Warning; We are not a politically correct site. Don't like us? Don't read.

Friday, December 23, 2016

Thursday, December 22, 2016

Girl, seven, walks into a Syrian police station to ask to use the bathroom and is blown up when handlers detonate suicide vest by remote control.

A seven-year-old girl calmly walked into a Damascus police station before blowing herself up, Syrian media has reported.

The explosion in the bustling Midan neighbourhood of the Syrian capital wounded three police officers, said the Al-Watan daily, which is close to the government.

'A seven-year-old girl entered the police station, carrying a belt that was detonated from afar,' the paper posted on its Facebook page.

A police source told Al-Watan that the little girl had appeared lost and asked to use the bathroom when the explosives went off.

A clip filmed at the scene of the incident, in the centre of Damascus, shows parts of the building reduced to rubble in the blast.

At one stage in the report, the camera shows the child's remains, which have been blurred out.

The girl's explosive device was reportedly detonated by her handlers, who were outside the building at the time.
Read the rest here...
No such thing as moderate rebels...
The west is siding with these ...people?
It's hard to differentiate between propaganda and the truth these days, it seems to be true. 
This is sad and evil beyond description.
How can we survive as a species if we are still capable of such acts against children?

Wednesday, December 21, 2016

O'Reilly talking memo...out of control left wing colleges.Also, The rise of dark forces

He makes a good point, colleges are supposed to be learning centers; professors, the center of it all, educating people in all aspect of life, even debates and opposition.
When they "impose" their will and opinions through threats of lower grades or whatever, they limit learning, evolution of democracy and advance totalitarianism, then again, the radical left, which is what they are, have never been known to embrace democracy and free speech.
Ever since radical feminism went on the warpath (specially in colleges) against anything male and those who supported them, their political correctness bandwagon was adopted as a tool by all anti-democratic dark forces, it's a hidden cute word for trying to destroy anything to do with freedom of speech, capitalism and the free market system. Radical feminists are to stupid, to enveloped in their hate to realize they where used to promote slavery of the people.
When we have groups who impose; "it's our way or else", it's a direct attack on a system which so many of our ancestors and grandparents work so hard to leave us. To let such groups flourish unopposed is extremely dangerous for the next generation; will they have it better than us, which is our responsibility to pass on, or will we leave them worse off...
There is always hardships to battle in order to make things better for our children, our elders went through them, this one seems to be ours.
If we sit back, afraid to say anything because we might be called something that ends with "ist or phobia" or begins with "anti", then we are surely looking at the fall of western culture.
When we refuse to speak up, we give what we do not agree with, a podium to prosper.

Tuesday, December 20, 2016

Revisiting; Pedophilia on the rise in the west?

This Sicko Liberal Says: ‘We Can’t Prove Sex With Children Does Them Harm’

Their view that children were not harmed by having sex with adults appears to have been adopted by those at the top of the civil liberties group.

Today we publish extracts from an NCCL report written for the Criminal Law Revision Committee in 1976 when Mrs Hewitt was general secretary.

It says: “Where both partners are aged 10 or over, but under 14, a consenting sexual act should not be an offense. As the age of consent is arbitrary, we propose an overlap of two years on either side of 14.

“Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage.

“The Criminal Law Commission should be prepared to accept the evidence from follow-up research on child ‘victims’ which show there is little subsequent effect after a child has been ‘molested’.

“The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of pedophilia result in lasting damage.

“The present legal penalties are too high and reinforce the misinformation and prejudice. The duty of the court should be to inquire into all the relevant circumstances with the intention, not of meting out severe punishment, but of determining the best solution in the interests of both child and pedophile.”

Mrs Hewitt, 65, was general secretary between 1974.
When we read things like this, one goes to wonder how the west can survive. Contrary to what the propaganda based lame stream media spews out, that we are an open and tolerant society; they don't seem to realize that there is a limit to inclusiveness, actually it harden us to the opposite thanks to them. They refuse to report about this kind of talk which is dangerous and obscene.

Western politicians say they are confused why President Putin is so popular in the west,
maybe this is why?
Putin: “A society that can’t defend its children has no tomorrow

This crap up there is not the only one we have reported on, there are many in the west, academics and politicians who are slowly trying to DE-sensitize people to pedophilia...MMM! I wonder why?
Left wing sick Academics who support pedophilia.
Meet the academics who are trying to redefine pedophilia as ‘inter-generational intimacy
Academics To Meet Tomorrow To Discuss How To “Normalize” Pedophilia
Here’s Why the Progressive Left Keeps Sticking Up for Pedophiles 
There is (unfortunately) more of those who are slowly defending pedoes,  I'll let you look it up.
Personally I find the research to disturbing.

There is no way in hell the west can survive if it does not recognize that the future is to protect the innocent, not those who harm them.

Saturday, December 17, 2016

So much for global warming...Mars is warmer than Toronto

A scientific analysis of just how damned cold it is in Canada
Canada is going through a bit of a cold snap right now. Cities from Vancouver to Windsor to Toronto are under cold weather alerts, while corners of the Canadian North are making their first plunge below minus 40 degrees Celsius. But to zero in on just how miserably chilly it is, the National Post dug through world climatological readings, historical temperature readings and called up a bunch of planetary scientists who probably had better things to do.

Yes, Mars is indeed warmer than Toronto
Mars vs. Earth temperature comparisons are always a little tricky. The temperamental Martian climate sees such wild variations that there’s usually some temperature overlap between the two planets. But let’s focus on Gale Crater, a notably chilly section of Mars hosting the Curiosity rover. The latest daily weather report from the rover (recorded on Sol 1547) saw an air temperature high of -8 C. In Toronto, Pearson International Airport was recording -8.4 C on Thursday afternoon. The city won’t have to deal with the -75 C overnight temperatures experienced by Gale Crater, but still: You’d think Toronto would be getting a bit more payoff for being 80 million kilometres closer to the sun.

Mayo, Yukon, is colder than the asteroid belt
Mayo, Yukon, ranked as one of the coldest parts of Canada on Thursday with a midday temperature of -43 C. This is just cold enough to put the Yukon community in line with select portions of the asteroid belt. The belt, of course, is a group of minor planets that orbit the sun between Mars and Jupiter. University of British Columbia astronomer Brett Gladman told the National Post that if the sun hits an asteroid just right, “the hottest temperature may rise to about -40 C.” Aside from the occasional planetary body with volcanoes or a thick atmosphere, the asteroid belt is the most distant point in the solar system where temperatures are still warm enough to overlap with Earth. So there you go, Mayo: You’re our last climatological link with the middle solar system.

It’s colder in Regina than the lowest temperature in the history of Australia
On Saturday, the residents of Saskatchewan’s capital are expected to be doing their Christmas shopping at temperatures hovering around -23 C. To date, this remains on par with the coldest temperature ever recorded at our Down Under cousin. In 1994, the fates aligned just enough so that the Australian snow resort of Charlotte Pass could get a fair dinkum taste of -23 C.

The hottest spot in Canada is colder than the coldest spot in the Orkney Islands
When the Hudson’s Bay Company was recruiting fur traders for its posts in the Canadian frontier, they had to turn to what was then the most bleak, windswept and freezing corner of the English-speaking world: Scotland’s Orkney Islands. Well, on Thursday the Orkneys were practically sun tanning at 10 C. By contrast, the absolute warmest spot in all of Canada on Thursday was on Sable Island, Nova Scotia, where the island’s famous wild horses could enjoy a high of 4.8 C.

It’s colder in Edmonton than at the South Pole
Granted, the Southern Hemisphere is experiencing summer right now. But still; a snowy patch of ice desert in the middle of Antarctica is warmer than the Alberta capital. The pole-based Amundsen-Scott research station was recording -21 C as of press time, just as Edmonton temperatures began plunging towards an overnight low of -28 C.

Ottawa is way colder than Moscow
The cold of the Russian capital is legendary. It’s Napoleon-freezingly cold. It’s so cold that smiling is illegal. It’s so cold that Vladimir Putin’s cronies sometimes have to put their hands in their own pockets. And yet, on Thursday night Moscow would be a mere -14 C as compared to the -23 C overnight temperatures hitting the Canadian capital.

Victoria will be almost as cold as the peak of Africa’s tallest mountain
There’s a reason Victoria is where Canada puts all its old people; it’s the only large city in Canada that can eke out an entire winter without seeing snow stick to the ground. But on Thursday night, the B.C. capital is expected to see a low of -4 C. Give or take a scarf, that’s roughly on par with the -7 C forecast for the peak of Tanzania’s Mount Kilimanjaro.

Suck it up, Canada, Pluto can’t even unfreeze its nitrogen
Temperatures of -40 C might feel alien, but it’s positively balmy compared to what most of the solar system has to put up with. The exterior of the International Space Station plunges to -157 C when it’s in shadow. Even though the Voyager spacecraft is still running its heater, its components operate at -79 C. On Pluto, it’s so cold that all of its nitrogen has frozen solid. As Brown University planetary scientist John Mustard told the National Post, “that’s cold.”
So stick your carbon tax up your..

Friday, December 16, 2016

Amid rape epidemic, Finland's dangerously stupid PSA (feminists and their manginas) says use your mittens?

This is so stupid it's just beyond belief, they fail to mention the rape epidemic in Europe is not caused by one person, but usually a group, how is mittens going to protect women?
Then again, coming from feminist's, "we can do this without the help of men" policy and idealism, and their manginas, it's no surprise; they are putting women in danger.

Here is a suggestion, eliminate feminism, shame her mini skirt wearing mangina, never go out alone, surround yourself with real men, friends, boyfriend, brother, father, so on, preferable red necks, construction workers, bikers, vets, even cops, so on, believe it or not, we are the majority...These are the men who will pull your chair, open your door, protect your rights and kick the ass of anyone who tries to disrespect you.

But most importantly, recognize who put your safety, your freedoms in danger, those who tried to feminize the male population, the weak pink shirt, mini-skirt wearing sub-male of the species who claimed to be a feminist in order to hide his inferiority complex, the politician, who side-stepped your safety by bringing in those who think of women as property to do with as they wish, so they can get a few extra votes and cheap labor.

But most importantly, accept, that the opposite of the feminine female, their needs to be a masculine male, this does not mean you give up anything, we are not them, it simply means you are putting back the balance in the circle of life...
Both gender enhances each other and keeps one another on a path and road to normality, it also keeps the bad crap away. One without the other....well you can see what it caused.

Hope everyone has now realized, that the world is not exactly what these fools have been trying to push on you; singing kumbaya in a circle, throwing flowers, smoking pot and saying "peace and love" and men all bad. This has only shown weakness, and as one can plainly see, some will use it to their advantage...

Of course you could always wear mittens....see if that works...
Choice is yours...who do you prefer...who will protect your rights...and who would you rather have at your side when the time comes?


Or this...

Together with both gender working as one, recognizing each others gifts, respecting each others place in the circle of life is what creates a good environment for ourselves and for the generations to come...

In closing;
The safety of everyone specially women, children, elderly, depend on working together with "REAL" men and recognizing those whose idealism and hate are the ones who weakens us by grouping us like obedient sheeps.
We might not be able to rid ourselves of all evils in the world, but we can definitely make a dent and do better united than what's going on in the world created by weak minded people with a personal twisted misguided agenda.
Whether one is a feminist, mangina, an elitist or someone who needs safe spaces and puppies, their hypocrisy is, they need real men to defend their right to be or spew out the division they preach...and that my friends is an undeniable truth.

The N.C. Chronicles does not condemn or promote violence against any specific group,  we offer information and opinions.

Thursday, December 15, 2016

White Women Are Getting Fed Up. Feminists new target...White women?

Guess the first thought out of the snowflakes would be to declare this... racist..
Of course, White women have no right to go outside the left wing narrative clearly adopted by the radical feminists.
Next thought would be why aren't the feminists screaming about what these ladies talk about?
Last but not least, why are some MEN allowing this to happen to women?
How is that demonstration against abuse on women going while some (manginas) are wearing skirts?
Do the ladies feel secure and safe when they see their men wearing skirts?

Put you big boy pants on, our daughters need us.
We always said; Masculine males are a necessity, to make sure women have the right to be what they want, working or stay at home mom, and to feel safe doing it...
Seems to us, since this safe space, puppy petting, play-dough snowflake society the left and the feminists have tries to impose on people is harming women, which is having a backlash against all those man-hating feminists...
And by the way, about white women..
The feminist cause was betrayed by white American women
Is it us or are the feminists turning against, back-stabbing, blaming white women for the mess "they" made?

We hope some are waking up to the reality that without the strong masculine male, balance doesn't exist.
No man wants to put women in cages, as the feminist taking point seems to point to.
Take away the natural balance of life, what men are really here for, (to provide and protect) and many will suffer because of it...
Men in the west are showing weakness, and some will take advantage of it...
Unless you haven't notice, the world is getting more dangerous not better...
Who suffers first in a weakened society? Men? Or women children and elders?

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

New Study Reveals Solar Panels Contribute to Global Warming

The extreme environmentalists on the left — you know, the ones who block the construction of pipelines and demand that we completely abandon all fossil fuels and focus solely on renewable energy — purportedly want to save the earth by significantly reducing greenhouse gases and carbon emissions in the United States, usually through increased use of taxpayer-subsidized solar panel and windmill farms.

Imagine their surprise, then, at the results of new study from Utrecht University, published in the science journal Nature, that showed that long-term, solar panels have a bigger net impact on increasing “global warming” than emissions-releasing, fossil fuel-utilizing energy production sources.

According to The Daily Caller News Foundation, the study looked at 40 years’ worth of data and concluded that while more modern versions of solar panels may ultimately result in a net reduction of carbon emissions over the span of decades, most solar panels actually don’t last long enough to attain such a result.

In fact, when considering the amount of carbon emissions released in the production of the solar panels, such as from the mining of the materials used or from the factories that assemble them, solar panels are actually causing damage to the environment instead of reducing it.

An even more stunning revelation that should throw environmentalists for a loop is that even though carbon emissions have been steadily on the decline in the U.S. since 2007, it isn’t because of renewable energy sources like solar panels or windmill farms.

Instead, a 2015 study by the Manhattan Institute revealed that the increased use of the horizontal fracturing technique to obtain natural gas, better known as fracking, is actually responsible for the reduction in carbon emissions.

That study found that solar energy was accountable for a roughly 1 percent reduction overall in carbon emissions, while the increased use of fracking accounted for a nearly 20 percent reduction in carbon emissions as more and more factories and power plants switched from coal to the much cleaner natural gas.

You likely won’t hear the media or many environmentalists admitting this, though, just as they ignore the fact that solar panel and windmill farms routinely kill birds by the hundreds or thousands in some areas or ruin the natural habitat for countless other animals both small and large, endangered or not.

Keep this information in mind for the next time some wacky enviro-statist demands that we give up all our oil and gas to focus exclusively on renewable energy sources, which simply aren’t yet ready for prime time as they are still too expensive and don’t yet do what they are purported to do.

Perhaps in time, with some private investment and technological advancements, renewable energy sources will become capable of handling the load required to keep this country running smoothly and efficiently without contributing further damage to the environment. That day is simply not yet here.
 Environmentalists on the left always try to impose their will by saying the argument is closed, the science is there....
When we accept that kind of idealism, then we are susceptible to accepting others which limits debate and that is the most dangerous thing one could ever do in a democracy.
We "must" always look at all sides, at all possibilities and if we do not agree, debate and offer alternatives.

Tuesday, December 13, 2016

Elders, many are forgotten at Christmas. Don't forget them.

Don't forget your family, specially your Elders.
It's the time of the years, which is very important to them.

Monday, December 12, 2016

Antarctica records unofficial coldest temperature ever

There's cold, and then there's Antarctica cold. ... How does a frosty reading of 135.8 degrees below zero sound?

Based on remote satellite measurements, scientists recently recorded that temperature at a desolate ice plateau in East Antarctica. It was the lowest temperature ever recorded on Earth, though it may not get that recognition in the official record book.

A NASA satellite measured that temperature in August 2010; on July 31 of this year, another bone-chilling temperature of -135.3 degrees was recorded.

"I've never been in conditions that cold, and I hope I never am," said ice scientist Ted Scambos of the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colo. "I am told that every breath is painful, and you have to be extremely careful not to freeze part of your throat or lungs when inhaling."

The -135.8-degree reading is "50 degrees colder than anything that has ever been seen in Alaska or Siberia or certainly North Dakota," he said.

"It's more like you'd see on Mars on a nice summer day in the poles," Scambos said from the American Geophysical Union scientific meeting in San Francisco on Monday, where he announced the data.

Winter in Antarctica occurs, as it does throughout the Southern Hemisphere, in the months of June, July and August, when the continent is in total darkness.

The official record, as measured by a thermometer, remains -128.6 degrees, set in Vostok, Antarctica, on July 21, 1983. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO), the official keepers of world weather records, recognizes only readings measured by thermometers on location, not remotely by satellite.

"Vostok is still the world's coldest recorded location," said Randy Cerveny, an Arizona State University professor of geography and the "rapporteur for climate extremes" at the WMO, via e-mail. "They are using remote sensing, not standard weather stations, so we at the World Meteorological Organization will not recognize that."

Cerveny noted that there is no way to determine the elevation of the remote-sensed value. Official temperature measurements must be made of the air about 7 feet above the ground, to prevent the ground temperature from impacting the air temperature.

Vostok is a Russian research station about 600 miles from the South Pole, where the highest temperature ever recorded was 4 degrees on a summer afternoon.

As for the USA's coldest mark on record, it's -80 degrees, set in Prospect Creek, Alaska, on Jan. 23, 1971, according to Christopher Burt, weather historian for the Weather Underground. Excluding Alaska, the lowest temperature was the -70-degree temperature recorded in Rogers Pass, Mont., in January 1954.

Regardless of whether or not the Antarctica mark is an "official" record, it's still unimaginably cold: "Thank God, I don't know how exactly it feels," Scambos said. He said scientists do routinely make naked 100-degree-below-zero dashes outside at the South Pole, so people can survive that temperature for about three minutes.

Scambos said that in East Antarctica, the air is dry, the ground chilly and the skies cloudless. Cold air swoops down off a dome and gets trapped in a chilly lower spot, "hugging the surface and sliding around."

The Antarctica measurements were made by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensor on board NASA's Aqua satellite and by Landsat 8, a satellite launched early this year by NASA and the U.S. Geological Survey.

The record for cold has little to do with global warming, because it is one spot in one place, said Waleed Abdalati, an ice scientist at the University of Colorado and NASA's former chief scientist.

Both Abdalati, who wasn't part of the measurement team, and Scambos said this is probably an unusual random reading in a place that hasn't been measured much and could have been colder or hotter in the past.

"It does speak to the range of conditions on this Earth, some of which we haven't been able to observe," Abdalati said.
I thought things where supposed to be warming up down there??

Friday, December 9, 2016

Immorality Embraced by Liberals as "Sexual Diversity" How did we get to this point?

"Without natural balance, there is no limits on immoral behavior..."
That said...
Paedophilia is natural and normal for males’ – liberal professors make case for sexual predators at academic conferences. (BULLSH*T)
I would say what is "NATURAL" and "NORMAL" for males to do with pedophiles, but in this screwed up world, I might get arrested for promoting hate.
(there is more of these "statements" on the web, I'll let you look it up)
When you have these "academics" making this kind of perverted statements, goes to wonder if it's not their own personal character they are talking about?

Then we have...
Bestiality brothels are 'spreading through Germany' warns campaigner as abusers turn to sex with animals as 'lifestyle choice'

We have a safe space for all you liberal snowflakes where you can be with those who think just like you...
Satanic Temple’s new headquarters in Salem

Satanic Temple has seven chapters in the USA and Europe

Alaskan council meeting opens with prayer to Lucifer

Satanic Temple One Step Closer to Forming 'After School Satan Club'
This isn't about religion, it's about making a frigging point.
What next? Sacrifices???

Don't get me wrong I believe in freedoms of choice, I just choose to make the right decisions, not only for myself and eternity, (what one does in life, echoes in eternity) but for the protection of the innocent and the well being of future generations...
Life has to have balance, good must fight evil, not live with it.

Can they tell what's right and wrong anymore???

The N.C. Chronicles offers information and links for you to research, a healthy community and democracy depends on an informed population.

Thursday, December 8, 2016

Police officer facing tribunal after removing kitten from drug user's home

 A Toronto-area police officer who allegedly removed a kitten from the home of a drug user is set to face a misconduct charge at a police hearing next week.

Durham Regional Police Const. Beth Richardson, a 17-year police veteran, has been charged with discreditable conduct under the Police Services Act, in connection with the incident, which occurred on Jan. 12.

According to a hearing notice obtained by CTV News, Richardson removed the kitten after being dispatched to an Oshawa, Ont. rooming house to check on the “wellbeing of a female who had been using drugs for several days.”
 The notice states that Richardson spotted the kitten “cowering under a table” while in the drug user’s home.

In an interview with CTV Toronto Friday, Richardson’ lawyer Joseph Markson said the kitten was “looking just ragged,” when his client came upon the pet. “Really thin, very small, smelled like smoke, running eyes, and scared out of its wits.”

