Warning; We are not a politically correct site. Don't like us? Don't read.

Saturday, January 16, 2016

"We can’t prove sex with children does them harm" says deranged liberal feminist.

EVIDENCE has emerged that the views of the Paedophile Information Exchange influenced policy-making at the National Council for Civil Liberties when it was run by former Labour Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt.
PIE members were lobbying NCCL officials for the age of consent to be reduced and campaigning for “paedophile love”.
Their view that children were not harmed by having sex with adults appears to have been adopted by those at the top of the civil liberties group.

Today we publish extracts from an NCCL report written for the Criminal Law Revision Committee in 1976 when Mrs Hewitt was general secretary.

It says: “Where both partners are aged 10 or over, but under 14, a consenting sexual act should not be an offense. As the age of consent is arbitrary, we propose an overlap of two years on either side of 14.

Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage.

“The Criminal Law Commission should be prepared to accept the evidence from follow-up research on child ‘victims’ which show there is little subsequent effect after a child has been ‘molested’.

“The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of pedophilia result in lasting damage.

“The present legal penalties are too high and reinforce the misinformation and prejudice. The duty of the court should be to inquire into all the relevant circumstances with the intention, not of meting out severe punishment, but of determining the best solution in the interests of both child and pedophile.”
Read whole article here.
When a state refuses to protect it's most vulnerable, against the most vile decadents, such a nation cannot survive and will fall hard.
There are certain things a free society cannot allow, pedophilia, sex with kids, or those who try to condone it, is definitely one of them.  The health and continuance of a state is totally dependent on it's next generation. 
Morality is an integral part of freedoms, without it, all kinds of negative behavior makes it's way into our lives and when that happens, you loose the will to defend, fight, even die to protect what one knows is adverse behavior and especially destructive activities.
The west especially, has been in the grasp of radical left wing policies for a while now, so much so, that other states are starting to refuse to side with them, even at the cost of economic security.
Poland Hungary, and many more, have sided, even if they refuse to admit it, with Russia and it's President. Dividing Europe, even the world further. And those who have adopted radicalism, have their population in full revolt. Sweden, Finland, even France.
They have the vision to understand that the decadence and imbalance the west has adopted is causing a backlash that they don't want in their respective nations. Assaults and rapes by foreigners is on the increase, child and even elder abuse is rampant, economic prosperity is just about done, failing markets, increase debt and deficits which cannot be paid back, all have a coloration with the flirting the west has with radical, unbalanced policies.
It is not freedom to promote pedophilia, or any course of action that goes against the very fabric of been a decent human being, there are rules imbeded inside us that says this is wrong. The conflict inside caused rebellion, sometimes without realizing it.
The main problem with what is above is that people who refuse to say something about it, even when they know it's wrong, seem to have forgotten that they are the balance against such immorality, or to get involved in explaining that there is a limit to what we can accept.
The warning are there, right in front of our eyes, we all know deep down, the way things are going, our society will fall if we say nothing, but the left, or whatever it is, have gotten so powerful that they can only throw words out there, "phobia, hate speech", and people cringe.
When such a society has reached that level of control over it's population, preventing free expression, there is no limits to what is presented as normal.
The first step into eventual legalizing pedophilia against kids will be to talk about it, throw out there "well it's not that bad" or "we can't prove sex with kids does them harm", (Really??? That's their twisted idea of a free society.) even if it takes decades, they figure that eventually we will be desensitized to it, and believe it or not, some people actually are. Then comes the name calling if your against it, shutting down opposition, then laws are passed legalizing it.
Is this whats going on here, it seems so....
The other question is, "why is it, we can always find radical feminists and their manginas, behind this?"

The point is this, what is left of those of us who fight back and understand the limits of democracy in order to make it flourish, know damn well where this is headed, it's not about "imposing" our will, it's about leaving behind a circle that is health for our descendants, our kids.
If we refuse to speak up, or accept their vile accusations against us, for simply speaking the truth, when we take a step back because of the fear to be called names, we embolden them to continue and eventually destroy our children's future.
What we have is not because someone gave it to us, but because we fought for it, build it and nourished it for the next generation, if we fail to apply those simple rules, we hand our freedoms to the few who claim to know better, and that, as we see historically, is extremely dangerous.
 If there is anything history has though us, when you give an inch, they will take a foot. 
Maybe this is why the elitist, the establishment, even here in Canada is so afraid of Donald Trump, he's telling us to think for ourselves.
The last question is....
Who are you?
Or this...

No comments: