Like the brother say's, it's 2015, it's not the way it use to be, men have been degraded by feminists as violent animals without separating the good from the bad, they call all men bad, and guess what, if you disrespect someone, eventually they will loose respect for you.
Hit a man in today's world, some will hit you back.
Be aware of some real life facts, men are stronger and if you think he won't hit you back because he's a man, well; you better hope your right.
Don't want to experience violence, don't be violent yourself.
From CBC.
Statistics show that 80% of Canadian mothers take paid maternity
leave after giving birth. Well, recently a case has surfaced in Ontario
which will likely forever change the way Canadians perceive the concept
of maternity leave. Thirty-one-year-old, Barrie, Ontario, resident Trish
Lemierre is suing her employer after they refused to give her paid
maternity leave after she adopted a six-week-old Bichon Frise puppy.
"I want my 40 weeks just like any other mother."
Trish Lamierre, puppy owner
"Taking
care of a puppy is a full-time job and if I am not there for every
moment in the first year of its life I have failed as a parent," says Lemierre.
When asked if she thought puppies and babies were different, Ms Lemierre responded: "Absolutely not! A puppy is a baby, a dog baby. I deserve the time to bond with my newborn too!"
Welcome to the new world order, lives don't really matter, but hey, this is important enough to be on the msm.
Posted by Nubian Queen.
(NaturalNews) The sleeping giant of the African-American community has
awakened against the crimes of the vaccine profiteers and their
relentless destruction of young black lives.
It's happening right
now, and it touches my heart to see this community rising up and waking
up to the life-destroying deceptions of the CDC and its pharmaceutical
puppet masters that have dictated "public health policy" in America with
wildly destructive consequences for the black community. An entire
generation of black babies now suffers under the vaccine injury side
effects that the CDC has known about but has willfully hidden from the world in order to protect vaccine profits, all while black children suffer from autism caused by vaccines!
"I am
a Senior Scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
where I have worked since 1998," wrote Dr. Thompson in a now-famous
public confession. "I regret that my coauthors and I omitted
statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in
the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American
males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at
increased risk for autism."
More than profiting from destroying lives; Does the vaccine industry now echo the genocidal crimes of Tuskegee?
But
there may be even more to it than profit, it turns out. In a
courageous, inspirational speech recorded yesterday at a California
rally against SB277, African-American minister Tony Muhammad drew a line
in the sand against the corrupted vaccine industry and its genocidal
agenda, saying, "Could this be a bill to destroy our boy babies? And I'm
letting you know that the black community, we are not going to stand by
and let another Tuskegee experiment happen again!"
In
the speech, Tony Muhammad reveals that Minister Louis Farrakhan has
also awakened to this issue, and a plan is being put in place to
directly confront the CDC in Atlanta, to denounce the genocidal actions
of the vaccine industry's destruction of black lives, and to hold black
politicians in California who vote for SB277 accountable for their
actions that are destroying black lives across the state and the nation.
"[W]e will bring them up on charges of treason!" promises Muhammad.
Because if #BlackLivesMatter,
then young black children need to be protected from the criminal
racketeering of the destructive vaccine industry and its deadly
chemicals that disproportionately harm young black babies.
Nation of Islam ministers show courage
while everyday Christian pastors have already surrendered their flock
to the destruction of Big Pharma
Hearing the courage and conviction in this man's voice, it makes me ashamed to realize that there
seem to be no white preachers or ministers who dare take a stand
against the criminal vaccine industry and its violation of our sacred
bodies.
Somehow, nearly all the white churches (with a few
notable exceptions) have become slaves to the twisted will of the
fascist government and its corporate puppet masters. Only the
African-American community, it seems, has enough spine to stand up and
say, "You will STOP killing our babies in the name of false public
health!"
Maybe that's because the black community remembers all
too well how many times the government has violated their bodies, their
civil rights, their parental rights and their human dignity over
generations of punitive oppression by bad government, from the FBI to
the DEA and now the CDC. Not only was the FBI directly involved in the threatening of Martin Luther King, Jr. and an attempt to convince him to commit suicide...
and not only is the DEA shoring up its funding and power by throwing
young black men in prison for possession of minor quantities of
marijuana that white people get away with... now the CDC is pushing medical genocide against blacks while calling it "public health."
The cancer industry also preys upon black men and women in America by withholding information about vitamin D
Everything
already mentioned here is on top of the cancer industry preying upon
African-American men and women by denying them knowledge of how black
people need more vitamin D than white people because of the
relationship between sunlight, skin pigmentation and vitamin D creation.
In fact, the entire medical system has long conspired against African-Americans to keep them blind to disease prevention facts while profiting from their suffering and disease.
Share this message, friends! Share the videos, the articles and get ready to join the march against the CDC.
There's been many ties of vaccines to autism, some countries in europe are openly looking into it, even admitting there might be a problem, but in good ol'north america, people will bow to what the main stream media will tell them, "don't worry, be happy", even if the big pharmaceutical are profiteering at the expense of your kids.
Posted by Nubian Queen.
The women pictured above are not veterans who suffered losses of limbs to combat injuries. According to a February 2015 article from Globo.com, the photograph shows a group of Brazilian women who gathered together for a calendar photo shoot in order to raise money for amputees who cannot afford prosthetic limbs.