Markson said there was “no one around” the kitten in a position to take care of it.

According to the notice, Richardson removed the kitten without the owner’s consent or knowledge.

Richardson allegedly took the kitten to a veterinarian for a checkup where it was “medically cleared.”
Read the rest here.

Online petition;
 Amazing isn't it?

There are bad cops in this world, we have criticized and pointed to that fact...
But we also have to recognize that there are many more good one who try to do what they believe is the right thing, and when they do, they have to go through this crap...
When things like this happens, it prevent them from making on the spot decisions for the good of the moment, whether it's for a scared animal or a human being, because they have to check in.

Sure there are some who would and do take advantage of their position, whatever that may be, it's human nature, but it is also human nature to care for life and the well being of others, and if their hands are tied even for something so small like this, imagine the cost for a person, the price could be someones life.

That said, maybe this is why good cops don't want to make helpful on the spot decisions anymore, they're afraid to unnecessarily go though this kind of B.S. or in some case to be called something that ends with ist or phobia...

Wednesday, December 7, 2016

CBC and friends tries to blame Trump for rising food prices and failed left wing economic policies.

The average Canadian family may need to dish out as much as $420 more for food next year — and consumers could have president-elect Donald Trump to thank for part of the price bump, the lead author of a new report says.
Canada's Food Price Report, published by researchers at Dalhousie University in Halifax, was released Monday evening.
The annual report, which looks ahead to 2017, cites weather disruptions caused by La Nina, energy-related costs — including the potential effect of carbon pricing on the agricultural sector — and a weak Canadian dollar as factors in the expected price hikes.
Economists forecast the loonie could fall as low as 70 cents US in 2017, and a weaker dollar would reduce the buying power of importers.
"Everything we actually import from everywhere will increase in price," says Sylvain Charlebois, lead author of the report.

'Trumped' at the grocery store

But Charlebois, who works with the faculties of management and agriculture at Dalhousie, suggests there's one more major factor that could contribute to the increase in food prices: the incoming U.S. president.
"We are expecting Canadian shoppers to be Trumped at the grocery store," said Sylvain Charlebois, lead author of the report.
The report suggests that if Trump's administration was somehow able to force all illegal workers to leave, the U.S. agriculture industry would be short by as many as two million workers.
"You're going to see a lot of farmers actually desperate to harvest anything," said Charlebois.
Read whole story here

CBC's bias is embarrassing. Won't blame Trudeau for the carbon price, lower dollar, (eventual hike in the gst?) that will increase the cost of everything for Canadians and make our economy even less competitive.

 First of all, Trump is "NOT" going to deport migrant workers, he said he would figure out what to do after he kicks out the criminal element of illegal immigration.
There is more than enough migrant workers in the U.S. to work on the farms. something the cbc seems to have forgot in this one sided left wing report.
The main culprit in the rise of food prices will be this ill advised carbon tax, which will be put on everything, (since everything you use is dependent on the oil sector) this is not to save the planet, it's for raising more revenues for their pet projects like green energy, foreign donations to Indonesia, Vietnam, the U.N., (just to name a few) , and to add more taxpayers money to hide the fact that their economic policies is bankrupting the whole western world.
Instead of medias like the CBC reporting the truth, they try to deviate reality in order to protect their favorite political party...in which case all this is called...propaganda.

Monday, December 5, 2016

Why Don't Feminists Fight for Muslim Women?

With the west running away from the radical left politically, many has realized they where never for the rights of others, but for personal power and financial gains, (which we have pointed to on many occasions).
Feminism is no different, if not the main reason why the west is in such a mess. The demonization of men and traditional families, not to mention the stay at home mom which some describe as slaves to their husbands even when these women have made a well though out choice to care for their families by staying home.
The idea some of them promote or ignore the abuse of muslim women who are forced into the backwards sharia laws, where the video above carefully dissect the true nature of such a law, the control of women's freedom to be who they wish to be, is nothing more than dictating how women should behave, obey, even dress to please those who want to bring the past into today.
By keeping silent about this issue, they have shown their true nature and that's why feminism is on a path to oblivion, their hypocrisy is so obvious that women have awaken to their self serving hatred of anything traditional and things that don't serve their twisted views of an illogical idealism.
One thing is for sure, women have realized their freedoms depend on co-operation with men, together is how we advance, without been grouped into small circle where it's easier for organizations like radical feminism to divides and benefit from said divisions.
Their time has coma and gone, if it was ever there to begin with.

In order to leave a better world to the next generation than we had, siding with radical idealism like feminism has slowed our development because thanks to them and groups like them we are more busy with words than end with ism and phobia, and fighting with each other...people have been made so scared to be called names if they speak their minds, they don't realize their silence gives a chance for devolution to flourish.

So why don't these radical feminist fight for muslim women??
Because taking the issue on, would not be...financially beneficial.
Hiding someone you love behind a scarf or all covered up is not a religious thing but a law which dictates that if women do not cover up, they are asking and are responsible, if they are raped. (among other things)
This is not western values and if anything, though not perfect, they should be advanced and protected, after all, haven't we made our surroundings better than any other system?
And if we bow to tribalism, like feminists, sharia law, and other idealism, aren't we slowing down our evolution by going backwards?

The N.C. Chronicles does not condemn anyone's beliefs, if it fits your style, so be it, but do not try to "impose it".

Friday, December 2, 2016

Trump Christmas Parody “It’s The Most Wonderful Time in 8 Years”

Now that's hilarious.

Is Justin Trudeau globalist policies Bankrupting Canada? Is the west doomed to fail economically?

Justin Trudeau the Canadian Prime Minister said that he learned a lot from his father who was Prime Minister of Canada from 1968 to 1979, and again from 1980 to 1984.  But what did he learn?   Was it how to bankrupt a country like his father did?  Pierre Elliot Trudeau devastated the Canadian economy in many ways, but his biggest blunder came in 1974 when he sold out Canada to private banks.  Ever since then we have joined many other countries who also have been taken captive by private banks and are deeply in debt.  And now our young Trudeau will finish what his father started.The Bank of Canada was established in 1934 to supply interest free loans to the government for infrastructure and other related projects.  When the money was paid back, it was withdrawn from the system.  It worked very well and Canada prospered.   There was never too much or too little money in the system producing neither inflationary or recessionary cycles.   Then in 1974 Pierre Elliot Trudeau changed all that.  It is not known whether he was threatened, paid off, or simply made a bad decision, but he agreed to borrow from private banks instead of the Bank of Canada.  The Basel Committee was very influential in his decision.  After 1975, Canadian federal debt grew for the next 12 years at more than 20 percent per year.  Currently, Canada’s national debt stands at over $1.1 trillion and taxpayers are forced to pay over $30 billion in interest on the debt every year. 
His son, Justin Trudeau been a drama teacher turned Prime Minister, is totally clueless about economics. He is spending like a drunken sailor out on a binge.  He currently wants to spend $60 billion on infrastructure which will produce no return on investment aside from some small tax revenue from wages and supplies used in these projects.  Along with all his other spending projects for climate change, refugee programs, foreign aid, and similar non revenue producing investments, he has no clue where the money to fund these projects will come from, but says that “it will all sort itself out”.

