note of warning, though.
She always wins.

Yes quite so. It is good to see that these concerned commentators are speaking out about this shocking piece. And they have good reason to be concerned. As Mohler says at the end of his commentary:
When an argument is made in public that it should be illegal for women to choose to be stay-at-home moms, we have transcended a cultural boundary that should have our attention and in a hurry. The greater likelihood is not that there will be a law making such a choice illegal, the fact is that other forms of coercion are probably even more powerful, including what we now see as the looming moral argument that women who stay at home with their children are a drain on the economy, because they are absent from the paid workforce. Expect that now to become rather standard cultural fare.
As it is said above; "Women aren't listening". Well thank God. 
The last election in America showed that women do not follow the established line the radical feminists have put forward for all women. Since most voted for a man not, according to some' If you don't vote for a woman your going to hell" madeleine albright, 

The point they will never get is women have more of a understanding of issues than what they give them credit for, telling them they will go to hell, that it's not about benefiting policies for their families but simply putting someone in power because of their gender, was never in the cards. 

If women choose to work, not have kids or families, if they chose to work and have families, or if they chose to stay-at-home, then the word feminists must accept in all these cases is...the right to chose.

A nation does better when women chose to stay-at-home, it's not a law, they don't have to, they decide to sacrifice their own personal ambitions to make sure the family has a chance for a better future. They decide to take than path among many choices women have today.

It's not easy to be a stay-at-home-mom, case in point, none of these radical feminists have the strength to do it. And if they do have kids, well...they will demonize their own sons and chose the path for their daughters, which makes for a very confused bunch of kids.

The magic word here feminists will never get, or will never understand is; "the right to chose".
If they where for women's rights instead of hatred for the male species, they would support and promote these rights equally, but they don't, ironically and it must burn their butts, is that without men, they wouldn't exist at all would they.

To be honest, it's hard to understand why they took this road of hatred and misconception about the reality of the family life, the western world is in a downfall for many reason and we can safely that, radical feminism is part of the problem.

Most of us, (moms and dads) have daughters and granddaughters, nieces,, so on, do we want them to be in the home for all their lives, covered, answerable to men? As feminists would like us to believe...of course not.
Speaking for myself I always told my daughters there is nothing in this world that cannot be achieve if they put their minds to it and fully support their personal choices...
Some decided to be stay-at-home-moms, some run their own businesses and I am proud of all of them.
A nation depends on the strength of the traditional family, without that entity, no nation can survive in the long run....
Imposing one's will on another is totalitarianism, fascism, and...communism...adopting those policies is always doomed to failure, it's not hard to see, where the heck are those systems now, nowhere to be seen or in a downfall...just as feminism is today...
Democracy not only means the right to chose, but also to respect the rights people (women) make, the sooner feminism and their manginas realize this the sooner they can come back to the human race.