Warning; We are not a politically correct site. Don't like us? Don't read.

Friday, July 31, 2015

The View Ladies Agree: Woman Slapped by Man in Viral Video Deserved it

My girl Woopie tells it like it is.


This guy explaind all this pretty well. Times have changed, be aware.
 Like the brother say's, it's 2015, it's not the way it use to be, men have been degraded by feminists as violent animals without separating the good from the bad, they call all men bad, and guess what, if you disrespect someone, eventually they will loose respect for you.
Hit a man in today's world, some will hit you back.
Be aware of some real life facts, men are stronger and if you think he won't hit you back because he's a man, well; you better hope your right.
Don't want to experience violence, don't be violent yourself.
And remember who got us to this point. FEMINISM
Posted by Nubian Queen.

Monday, July 27, 2015

I really hope this is a fake story, Woman sues employer after being refused paid maternity leave for adopting a puppy

 From CBC.
Statistics show that 80% of Canadian mothers take paid maternity leave after giving birth. Well, recently a case has surfaced in Ontario which will likely forever change the way Canadians perceive the concept of maternity leave. Thirty-one-year-old, Barrie, Ontario, resident Trish Lemierre is suing her employer after they refused to give her paid maternity leave after she adopted a six-week-old Bichon Frise puppy.

"I want my 40 weeks just like any other mother."
Trish Lamierre, puppy owner

"Taking care of a puppy is a full-time job and if I am not there for every moment in the first year of its life I have failed as a parent," says Lemierre.
When asked if she thought puppies and babies were different, Ms Lemierre responded: "Absolutely not! A puppy is a baby, a dog baby. I deserve the time to bond with my newborn too!"

Welcome to the new world order, lives don't really matter, but hey, this is important enough to be on the msm.
Posted by Nubian Queen.

Sunday, July 26, 2015

African-American community, SB277 vaccines, autism.

African-American community rages against SB277 and the Tuskegee-like crimes of mandatory vaccines that destroy black babies' lives
 by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor

(NaturalNews) The sleeping giant of the African-American community has awakened against the crimes of the vaccine profiteers and their relentless destruction of young black lives.

It's happening right now, and it touches my heart to see this community rising up and waking up to the life-destroying deceptions of the CDC and its pharmaceutical puppet masters that have dictated "public health policy" in America with wildly destructive consequences for the black community. An entire generation of black babies now suffers under the vaccine injury side effects that the CDC has known about but has willfully hidden from the world in order to protect vaccine profits, all while black children suffer from autism caused by vaccines!

In particular, CDC scientist Dr. William Thompson publicly confessed to taking part in an elaborate vaccine science fraud to cover up the links between vaccines and autism in young African-American males. This confession, reprinted in part below, was exhaustively censored by the pharma-controlled mainstream media, which actively conspired to keep the African-American community blind and ignorant to the truth of how the vaccine industry is destroying their babies for profit.

"I am a Senior Scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where I have worked since 1998," wrote Dr. Thompson in a now-famous public confession. "I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism."


More than profiting from destroying lives; Does the vaccine industry now echo the genocidal crimes of Tuskegee?

But there may be even more to it than profit, it turns out. In a courageous, inspirational speech recorded yesterday at a California rally against SB277, African-American minister Tony Muhammad drew a line in the sand against the corrupted vaccine industry and its genocidal agenda, saying, "Could this be a bill to destroy our boy babies? And I'm letting you know that the black community, we are not going to stand by and let another Tuskegee experiment happen again!"

Watch this stunning, inspirational speech by Tony Muhammad at this YouTube link.

In the speech, Tony Muhammad reveals that Minister Louis Farrakhan has also awakened to this issue, and a plan is being put in place to directly confront the CDC in Atlanta, to denounce the genocidal actions of the vaccine industry's destruction of black lives, and to hold black politicians in California who vote for SB277 accountable for their actions that are destroying black lives across the state and the nation. "[W]e will bring them up on charges of treason!" promises Muhammad.

Because if #BlackLivesMatter, then young black children need to be protected from the criminal racketeering of the destructive vaccine industry and its deadly chemicals that disproportionately harm young black babies.

Nation of Islam ministers show courage while everyday Christian pastors have already surrendered their flock to the destruction of Big Pharma

Hearing the courage and conviction in this man's voice, it makes me ashamed to realize that there seem to be no white preachers or ministers who dare take a stand against the criminal vaccine industry and its violation of our sacred bodies.

Somehow, nearly all the white churches (with a few notable exceptions) have become slaves to the twisted will of the fascist government and its corporate puppet masters. Only the African-American community, it seems, has enough spine to stand up and say, "You will STOP killing our babies in the name of false public health!"

Maybe that's because the black community remembers all too well how many times the government has violated their bodies, their civil rights, their parental rights and their human dignity over generations of punitive oppression by bad government, from the FBI to the DEA and now the CDC. Not only was the FBI directly involved in the threatening of Martin Luther King, Jr. and an attempt to convince him to commit suicide... and not only is the DEA shoring up its funding and power by throwing young black men in prison for possession of minor quantities of marijuana that white people get away with... now the CDC is pushing medical genocide against blacks while calling it "public health."