According to the Fraser Institute, combined federal and provincial debt in this country will top $1.3 trillion this year.  That’s if Trudeau stops spending, but that is unlikely.  This is in addition to Canada’s $450 billion government debt already on the books.  Currently local, provincial and federal governments pay more than $60 billion a year to service their debt.  Money that we would not have to pay if Canada borrowed from the Bank of Canada like they are supposed to.
Recently there has been a new development which is before the courts.  Canadian constitutional lawyer, Rocco Galati, on behalf of Canadians William Krehm, and Ann Emmett, and COMER (Committee for Monetary and Economic Reform) on December 12th, 2011 filed an action in Federal Court, to restore the use of the Bank of Canada to its original purpose, by exercising its public statutory duty and responsibility. That purpose includes making interest free loans to municipal, provincial, and federal governments for expenditures (education, health, other social services) and /or infrastructure expenditures.  Whether this will gain any traction or not remains to be seen, for as we have seen before, bankers do not give up easily.
$200 Million Funding to rebuild Iraq’s Economy

$7.5 million in funding for Madagascar

$12.5 million in funding for Liberia

$2.65B to climate-change fund at Commonwealth summit

Trudeau's Spending Priorities Send Too Many Tax Dollars Overseas

Liberals accused of “betraying” Canadian veterans, failing to deliver on campaign promises
Some of the promises the Liberals failed to deliver include free education for veterans who complete their service, restoring the option of lifetime pensions to veterans with disabilities and the promise to invest $80 million every year to create a new education benefit to help veterans re-enter the workforce and to help expand Canada’s skilled labour force, which was supposed to provide full support for the costs of up to four years of college, university, or technical college.
Now it turns out the $80 million was not included in the 2016-2017 fiscal years because it was not part of the federal budget.
Since winning the elections last October, the Liberal government had made pledges to spend more than $5 billion on foreign aid, including $2.65 billion to fight climate change, $785 million to fight against AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria, $13 million for Vietnamese farmers, $15 million for job training in Africa, $14.25 million for infrastructure in Indonesia, $147 million to the United Nations Central Emergency Response Fund, $125 million for Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Program, $1 million to UNICEF Child Protection Working Group, $1 million to the UN Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict, $75.4 million in support of projects in health, education and nutrition, as well as a financing mechanism that can assist countries hosting large numbers of Syrian refugees, $17 million for enhancing regional security in Southeast Asia, $20 million to Sri Lanka for job creation and “diversity” enhancement, $2 million funding to Ecuador following the earthquake, $200 million in additional financing to the Iraqi government and $158 million over three years in support of humanitarian and stabilization efforts for the people of Iraq.
The $158-million pledge is part of Canada’s three-year, $1.6-billion commitment to Iraq and the region announced by Trudeau in February 2016, which includes $840 million in humanitarian assistance.

How many Veterans would love to have a house and home like this? (you gotta look at this, furnished and everything)
In Canada Syrian Refugees Get $3600 Per Month From The Government, $43,000 Per Year, While The Average Canadian Makes $27,600 Per Year
Jezz, maybe I should get a boat, get picked up by the Canadian government and claim to be a refugee? Would love to have a "house" like this. Free house and free furniture, feed and clothe.
In the mean time in Canada, some people sleep outside in the winter, including our veterans.

How many First Nations community and families "inside Canada" would love to have a home like this instead of the shacks they live in specially up North.

And that is a few of what he is giving out for his globalism ideals.

Over a billion to Iraq for Humanitarian aid, (an oil rich country) this would sound nice except Iraq is surrounded by rich Arab countries who would rather spend money on financing and arming terrorist organizations  like al nusra and isis rather than helping out innocent civilians and why should they right? After all, the naive western countries are doing it for them. How many refugees have been accepted on the Arab gulf states territories by the way? That's right 0...

Don`t get me wrong, we are no fans of the previous government either,
From its swearing-in on May 18, 2011 to August 26, 2011, the Harper government distributed 443 cheques worth a combined $3.9 billion.

The Harper `conservative` government took a healthy national economy which was paying down the debt (from 650 billion to 550 billion,with a 13 billion surplus) and put it back to 650 billion with a chocking deficit, then in the last year of their mandate claimed a balanced budget, thanks to them selling off government shares in the auto industry.
Imagine for one minute how well off the country would be if they would have continued to pay down the debt, produced surplus. All those interest payments would have gone down, instead of up and could have made life easier for the nations citizens. 
Even today a year after the election, conservatives are praising Harper, putting up pictures of him saying "miss me now".
Ah! NO!
This kind of politics show one thing, it`s not about serving people but power itself at any cost, whether liberal or conservatives.

Back to today....
Of all these billions sent over seas, and remember, this is over and above what we already generously give out, how much of that would have helped, vets, elderly, poor, children, families, health care, shouldn't economic policies of a nation be awarded to it`s population first. Instead of dishing out billions to countries who spend their money on military equipment to keep their people under a totalitarian regime, governments based on undemocratic tribalism, on and on...
Shouldn't we start thinking about our own first, or is it that globalism and establishment elitist believe we have more than enough and their popularity on the world stage is more important.

What is so disturbing, some of all this "globalist economics" is for get this; AFFORDABLE HOUSING", specially in Indian, Indonesia...in the meantime...
The number of homeless veterans in Canada is soaring

Number of people living on Toronto streets increases: Survey...Military veterans make up 16%
 Hydro One leaves family of 6 without electricity for months
According to Ontario’s auditor general, over the past eight years Ontario residents have paid $37 billion more than they should have for electricity.Justin Trudeau is taking Ontario’s nightmare and imposing it on the provinces who still produce coal: Alberta, Saskatchewan, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick.

But hey, what's really important for the Canadian economy and prestige is;
Repairs to prime minister's official residence could cost $38M 

Shades of the clinton foundation???
Trudeau defends fundraiser with Chinese businessman who later donated $200,000 to father's foundation

In closing;
Been a nationalist doesn't mean one is extreme right wing, sure we should help out, but only if we can afford it, after our own are cared for. To spend on a credit card, as you all know, will eventually reach it's limits, even put one at a point of bankruptcy.
The idea some elitist professional politicians are pushing that increase deficits and debt in a good thing is absolutely idiotic, if anyone understand economics even the slightest.
The cost of hydro alone, because of unproductive green policies is breaking families to a point where they have to choose, between food, medicines, mortgages, education, not to mention the cost in job production because businesses can't afford to hire.
Believe it or not, there is such a thing as clean coal, and technology can make it even more cleaner, making hydro affordable.  High electricity rates goes down the line to food, clothes, health care, housing, employment, transportation, even political instability.

Freedoms and economic prosperity in the third world does not depend on how many of them leave to come west, or how much the west dishes out to them, (which is called national welfare). If one wants freedom and prosperity, one has to fight for it, not escape and leave loved ones behind.
Or is it? I mean the more the west keeps the third world dependent, the more their population emigrates here, producing a cheap labor force? Keeping our own salaries down?

The Trump effect and the rise of center right political parties in Europe has shown that people in the west are sick and tired of been ignored to a point where, what was a promising future, has become a nightmare, economically.
Where one could work to owning a home is now out of reach for most people today, than 50 or 100 years ago. Now we fight just to put a chicken in the pot, all other dreams are just that...dreams.