Wouldn't it been better to be honest about these Brazilian woman doing a photo shoot for a good cause instead of lying about it?
Here is an actual (and amazing) female veteran: Congresswoman Tammy Duckworth
Feminism; how can we believe anything they say? If they really respected female vets, they wouldn't have to lie about it now would they. Posted by Nubian Queen.
It's time the "educated" Black
woman understand that unless you went to Wife School, getting an
education does not make you certified wife material. I watched one of
the videos centered around some educated Black women as they professed
that they have done everything right but are still single. Looking
through feminists binoculars they have done everything right, but in
REALITY...umm most likely not. They went on to say that the reason they
are not married is because there are
simply more Black women than Black men in America and that they really
didn't want to interracial date. Well if this is the case, what is
stopping the "educated" Black woman, that has moved in the middle class
if not higher from traveling abroad? There are Black men all over the
world so how is it that their only excuses are that too many Black men
are in jail and that we outnumber them?? Do we ever stop to think that
we are not being 'wifed' because we are lacking the qualities of one.
During this video, I didn't hear one woman mention any feminine
qualities of being a woman or wife, such as, how they would love to have
warm home-cooked meals prepared for their families or that they wanted a
man to lead them, etc.
Too
many Black women get an education and want to wear the pants. When we
do get in a relationship, we switch from an independent mindset to a
mindset of wanting to control the relationship. Getting a degree does
not put us above men. It certainly won't guaranteed us to get one
because masculine men DO NOT need a provider...they need a wife, a
nurturer, a lover, a helpmeet, someone that will turn their house into a
home, someone that will respect their leadership. ...Not a woman that
he has to constantly combat for the masculine position. Know your role,
play your position, or you won't have one.
And before someone says it...no, we are not against education for women, we are educated.
-Virtuous woman
We all have a natural road to follow, if we chose to go the wrong way, it's our own choices, and we have no right to complain.
Nubian Queen
A U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) study to understand why lesbians are fat has now cost taxpayers over $3.5 million to-date.
The study,
“Sexual Orientation and Obesity: A Test of a Gendered Biopsychosocial
Model,” seeks to determine why there is a disparity in the obesity rates
between straight women and lesbian women and straight men and gay men.
According to the study, “It is now well-established that women of
minority sexual orientation are disproportionately affected by the
obesity epidemic, with nearly three-quarters of adult lesbians
overweight or obese, compared to half of heterosexual women. In stark
contrast, among men, heterosexual males have nearly double the risk of
obesity compared to gay males.” Apparently,
“these disparities are of high public-health significance,” therefore,
the National Institutes of Health has been continuously funding the project.
Since CNSNews.com first discovered
the government’s funding of the study in 2013, the cost to taxpayers
has increased from approximately $1.5 million to over $3.5 million.
A website with information pertaining to the project claims the study will continue until June 30, 2016. Source
Now you know what your funding with your hard earned money.
Nubian Queen.
Be advise, this is pretty sick, a conversation about killing babies and selling baby parts, all the time eating lunch, cold hearted or what?
In this video at the beginning this radical feminist and every feminist in between, claims it's just a clump of cells,then attacks everyone who doesn't agree with her.
Got a question y'all,
If it's just a clump of cells how come planned parenthood is selling baby body parts for profit???
If you want to know what evil is, those who have no respect for life then try to profit from it is probably as close as one can come.
Feminist support all this Gender confusion since some of their founders were White Lesbians. Feminist will support the Unisexualization of Genders because they follow lesbian Consciousness that promotes rejecting Men and becoming "Men."
We have Black Feminist who have no clue what Political Lesbianism is, and even feel the Sex Revolution of Feminist improved the Status of Women. We see even Black Feminist joining the Slut Walks with Breasts out to protest Why men can wear no shirt, and Women can't! Now you tell me you want Men to respect you, you don't want to be exploited? By following the ideology of the Feminist Movement you Exploit yourself, and contribute to the Destruction of the Natural Black Family Unit!
MAMA AFRIKA BWAF
Posted by Nubian Queen
For you to say that you don't need a man shows just how unbalanced you, your homes and your relationships are. You're so brainwashed that you don't even see it. You NEED him to make your families compete. You NEED him to lead the family. You NEED him to be the protector of the family and the home. You NEED that masculine energy to balance your feminine energy. Only women who seek to suppress their feminine energy and those who have been brainwashed by feminism believe that equilibrium in the home and family can be accomplished without the presence of a man. I can already hear the naysayers spouting their ignorance, "I don't need a man...". Blah, blah, blah...Tell it to someone who believes you.
Stop trying to be the man in the relationship. You haven't even mastered being the woman yet.
Originaly from BWAF
Posted by Nubian Queen.
In order to fully control the population, an entity must destroy it's opposition, in this case Christianity.
Ir's not our place to judge those who want to live outside God's way, they have the perfect right to do so, but, so do those who oppose such lifestyle without been attacked for their beliefs.
The continuance of life depends on the union of a man and a woman, even the gay community depends on it. One must ask, Who is really behind the west's path to oblivion and how did such a small minority get so much power. Romans 7:23.
We are at war with the most formidable foe imaginable.
His mission is to destroy our faith in God.
What is strange is how furiously someone or something is targeting our children, especially in schools, any sane person would know this is wrong. Kids are not interested in sex or sex ed or alternative lifestyle, as parents we all know this, they are born and until a certain age their innocence show no signs of racism or hate of any kind, going against this, drives them at an early age towards an unhealthy path, there are many things in this world that only adults can handle, and must be kept away from the innocent. Teach someone so young about these differences and you create division. Children get along with everyone, it's only when adults outside the family inject themselves where they don't belong, that
Pao who is known as a radical feminist has been kicked out of Reddit, her effort to curb free speech at the popular web site provoked a revolt, causing Reddit to loose a massive amount of users and support, including this site.
This goes to show feminism and their radical views does not work and their support is so small that anyone adopting this mantle is doomed to fail.
She can claim all she wants that it was mutual or that she resigned, but the real story is that she tried to impose her personal views, users did not accept her way of looking at thing, her lack of understanding what free speech really means and with a concerted effort and revolt, she was kicked out.
Good riddance...
Earlier this year two psychologists in Canada declared that pedophilia is a sexual orientation just like homosexuality or heterosexuality.
Van Gijseghem, psychologist and retired professor of the University of Montreal, told members of Parliament, “Pedophiles are not simply people who commit a small offense from time to time but rather are grappling with what is equivalent to a sexual orientation just like another individual may be grappling with heterosexuality or even homosexuality.”
He went on to say, “True pedophiles have an exclusive preference for children, which is the same as having a sexual orientation. You cannot change this person’s sexual orientation. He may, however, remain abstinent.”
When asked if he should be comparing pedophiles to homosexuals, Van Gijseghem replied, “If, for instance, you were living in a society where heterosexuality is proscribed or prohibited and you were told that you had to get therapy to change your sexual orientation, you would probably say that that is slightly crazy. In other words, you would not accept that at all. I use this analogy to say that, yes indeed, pedophiles do not change their sexual orientation.”
Dr. Quinsey, professor emeritus of psychology at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario, agreed with Van Gijseghem. Quinsey said pedophiles’ sexual interests prefer children and, “There is no evidence that this sort of preference can be changed through treatment or through anything else.”
--------------------
This is just f*cked up...
Here we go...again. When parents are taken out of the equation and the state takes over the education of kids, things always go very bad... "Give me a child when he's 7 and he's mine forever," to underscore the need for early childhood education. “The third reich will take youth and give to youth its own education and its own upbringing.” A.Hitler
Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted." Vladimir Lenin
In China, when Mao was Chairman, parents were terrified to tell their children anything that differed from the government line in case the children repeated it and endangered the whole family. Jung Chang
In North Korea, students are taught from a very young age to abide by the system of government.
As for Canada and it's education system...(what's the difference between those up there and this cr*p...)
For a century, from the 1880s until the mid-1980s, the government of Canada maintained a system of boarding schools for Native children that were operated by churches, including the Anglican and Presbyterian churches, the United Church of Canada, and the Roman Catholic Church. The schools’ ostensible purpose was to provide education for Native children. But that education served a larger purpose, one that can only be termed genocidal: to eliminate indigenous culture from Canada. “The problem with the Indians is one of morality and religion,” said the Reverend A. E. Caldwell of his school in 1938. “They lack the basic fundamentals of civilized thought and spirit, which explains their childlike nature and behavior. At our school we strive to turn them into mature Christians who will learn how to behave in the world and surrender their barbaric way of life and their treaty rights, which keep them trapped on their land and in a primitive existence. Only then will the Indian problem in our country be solved.”
Throughout history, we have seen many system try to take responsibility for kids moral values, by-passing parents and families as if they where the problem, in fact, the main problem of a failing state is it's lack of faith in parental guidance towards their own children.
It eventually ends up, as we see now, name calling, if mom or dad doesn't agree with such a radical reverse of moral thoughts and values.
Homophobes, racist, and many other name calling scares the population into silence, this is a very bad thing because instead of debates and understanding, people that are forced to keep their viable opinions to themselves, develop a dislike or even hatred for those who force them to accept what they see as the UN-acceptable.
This type of policy of shaming dissenting opinions does not advance freedoms and democracy, on the contrary, it develops a us against them attitude.
Moral values is not about condemning some specific group, what it truly does is offer a balance through discussion, to prevent such disturbing trends inside our so called system of fairness, like the ones above.
This isn't the first time we pointed out pedophiles and their supporters inside the system, calling it inter-generational love, they are there, and as we see lately, the more they talk about it the more people become desensitized to it...
I don't know about the rest of you, but we at TNC will NEVER be desensitized to pedophilia, it's disgusting and perverse.
Take it from us, any society which forgoes it's moral responsibilities towards their children to others, as already failed themselves and guarantied it's fall... it is..inevitable.
Would you want to put your life on the line to protect such a system?
Not likely...
The balance in life is between the people and the state, both have a responsibility to listen to each other to achieve a semblance of morality.
Many times we have pointed out the imbalance where we live, anti-male propaganda, male hatred coming from local feminists, demonizing fathers to children in hidden agendas inside the local women`s shelter, even attacking stay at home moms...