The cancer industry also preys upon black men and women in America by withholding information about vitamin D

Everything already mentioned here is on top of the cancer industry preying upon African-American men and women by denying them knowledge of how black people need more vitamin D than white people because of the relationship between sunlight, skin pigmentation and vitamin D creation. In fact, the entire medical system has long conspired against African-Americans to keep them blind to disease prevention facts while profiting from their suffering and disease.

Click here to see my video explaining all this,

Share this urgent message across the community

Share this message, friends! Share the videos, the articles and get ready to join the march against the CDC.

There's been many ties of vaccines to autism, some countries in europe are openly looking into it, even admitting there might be a problem, but in good ol'north america, people will bow to what the main stream media will tell them, "don't worry, be happy", even if the big pharmaceutical are profiteering at the expense of your kids.
Posted by Nubian Queen.

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Second Planned Parenthood Senior Executive Haggles Over Baby Parts Price...

If it's just a clump of cells as feminists claim...
Why are they selling baby parts???

Evil thrives where good people do nothing.
Posted by Nubian Queen

Monday, July 20, 2015

Feminists fake a photo (female vets) to advance their cause

From as feminist web site;

The women pictured above are not veterans who suffered losses of limbs to combat injuries. According to a February 2015 article from Globo.com, the photograph shows a group of Brazilian women who gathered together for a calendar photo shoot in order to raise money for amputees who cannot afford prosthetic limbs.

Wouldn't it been better to be honest about these Brazilian woman doing a photo shoot for a good cause instead of lying about it?
Here is an actual (and amazing) female veteran: Congresswoman Tammy Duckworth

Feminism; how can we believe anything they say?
If they really respected female vets, they wouldn't have to lie about it now would they.
Posted by Nubian Queen.

Saturday, July 18, 2015


It's time the "educated" Black woman understand that unless you went to Wife School, getting an education does not make you certified wife material. I watched one of the videos centered around some educated Black women as they professed that they have done everything right but are still single. Looking through feminists binoculars they have done everything right, but in REALITY...umm most likely not. They went on to say that the reason they are not married is because there are simply more Black women than Black men in America and that they really didn't want to interracial date. Well if this is the case, what is stopping the "educated" Black woman, that has moved in the middle class if not higher from traveling abroad? There are Black men all over the world so how is it that their only excuses are that too many Black men are in jail and that we outnumber them?? Do we ever stop to think that we are not being 'wifed' because we are lacking the qualities of one. During this video, I didn't hear one woman mention any feminine qualities of being a woman or wife, such as, how they would love to have warm home-cooked meals prepared for their families or that they wanted a man to lead them, etc.
Too many Black women get an education and want to wear the pants. When we do get in a relationship, we switch from an independent mindset to a mindset of wanting to control the relationship. Getting a degree does not put us above men. It certainly won't guaranteed us to get one because masculine men DO NOT need a provider...they need a wife, a nurturer, a lover, a helpmeet, someone that will turn their house into a home, someone that will respect their leadership. ...Not a woman that he has to constantly combat for the masculine position. Know your role, play your position, or you won't have one.

And before someone says it...no, we are not against education for women, we are educated.
-Virtuous woman

We all have a natural road to follow, if we chose to go the wrong way, it's our own choices, and we have no right to complain.
Nubian Queen

Thursday, July 16, 2015

Taxpayers Spend $3.5 Million to Find Out Why Lesbians Are Fat

A U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) study to understand why lesbians are fat has now cost taxpayers over $3.5 million to-date.
The study, “Sexual Orientation and Obesity: A Test of a Gendered Biopsychosocial Model,” seeks to determine why there is a disparity in the obesity rates between straight women and lesbian women and straight men and gay men.
According to the study, “It is now well-established that women of minority sexual orientation are disproportionately affected by the obesity epidemic, with nearly three-quarters of adult lesbians overweight or obese, compared to half of heterosexual women. In stark contrast, among men, heterosexual males have nearly double the risk of obesity compared to gay males.”
Apparently, “these disparities are of high public-health significance,” therefore, the National Institutes of Health has been continuously funding the project.
Since CNSNews.com first discovered the government’s funding of the study in 2013, the cost to taxpayers has increased from approximately $1.5 million to over $3.5 million.
A website with information pertaining to the project claims the study will continue until June 30, 2016.

Now you know what your funding with your hard earned money.
Nubian Queen.

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

Planned Parenthood caught Selling Baby Parts

Be advise, this is pretty sick, a conversation about killing babies and selling baby parts, all the time eating lunch, cold hearted or what?

In this video at the beginning this radical feminist and every feminist in between, claims it's just a clump of cells,then attacks everyone who doesn't agree with her.

Got a question y'all,
If it's just a clump of cells how come planned parenthood is selling baby body parts for profit???
If you want to know what evil is, those who have no respect for life then try to profit from it is probably as close as one can come.

They're talking about babies, children, as if it's a profit margin, that's what so sick about all this.
Human life is not a clump of cells, it's a human being.
Nubian Queen.

Feminism and the Black Woman

Feminist support all this Gender confusion since some of their founders were White Lesbians. Feminist will support the Unisexualization of Genders because they follow lesbian Consciousness that promotes rejecting Men and becoming "Men."
We have Black Feminist who have no clue what Political Lesbianism is, and even feel the Sex Revolution of Feminist improved the Status of Women. We see even Black Feminist joining the Slut Walks with Breasts out to protest Why men can wear no shirt, and Women can't! Now you tell me you want Men to respect you, you don't want to be exploited? By following the ideology of the Feminist Movement you Exploit yourself, and contribute to the Destruction of the Natural Black Family Unit!
Posted by Nubian Queen

Sunday, July 12, 2015

So you say you dont need a man?

For you to say that you don't need a man shows just how unbalanced you, your homes and your relationships are. You're so brainwashed that you don't even see it. You NEED him to make your families compete. You NEED him to lead the family. You NEED him to be the protector of the family and the home. You NEED that masculine energy to balance your feminine energy. Only women who seek to suppress their feminine energy and those who have been brainwashed by feminism believe that equilibrium in the home and family can be accomplished without the presence of a man. I can already hear the naysayers spouting their ignorance, "I don't need a man...". Blah, blah, blah...Tell it to someone who believes you.
Stop trying to be the man in the relationship. You haven't even mastered being the woman yet.
Originaly from BWAF
Posted by Nubian Queen.

Saturday, July 11, 2015

Nigerian bishops: Refuse to bow to the ‘dangerous influence’ of Western LGBT imperialism

The Nigerian Catholic Bishops Conference has made a forthright defense of the institution of marriage, following the U.S. Supreme Court decision redefining the institution and an Irish popular referendum ushering the new definition of marriage into the Emerald Isle.
"The Catholic Bishops Conference of Nigeria would like to once again reiterate the perspective of the Church on more recent developments concerning the sanctity and dignity of human life and the institutions of marriage and the family all across the world," reads the statement signed by Archbishop Ignatius Kaigama of Jos, president of the Nigerian Bishop’s Conference, and Conference Secretary Bishop William Avenya of Gboko.
The Nigerian bishops write in the statement, released on Wednesday, that the intensifying homosexual political pressure "will tend to provoke a notable and rapid shift in public opinion about the nature and meaning of marriage and family as it has been known for millennia," which has in turn has resulted in legislative and judicial maneuvers to redefine marriage.
"We wish to state that this is a sad, unjust and lamentable situation based largely upon a distorted perception of natural law, the will of God and human nature," the bishops say.
The bishops note that many of the world's leading economies – including Canada, France, the United Kingdom, Ireland and now the United States of America – have gone down the path of legalizing same-sex "marriage". That worries them that these nations will exert economic and cultural pressure on traditional societies' “morality and values.”
The bishops expressed concern at "the persistent and continuous propagation and globalization of the homosexual lifestyle and the effort to redefine marriage which is a distorted view of human sexuality, coming especially from the Western world.”
The bishops call on Nigerian legislators to wary of accepting these Western trends, for the sake of families, because "endorsing homosexual unions or 'same-sex marriage' will be devastating and detrimental to our nation of Nigeria, as it will lead to the inevitable deconstruction of the family and the society at large, with other serious but negative implications."
Furthermore, they appeal to those involved in media, music, entertainment, teaching, medicine, marketing and business "to become faithful gatekeepers by protecting the public from the infiltration of this propaganda, which is often spread through various media and forums."
Finally, they appeal to parents to teach their children "the immutable meaning of marriage so as to strengthen them to stand fearless by the indelible truth in a rapidly changing world," and to young people to hold firmly to the "sound religious and cultural values that celebrate the beauty and blessings of marriage as the lifelong union between one man and one woman."
"We hereby re-emphasize," the Nigerian bishops conclude, "that marriage is the sacred union of one man and one woman for the begetting and care of children. It forms the core of the family, which is the bedrock and foundational cell of our civilization and as such judges to shun all pressures and protect all Nigerians from the growing but dangerous influence of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender propaganda."
The Catholic bishops of Nigeria have repeatedly and unequivocally expressed their support for the protection of life, real marriage, family, and human dignity, and denounced the attempts by Western countries to impose the culture of death on Nigeria.
“The right to life is the first of all fundamental human rights,” the bishops stated in a document published at the end of the Plenary Assembly held in February 2013, under the theme of "Faith and Dignity of the Human Being."
A communiqué issued last year following an international pro-life march and conference organized by the Catholic Bishops of Nigeria held in Abuja called for the Church to be “more courageous and consistent in pro-life activities in favor of human life, marriage and the family as counter-cultural antidotes to anti-life ideologies and practices.”
The Catholic bishops of Nigeria's Ibadan Ecclesiastical Province said in a statement at the beginning of their International Pro-life and Pro-family Conference held at the University of Ibadan in April that "the adoption or promotion of same-sex unions undermines the right to life, right to freedom of conscience, religious liberty, respect for moral and cultural values.”
"It also harms the innocence of children, degrades marriage and family life and destabilizes society, now and in the future," the Ibadan bishops stated.
The full text of the July 8th statement on the stand of the Catholic Bishops Conference of Nigeria on Marriage, Family and Human Society is available here.
 God bless Nigeria!