The N.C. Chronicle offers information and an opinion. Call it a stepping stone.
The rest is up to you.
We are not the lame stream media, we do not want you to believe blindly, that's called...
Always take the time to research what we offer.

Thursday, December 1, 2016

An ice age could be coming?

Earth faces another ICE AGE within 15 YEARS as Russian scientists
 discover Sun 'cooling'

Experts say that solar activity as low as it currently is has not been
seen since the mini-ice age that took place between 1645 and 1715 – a
period known as the Maunder Minimum where the entire Thames froze over.

A new model has allowed experts to predict solar activity with more
accuracy than ever before and it suggests that magnetic activity will
fall by 60 per cent between 2030 and 2040.

The model looks at the Sun’s ’11-year heartbeat’ – the period it takes
for magnetic activity to fluctuate. This cycle was first discovered some
173 years ago.

However, a mathematician has established a more up-to-date model that
can forecast what the solar cycles will look like based upon dynamo
effects in two layers of the Sun.

These frightening photos of lightning from a hurricane above Miami,
Florida in the USA were taken after the storm left a trail of
destruction in the Caribbean.

The world's temperature could drop

Dynamo effects are a geophysical theory that dictate how the movement of
the Earth’s outer core conducts materials like liquid iron across the
magnetic field to create an electric current – this also influences
fluid motion beneath Earth’s surface to create two magnetic fields along
the axis of the Earth’s rotation.

Valentina Zharkova from Northumbria University applied this theory to
the Sun, and was able to predict the affects of solar cycles with 97 per
cent accuracy.

Ms Zharkova said at the National Astronomy Meeting: “We found magnetic
wave components appearing in pairs, originating in two different layers
in the Sun's interior.

“They both have a frequency of approximately 11 years, although this
frequency is slightly different, and they are offset in time.

“Combining both waves together and comparing to real data for the
current solar cycle, we found that our predictions showed an accuracy of
97 per cent.”

Ms Zharkova says the next cycle is set to peak in 2022, and the cycle
after, known as Cycle 26, will herald a new ice age.

Worldwide temperatures will drop

She continued: "In Cycle 26, the two waves exactly mirror each other -
peaking at the same time but in opposite hemispheres of the Sun.

“Their interaction will be disruptive, or they will nearly cancel each
other. We predict that this will lead to the properties of a 'Maunder

During the Maunder minimum, temperatures dropped globally by 1.3 degrees

Although it seems insignificant, it led to shorter seasons and
ultimately food shortages.

The Maunder Minimum is also known as the "prolonged sunspot minimum" and
is the name used for the period starting in about 1645 and continuing to
about 1715

During this 70 year period sunspots became exceedingly rare.

The phenomenon was only properly researched in 1976 when  John Eddy
published a scientific paper.

Astronomers before Eddy had also named the period after the husband and
wife solar astronomers Annie Maunder E. Walter Maunder  who studied how
sunspot latitudes changed with time.

Climate models have shown that low solar activity interferes with the
Jet Stream – the current of air and warm water which keeps Britain’s
temperatures higher than they would otherwise be.
All this points to one thing, some scientists, anti-oil demonstrators, climate change proponent, and all the other left wing pudding pop's refusal to look at all possibilities and ram us with carbon taxes and all their one sided b.s., make life difficult by increasing prices of all thing we need to survive...
Went grocery shopping yesterday and a small case of strawberries was been sold at almost $10...
It's difficult to know what is really going on, it's true that the sun's cycle is in the process of a cool down, most scientists agree on this, so that would contradict those muffins who need safe spaces and puppie's argument on global warming, will they at least look at the possibility in order to get it right and make sure we are ready for such a possibility?
Don't hold your breath, they don't try to be somewhat accurate, their main concerns is to impose their will on the rest of us.
That's why we always say, don't trust the lame stream media anymore, their ranks are full of these left wing cup cakes who only try to  manipulate their views on the rest of us.
By not looking at all possibilities, they are putting all of us in danger, if there is a mini ice age and with the increase population, survival for billions of people will be impossible, and the rest of us will have to fight to stay alive, not to mention what the elite will try to take from us in order to keep themselves in power.

But all this is theoretical, hopefully, thing will just naturally settle itself...
But if it doesn't be ready, at least this way we will have a chance.

Wednesday, November 30, 2016

What muslim clerics say about Christmas

So, they come over here, they won't accept our traditions, but we have to accept theirs when Ramadan comes around??? 
And they wonder why there is a backlash against Islam????
We are more than willing to respect theirs, if they respect ours, if they don't, why should we care about anything they say?
Isn't this "imposing" one's beliefs on another and if we go to where they are from, and wish everyone a Merry Christmas, do we risk getting stoned to death or will they accept our traditions the way they demand we accept theirs in our country?
The point is, what you do in your home is your business, such is the way of things here, but if you come to a Judeo-Christian country wanting freedom and safety, which you say you have escaped from yours, then respect the traditions of the land that welcomed you with open arms, otherwise resentment will set in...that can lead to hatred...
We will not "impose" our will on you, so don't you try to impose yours on us...

Now we understand the concept of freedom of speech, these 2 up there have the right to it, but we also have the right to debate and contradict their "opinions".
Also, to those who come here expecting to be free and have the right to religious freedom, it's never a sin to be polite and to recognize that the reason you do have all these rights is because of the taxpayers of said country who open their hearts and pocketbook to help you out.
Why would they escape a war torn country who is intolerant of different faction of Islam, just to bring said intolerance here, like those 2 are doing???

The N.C. Chronicles does not condemn anyone's way of life nor do we put all in one basket, but as a First Nation site, we fully understand what division and intolerance can lead to.
Our history is full of; "OUR WAY IS BETTER."
We are still suffering it's effect to this day.

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

Children Win a soccer game by more than five points and they lose, Ottawa league says

In yet another nod to the protection of fledgling self-esteem, an Ottawa children’s soccer league has introduced a rule that says any team that wins a game by more than five points will lose by default.

The Gloucester Dragons Recreational Soccer league’s newly implemented edict is intended to dissuade a runaway game in favour of sportsmanship. The rule replaces its five-point mercy regulation, whereby any points scored beyond a five-point differential would not be registered.

Kevin Cappon said he first heard about the rule on May 20 — right after he had scored his team’s last allowable goal. His team then tossed the ball around for fear of losing the game.

He said if anything, the league’s new rule will coddle sore losers.

“They should be saying anything is possible. If we can get five goals really fast, well, so can the other team,” said Kevin, 17, who has played in the league for five years. “People grow in adversity, they don’t really get worse…. I think you’ll see more leadership skills being used if a losing team tries to recuperate than if they never got into that situation at all.”

Kevin’s father, Bruce Cappon, called the rule ludicrous.

“I couldn’t find anywhere in the world, even in a communist country, where that rule is enforced,” he said.

Mr. Cappon said the organization is trying to “reinvent the wheel” by fostering a non-competitive environment. 

Read whole story here.