"When a woman lives with a man, she abuses her kids"...(told to us by a single mother who took her kids out of a program run by the local shelter)
Men achieve power through rape
Men buy beer and beat their wives during sporting events.
It takes hateful idiots to promote such garbage, but the worse is those who still side with such hate and believe they are making a difference, as for the males, they can be basically called, "manginas", since they obviously believe they are rapists.
As for the gay community, if you don`t start fighting against pedophiles who claim the same right as you, you will be tagged with them...
Many gay families just want to be left in peace to raise their families, they do not side with radicals who try hard to include kids into their perverse way of imposing their will on others...(see comment below picture)
It`s all a matter of balance, which seems to be thrown out the window lately, if we don`t speak up because we are afraid to be called names, aren't promoting what we do not agree with?
In order to understand, we have to openly talk about our disagreements without been afraid to be called names, because as we said, if people are prevented from expressing themselves, ask question, if they keep it to themselves it will fester into something worse.
In order to understand one another we have to talk to each other, find the balance, and especially the limitations, so not to open the door to the perverse, who will use it to divide and sneak their ways into our lives.
And that is exactly what the pedoes are doing, using the lgbt community to advance their perversion on our kids...
It's time for women to yell out to that radical man hating feminist..
"OUR MEN ARE NOT RAPISTS, WE DO NOT RAISE OUR SONS AS POTENTIAL RAPISTS."
For men to take action against any idiot who claims...
"ALL MEN BAD, ABUSIVE, RAPISTS...SO ON"
and for the gay community to get angry and fight back when pedophiles and their supporters claim they have the same right..
LIKE F*CK YOU DO....DON'T' COMPARE US TO YOU?
We have to fight for balance, we just can't hope it is given to us by some state or wish it comes by itself...
If we don't, this system will not survive and will get worse as time goes by.
Cyrus recently slammed Christian conservatives for believing in "fairy tales" like the story of Noah's ark and argued that those who hold to a traditional definition of marriage should not be permitted to make laws within the United States.
In a recent interview with Paper magazine, Cyrus, who appears nude within the publication, refers to herself as the "least judgmental person ever." (Least judgmental? See what she says about her own parents below)
However, the magazine notes that while she was raised in a Christian home and was baptized in a Southern Baptist church, the "Wrecking Ball" singer "maintains a particular contempt for fundamentalist lawmakers who rally against this sort of progressive, potentially life-saving changes [for the LGBT] community."
"Those people [shouldn't] get to make our laws," Cyrus said of Christians who hold to a traditional view of marriage.
The former Disney Channel star also criticized her parent's political views, calling them "conservative-ass mother--kers." (there is her respect for her own parents)
Less than a decade ago, Cyrus was considered a role model for young girls. As a teen, the "Hannah Montana" star refused to dress immodestly, telling People Magazine, "I like to look kind of like what girls would want to look up to, and their moms and dads will say, 'Hey, that's cool. That's different.' " She also wore a purity ring, signaling her commitment to practice abstinence until marriage
Sadly, like Katy Perry, who famously traded her career as a Gospel singer for that of a secular popstar, Cyrus has since rejected her faith in exchange for fame. read whole story here.
In the ol'days we would relate this crap to selling one's soul for fame, but today it is accepted as feminists empowerment....whatever one believes, this is just decadence, the beginnings of the fall of a society.
How does someone go from Anna Montana to this slutty sh*t.,..
What a f*cking great example for young girls, what's worse, parents that bring their girls to see this douche bags behavior and pass it off as normal.
Don't complain when your daughter behave badly....
And I'm out of touch???
By no means are we promoting religion or hiding one's personality, be who you want to be, but if you want respect, it has to be earned, dressing like, promoting and behaving like a slut, will attract the wrong people, and guess what, of course most people are good but you have to accept, there are bad people in the world.
Freedoms goes hand in hand with some degree of morality, without it, there is one destructive aspect that creeps in, decadence. And when it gets to that point, society is irreversibly corrupt and will eventually fall. It is..inevitable.
Who wants to work hard, or fight and die to protect such a society? The numbers of those who would sacrifice for such debauchery diminish and eventually such a society is taken over by another,
i.e.; fascism, communism, totalitarianism, imperialism, or whatever.
Any nation who looses it morality and it's self respect is no longer a viable entity, history clearly shows this, it's all there to see....
Yet with all this evidence, we as a species still end up destroying ourselves, having to start all over again...Question is, how long will life permit humanity to continue...
We are already starting to become sterile and the population is reversing not increasing...
Just look at how much money and technology is been put into artificially producing the next generation....we never had that problem before.
In closing do you really think the cyrus and perry's of this world really believe in what they spew out of their mouth, not likely, it's all about the...money, greed and power. They are to stupid to see they are the tools in a greater scheme, and that is the control of the minds of our kids...
What the end game is, your guess is as good as mine, because none of this makes any f*cking sense.
But I do know this, it's all at the expense of our kids and the next generation.
You want to save the world, get rid of pollution, corruption, greed, and everything else that make our surroundings a lost cause, it all starts with the way families raise their kids.