In order to fully control the population, an entity must destroy it's opposition, in this case Christianity.
Ir's not our place to judge those who want to live outside God's way, they have the perfect right to do so, but, so do those who oppose such lifestyle without been attacked for their beliefs.
The continuance of life depends on the union of a man and a woman, even the gay community depends on it. One must ask, Who is really behind the west's path to oblivion and how did such a small minority get so much power.
Romans 7:23.
We are at war with the most formidable foe imaginable. His mission is to destroy our faith in God.

What is strange is how furiously someone or something is targeting our children, especially in schools, any sane person would know this is wrong. Kids are not interested in sex or sex ed or alternative lifestyle, as parents we all know this, they are born and until a certain age their innocence show no signs of racism or hate of any kind, going against this, drives them at an early age towards an unhealthy path, there are many things in this world that only adults can handle, and must be kept away from the innocent.
Teach someone so young about these differences and you create division. Children get along with everyone, it's only when adults outside the family inject themselves where they don't belong, that

partition flourishes.
Posted by Nubian Queen.

Friday, July 10, 2015

Ellen pao, aka; chairmai pao, is kicked out of reddit.

Pao who is known as a radical feminist has been kicked out of Reddit, her effort to curb free speech at the popular web site provoked a revolt, causing Reddit to loose a massive amount of users and support, including this site.
This goes to show feminism and their radical views does not work and their support is so small that anyone adopting this mantle is doomed to fail.
She can claim all she wants that it was mutual or that she resigned, but the real story is that she tried to impose her personal views, users did not accept her way of looking at thing, her lack of understanding what free speech really means and with a concerted effort and revolt, she was kicked out.
Good riddance...

What happens when you throw moral values out the window? and let the state educate your kids?

First of all, as we seen with fascism and communism, your kids are the target....
MSNBC: We Have to Break Through This Idea 'That Kids Belong to Their Parents'

Then this sh*t.
That was FAST: Yesterday it was gay marriage; Now look who wants “equal rights”
Using the same tactics used by “gay” rights activists, pedophiles have begun to seek similar status arguing their desire for children is a sexual orientation no different than heterosexual or homosexuals.

Earlier this year two psychologists in Canada declared that pedophilia is a sexual orientation just like homosexuality or heterosexuality.

Van Gijseghem, psychologist and retired professor of the University of Montreal, told members of Parliament, “Pedophiles are not simply people who commit a small offense from time to time but rather are grappling with what is equivalent to a sexual orientation just like another individual may be grappling with heterosexuality or even homosexuality.”

He went on to say, “True pedophiles have an exclusive preference for children, which is the same as having a sexual orientation. You cannot change this person’s sexual orientation. He may, however, remain abstinent.”

When asked if he should be comparing pedophiles to homosexuals, Van Gijseghem replied, “If, for instance, you were living in a society where heterosexuality is proscribed or prohibited and you were told that you had to get therapy to change your sexual orientation, you would probably say that that is slightly crazy. In other words, you would not accept that at all. I use this analogy to say that, yes indeed, pedophiles do not change their sexual orientation.”

Dr. Quinsey, professor emeritus of psychology at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario, agreed with Van Gijseghem. Quinsey said pedophiles’ sexual interests prefer children and, “There is no evidence that this sort of preference can be changed through treatment or through anything else.”
This is just f*cked up...

Here we go...again. 
When parents are taken out of the equation and the state takes over the education of kids, things always go very bad...
"Give me a child when he's 7 and he's mine forever," to underscore the need for early childhood education.
“The third reich will take youth and give to youth its own education and its own upbringing.”

Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted."
Vladimir Lenin

In China, when Mao was Chairman, parents were terrified to tell their children anything that differed from the government line in case the children repeated it and endangered the whole family.
Jung Chang

In North Korea, students are taught from a very young age to abide by the system of government.

As for Canada and it's education system...(what's the difference between those up there and this cr*p...)
For a century, from the 1880s until the mid-1980s, the government of Canada maintained a system of boarding schools for Native children that were operated by churches, including the Anglican and Presbyterian churches, the United Church of Canada, and the Roman Catholic Church. The schools’ ostensible purpose was to provide education for Native children. But that education served a larger purpose, one that can only be termed genocidal: to eliminate indigenous culture from Canada. “The problem with the Indians is one of morality and religion,” said the Reverend A. E. Caldwell of his school in 1938. “They lack the basic fundamentals of civilized thought and spirit, which explains their childlike nature and behavior. At our school we strive to turn them into mature Christians who will learn how to behave in the world and surrender their barbaric way of life and their treaty rights, which keep them trapped on their land and in a primitive existence. Only then will the Indian problem in our country be solved.”

Throughout history, we have seen many system try to take responsibility for kids moral values, by-passing parents and families as if they where the problem, in fact, the main problem of a failing state is it's lack of faith in parental guidance towards their own children.
It eventually ends up, as we see now, name calling, if mom or dad doesn't agree with such a radical reverse of moral thoughts and values.
Homophobes, racist, and many other name calling scares the population into silence, this is a very bad thing because instead of debates and understanding, people that are forced to keep their viable opinions to themselves, develop a dislike or even hatred for those who force them to accept what they see as the UN-acceptable.
This type of policy of shaming dissenting opinions does not advance freedoms and democracy, on the contrary, it develops a us against them attitude.
Moral values is not about condemning some specific group, what it truly does is offer a balance through discussion, to prevent such disturbing trends inside our so called system of fairness, like the ones above.
This isn't the first time we pointed out pedophiles and their supporters inside the system, calling it inter-generational love, they are there, and as we see lately, the more they talk about it the more people become desensitized to it...
I don't know about the rest of you, but we at TNC will NEVER be desensitized to pedophilia, it's disgusting and perverse.
Take it from us, any society which forgoes it's moral responsibilities towards their children to others, as already failed themselves and guarantied it's fall... it is..inevitable.
Would you want to put your life on the line to protect such a system?
Not likely...
The balance in life is between the people and the state, both have a responsibility to listen to each other to achieve a semblance of morality.
Many times we have pointed out the imbalance where we live, anti-male propaganda, male hatred coming from local feminists, demonizing fathers to children in hidden agendas inside the local women`s shelter, even attacking stay at home moms...
"When a woman lives with a man, she abuses her kids"...(told to us by a single mother who took her kids out of a program run by the local shelter)
Men achieve power through rape
Men buy beer and beat their wives during sporting events.
It takes hateful idiots to promote such garbage, but the worse is those who still side with such hate and believe they are making a difference, as for the males, they can be basically called, "manginas", since they obviously believe they are rapists.

As for the gay community, if you don`t start fighting against pedophiles who claim the same right as you, you will be tagged with them...
Many gay families just want to be left in peace to raise their families, they do not side with radicals who try hard to include kids into their perverse way of imposing their will on others...(see comment below picture)
It`s all a matter of balance, which seems to be thrown out the window lately, if we don`t speak up because we are afraid to be called names, aren't promoting what we do not agree with?
In order to understand, we have to openly talk about our disagreements without been afraid to be called names, because as we said, if people are prevented from expressing themselves, ask question, if they keep it to themselves it will fester into something worse.
In order to understand one another we have to talk to each other, find the balance, and especially the limitations, so not to open the door to the perverse, who will use it to divide and sneak their ways into our lives.
And that is exactly what the pedoes are doing, using the lgbt community to advance their perversion on our kids...

It's time for women to yell out to that radical man hating feminist..
For men to take action against any idiot who claims...
and for the gay community to get angry and fight back when pedophiles and their supporters claim they have the same right..
We have to fight for balance, we just can't hope it is given to us by some state or wish it comes by itself...
If we don't, this system will not survive and will get worse as time goes by.
It`s not us vs them anymore, it`s us or them...

Thursday, July 9, 2015

The fall of the western world...brainwashing kids into perverted behaviour.

Cyrus recently slammed Christian conservatives for believing in "fairy tales" like the story of Noah's ark and argued that those who hold to a traditional definition of marriage should not be permitted to make laws within the United States.

In a recent interview with Paper magazine, Cyrus, who appears nude within the publication, refers to herself as the "least judgmental person ever." (Least judgmental? See what she says about her own parents below)

However, the magazine notes that while she was raised in a Christian home and was baptized in a Southern Baptist church, the "Wrecking Ball" singer "maintains a particular contempt for fundamentalist lawmakers who rally against this sort of progressive, potentially life-saving changes [for the LGBT] community."

"Those people [shouldn't] get to make our laws," Cyrus said of Christians who hold to a traditional view of marriage.

The former Disney Channel star also criticized her parent's political views, calling them  "conservative-ass mother--kers." (there is her respect for her own parents)

Less than a decade ago, Cyrus was considered a role model for young girls. As a teen, the "Hannah Montana" star refused to dress immodestly, telling People Magazine, "I like to look kind of like what girls would want to look up to, and their moms and dads will say, 'Hey, that's cool. That's different.' " She also wore a purity ring, signaling her commitment to practice abstinence until marriage

Sadly, like Katy Perry, who famously traded her career as a Gospel singer for that of a secular popstar, Cyrus has since rejected her faith in exchange for fame.
read whole story here.
In the ol'days we would relate this crap to selling one's soul for fame, but today it is accepted as feminists empowerment....whatever one believes, this is just decadence, the beginnings of the fall of a society.

