Warning; We are not a politically correct site. Don't like us? Don't read.

Wednesday, November 30, 2016

What muslim clerics say about Christmas

So, they come over here, they won't accept our traditions, but we have to accept theirs when Ramadan comes around??? 
And they wonder why there is a backlash against Islam????
We are more than willing to respect theirs, if they respect ours, if they don't, why should we care about anything they say?
Isn't this "imposing" one's beliefs on another and if we go to where they are from, and wish everyone a Merry Christmas, do we risk getting stoned to death or will they accept our traditions the way they demand we accept theirs in our country?
The point is, what you do in your home is your business, such is the way of things here, but if you come to a Judeo-Christian country wanting freedom and safety, which you say you have escaped from yours, then respect the traditions of the land that welcomed you with open arms, otherwise resentment will set in...that can lead to hatred...
We will not "impose" our will on you, so don't you try to impose yours on us...

Now we understand the concept of freedom of speech, these 2 up there have the right to it, but we also have the right to debate and contradict their "opinions".
Also, to those who come here expecting to be free and have the right to religious freedom, it's never a sin to be polite and to recognize that the reason you do have all these rights is because of the taxpayers of said country who open their hearts and pocketbook to help you out.
Why would they escape a war torn country who is intolerant of different faction of Islam, just to bring said intolerance here, like those 2 are doing???

The N.C. Chronicles does not condemn anyone's way of life nor do we put all in one basket, but as a First Nation site, we fully understand what division and intolerance can lead to.
Our history is full of; "OUR WAY IS BETTER."
We are still suffering it's effect to this day.

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

Children Win a soccer game by more than five points and they lose, Ottawa league says

In yet another nod to the protection of fledgling self-esteem, an Ottawa children’s soccer league has introduced a rule that says any team that wins a game by more than five points will lose by default.

The Gloucester Dragons Recreational Soccer league’s newly implemented edict is intended to dissuade a runaway game in favour of sportsmanship. The rule replaces its five-point mercy regulation, whereby any points scored beyond a five-point differential would not be registered.

Kevin Cappon said he first heard about the rule on May 20 — right after he had scored his team’s last allowable goal. His team then tossed the ball around for fear of losing the game.

He said if anything, the league’s new rule will coddle sore losers.

“They should be saying anything is possible. If we can get five goals really fast, well, so can the other team,” said Kevin, 17, who has played in the league for five years. “People grow in adversity, they don’t really get worse…. I think you’ll see more leadership skills being used if a losing team tries to recuperate than if they never got into that situation at all.”

Kevin’s father, Bruce Cappon, called the rule ludicrous.

“I couldn’t find anywhere in the world, even in a communist country, where that rule is enforced,” he said.

Mr. Cappon said the organization is trying to “reinvent the wheel” by fostering a non-competitive environment. 

Read whole story here.

We all know, unless one is a leftist snowflake, that competition is what advances the human race. 
It starts at a young age and continues into adulthood, it makes people try harder when they do not succeed.
With this character, medicines, products, freedoms are enhanced and everyone benefits.
One does not have to shove winning in the oppositions face when they loose, we can be graceful which will promote them to try even harder the next time, but as we have seen with this snowflake policies lately, the idea of eliminating competition have produce a generation that needs, crying rooms, puppies and play-dough safe space to deal with a loss...
Not a good road to follow considering the shape of this world at the moment, actually, it makes for a weakened nation and the west in on a path to a fall that will last generations to come...
Our enemies couldn't defeat us militarily, so we will do it to ourselves from the inside.
How is that any good for democracy?

Monday, November 28, 2016

Parent loses fight to pull kids from school over “false teachings”

A Superior Court judge has rejected a Hamilton dad's fight to be warned in advance about what he considers to be "false teachings" so he can pull his kids out of class.

Steve (Eustathios) Tourloukis wanted to be alerted by Hamilton's public school board anytime a long list of topics he considered an attack on his Greek Orthodox religion came up in lessons.

In turning down the request, Justice Robert Reid also refused to declare parents have the final authority over the education of their children in a ruling last Wednesday in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Hamilton.

The ruling puts inclusion and equality before individual religious accommodations in public education and in a diverse society.

Reid said allowing Tourloukis to "isolate" his children from aspects of the curriculum would be conflicting with "competing legislative mandate and Charter values favouring inclusivity, equality and multiculturalism."

Some Christian groups call the decision a blow to parental rights while advocates of the province's anti-bullying legislation see it as a victory.

"This is a landmark decision removing parental authority when it comes to the education of the children," said Charles McVety, president of the Canada Christian College, which helped fundraise for Tourloukis' legal fees.

"It should be most troubling to every parent because this will be a case used as precedent … For me, it's a dark day for children and it's a dark day for parents when special interest groups supersede the rights of a parent to protect their child."

But others see it as a win for Ontario's Equity and Inclusive Education Strategy
, which led to new policies across the province — including in the Hamilton Wentworth District School Board — to remove biases and barriers to ensure all students feel welcomed and accepted.

"It's definitely a step in a positive direction," said Maya Roy, executive director of Newcomer Women's Services Toronto.

Toronto sexual health educator Stephanie Baptist said, "I'm not OK with one person's religious accommodation trumping another person's human rights. 

 "We're all different and our public system must make it safe for all of us. It is by participating in that learning that all students grow up with that open-hearted acceptance of folks of all different backgrounds so we can live together in this pluralist society."

Now look carefully at the words these "people" use;  
Equity, inclusive, positive direction, trumping, participating, open-hearted, acceptance, different background, pluralistic society...

Correct me if I'm wrong but did they just use these words to take away parental rights, religious rights, family rights, children's rights, freedom of choice??
They take away the right of parents to "guide" their kids the way they choose?? And dare to use words like "inclusive"?
How is it "positive direction" when you limit ones own tradition to impose yours on them??

We said it before, they are trying their hardest to rid us of all religious beliefs because they consider it to be a detriment to their eventual twisted goal to replace it with their own immoral views and government supremacy, and  in order to do this they're using...kids.
The idea of teaching sex ed and alternative lifestyles to kids that young, promotes immoral behavior. Without parental guidance, family strength, the next generation is on a path to dependency on governments and it's radicals (like feminism and Marxism).

Amazing; they take away rights of parents and freedom of religion and claim a "pluralistic society".
How the h*ll can you have a free system by taking away family rights, individual rights, freedom of choice, and claim to be "open hearted"?

 A democratic society, a free system must be give respect and accept that there is opposition, different views, we must have an open mind to the idea that not all will think the same.
The very idea that to take away one groups rights to promote another advances resentment, hate, and worse.
These people up there do not promote diversity, as a matter of fact it's the opposite, we seen many groups use this weakness to try to bring in contrary laws to our constitutional rights, sharia laws for instance, where women are considered less than men.

True democracy is always walking a fine line, but it's main goal is to accept that no one should "impose" one's will on others, to look at what is there and debate what we think is right or wrong. 
It is marxism, fascism, totalitarianism to force everyone to think the same, it is not democracy.

Take a good look at what is going on, they are taking away family rights, parental rights, children's rights, religious rights, and replacing it with an imposition of what they see as to how society should behave and claiming it to be...freedom.
Don't you find that a little disturbing?

Your rights to your family and kids are slowly been diluted and taken away, one little piece at a time, and one day you will wake up and....
I guess the real question is; Are they your kids or state property?
The president has the power to “shape our children,” Hillary Clinton said in a controversial tweet that sparked outrage among parents.
“Sexual education is planned for all Quebec students,” Pascal Ouellet, ministry of education spokesperson, told Canadian Press

Let's be realistic; when one group tries to "control" the way every one thinks, there is always a backlash, or is what's going on in politics lately, specially in Europe not obvious enough?
The extreme left is imposing it's will on the population, and now the extreme right is rising.
Where balance was king,  the middle ground is becoming...extincted.

Though if comes to a confrontation, should we be worried?
(LOL, we gotta look at the funny side sometimes, can't be to serious about all this)

It's no secret feminists and marxists want to create omega males, and only in western culture.
Not a good idea if one looks at the real world and they are targeting schools.

Never take our word for it, we offer information and an opinion, it's up to you to research further. We are not a propaganda site like the main stream media.  

Friday, November 25, 2016

Trudeau government deserves credit for getting rid of coal...Do they???

The Trudeau government has taken important steps to assert Canadian leadership on environmental issues after years of neglect under the Harper government.

It played a key role in negotiating the landmark Paris Agreement on climate change, and in October it announced it will impose a national price on carbon starting in 2018. Now it plans to phase out almost all use of coal to generate electricity by 2030, a move that will cut greenhouse gas emissions while producing significant health benefits from cleaner air.

The usual suspects are grumbling, but the government deserves credit for pressing ahead on an issue that is arguably the most important this country, and all countries, must face: climate change.

The plan to get rid of coal essentially involves speeding up a plan developed under the Conservatives in 2012. It will require the four provinces that still have coal-fired electricity plants to shut them down, install carbon-capture technology, or achieve equivalent emission reductions elsewhere.

The government says that will have the same greenhouse-gas effect as taking 1.3 million cars off the road and will ensure that 90 per cent of Canada’s power sources are sustainable (up from 80 per cent now). And health groups say eliminating coal burning will prevent more than 1,000 premature deaths and save billions in health costs.

Only Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall is griping and he is mostly isolated on this issue, now that Alberta is moving in a more environmentally responsible direction under its NDP government. It would be too much to expect every province to just fall in line.

Other critics say phasing out coal risks putting Canada badly out of step with the United States once Donald Trump is installed in the White House.

It’s true Trump has pledged to dump the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan, which he calls a “war on coal.” That won him support in coal country, but it’s far from clear that Trump can actually deliver on his promise to revive the industry and the communities that depend on it.

The fact is coal has been a dying industry for decades as utilities abandon it for cheaper, cleaner-burning natural gas and renewable alternatives. There used to be a quarter of a million coal mining jobs in the U.S.; now there are just over 50,000. Even Trump can’t do much to prop up an industry in such terminal decline.

In the face of all this, the Trudeau government’s plan makes eminent sense. But that doesn’t mean there won’t be trade-offs, and the provinces will have to make sure it doesn’t lead to sharply higher electricity prices.

For that, they should learn from the mistakes of Ontario. This province did away with coal-fired plants several years ago and moved boldly towards greener energy. But it’s now all too apparent that the government made a lot of mistakes along the way, and the Liberals are paying a high political price — as Premier Kathleen Wynne ruefully acknowledged over the weekend.

All governments must walk a fine line: take effective action on the environment without alienating the public. The federal government has made a good start on the first part. The second part, as Ontario is finding out, is bound to be more tricky.
First of all, there is such a thing as burning clean coal, we do have the technology...
Next, wont make a difference in the world because;
That's just 2 countries, watch African nations in the next 20 years.
As long as third world nations keep on building dirty coal power station, instead of clean ones, whatever we do on this side won't make a difference.
Oh wait, yes it will, your hydro and those of businesses will increase, taking more money from your pockets and eliminating jobs in the business sector.
Just look at Ontario Canada.
But hey at least the snowflakes out there will have their safe space to play with their play-dough, coloring books and pet their puppies, happier than pigs in shit that they imposed their ideas on the rest of us, even if it makes no difference.

The best way to handle all this is to research and share clean coal development, in order to help third world nations catch up, and eventually switch to more "affordable" clean energy...
One step at a time... 

When they "imposed" their ideas on us like they did in the province of Ontario, everything jumped in prices to a point where food for some is a commodity.
Do they care, they are hurting millions? Not one bit, after all, most of them (elitists) who do impose their will, without consultation can afford it.
They know who they hurt, but just don't give a sh*t...
Canada's rejection of coal will clear the air but impact workers and power bills

Trudeau government deserve credit?  For what? Spending and sending billions to other countries on top of what we already give at the expense of their own people?
They act as if we have to much and deserve to be put in the poor house.
What kind of government does that?

Thursday, November 24, 2016

Trudeau government must tighten gun laws....Against legal gun owners???

During the Harper years not only was the long gun registry killed, but the Conservative government watered down other gun control measures. It’s time the Trudeau government reversed those measures and tightened gun control laws in general.
It’s hard to believe the former Conservative government could have watered down gun control legislation more than it did when it closed the long gun registry in 2012.