If Moscow-based independent investigative journalist John Helmer is right, Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras is a marked man and SYRIZA governance on thin ice showing cracks:
”(a) putsch in Athens to save allied Greece from enemy
Russia is in preparation by the US and Germany, with backing from the
non-taxpayers of Greece - the Greek oligarchs, Anglo-Greek shipowners,
and the Greek Church.”
“At the highest and lowest level of Greek government, and from
Thessaloniki to Milvorni, all Greeks understand what is happening.
(Sunday) they voted overwhelmingly to resist.”
“According to a high political figure in Athens, a 40-year veteran,
‘what is actually happening is a slow process of regime change.’ “
Wherever neocon Assistant Secretary of State for European and
Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland shows up (Hillary Clinton’s handpicked
choice for the job), trouble usually follows.
Helmer says she’s “in charge of warmaking in Europe.” Her notorious
involvement in Ukraine’s February 2014 coup is well documented.
According to Helmer, she gave Tsipras two ultimatums in Athens last
March – surrender to Troika demands and remain allied with US-dominated
NATO’s anti Russian agenda.”
Her spokeman Mark Toner said Washington is “focused on, frankly, the
opposite (of Sunday’s referendum), which is finding a path forward that
allows Greece to continue to make reforms (more austerity), return to
growth (by letting Troika bandits rape its economy and population), and
remain in the Eurozone.”
Since the 19th century, Greece had five military coups or attempted
ones. Junta dictatorship ruled from 1967 – 1974. Another one can’t be
ruled out.
Over five dozen former high-ranking military officials fired a shot
across the bow declaring their “oath to the Fatherland and the Flag. By
choosing isolation, we place the Fatherland and its future in danger,”
they warned.
They publicly called for a “yes” vote ahead of Sunday’s referendum.
Will not getting it mobilize them along with other Greek dark forces,
Washington and Brussels to oust Tsipras forcibly or otherwise?
Grexit “will make our country weaker,” they claimed – even though
Greeks weren’t asked about it and most oppose the idea. “We will lose
allies that have stood by our side. We will lose the strength we gain
from associations and groupings to which we belong historically and
culturally,” the former military officials said.
Ties to Washington and Brussels run counter to what best serves long-suffering Greeks.
Will conditions be made worse than ever by greater austerity if coup rumblings become reality? Is this US/Eurogroup’s Plan B?
Helmer cited political sources in Athens saying Tsipras and other
SYRIZA officials acted preemptively to prevent one – replacing military
and intelligence leadership with their own “but not radically.”
Moscow remains skeptical about Tsipras withstanding
Washington/Brussels pressure – especially given dominant Germany’s
hardline position.
He faces enormous pressure. His six months in office shows he promises Greeks one thing and does another.
He agreed to nearly all Troika demands. Not good enough. They want
total surrender. Germany’s Merkel and France’s Hollande told him to
capitulate fully for further bailout aid.
Greek banks remain closed. They’re close to collapse. The ECB raised
the amount of collateral they must post for further emergency loans.
Does Finance Minister Varoufakis’ resignation signal Tsipras’
capitulation to follow – negating popular opposition to austerity he
pledged to support?
Hollande spoke for himself and Merkel saying Tsipras must “offer
serious, credible proposals” for bailout help – code language for
demanding unconditional surrender, a Greek Versailles.
He and new Finance Minister Euclid Tsakalotos are heading to Brussels
for further talks. Hardline Troika officials intend cutting them no
slack.
Will Tsipras cave to their demands and betray millions of Greeks in
the process? Given his record so far in office, it’s hard imagining
otherwise. Hopefully he’ll surprise but don’t bet on it. Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Originalstory by Global research
-----------------------
The Greek Prime Minister has shown he has the support of the people, especially with the overwhelming victory of the referendum. If NATO decides to promote a coup as in the Ukraine example, it will show they do not have respect for democracy and the free vote...
That in itself could be extremely dangerous and cause a domino effect in many parts of Europe, namely Italy, Spain, Portugal, so on...
We might not agree with Greece's path, but true democracy demands we respect the choices people make, especially when it come to freedoms, if not, the system we have now has run it's course and we can only sit back and see what's next.
Daddy doesn't live here anymore
Most of the parents
who read my newsletter are strong advocates of Child-Centered Divorce.
That means they put the emotional and psychological needs of their
children first when making any decisions regarding divorce and
parenting. This puts both mothers and fathers on the same side when it
comes to their children — as guardians, protectors and parents — not
adversaries. Sadly, not all
parents divorce with a focus on compatibility in parenting following the
divorce. The stories, like your own, vary widely, but the outcomes are
painful for everyone in the family.
Statistics regarding the number of children who
are experiencing the consequences of divorce, living life without access
to their biological fathers or having infrequent interactions with
their fathers are alarming. I'm sharing some of them below not to point
fingers, judge or blame. Instead, I want to bring heightened awareness
about this to families around the world encouraging parents to do
everything possible to avoid falling into this sad reality.
Surveys show concern about this growing problem. According to stats found in an article at www.dads-daughters.com,
72.2 % of the U.S. population believes absentee fathers to be the most
significant social problem facing America. That's easy to understand
when you look behind the numbers and think about the families that have
been impacted.