Billy Ray Cyrus Regrets Bringing Miley to Hollywood

How does someone go from Anna Montana to this slutty sh*t.,..
What a f*cking great example for young girls, what's worse, parents that bring their girls to see this douche bags behavior and pass it off as normal.
Don't complain when your daughter behave badly....
And I'm out of touch???

By no means are we promoting religion or hiding one's personality, be who you want to be, but if you want respect, it has to be earned, dressing like, promoting and behaving like a slut, will attract the wrong people, and guess what, of course most people are good but you have to accept, there are bad people in the world.

Freedoms goes hand in hand with some degree of morality, without it, there is one destructive aspect that creeps in, decadence. And when it gets to that point, society is irreversibly corrupt and will eventually fall.  It is..inevitable.
Who wants to work hard, or fight and die to protect such a society? The numbers of those who would sacrifice for such debauchery diminish and eventually such a society is taken over by another,
i.e.; fascism, communism, totalitarianism, imperialism, or whatever.
Any nation who looses it morality and it's self respect is no longer a viable entity, history clearly shows this, it's all there to see....
Yet with all this evidence, we as a species still end up destroying ourselves, having to start all over again...Question is, how long will life permit humanity to continue...
We are already starting to become sterile and the population is reversing not increasing...
Just look at how much money and technology is been put into artificially producing the next generation....we never had that problem before.
In closing do you really think the cyrus and perry's of this world really believe in what they spew out of their mouth, not likely, it's all about the...money, greed and power. They are to stupid to see they are the tools in a greater scheme, and that is the control of the minds of our kids...
What the end game is, your guess is as good as mine, because none of this makes any f*cking sense.
But I do know this, it's all at the expense of our kids and the next generation.
You want to save the world, get rid of pollution, corruption, greed, and everything else that make our surroundings a lost cause, it all starts with the way families raise their kids.

Wednesday, July 8, 2015

Is there a Possible military coup in Greece's near future?

If Moscow-based independent investigative journalist John Helmer is right, Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras is a marked man and SYRIZA governance on thin ice showing cracks:
 ”(a) putsch in Athens to save allied Greece from enemy Russia is in preparation by the US and Germany, with backing from the non-taxpayers of Greece  - the Greek oligarchs, Anglo-Greek shipowners, and the Greek Church.”
“At the highest and lowest level of Greek government, and from Thessaloniki to Milvorni, all Greeks understand what is happening. (Sunday) they voted overwhelmingly to resist.”
“According to a high political figure in Athens, a 40-year veteran, ‘what is actually happening is a slow process of regime change.’ “
Wherever neocon Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland shows up (Hillary Clinton’s handpicked choice for the job), trouble usually follows.
Helmer says she’s “in charge of warmaking in Europe.” Her notorious involvement in Ukraine’s February 2014 coup is well documented.
According to Helmer, she gave Tsipras two ultimatums in Athens last March – surrender to Troika demands and remain allied with US-dominated NATO’s anti Russian agenda.”
Her spokeman Mark Toner said Washington is “focused on, frankly, the opposite (of Sunday’s referendum), which is finding a path forward that allows Greece to continue to make reforms (more austerity), return to growth (by letting Troika bandits rape its economy and population), and remain in the Eurozone.”
Since the 19th century, Greece had five military coups or attempted ones. Junta dictatorship ruled from 1967 – 1974. Another one can’t be ruled out.
Over five dozen former high-ranking military officials fired a shot across the bow declaring their “oath to the Fatherland and the Flag. By choosing isolation, we place the Fatherland and its future in danger,” they warned.
They publicly called for a “yes” vote ahead of Sunday’s referendum. Will not getting it mobilize them along with other Greek dark forces, Washington and Brussels to oust Tsipras forcibly or otherwise?
Grexit “will make our country weaker,” they claimed – even though Greeks weren’t asked about it and most oppose the idea. “We will lose allies that have stood by our side. We will lose the strength we gain from associations and groupings to which we belong historically and culturally,” the former military officials said.
Ties to Washington and Brussels run counter to what best serves long-suffering Greeks.
Will conditions be made worse than ever by greater austerity if coup rumblings become reality? Is this US/Eurogroup’s Plan B?
Helmer cited political sources in Athens saying Tsipras and other SYRIZA officials acted preemptively to prevent one – replacing military and intelligence leadership with their own “but not radically.”
Moscow remains skeptical about Tsipras withstanding Washington/Brussels pressure – especially given dominant Germany’s hardline position.
He faces enormous pressure. His six months in office shows he promises Greeks one thing and does another.
He agreed to nearly all Troika demands. Not good enough. They want total surrender. Germany’s Merkel and France’s Hollande told him to capitulate fully for further bailout aid.
Greek banks remain closed. They’re close to collapse. The ECB raised the amount of collateral they must post for further emergency loans.
Does Finance Minister Varoufakis’ resignation signal Tsipras’ capitulation to follow – negating popular opposition to austerity he pledged to support?
Hollande spoke for himself and Merkel saying Tsipras must “offer serious, credible proposals” for bailout help – code language for demanding unconditional surrender, a Greek Versailles.
He and new Finance Minister Euclid Tsakalotos are heading to Brussels for further talks. Hardline Troika officials intend cutting them no slack.
Will Tsipras cave to their demands and betray millions of Greeks in the process? Given his record so far in office, it’s hard imagining otherwise. Hopefully he’ll surprise but don’t bet on it.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net
Originalstory by Global research
The Greek Prime Minister has shown he has the support of the people, especially with the overwhelming victory of the referendum. If NATO decides to promote a coup as in the Ukraine example, it will show they do not have respect for democracy and the free vote...
That in itself could be extremely dangerous and cause a domino effect in many parts of Europe, namely Italy, Spain, Portugal, so on...
We might not agree with Greece's path, but true democracy demands we respect the choices people make, especially when it come to freedoms, if not, the system we have now has run it's course and we can only sit back and see what's next.