But it did. In the dying days of its government in 2015 it managed to pass Bill C-42, a law that made it tougher for police to keep a watchful eye over who buys guns by limiting the power of chief firearms officers. It also relaxed transport rules for guns and introduced a six-month amnesty for licence renewals, among other measures.

At the time, the Trudeau Liberals were campaigning on a platform that included promises to repeal some of the changes Bill C-42 ushered in and to introduce further efforts aimed at reducing gun crime in Canada.

It’s time the government acted on those promises to counter a worrisome increase in the number of firearms and a spike in gun crime.

As noted by Wendy Cukier, president of the Coalition for Gun Control, the number of restricted firearms, mostly handguns, has increased by 50 per cent over the last five years to about 795,000. And as she argues, it’s only logical that the more guns there are out there, the more chance some will end up in the wrong hands.

In fact, Toronto is seeing a significant increase in the use of guns in violent crime. Consider that as of Monday the city had already seen 35 gun homicides in 2016, up from a total of 21 in 2015. Though it’s not quite “the year of the gun,” when Toronto saw 52 gun deaths in 2005, the trend is frightening enough.

Also troubling is the fact that the majority of illegal firearms in the city now originate in Canada, not the United States.

No wonder. It’s disturbingly easy for licensed gun owners to buy multiple guns with a single permit, and then sell them on the black market. As Betsy Powell reported in Saturday’s Star, security guard Andrew Winchester, for example, purchased an astonishing 47 handguns in a six-month buying binge.

Though all of those handguns would have been added to the Canadian Firearms Registry at the time of purchase, no red flags were raised or followed up on by the chief firearms officers.

It’s not clear why this is happening. It could be because of the watering down of the chief firearms officers’ powers by Bill C-42, or the fact police don’t have the resources to interview gun purchasers. Or, as one Toronto cop complained in a memo obtained by Powell, it could be because an internal conflict within the RCMP’s Canadian Firearms Program has created obstacles to police obtaining information from its registry.

But whatever the reasons, the Trudeau government needs to solve them quickly. Among the government’s most important promises:

    Require enhanced background checks to purchase a handgun or other restricted firearm.

    Require purchasers to actually show their license when they buy a gun and for retailers to confirm it is valid.

    Repeal measures in Bill C-42 that allowed restricted and prohibited weapons to be transported without a permit.

The Liberals recognized all those issues in last year’s election campaign. Now they are in power, they should act on them.
The stupidity of some people goes without saying...their propaganda bullsh*t, lies and manipulation of the truth is extremely dangerous.
Lying to promote personal wants passed on by media is what got Mr.Trump elected, one reads crap like that above in the lame stream media and you have no choice but to disbelieve anything they say, 
The most dangerous thing against a democracy are people like the one above, they do not realize they have become a tool to be used by those who are more interested in increasing their power over us instead of serving.
There is nothing wrong with trying to keep the population safe, don't get us wrong, but we doubt very much this is what it's all about.

That said: (let's dissect what is said above)
1- One can only tighten gun control laws on legal gun owners. Illegal guns do not get registered.
2- Gun crimes increases when the liberal-democrats are in power, and the economy is in a downturn.
3- The majority of illegal firearms do not come from Canada but from the U.S. When you have 300,000 million guns floating around down south, it's inevitable some will find their way into Canada.
4- When one buys a gun or multiple ones in Canada, they are instantly registered to the owner, making it impossible to sell them on the black market without knowing where they come from. It would be a really stupid person who would buy multiple guns from a store and then sell said guns on the black market.
5- There is doubt there would be any conflict within the RCMP on how to get information about what they would think is an illegal gun. One thing about Canadian laws or Canadian law enforcement, they have more power than our cousin to the south, some would say too much.

The thing is, more gun control laws are always against the legal gun owners, not illegal ones. 
This is more about knowing where all the "legal" guns are by governments than black market issues. 
One goes to wonder why the government, through people like the one above are so afraid of responsible citizen than criminals.
Maybe it's got something more to do about spending on the nations credit card to a point where eventually it will go bankrupt and fear that the people will rise against them. Register as many guns as possible, make it harder to own one and whatever will come economically, the elite are still in power after causing the problem in the first place.
In the shape the world is today, with hatred and violence against anyone who is not the same, the liberal-democrats ideal they push, where we all live in a world of make believe and sign kumbaya together is basically non-existent. That kind of reasoning is dangerous, and they know it, they are not as stupid as they make themselves out to be.
Like we said; what they are really worried about is a lost of their economic greed and established personal power. They know damn well time is not on their side with the damages they have caused and a unharmed citizenry is their best chances to keep their personal wealth and power..

The best way to relate to all this is to look at history;
What did Hitler do in 1939...he nationalized everything, made the people dependent on the Government, then federalized police and took everyone's guns,,we all know the rest of the story!!! 

Never take our word for it, we only offer an opinion and information, research for yourself, make up your own opinions, this is the way to ensure your freedoms and those around you, specially the next generation.

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

Canadian government orders residents to get rid of their old wood-burning stoves or pay thousands of dollars in fines

(NaturalNews) In a blatant attack on those who prefer living as self-sufficiently as possible, citizens of Montreal have been ordered to first register their wood-burning stoves, and then ultimately get rid of them within three years, unless they meet rigid air quality standards.

The deadline to register wood-burning stoves and fireplaces in Montreal was December 22, 2015, and the new emissions regulations will be implemented in 2018. Those who refuse to comply will be subject to fines, and those who are willing to adjust will be forced to pay for expensive modifications to their wood-burning stoves and fireplaces.

From the National Post.com:

"Starting in 2018, wood-burning appliances will be banned unless they meet the rigorous new emission standards of 2.5 grams of fine particles or less per hour. The bylaw is among the strictest in North America, said Real Menard, the city's executive committee responsible for the environment. Presently, transforming a stove or fireplace with inserts so that it is in compliance with the coming regulations costs between $2,000 and $8,000."

Many outraged Montreal citizens have left comments on news articles and social media platforms regarding the new regulations, voicing the fact that they see the new standards for exactly what they are: an attempt to demonize those who prefer to avoid dependence on the grid for their heating and cooking needs.