1. An estimated 24.7 million children (36.3%) live absent from their biological father.
2. There are almost 17 million children (25%) living with their single mothers.
3. Today nearly 4 out of 10 first marriages end
in divorce, 60% of divorcing couples have children, and over one million
children each year experience the divorce of their parents.
4. One out of every six children is a stepchild.
5. 26% of absentee fathers live in a different state than their children.
6. About 40% of the children who live in absentee
father households haven't seen their fathers in at least a year while
50% of children who don't live with their fathers have never stepped
foot in their father's home.
7. Children who live absent from their biological
fathers, on average, are more likely to be poor... experience
educational, health, emotional and psychological problems ... be victims
of child abuse ... and engage in criminal behavior than their peers who
live with their married, biological mother and father.
8. 57.7 percent of all black children, 31.8
percent of all Hispanic children, and 20.9 percent of all white children
are living in single-parent homes.
Of course, there's a big difference between
fathering a child and being a "father." Children need the influence of a
loving, protective and responsible father in their lives. But if that
father isn't stepping up to his position, he may be doing more damage
than by being absent.
That brings us back to the advantages of
maintaining a child-centered divorce. The more we can encourage Mom and
Dad to co-parent with care and compassion following a divorce, the
better the outcome for everyone in the family. I know this isn't a
simple challenge. Not everyone has the maturity and emotional stability
to step up to the plate, put differences aside, and parent your children
together because you love them unconditionally. But if you can and do –
more power to you. You won't regret it!
-------------------------
"Of course, there's a big difference between
fathering a child and being a "father." Children need the influence of a
loving, protective and responsible father in their lives."
EXCUSE ME?
Of course there's a big difference between mothering a child and being a "mother." Children need the influence of a
loving, protective and responsible mother in their lives."
This is from personal experience since I raised my daughter on my own...
And let me say this from personal experience...
For some reason, a man will accept another man's children and raise them as their own more easily than women will.
I experienced this behavior for myself, and that's why I stayed single while raising my daughter. I didn't want her to be hurt.
Note;
TNC does not condemn all women for the behavior of some.
If
you’re ever surfing the web or watching the news and wondering if
you’re the only one who can’t take MSM seriously, you’re not alone. According to the 2015 State of the First Amendment survey,
only 24 percent of Americans believe that "overall, the news media
tries to report the news without bias.” A big, fat 70 percent disagreed
with that statement. And I’m just over here laughing. Publications like the New York Times and news networks like CNN pride themselves on their so-called unbiased reporting. Honestly,
these liberal publications and stations wouldn’t be able to survive if
they didn’t pretend that they were on the straight and narrow. Faking
objectivity is the only way they can maintain viewership. Maybe part of this has to do with professional lying journalist, Brian Williams. Or maybe CNN’s whole “black hole” Malaysian plane theory threw everyone off. Or maybe people are getting sick of the NY Times bombshell hit pieces on Marco Rubio. (First traffic violations, then his boat, and now they tell us that ”ordinary Cubans don’t like him. How could he EVER be president without the approval of the Castros?!)
A
flurry of headlines in recent months about the journalistic sins of
high-profile media personalities – Brian Williams, who was demoted at
NBC for lying; and ABC's George Stephanopoulos, a former aide to
then-President Bill Clinton whose contribution to the Clinton Foundation
came to light recently -- may have negatively influenced respondents'
feelings about the news media, the study said. Older
audiences are more likely to buy into the media's mantle of
objectivity, with 26% of those 50 or older agreeing with the claim. Only
7% of 18-29 year olds agree. Democrats (36%) are much more likely to
believe in the news media try to report without bias as opposed to
Republicans (19%).
The
survey had some additional interesting results. (And by interesting I
mean disturbing.) Apparently, 19 percent of Americans believe the First
Amendment goes too far. Believe it or not, that percentage has
significantly dropped since last year. (It was 38 percent.)
"Once
again there is a falloff in the number of those who say the First
Amendment goes too far when we move away from a terrorist attack," says
Gene Policinski, chief operating officer of the Newseum Institute, one
of the authors of the study. "We ought to be very vigilant when these
attacks occur" and not hastily pass laws that limit freedoms. "The law
are permanent, the emotions that surround these events are not."
Oh, and it gets worse. The survey found that one-third of Americans can’t name any rights guaranteed in the First Amendment. Not one. And those are probably the same people who voted for Obama. On the bright side, at least 70 percent of Americans know that MSM's filled with professional liars. So there’s that. Not all hope is lost. From COTR
------------------------------
I guaranty this is not only in America, over here, up north it's even worse, so much so, most don't even watch national news, personally, I rather get it online, make up my own mind.
And when you try to point it out in their comment section, well some of them go ape sh*t.
Cbc been the worse, but ctv, global, tvo, they are all in on it, even trying to sway voters the way they see who we should vote for...
New form of democracy or just an evolution of what has always been there?
I am a feminist. I have marched at the barricades, subscribed to Ms.
magazine, and knocked on many a door in support of progressive
candidates committed to women’s rights. Until a month ago, I would have
expressed unqualified support for Title IX and for the Violence Against
Women Act.
But that was before my son, a senior at a small liberal-arts college
in New England, was charged—by an ex-girlfriend—with alleged acts of
“nonconsensual sex” that supposedly occurred during the course of their
relationship a few years earlier.