How absentee fathers are affecting our kids

 Daddy doesn't live here anymore
Most of the parents who read my newsletter are strong advocates of Child-Centered Divorce. That means they put the emotional and psychological needs of their children first when making any decisions regarding divorce and parenting. This puts both mothers and fathers on the same side when it comes to their children — as guardians, protectors and parents — not adversaries.
Sadly, not all parents divorce with a focus on compatibility in parenting following the divorce. The stories, like your own, vary widely, but the outcomes are painful for everyone in the family.
Statistics regarding the number of children who are experiencing the consequences of divorce, living life without access to their biological fathers or having infrequent interactions with their fathers are alarming. I'm sharing some of them below not to point fingers, judge or blame. Instead, I want to bring heightened awareness about this to families around the world encouraging parents to do everything possible to avoid falling into this sad reality.

Surveys show concern about this growing problem. According to stats found in an article at www.dads-daughters.com, 72.2 % of the U.S. population believes absentee fathers to be the most significant social problem facing America. That's easy to understand when you look behind the numbers and think about the families that have been impacted.
1. An estimated 24.7 million children (36.3%) live absent from their biological father.
2. There are almost 17 million children (25%) living with their single mothers.
3. Today nearly 4 out of 10 first marriages end in divorce, 60% of divorcing couples have children, and over one million children each year experience the divorce of their parents.
4. One out of every six children is a stepchild.
5. 26% of absentee fathers live in a different state than their children.
6. About 40% of the children who live in absentee father households haven't seen their fathers in at least a year while 50% of children who don't live with their fathers have never stepped foot in their father's home.
7. Children who live absent from their biological fathers, on average, are more likely to be poor... experience educational, health, emotional and psychological problems ... be victims of child abuse ... and engage in criminal behavior than their peers who live with their married, biological mother and father.
8. 57.7 percent of all black children, 31.8 percent of all Hispanic children, and 20.9 percent of all white children are living in single-parent homes.

Of course, there's a big difference between fathering a child and being a "father." Children need the influence of a loving, protective and responsible father in their lives. But if that father isn't stepping up to his position, he may be doing more damage than by being absent.
That brings us back to the advantages of maintaining a child-centered divorce. The more we can encourage Mom and Dad to co-parent with care and compassion following a divorce, the better the outcome for everyone in the family. I know this isn't a simple challenge. Not everyone has the maturity and emotional stability to step up to the plate, put differences aside, and parent your children together because you love them unconditionally. But if you can and do – more power to you. You won't regret it!
"Of course, there's a big difference between fathering a child and being a "father." Children need the influence of a loving, protective and responsible father in their lives."
Of course there's a big difference between mothering a child and being a "mother." Children need the influence of a loving, protective and responsible mother in their lives."
This is from personal experience since I raised my daughter on my own...
And let me say this from personal experience...
For some reason, a man will accept another man's children and raise them as their own more easily than women will.
I experienced this behavior for myself, and that's why I stayed single while raising my daughter. I didn't want her to be hurt.

TNC does not condemn all women for the behavior of some.