One such comment on the National Post story was submitted by a man named Tristan Verboven, who hit the proverbial nail on the head:

"After thousands of years relying on fire as a source of heat, suddenly humans have discovered fire is so dangerous that we must use the power provided by a government monopoly instead. Yet somehow vehicle and industrial emissions are not worth eliminating. That [sic] would be way more complicated than inspecting people's private homes to enforce a law everyone knows is a racket."

Wood-burning stove bans already common in the U.S.
These types of bans are already becoming commonplace in the United States. And although the U.S. bans are not directly issued by the EPA, the agency has issued stricter emissions guidelines that make compliance with local wood-burning restrictions nearly impossible to meet without either expensive modifications or investment in expensive new EPA-approved stoves and fireplaces.

From CFACT.org:

"It seems that even wood isn't green or renewable enough anymore. The EPA has recently banned the production and sale of 80% of America's current wood-burning stoves, the oldest heating method known to mankind and mainstay of rural homes and many of our nation's poorest residents. The agency's stringent one-size-fits-all rules apply equally to heavily air-polluted cities and far cleaner plus typically colder off-grid wilderness areas such as large regions of Alaska and the American West."

The argument in favor of wood-burning stoves
Not only are traditional wood-burning stoves and fireplaces a time-honored American tradition, but there are also compelling arguments in favor of their use.

One of the most eloquent and reasonable defenses of wood-burning appliances comes from the WoodHeat.org website, in an article entitled The Argument In Favor Of Wood Heating. It's a lengthy read, but it offers a detailed analysis of the benefits of wood heating.

An excerpt:

"Judged by coverage in policy discussions about our energy future, wood heating is virtually nonexistent. Most politicians don't debate its merits or plan for its strategic use. ...

"The one thing that almost no governments do is encourage householders to heat with wood. Fuelwood is the only renewable energy resource that most governments don't seem comfortable with."

In other words, even though wood is a renewable resource that could reduce our dependency on fossil fuels, it is being systematically outlawed by the authorities.

The only logical reason for this is that governments do not want to encourage self-sufficiency; they would rather keep us completely dependent on them and the energy companies they represent for all of our needs.

Wood burning bans are just another method that the Agenda 21-promoting authorities use to keep us helpless and under their strict control, while generating enormous profits for energy providers.


There are many other important issues other than wood burning stoves relating to global warming. As the post above said;  "industrial emissions" specially from countries like China and India should be first on their (elite) agendas.
Going after wood burning stoves in Montreal is ridiculous at best and won't change anything or make the air any cleaner. But it will help corporations like hydro make more money and make people more dependent, which is probably the real issue in this case.

Fires, specially forest fires is part of the evolution of this planet, and an important part of nature itself.
Remember when these people use to say forest fires are part of forest renewals?
But now, they say wood stoves are causing global warming?
Believe what they (elitists) say and you become their sheeples, they need groups like this to keep them in power and to control every aspect of our lives, and that makes brain-washed voters dependent on the same people (elitists) who enrich themselves at the expense of the rest of us.
Here goes the true meaning of freedom of choice out the door.

Tuesday, November 22, 2016

WOW!!! Tribal clashes sparked by monkey kills 21, injures dozens in Libya

At least 21 people died and 50 were wounded in Libya in four days of clashes between rival factions in the southern city of Sabha, a health official said on Sunday.

According to residents and local reports, the latest bout of violence erupted between two tribes after an incident in which a monkey that belonged to a shopkeeper from the toppled dictator Moamer Gadhafi's Gaddadfa tribe attacked a group of schoolgirls who were passing by.

The monkey pulled off one of the girls' head scarf, leading men from the Awlad Suleiman tribe to retaliate by killing three people from the Gaddadfa tribe as well as the monkey, according to a resident who spoke to Reuters.
Read whole story here...

If some stupid monkey can cause such lack of respect and destruction of life, imagine what kind of trouble these same people would cause if we bring them here on mass, without extreme vetting...
(Example)  WATCH What These Muslims Do When They See a Christmas Tree Being Setup At the Mall!
Over a monkey pulling off a hijab off a girl...is it me or is this just scary from a standpoint of the way we look at thing in our neck of the woods.

Note; We do not put all in the same basket, most have a live and let live attitude, and most understand that if they respect the culture of the land they immigrated to, then their way of life, if not "imposed" on their new home will also be respected.

Monday, November 21, 2016

"Quit being a “P-ssy Generation” and put you big boy pants back on. The next generation depends on it.

 Esquire magazine got Clint Eastwood to unleash on all of the ridiculous anti-Trump rhetoric floating around about him being a racist.  In the issue that comes out Wednesday, Eastwood set some people straight:

    Clint Eastwood thinks America’s “pussy generation” needs to “just f–ing get over” Donald Trump’s “racism.”

In an interview with Esquire published Wednesday, the actor/director/producer said young America — which he has dubbed both the “kiss-ass” and “pussy” generation — needs to stop throwing the word “racist” around so freely.

“[Trump’s] onto something, because secretly everybody’s getting tired of political correctness, kissing up,” he said. “We’re really in a pussy generation. Everybody’s walking on eggshells. We see people accusing people of being racist and all kinds of stuff. When I grew up, those things weren’t called racist.”
I do believe we all had enough of the snowflakes out there....
Go hide in your safe spaces and go play with your crayon, play-doh and pet your puppies
Move over you whinny little shits and let the big boys show you how it's done.

There may be talk of globalism where we all gather in a circle and sing cumbaya, but for those of us who are more realistic, know damn well that the world doesn't work under that premise.
There are those who are waiting in the wings and see all this re-organization of the west into a snowflake society and all this crap about teaching or should we say brain-washing the young towards immoral and weakened society as an opportunity to destroy what our ancestors tried so hard to leave us.
We might not be a perfect union, but looking at the world right now, it's better than what some are offering.
If anyone wants to eliminate the west and there are many, their chances are looking better every day.

Hopefully as time goes by, this p*ssy generation will be pushed behind the line and more logical people who are not so stupid will come forward to make those with doubts realize; if we want to keep what we have, we must recognize weakness for what it is, a danger to not only ourselves but the safety of the next generation.
Strength is not a bad thing, it's what ensures our future and our freedoms, weakness on the other hand...
Well take the time to read a few history books...