What followed was a nightmare—a fall through Alice’s looking-glass
into a world that I could not possibly have believed existed, least of
all behind the ivy-covered walls thought to protect an ostensible
dedication to enlightenment and intellectual betterment.
It began with a text of desperation. “CALL ME. URGENT. NOW.”
That was how my son informed me that not only had charges been
brought against him but that he was ordered to appear to answer these
allegations in a matter of days. There was no preliminary inquiry on the
part of anyone at the school into these accusations about behavior
alleged to have taken place a few years earlier, no consideration of the
possibility that jealousy or revenge might be motivating a spurned
young ex-lover to lash out. Worst of all, my son would not be afforded a
presumption of innocence.
In fact, Title IX, that so-called guarantor of equality between the
sexes on college campuses, and as applied by a recent directive from the
Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights, has obliterated the
presumption of innocence that is so foundational to our traditions of
justice. On today’s college campuses, neither “beyond a reasonable
doubt,” nor even the lesser “by clear and convincing evidence” standard
of proof is required to establish guilt of sexual misconduct.
These safeguards of due process have, by order of the federal
government, been replaced by what is known as “a preponderance of the
evidence.” What this means, in plain English, is that all my son’s
accuser needed to establish before a campus tribunal is that the
allegations were “more likely than not” to have occurred by a margin of
proof that can be as slim as 50.1% to 49.9%.
How does this campus tribunal proceed to evaluate the accusations? Upon what evidence is it able to make a judgment?
The frightening answer is that like the proverbial 800-pound gorilla,
the tribunal does pretty much whatever it wants, showing scant regard
for fundamental fairness, due process of law, and the well-established
rules and procedures that have evolved under the Constitution for
citizens’ protection. Who knew that American college students are
required to surrender the Bill of Rights at the campus gates?
My son was given written notice of the charges against him, in the
form of a letter from the campus Title IX officer. But instead of
affording him the right to be fully informed, the separately listed
allegations were a barrage of vague statements, rendering any defense
virtually impossible. The letter lacked even the most basic information
about the acts alleged to have happened years before. Nor were the
allegations supported by any evidence other than the word of the
ex-girlfriend.
The hearing itself was a two-hour ordeal of unabated grilling by the
school’s committee, during which, my son later reported, he was
expressly denied his request to be represented by counsel or even to
have an attorney outside the door of the room. The questioning, he said,
ran far afield even from the vaguely stated allegations contained in
the so-called notice. Questions from the distant past, even about
unrelated matters, were flung at him with no opportunity for him to give
thoughtful answers.
The many pages of written documentation that my son had put
together—which were directly on point about his relationship with his
accuser during the time period of his alleged wrongful conduct—were
dismissed as somehow not relevant. What was relevant, however, according
to the committee, was the unsworn testimony of “witnesses” deemed to
have observable knowledge about the long-ago relationship between my son
and his accuser.
That the recollections of these young people (made under intense peer
pressure and with none of the safeguards consistent with fundamental
fairness) were relevant—while records of the accuser’s email and social
media postings were not—made a mockery of the very term. While my son
was instructed by the committee not to “discuss this matter” with any
potential witnesses, these witnesses against him were not identified to
him, nor was he allowed to confront or question either them or his
accuser.
Thankfully, I happen to be an attorney and had the resources to
provide the necessary professional assistance to my son. The charges
against him were ultimately dismissed but not before he and our family
had to suffer through this ordeal. I am of course relieved and most
grateful for this outcome. Yet I am also keenly aware not only of how
easily this all could have gone the other way—with life-altering
consequences—but how all too often it does.
Across the country and with increasing frequency, innocent victims of
impossible-to-substantiate charges are afforded scant rights to
fundamental fairness and find themselves entrapped in a widening web of
this latest surge in political correctness. Few have a lawyer for a
mother, and many may not know about the Foundation for Individual Rights
in Education, which assisted me in my research.
There are very real and horrifying instances of sexual misconduct and
abuse on college campuses and elsewhere. That these offenses should be
investigated and prosecuted where appropriate is not open to question.
What does remain a question is how we can make the process fair for
everyone.
I fear that in the current climate the goal of “women’s rights,” with
the compliance of politically motivated government policy and the tacit
complicity of college administrators, runs the risk of grounding our
most cherished institutions in a veritable snake pit of injustice—not
unlike the very injustices the movement itself has for so long sought to
correct. Unbridled feminist orthodoxy is no more the answer than are
attitudes and policies that victimize the victim. By Judith Grossman
————————————————————————————————— Women Against Feminism UK: We hear a lot from feminists that
feminism is a perfect movement made by perfect women (feminists), who
don’t hate men, who would never lie about domestic violence, the wage
gap, patriarchy, the “rape culture,” etc. Lies. Lies. Lies. This is what happens when a sacralized victim group gains
power. These blind social justice warriors talk nonsense and hate
common sense and logic. What’s about a good investigation? The feminist Judith Grossman should be ashamed of herself.
She was always oh-so aware of injustice except when it was done to
others and when it was done by those on “her side.” It’s only when her
son is attacked that she wakes up temporarily and sees what she and her
comrades have wrought over the years.