We all know, unless one is a leftist snowflake, that competition is what advances the human race. 
It starts at a young age and continues into adulthood, it makes people try harder when they do not succeed.
With this character, medicines, products, freedoms are enhanced and everyone benefits.
One does not have to shove winning in the oppositions face when they loose, we can be graceful which will promote them to try even harder the next time, but as we have seen with this snowflake policies lately, the idea of eliminating competition have produce a generation that needs, crying rooms, puppies and play-dough safe space to deal with a loss...
Not a good road to follow considering the shape of this world at the moment, actually, it makes for a weakened nation and the west in on a path to a fall that will last generations to come...
Our enemies couldn't defeat us militarily, so we will do it to ourselves from the inside.
How is that any good for democracy?

Monday, November 28, 2016

Parent loses fight to pull kids from school over “false teachings”

A Superior Court judge has rejected a Hamilton dad's fight to be warned in advance about what he considers to be "false teachings" so he can pull his kids out of class.

Steve (Eustathios) Tourloukis wanted to be alerted by Hamilton's public school board anytime a long list of topics he considered an attack on his Greek Orthodox religion came up in lessons.

In turning down the request, Justice Robert Reid also refused to declare parents have the final authority over the education of their children in a ruling last Wednesday in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Hamilton.

The ruling puts inclusion and equality before individual religious accommodations in public education and in a diverse society.

Reid said allowing Tourloukis to "isolate" his children from aspects of the curriculum would be conflicting with "competing legislative mandate and Charter values favouring inclusivity, equality and multiculturalism."

Some Christian groups call the decision a blow to parental rights while advocates of the province's anti-bullying legislation see it as a victory.

"This is a landmark decision removing parental authority when it comes to the education of the children," said Charles McVety, president of the Canada Christian College, which helped fundraise for Tourloukis' legal fees.

"It should be most troubling to every parent because this will be a case used as precedent … For me, it's a dark day for children and it's a dark day for parents when special interest groups supersede the rights of a parent to protect their child."

But others see it as a win for Ontario's Equity and Inclusive Education Strategy
, which led to new policies across the province — including in the Hamilton Wentworth District School Board — to remove biases and barriers to ensure all students feel welcomed and accepted.

"It's definitely a step in a positive direction," said Maya Roy, executive director of Newcomer Women's Services Toronto.

Toronto sexual health educator Stephanie Baptist said, "I'm not OK with one person's religious accommodation trumping another person's human rights. 

 "We're all different and our public system must make it safe for all of us. It is by participating in that learning that all students grow up with that open-hearted acceptance of folks of all different backgrounds so we can live together in this pluralist society."

Now look carefully at the words these "people" use;  
Equity, inclusive, positive direction, trumping, participating, open-hearted, acceptance, different background, pluralistic society...

Correct me if I'm wrong but did they just use these words to take away parental rights, religious rights, family rights, children's rights, freedom of choice??
They take away the right of parents to "guide" their kids the way they choose?? And dare to use words like "inclusive"?
How is it "positive direction" when you limit ones own tradition to impose yours on them??

We said it before, they are trying their hardest to rid us of all religious beliefs because they consider it to be a detriment to their eventual twisted goal to replace it with their own immoral views and government supremacy, and  in order to do this they're using...kids.
The idea of teaching sex ed and alternative lifestyles to kids that young, promotes immoral behavior. Without parental guidance, family strength, the next generation is on a path to dependency on governments and it's radicals (like feminism and Marxism).

Amazing; they take away rights of parents and freedom of religion and claim a "pluralistic society".
How the h*ll can you have a free system by taking away family rights, individual rights, freedom of choice, and claim to be "open hearted"?

 A democratic society, a free system must be give respect and accept that there is opposition, different views, we must have an open mind to the idea that not all will think the same.
The very idea that to take away one groups rights to promote another advances resentment, hate, and worse.
These people up there do not promote diversity, as a matter of fact it's the opposite, we seen many groups use this weakness to try to bring in contrary laws to our constitutional rights, sharia laws for instance, where women are considered less than men.

True democracy is always walking a fine line, but it's main goal is to accept that no one should "impose" one's will on others, to look at what is there and debate what we think is right or wrong. 
It is marxism, fascism, totalitarianism to force everyone to think the same, it is not democracy.

Take a good look at what is going on, they are taking away family rights, parental rights, children's rights, religious rights, and replacing it with an imposition of what they see as to how society should behave and claiming it to be...freedom.
Don't you find that a little disturbing?

Your rights to your family and kids are slowly been diluted and taken away, one little piece at a time, and one day you will wake up and....
I guess the real question is; Are they your kids or state property?
The president has the power to “shape our children,” Hillary Clinton said in a controversial tweet that sparked outrage among parents.
“Sexual education is planned for all Quebec students,” Pascal Ouellet, ministry of education spokesperson, told Canadian Press

Let's be realistic; when one group tries to "control" the way every one thinks, there is always a backlash, or is what's going on in politics lately, specially in Europe not obvious enough?
The extreme left is imposing it's will on the population, and now the extreme right is rising.
Where balance was king,  the middle ground is becoming...extincted.

Though if comes to a confrontation, should we be worried?
(LOL, we gotta look at the funny side sometimes, can't be to serious about all this)

It's no secret feminists and marxists want to create omega males, and only in western culture.
Not a good idea if one looks at the real world and they are targeting schools.

Never take our word for it, we offer information and an opinion, it's up to you to research further. We are not a propaganda site like the main stream media.  

Friday, November 25, 2016

Trudeau government deserves credit for getting rid of coal...Do they???

The Trudeau government has taken important steps to assert Canadian leadership on environmental issues after years of neglect under the Harper government.

It played a key role in negotiating the landmark Paris Agreement on climate change, and in October it announced it will impose a national price on carbon starting in 2018. Now it plans to phase out almost all use of coal to generate electricity by 2030, a move that will cut greenhouse gas emissions while producing significant health benefits from cleaner air.

The usual suspects are grumbling, but the government deserves credit for pressing ahead on an issue that is arguably the most important this country, and all countries, must face: climate change.

The plan to get rid of coal essentially involves speeding up a plan developed under the Conservatives in 2012. It will require the four provinces that still have coal-fired electricity plants to shut them down, install carbon-capture technology, or achieve equivalent emission reductions elsewhere.

The government says that will have the same greenhouse-gas effect as taking 1.3 million cars off the road and will ensure that 90 per cent of Canada’s power sources are sustainable (up from 80 per cent now). And health groups say eliminating coal burning will prevent more than 1,000 premature deaths and save billions in health costs.

Only Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall is griping and he is mostly isolated on this issue, now that Alberta is moving in a more environmentally responsible direction under its NDP government. It would be too much to expect every province to just fall in line.

Other critics say phasing out coal risks putting Canada badly out of step with the United States once Donald Trump is installed in the White House.

It’s true Trump has pledged to dump the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan, which he calls a “war on coal.” That won him support in coal country, but it’s far from clear that Trump can actually deliver on his promise to revive the industry and the communities that depend on it.

The fact is coal has been a dying industry for decades as utilities abandon it for cheaper, cleaner-burning natural gas and renewable alternatives. There used to be a quarter of a million coal mining jobs in the U.S.; now there are just over 50,000. Even Trump can’t do much to prop up an industry in such terminal decline.