I think it was Lenin who said; "Give the west a rope and they will hang themselves".
Communism or totalitarianism is an entity that hides behind closed doors, it uses local sub-intellectuals to do their dirty work and when they believe their time has come....they strike......, and those who quietly sat by and did nothing to stop them all of a sudden find themselves in a place they did not want to be, and realize it's too late to do anything.
Forget about titles like communism or others for a moment, read this and tell us you can't relate...
The "idea" of a Trump presidency, might be our last chance, the enemies of democracy and freedoms are always out there using those who are weak minded to achieve their goals.
Don't like the man? Fine....what's important is not the person but the tool to put an end to the weakness that has infested our system...Puppies and safe space, feminism and gender confusion? and you think this will strengthen our freedoms? 
Who protects the rights of women, kids and the Elderly? Snowflakes or men? 
Who keeps the pillars of democracy strong?
 Even the fools who spew their hate depends on men (ironic) to defend their rights to speak freely.
Get a f*cking waaahkerchief... 
Put your big boy pants back on.
And for God's sake, wake up......
They are depending on you...

And by the way...

Friday, November 18, 2016

Alberta government collects an additional $1M in fines after ending registration renewal notices

 The Notley government’s decision to scrap the mailing of reminder notices for expiring licence plate stickers and vehicle registrations has created additional income for the province off the backs of those who missed the unsent memo.

Halting the mail-outs was expected to save the province $3 million each year but the collected fines from motorists caught driving without valid registration or with expired stickers on their licence plates has created another source of income.

In April of this year, the province announced it would abruptly stop the practice of sending renewal notices to motorists. The announcement was following by a brief radio advertisement campaign advising Albertans of the change but it appears many Albertans were caught unaware.

    From April 2015 through August 2015, $3.7 million in fines were collected from motorists who failed to produce valid registration.
    From April 2016 through August 2016, $4.5 million in fines were collected from motorists who failed to produce valid registration, an increase of $800,000 over the 2015 numbers.
    From April 2015 through August 2015, $1.0 million in fines for expired licence plate stickers.
    From April 2016 through August 2016, $1.2 million in fines for expired licence plate stickers, an increase of $200,000 over the 2015 numbers.

Page MacPherson of the Canadian Taxpayers Federations questions the provincial government’s approach to removing the reminders.

“Really, it’s all needless,” said MacPherson. “If they had just done it a simple way by including (information regarding the end of mail-outs) with your yearly notifications in the mail and allowing people to voluntarily opt in or out of this, then I think that you could have avoided the whole thing.”

“You’re putting a lot of individual citizens through a lot of hardship having to fight these tickets and fines which they feel is unfair.”

In September, the Notley government hired a U.S. company to robocall Albertans notifying them to the fact registration renewals would no longer arrive in their mailboxes. The calls came too late for Albertans who had already received tickets.

During a three month period following the removal of registration reminders sent by mail, there were 207 more disputed registration and licence plate tickets than in the same three month period in 2015.
That's what happens when someone ends up with accidental governments. Disgusting is too soft a word for those who abuse citizens they are supposed to serve. 
You count all the money they stole from the people of Alberta and it's a hell of a lot more than a million...
If the P.C would have still been in power notley and her gang would have been bitching about this till the crow came home. NDP, what a bunch of hypocrites...

Thursday, November 17, 2016

Marin filmmaker Cassie Jaye’s new film, ‘The Red Pill,’ is a bitter one for feminists to swallow

When Marin filmmaker Cassie Jaye began working on her new documentary, “The Red Pill,” believed to be the first ever film on the men’s rights movement, she considered herself a feminist. By the time she finished the documentary, which screens Sunday at the Rafael Film Center, she could no longer in good conscience call herself that. And many of her former sisters in the women’s movement may never forgive her for it.
They’re livid that the 30-year-old San Anselmo resident would have the audacity to present evidence that challenges their condemnation of men’s rights organizations as misogynist hate-groups infested with “rape apologists.”
“Feminist academicians are threatened by that kind of dialogue,” she says.
In Melbourne, Australia, for example, a feminist petition decrying “The Red Pill” as “a misogynistic propaganda film” succeeded in getting a screening canceled there. A vicious review in the Village Voice insinuated that “The Red Pill” was financed by men’s rights activists. The supposedly progressive weekly went so far as to refuse to accept a paid advertisement for the film, a requirement to qualify for an Academy Award nomination.
“It’s infuriating,” Jaye says, seething. “That’s one of the lies that’s being perpetuated to discredit me and the film. It’s so frustrating to keep debunking that lie over and over again.”

‘Red Pill’ origin
She says she got “The Red Pill” off the ground with her own money as well as money from her mother, Nena Jaye, a co-producer, and her boyfriend. When that ran out, she launched a campaign on Kickstarter, the crowdfunding site the New York Times called “the people’s NEA.”
“I found Kickstarter to be the only way I could maintain creative control over the film and to get the funding I needed to complete it,” she says. “That the film was funded by MRAs (men’s rights activists) is a common lie that keeps spreading.”
The title of the documentary was inspired by popular culture symbols of red and blue pills introduced in the science fiction movie “The Matrix,” in which taking a blue pill results in blissful ignorance and taking the red pill means facing the sometimes painful truth.
A former Hollywood actress (“I got tired of playing the blonde who always got killed”), Jaye turned to documentary filmmaking as a way to make films that meant something to her. It took her more than three years to finish “The Red Pill,” her third documentary after “Daddy I Do,” a look at the world of purity balls and abstinence pledges, and “The Right to Love: An American Family,” about same-sex marriage rights.
 Jaye is no stranger to controversy. In 2010, the nonprofit Lark Theater canceled a screening of “Daddy, I Do” after two board members objected to showing it. Theater officials quickly apologized for “the terrible mistakes” that led to the ban and rescheduled it.