The petition was started earlier this year, but its signature count has skyrocketed over the weekend. It reads, in part:
After Pao lost her gender discrimination
case against venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins she was appointed CEO
of Reddit Inc and Reddit entered into a new age of censorship. A vast
majority of the Reddit community believes that Pao, "a manipulative
individual who will sue her way to the top", has overstepped her
boundaries and fears that she will run Reddit into the ground. ... Action must be taken to prevent Reddit from being further run into the ground.
It now has more than 132,000 signatures total. Read the rest.
TNC has quit reddit because of chairman pao's radical feminist ideals of censorship and will not return until she is gone. We also recommend that all be done to "explain" to reddit, radical feminist censorship will not be "profitable".
Conclusion
These women were feminists before they found a man. See how that works?
I say kudos to this girl for not being afraid to express the truth about her revelation. And maybe, just maybe… a mutually respectful and selfless relationship doesn’t have to be synonymous with oppression from the patriarchy, ladies.
In other words, it's life with a cat or an exciting life with a man.
Was watching cbc power and politics, sept. 10 2014, 6.00
pm., sure enough they could not resist the NFL story about domestic abuse. And
where did the NDP representative(ian capstick) go, looking for the woman vote, directly to, we
live in a rape culture...Excuse me????
He said; “we live in a society where women can’t wear
what they want, put as much make up, and walk down the street without been
raped or look behind their shoulder...In what world does this fool live in???
Coming from the NDP, this is not surprising since it’s
infested with radical feminists.
Now, to “inform” this mangina, we do not live in a rape
culture, women can wear what they want, paint their faces the way they want and
walk down the street in safety...and if anyone tries to rape them we will take
care of this individual, instantly.
BUT, there is, male and female individuals who have evil
intent on other humans, it has been with us since the dawn of time, and most
probably will always be around, unfortunately. The thing is, to be aware of
this and to fight it. This
under any circumstances does not define the strong majority of men and women,
moms and dads, brothers and sisters, husbands and wives as rapists as this “mangina”
was insinuating.
If a man looks at a woman who looks so fine, and does it
with respect, it’s not stare rape and I’m sure women will appreciate the “compliment”.
Why else would they dress fine?
The idea that the NDP spokesman would accuse all men of
been rapists, and that is exactly what he did, is disgusting and repulsive, not
only that but it make all women victims. Looking for votes with the wrong
message will put this leftist party back where it belongs, in the third row
after the next election.
Since the advent of the internet and especially recently
with the birth of the mrm, women against feminism, we now have clear information on what and who is
raping whom, and some female individuals have been doing it also, more than
ever, yet, this person from the NDP preferred to blame men only. So, with the
increase of female teachers having sex with under-age male students,
... should we
instruct our sons to not dress manly and look above their shoulder every time
they go to school and are thought by female teachers, or is it that according
to feminists and manginas, boys don’t matter???
Again, we do not live in a rape culture, it does not
exist, the act of the individuals on the innocent does not reflect on our society,
especially the honor of real men, or women. It does on the other hand; reflect
on the elitists who use this bullshit of a non-existent rape culture, to advance
their positions, at the expense of truth.
We will never be better than we are if we keep on
listening to idiots who thrive on demonizing a whole section of our society, in
this case men.
Politics and power has switched from honesty to division,
they seem to believe as long as they pit one against the other, they will
achieve power, they are so behind the times that they
forgot who votes and who really hold power, not them, but us.
As for the NDP, I hope they like their third party position after the next election, because no sane "man" would vote for those who considers all men, rapists...This is a feminist and mangina party, without an understanding of the realities we all live with...
ST. LOUIS (AP) – Eighteen black women who were told decades ago that
their babies had died soon after birth at a St. Louis hospital now
wonder if the infants were taken away by hospital officials to be raised
by other families.
The suspicions arose from the story of Zella Jackson Price,
who said she was 26 in 1965 when she gave birth at Homer G. Phillips
Hospital in St. Louis. Hours later, she was told that her daughter had
died, but she never saw a body or a death certificate.
No one is sure who was responsible, but Price’s daughter ended up in
foster care, only to resurface almost 50 years later. Melanie Gilmore,
who now lives in Eugene, Oregon, has said that her foster parents always
told her she was given up by her birth mother.
Price’s attorney, Albert Watkins, is asking city and state officials
to investigate. In a letter to Gov. Jay Nixon and St. Louis Mayor
Francis Slay, Watkins said he suspects the hospital coordinated a scheme
“to steal newborns of color for marketing in private adoption
transactions.”
Gilmore’s children tracked recently down her birth mother to mark
their mother’s 50th birthday. The search led them to the now 76-year-old Price, who lives in suburban St. Louis.
In March, an online video caused a sensation when it showed the
moment that Gilmore, who is deaf, learned through lip reading and sign
language that her birth mother had been found.
The two women reunited in April. DNA confirmed that they are mother and daughter.
“She looked like me,” said Price, a gospel singer who has five other
children. “She was so excited and full of joy. It was just beautiful.
I’ll never forget that,” she said of the reunion.
After the reunion, Watkins started getting calls from other women who
wondered if their babies, whom they were told had died, might have
instead been taken from them. Read the rest of the story here.
Is anyone surprised by all this?
Posted by Nubian Queen.