In the face of all this, the Trudeau government’s plan makes eminent sense. But that doesn’t mean there won’t be trade-offs, and the provinces will have to make sure it doesn’t lead to sharply higher electricity prices.

For that, they should learn from the mistakes of Ontario. This province did away with coal-fired plants several years ago and moved boldly towards greener energy. But it’s now all too apparent that the government made a lot of mistakes along the way, and the Liberals are paying a high political price — as Premier Kathleen Wynne ruefully acknowledged over the weekend.

All governments must walk a fine line: take effective action on the environment without alienating the public. The federal government has made a good start on the first part. The second part, as Ontario is finding out, is bound to be more tricky.
First of all, there is such a thing as burning clean coal, we do have the technology...
Next, wont make a difference in the world because;
That's just 2 countries, watch African nations in the next 20 years.
As long as third world nations keep on building dirty coal power station, instead of clean ones, whatever we do on this side won't make a difference.
Oh wait, yes it will, your hydro and those of businesses will increase, taking more money from your pockets and eliminating jobs in the business sector.
Just look at Ontario Canada.
But hey at least the snowflakes out there will have their safe space to play with their play-dough, coloring books and pet their puppies, happier than pigs in shit that they imposed their ideas on the rest of us, even if it makes no difference.

The best way to handle all this is to research and share clean coal development, in order to help third world nations catch up, and eventually switch to more "affordable" clean energy...
One step at a time... 

When they "imposed" their ideas on us like they did in the province of Ontario, everything jumped in prices to a point where food for some is a commodity.
Do they care, they are hurting millions? Not one bit, after all, most of them (elitists) who do impose their will, without consultation can afford it.
They know who they hurt, but just don't give a sh*t...
Canada's rejection of coal will clear the air but impact workers and power bills

Trudeau government deserve credit?  For what? Spending and sending billions to other countries on top of what we already give at the expense of their own people?
They act as if we have to much and deserve to be put in the poor house.
What kind of government does that?

Thursday, November 24, 2016

Trudeau government must tighten gun laws....Against legal gun owners???

During the Harper years not only was the long gun registry killed, but the Conservative government watered down other gun control measures. It’s time the Trudeau government reversed those measures and tightened gun control laws in general.
It’s hard to believe the former Conservative government could have watered down gun control legislation more than it did when it closed the long gun registry in 2012.

But it did. In the dying days of its government in 2015 it managed to pass Bill C-42, a law that made it tougher for police to keep a watchful eye over who buys guns by limiting the power of chief firearms officers. It also relaxed transport rules for guns and introduced a six-month amnesty for licence renewals, among other measures.

At the time, the Trudeau Liberals were campaigning on a platform that included promises to repeal some of the changes Bill C-42 ushered in and to introduce further efforts aimed at reducing gun crime in Canada.

It’s time the government acted on those promises to counter a worrisome increase in the number of firearms and a spike in gun crime.

As noted by Wendy Cukier, president of the Coalition for Gun Control, the number of restricted firearms, mostly handguns, has increased by 50 per cent over the last five years to about 795,000. And as she argues, it’s only logical that the more guns there are out there, the more chance some will end up in the wrong hands.

In fact, Toronto is seeing a significant increase in the use of guns in violent crime. Consider that as of Monday the city had already seen 35 gun homicides in 2016, up from a total of 21 in 2015. Though it’s not quite “the year of the gun,” when Toronto saw 52 gun deaths in 2005, the trend is frightening enough.

Also troubling is the fact that the majority of illegal firearms in the city now originate in Canada, not the United States.

No wonder. It’s disturbingly easy for licensed gun owners to buy multiple guns with a single permit, and then sell them on the black market. As Betsy Powell reported in Saturday’s Star, security guard Andrew Winchester, for example, purchased an astonishing 47 handguns in a six-month buying binge.

Though all of those handguns would have been added to the Canadian Firearms Registry at the time of purchase, no red flags were raised or followed up on by the chief firearms officers.

It’s not clear why this is happening. It could be because of the watering down of the chief firearms officers’ powers by Bill C-42, or the fact police don’t have the resources to interview gun purchasers. Or, as one Toronto cop complained in a memo obtained by Powell, it could be because an internal conflict within the RCMP’s Canadian Firearms Program has created obstacles to police obtaining information from its registry.

But whatever the reasons, the Trudeau government needs to solve them quickly. Among the government’s most important promises:

    Require enhanced background checks to purchase a handgun or other restricted firearm.

    Require purchasers to actually show their license when they buy a gun and for retailers to confirm it is valid.

    Repeal measures in Bill C-42 that allowed restricted and prohibited weapons to be transported without a permit.

The Liberals recognized all those issues in last year’s election campaign. Now they are in power, they should act on them.
The stupidity of some people goes without saying...their propaganda bullsh*t, lies and manipulation of the truth is extremely dangerous.
Lying to promote personal wants passed on by media is what got Mr.Trump elected, one reads crap like that above in the lame stream media and you have no choice but to disbelieve anything they say, 
The most dangerous thing against a democracy are people like the one above, they do not realize they have become a tool to be used by those who are more interested in increasing their power over us instead of serving.
There is nothing wrong with trying to keep the population safe, don't get us wrong, but we doubt very much this is what it's all about.

That said: (let's dissect what is said above)
1- One can only tighten gun control laws on legal gun owners. Illegal guns do not get registered.
2- Gun crimes increases when the liberal-democrats are in power, and the economy is in a downturn.
3- The majority of illegal firearms do not come from Canada but from the U.S. When you have 300,000 million guns floating around down south, it's inevitable some will find their way into Canada.
4- When one buys a gun or multiple ones in Canada, they are instantly registered to the owner, making it impossible to sell them on the black market without knowing where they come from. It would be a really stupid person who would buy multiple guns from a store and then sell said guns on the black market.
5- There is doubt there would be any conflict within the RCMP on how to get information about what they would think is an illegal gun. One thing about Canadian laws or Canadian law enforcement, they have more power than our cousin to the south, some would say too much.

The thing is, more gun control laws are always against the legal gun owners, not illegal ones. 
This is more about knowing where all the "legal" guns are by governments than black market issues. 
One goes to wonder why the government, through people like the one above are so afraid of responsible citizen than criminals.
Maybe it's got something more to do about spending on the nations credit card to a point where eventually it will go bankrupt and fear that the people will rise against them. Register as many guns as possible, make it harder to own one and whatever will come economically, the elite are still in power after causing the problem in the first place.
In the shape the world is today, with hatred and violence against anyone who is not the same, the liberal-democrats ideal they push, where we all live in a world of make believe and sign kumbaya together is basically non-existent. That kind of reasoning is dangerous, and they know it, they are not as stupid as they make themselves out to be.
Like we said; what they are really worried about is a lost of their economic greed and established personal power. They know damn well time is not on their side with the damages they have caused and a unharmed citizenry is their best chances to keep their personal wealth and power..

The best way to relate to all this is to look at history;
What did Hitler do in 1939...he nationalized everything, made the people dependent on the Government, then federalized police and took everyone's guns,,we all know the rest of the story!!! 

Never take our word for it, we only offer an opinion and information, research for yourself, make up your own opinions, this is the way to ensure your freedoms and those around you, specially the next generation.