Down a rabbit hole
Until a couple of high-profile rape cases piqued her interest, the mysterious men’s rights movement was a rabbit hole she’d never thought of jumping down. Surprisingly, no one else had, either.
“This is the first and only film about men’s rights ever made,” she says. “And it was the first time in my life I started to look at men’s issues. I thought I was going to make a film about women haters. I was going to go in there with one or two camera people and hope that I don’t get hurt. I thought I was making a sensational film about this underground movement of misogynists. It turned out to be very different.”
She spent a great deal of time interviewing the big bad wolf of MRAs, Paul Elam, founder of the website “A Voice for Men.” The Australian petition to block the screening of “The Red Pill” branded him “a pro-rape racist.” And feminists continue to call his organization a hate group, citing the Southern Poverty Law Center, which denies ever making such a denouncement.

‘Male Power’ author
In Warren Farrell, author of the “The Myth of Male Power: Why Men are the Disposable Sex,” a bible of the men’s movement, she found its intellectual godfather practically in her own backyard. Farrell, who will appear with her at Sunday’s screening, lives in Mill Valley.
In his bombshell 1993 book, Farrell defines power as having control over your life. Rather than having power, he argues, both sexes historically have been cast into gender roles: women as child bearers and men as providers, the ones who go out into the world to earn money to support the family.
As an illustration of male powerlessness, Farrell and Elam point out that men are the only sex drafted to fight wars. Men traditionally take on high-risk jobs in mining, agriculture, forestry and fishing and are 11 times more likely to die on the job than women. They have much higher suicide rates and are three times more likely to be murder victims. Women live five years longer on average than men. Father’s rights are legally secondary to women’s in family court and child custody cases. Although death rates for breast cancer and prostate cancer are about the same, six times more money is spent on breast cancer research in the U.S.
“What Farrell is saying challenges feminist ideals, and I think that’s why he’s a threat to the gender discussion,” Jaye says. “He’s posing the idea that maybe we don’t live in a patriarchy where men oppress women, but what looks like a patriarchy is a result of gender roles.”
The feminists Jaye spoke to are hearing none of it. In one scene in “The Red Pill,” a group of feminist protesters are shown harassing men as they enter a lecture by Farrell in Toronto, Canada, screaming that he’s a “rape apologist.” A feminist activist known as “Big Red,” in particular, comes off as a shrieking, obscenity-spewing harridan.

Feminist disconnect
To get the feminist side of the issue, Jaye interviewed several authorities on the subject, including Katherine Spillar, executive director of the Feminist Majority Foundation and executive editor of Ms. Magazine; and Michael Kimmel, author of the book “Angry White Men” and professor of gender studies at Stony Brook University. They both seem dismissive and mildly annoyed at being asked to give men’s rights any credibility at all.
“The essence of what they said is that men’s rights activists are trying to turn back the clock on women’s rights and promoting violence against women,” Jaye says. “ What I found was that a lot of the feminists I was talking to had never even spoken to men’s rights activists themselves. So I was really conflicted with what I was hearing from the men, and then finding the sources to support what they were saying, and then talking to feminists and realizing this disconnect among feminists in general in not really knowing what men’s rights activists have to say because no one was willing to talk to them before.”
In “The Red Pill,” Jaye includes a video diary that shows her confusion and frustration as her own preconceived beliefs are challenged and eventually changed. At the end of the film, she announces that she’s no longer a feminist.
“I want to make the strong point that I’m very much for women’s rights and have been in my 10-year career in filmmaking,” she says. “By not labeling myself a feminist anymore in no way shape or form says I’m anti-women’s rights. Why I chose to drop the label is because, after making this film, I don’t view feminism as the road to gender equality. That’s largely because of the way that men’s issues are addressed within feminism. I don’t think it’s conducive to an environment to discuss gender issues and ultimately solutions if men are being demonized.”
Source and credits.

Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Toronto anti-Trump event a flop....the fall of globalism and left wing policies.

After all the drama we’ve heard over the past few days about the extensive protests and riots in the United States over the presidential election, the Toronto incarnation was a bit of a let down.

Media tee-up stories predicted 1,000 attendees would show up at Nathan Phillips Square at City Hall on Sunday to denounce president-elect Trump. Reports then adjusted that to “hundreds.” Not quite. Maybe 200 were there. Maybe.

And the number drops again if you knock off that sampling of diverse Canadians standing around the periphery of the event who were there merely to watch the spectacle or, as some of them told me or others around them, actually supported Trump.

The basic premise of the event was actually much more sensible than some of the American versions attempting to nullifying the results or retroactively reform the electoral college.

“Make Racists Afraid Again” was the Toronto event’s theme and the slogan, written on a giant banner and a number of signs.

Given the news that a chapter of the KKK plans a celebratory event to mark Trump’s victory, it is truly alarming that such a group would feel emboldened to rear up like that. It would be a hell of a lot nicer if they just crawled back in their hole, fearful of being noticed.

But this unique framing was almost lost because of how this anti-Trump event looked no different than an anti-Harper rally, anti-pipeline protest or any other such event that brings out the usual suspects.

You see the same people at every event. The same public sector union flags are flown in solidarity. The Socialist International crowd was on hand, as usual, handing out copies of their magazine.

It’s like they were all just going through the motions. It must have been nice though, to have a fresh target. Back in October, academics held a conference at Carleton University to discuss just what the hell they were going to complain about now that Stephen Harper had been turfed.

For one whole year, Barack Obama was president and Justin Trudeau prime minister. Plus Kathleen Wynne was still at the helm in Ontario and Rob Ford was long gone from the mayor’s chair in Toronto. There was little to take to the streets about, which sucks if that’s one of your hobbies.

We’ll see. Anti-Trump protests in Canada are planned again for next week. Maybe they’re just getting the machine all fired up again.
Maybe this will give them a hint, that even in Canada, we are all sick and tired of the sjw, left wing, feminists, all men bad, white privilege, safe space, spend spend spend on credit, immoral b*llshit they have been spewing for the past few decades.. 
And that their time of attacking anyone who doesn't think like them is over.
Their way of thinking has weakened the west to a point where it might not recover.

The idea that there is no such thing as Canadian values is another one of their crap that has come back to haunt them, we do have values, just not at the expense of our own.
We don't mind helping others, but we have to do it with a logical mind set, dishing out free stuff is fine, caring for those in need is one of our values, but only "after" we have looked after our poor, elders, children, disabled, so on.
This is NOT a globalist world, we are not ready for it, obviously, (brexit, Trump, more to come). Free-trade takes from industrialized countries and hands it over to developing ones. Reducing our manufacturing sector, moving them to Mexico, or China, or India, did not reduced their prices, it only enriched the greedy, by paying less to their workers. All the while limiting the amount of jobs and taxpayers here at home.
Social programs are under financial stress, they keep on saying all is well, yet borrow to keep them afloat. How is that going to work out in the long run?
We know that competition works well in a capitalist system, so why not between nations instead of handing them...welfare. Or in this case our financial power base.
Be like Canada's present leadership, give away billions upon billions on top of the billions they already give,  then ask these same nations to invest this money we gave them, in this country.
Keep in mind, they pay their labor force the bare minimum, but hey...they will come to a country that has a much higher wage laws, reducing their profits...when did this ever happened????
Can you hear it? The giggles in the background at the idiocy of this type of financial policy.
This is no longer about left or right, it's about been realistic, we have bad financial leaders who think taxpayers money is theirs, in the meantime, looking at their own citizen as a tool to do with as they please.
It's called imperious thinking, the elite abusing the wealth of their own nations, while enriching themselves.
This kind of thinking never ends well....

Life and nature is all about balance, we had the spend, give away, who cares about the debt (obama and co.) corrupt politicians (clintons). The west is close to bankruptcy, maybe now it's time for the other side, start paying down the debt, fixing our finances, so we can keep viable and afford the social programs we already have, instead of adding more and crashing the whole thing under it's own weight.

Brexit and Trump is only the beginning... what's coming is going to be interesting to say the least.

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

The West Must Fall Before World Govt Can Be Established

Bringing in massive amounts of immigrants at one time are not our values, it basically produces unemployment for those who are already here and keeps their salaries down. Including our own. When they bring them in, they settle where they can feel comfortable, meaning in a neighborhood where there is already an established immigrant population. Sine there is a limited amount of employment, welfare settles in and a poor working class neighborhood become a ghetto or worse, a slum.
Our true values is to help people on the understanding that it will benefit our own, not put them in a worse situation. When we bring in to many, it reduces the amount of apartment rentals, jacking up the price, reduce jobs, reducing salaries, but most importantly, it causes resentment, even hatred, not to mention, increase in criminal activity, like drugs for those who will take advantage of the situation, or a twisted belief in the idea that it will offer temporary relief for others who have no chance at the dream to improve their families situation. We have seen all this before, just ask an Indian.

You might think that Alex Jones is a conspiracy theorist since the main stream media keeps on referring to him as such in order to hide their own propaganda policies, and he might well be in some way. The danger is to listen to them, and not even taking a look at what others think no matter how silly the msm is trying to convince you of it in order to control your mind and the way you think.

That said.... The other thing we noticed is a repeat of history we are going through. In the 1930's, The west found the Soviet Union to be a danger to western elitist power. So they financed, through the imf, world back, or whatever it was called back then, a buffer, between them and the communists and that was Germany. They believed that Hitler and his hatred of communism would serve their purposes in holding back Stalin and financially line their pockets all at the same time. Didn't exactly work out that way, The German government simply printed more money... The results of their idiotic financial policy...well...

The same policies are on the way now, in this case they are called the globalists. In order to line their pockets at our expense, they are using what's going on in the middle east, (which they caused in the first place), bringing massive amounts of refugees who do not hold the same open democratic values as we do, specially on our women's issues and hoping that all will work out in the end, causing resentment and even hatred.
Lower pay, higher rent, costly products, such as food, just to name a few, is putting a strain on our nations in the west to a point where the population is restless. And do the elite care? Not one bit, because behind their posh lifestyle and their electric fences they do not see anything other than how much profits they can make. Here is something you should look up about those who financially support these destructive policies, like the clinton foundation, and george soros of this world... Are they loosing any money or is their pockets been lined even more with billions... Take a wild guess which is which and then ask yourself, why is it every time you decide to oppose this obvious manipulations of you freedom of expressions and financial safety, your called some kind of racist, homophobe, islamophobe or other ists's and ism's...
 They are, as Jessy Ventura said in the movie Predator...

To pry them away from their established seat of power is going to be extremely hard and the new President has to be careful, they won't give up their power so easily. They have their, bought and paid for agitators in congress and inside the bureaucracy, and they (elite, establishment, globalist, AKA; profiteers, carpetbaggers) have no intentions to give it up.
Whatever the case, such greedy policies by a small group who control our lives is always dangerous, they where lucky in the 30's and 40's, that it turned out the way it did, and in the aftermath, they made even more profits. Question is now, are "we" going to be so lucky this time as they manipulate the world for their own globalist intentions.
We have paid a large price with all these free trade agreements, just look at the devastated manufacturing power we use to have, specially in the U.S. and Canada, did they create more jobs? More taxpaying employment? Or more government dependents? They took their businesses and moved them to a place where salaries where ridiculously low and are making even more profits selling us their goods at a even higher price.

But hey, what do we know, who says it didn't work....
There is enough of these to keep them in power for a long time...
Just look at them demonstration the new President's victory. (GOOD LITTLE SHEEPLES)

Where will all this end up?
Remember, they (elitists) believe there is profits in war and reducing the population.

Never take our word for it...research for yourself.
We inform, you decide.

Monday, November 14, 2016

Respect for incoming administration, the end of radical feminism..and the politically correct sjw.

Democracy and freedoms flourishes when you accept opposing opinions and respect the vote of the people. You can be assure that one will have their chance in the next election, and if you do win, that those who oppose you will respect your win.
If not, then the divisions get even further and a nation is on the path to such a division that said country could fall.

I never fully understood the electoral college system of America till now...
Why the Electoral College should be abolished:

As for some of the world leaders who yapped against D.J. Trump, well they are falling in line. (specially Mexico) and...
Saudi Prince Who Called Trump a “Disgrace” – Kisses Trump’s Butt Today

Even our own illustrious leader (not a fan, since he seems to be more a globalist with out tax dollars than taking care of his own people.)
Justin (selfie) Trudeau: Canada Willing to Renegotiate NAFTA with Trump

And if I may say...
B. Obama never ran anything before becoming President, he was an activist, a community organizer, and everyone including those who opposed him accepted him as President.

So, those who demonstrated the election of D.J. Trump, (remember that he ran a giant business and has experience since a government is the biggest business of any country), should give the same respect they received 8 years ago.

And for my feminist friends, how does it feel like to have people vote in an alpha male as President of the United States? (yes it's a poke in the eye..hehe!)

What is the alpha male one may ask?

He defends the rights of women to be who they chose to be.

He protects the Elderly and children...and their right to live in safety

Offers his people the best of life

Punishes those who abuse the laws of the land

That said, the feminist attacks on the traditional family is over, their hatred for husbands and fathers, including working women, stay at home moms and wives, is also over, sure they will continue to yap against it, but who will take them seriously anymore.
And who do radical feminists depend on for their freedom to yap their B.S.? The alpha male...

Does that mean women should not have a place in the government? Of course not, but what we need are strong women, not those who pass on that all women are victims.

Women who should have a place in the incoming administration and would do good for families and the nation...

KellyAnne Conway,

Sarah Palin,

Michele Bachmann,

Janine Pirro

Michelle Malkin

Ann Coulter

My personal favorite Laura Ingraham

I believe these women would be an asset to offer a balance to the politically correct bullshit we have been blasted with these past decades; that have almost destroyed the strength of a nation...the family.

Sunday, November 13, 2016

Van Jones snaps at CNN commentator...the left in total meltdown.

This is his idea on respecting opposing views not to mention the disrespect he (left wing dumb-ass who accused Trump of hating women) shows to a woman because she does not hold his opinion?
These are the same people who accused anyone who did not support obama as been racist, and they have the balls to spew this shit? That's division to a point where they will be responsible for some nasty shit which could happen, or is happening right now in some American cities.
I must admit I never understood the left, specially lately,  
"We win, you must accept...you win, we will not accept"? 

Here is something to think about;
Donald Trump had; the establishment, both parties, the media and the elitists like soros against him and he still won.
Imagine his win, or his trues support if all these num-nuts would have been fair? 
His results would have been even more one sided. 

Thursday, November 10, 2016

Will "they" leave after Trump is elected President? lol..Not in a million years.

Who said they would leave if Trump wins election...
Was watching a few minutes of the view today, (yes I know, but we have to see what everyone says in order to understand), golberg said she never said she would leave, beg to differ, she did threaten to leave.
At 2.10 min..."maybe it's time for me to move"...

For fairness, can't find anything about behar ever saying she would leave...

But before they deny it here are some who did say it...
Al sharpton and raven simone

Here are others who said they would leave...(I'll let you research the rest)
B. streisand
B, cranston
M. cyrus
L. dunham
A. shumer
J. stewart
C. handler 
S.l. jackson
See them and more here

Let's face it, these hypocrites lied, or just made statements to "try to guide" people the way they want, actually believing they have more of an impact that they really do, they will never leave because of the money they do make in Hollywood.

Here is a small example of someone already changing her mind..."I accept you (Trump) as my president..."
While crying her ass off...

I'm sure not all will react like her, but you can be sure, they are not going anywhere, especially Jupiter. (cher) or south africa, (samuel  l. jackson). They love their money to much, and if they did leave, well...They know damn well they would pay for it.
Amy Schumer Says Vow to Leave Country if Trump Won Was a Joke
He!He!He!....why say it in the first place...anyway, afraid to loose ur place there amy.

As for them coming to Canada, here is someone who basically says what we all think...
Don Cherry tells ‘left wing kook’ Americans to stay home
“The left wing kook entertainers and the left wing weirdo’s (sic) in the media in the US have said if Trump wins the presidency they will move to Canada. Please, we have enough of these type here now.”

Anyway, like we said, these .... are not going anywhere..Big mouths with no style.
But...they do have the right to say these stupid things, thanks to what we all enjoy...freedom of speech.

Sunday, November 6, 2016

Interesting isn't it? Spain Has No Government For 10 Months - Economy Grows, Unemployment Falls.

We are continually told that every country must have an activist government. No economy nor society can be allowed to just bumble along by itself, the firm smack of political control is necessary for the world to continue to turn on its axis. This is not really what the empirical evidence tells us of course. Spain has not really had a government for the past 10 months and yet it is expected to be one of the fastest-growing eurozone economies this year. And as a result the unemployment rate has just fallen to 18.9%. So much for the necessity of activist management of the economy then:

    Spain’s unemployment rate has dropped to 18.9 percent in the third quarter from 20 percent in the previous three-month period, the lowest rate in six years and welcome news for acting premier Mariano Rajoy as he looks to begin a second term in office this week.

    The National Statistics Institute said Thursday the number of people out of work fell by 253,900 July through September to a rounded total of 4.3 million.

That’s a rather better economic performance than the country had when they did have an activist government:

    Spain’s central bank expects the country to expand by 3.2% this year, among the most robust growth rates in Europe, which has created more jobs.
Read the rest here.
Maybe we just shouldn't vote, seems like we would be better off...lol.

Friday, November 4, 2016

And today on The ridiculous files...Bagpiper fined for carrying a knife stuffed in his sock

A Montreal bagpiper said he's never had a problem, but yet he was fined $220 this week for carrying a knife that was stuffed in his sock.

For years, Jeff McCarthy said he's been walking Montreal streets with a traditional Scottish knife stuffed in his sock off and on.

But on Wednesday, while going to play the bagpipes at the McGill University fall convocation at Place-des-arts, he was stopped by police and fined, saying he was carrying a concealed weapon.

McCarthy, who said he might contest the ticket, told the CBC he was shocked, adding he wasn't waving the knife is a violent manner.

Ban on Sikh kirpan (knife) overturned by Supreme Court 
 A Quebec school board was wrong to tell a 12-year-old Sikh boy he could not wear his ceremonial dagger in the classroom, as his faith requires, Canada's top court ruled unanimously Thursday.

Tuesday, November 1, 2016

IMF: Global debt rises to all-time high $152tn

Are you ready for what's coming...when one keeps on borrowing from a credit card, eventually one goes bankrupt, what will happen when countries go bankrupt? Massive unemployment, No welfare, no child tax credits, no old age pension, food controlled by same governments who just bankrupted their nations, demonstration, martial law. on and on....and people keep on electing those who borrow even more....the sheep following the wolf...
Historically, when this happens, the elite usually find an answer to this problem with a world war....