Tuesday, July 7, 2015

New Survey Reveals Bad News For The Mainstream Media

 If you’re ever surfing the web or watching the news and wondering if you’re the only one who can’t take MSM seriously, you’re not alone.
According to the 2015 State of the First Amendment survey, only 24 percent of Americans believe that "overall, the news media tries to report the news without bias.” A big, fat 70 percent disagreed with that statement.
And I’m just over here laughing. Publications like the New York Times and news networks like CNN pride themselves on their so-called unbiased reporting.
Honestly, these liberal publications and stations wouldn’t be able to survive if they didn’t pretend that they were on the straight and narrow. Faking objectivity is the only way they can maintain viewership.
Maybe part of this has to do with professional lying journalist, Brian Williams. Or maybe CNN’s whole “black hole” Malaysian plane theory threw everyone off.  Or maybe people are getting sick of the NY Times bombshell hit pieces on Marco Rubio. (First traffic violations, then his boat, and now they tell us that ”ordinary Cubans don’t like him. How could he EVER be president without the approval of the Castros?!)
A flurry of headlines in recent months about the journalistic sins of high-profile media personalities – Brian Williams, who was demoted at NBC for lying; and ABC's George Stephanopoulos, a former aide to then-President Bill Clinton whose contribution to the Clinton Foundation came to light recently -- may have negatively influenced respondents' feelings about the news media, the study said.
 Older audiences are more likely to buy into the media's mantle of objectivity, with 26% of those 50 or older agreeing with the claim. Only 7% of 18-29 year olds agree. Democrats (36%) are much more likely to believe in the news media try to report without bias as opposed to Republicans (19%).
The survey had some additional interesting results. (And by interesting I mean disturbing.) Apparently, 19 percent of Americans believe the First Amendment goes too far. Believe it or not, that percentage has significantly dropped since last year. (It was 38 percent.)
"Once again there is a falloff in the number of those who say the First Amendment goes too far when we move away from a terrorist attack," says Gene Policinski, chief operating officer of the Newseum Institute, one of the authors of the study. "We ought to be very vigilant when these attacks occur" and not hastily pass laws that limit freedoms. "The law are permanent, the emotions that surround these events are not."
Oh, and it gets worse.
The survey found that one-third of Americans can’t name any rights guaranteed in the First Amendment. Not one.
And those are probably the same people who voted for Obama.  
On the bright side, at least 70 percent of Americans know that MSM's filled with professional liars. So there’s that. Not all hope is lost. 

I guaranty this is not only in America, over here, up north it's even worse, so much so, most don't even watch national news, personally, I rather get it online, make up my own mind.  
And when you try to point it out in their comment section, well some of them go ape sh*t.
Cbc been the worse, but ctv, global, tvo, they are all in on it, even trying to sway voters the way they see who we should vote for...
New form of democracy or just an evolution of what has always been there?

Oh! The irony...What Happens When a Feminist’s Son is Accused of Rape?

I am a feminist. I have marched at the barricades, subscribed to Ms. magazine, and knocked on many a door in support of progressive candidates committed to women’s rights. Until a month ago, I would have expressed unqualified support for Title IX and for the Violence Against Women Act.
But that was before my son, a senior at a small liberal-arts college in New England, was charged—by an ex-girlfriend—with alleged acts of “nonconsensual sex” that supposedly occurred during the course of their relationship a few years earlier.
What followed was a nightmare—a fall through Alice’s looking-glass into a world that I could not possibly have believed existed, least of all behind the ivy-covered walls thought to protect an ostensible dedication to enlightenment and intellectual betterment.
It began with a text of desperation. “CALL ME. URGENT. NOW.”
That was how my son informed me that not only had charges been brought against him but that he was ordered to appear to answer these allegations in a matter of days. There was no preliminary inquiry on the part of anyone at the school into these accusations about behavior alleged to have taken place a few years earlier, no consideration of the possibility that jealousy or revenge might be motivating a spurned young ex-lover to lash out. Worst of all, my son would not be afforded a presumption of innocence.
In fact, Title IX, that so-called guarantor of equality between the sexes on college campuses, and as applied by a recent directive from the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights, has obliterated the presumption of innocence that is so foundational to our traditions of justice. On today’s college campuses, neither “beyond a reasonable doubt,” nor even the lesser “by clear and convincing evidence” standard of proof is required to establish guilt of sexual misconduct.
These safeguards of due process have, by order of the federal government, been replaced by what is known as “a preponderance of the evidence.” What this means, in plain English, is that all my son’s accuser needed to establish before a campus tribunal is that the allegations were “more likely than not” to have occurred by a margin of proof that can be as slim as 50.1% to 49.9%.
How does this campus tribunal proceed to evaluate the accusations? Upon what evidence is it able to make a judgment?
The frightening answer is that like the proverbial 800-pound gorilla, the tribunal does pretty much whatever it wants, showing scant regard for fundamental fairness, due process of law, and the well-established rules and procedures that have evolved under the Constitution for citizens’ protection. Who knew that American college students are required to surrender the Bill of Rights at the campus gates?
My son was given written notice of the charges against him, in the form of a letter from the campus Title IX officer. But instead of affording him the right to be fully informed, the separately listed allegations were a barrage of vague statements, rendering any defense virtually impossible. The letter lacked even the most basic information about the acts alleged to have happened years before. Nor were the allegations supported by any evidence other than the word of the ex-girlfriend.
The hearing itself was a two-hour ordeal of unabated grilling by the school’s committee, during which, my son later reported, he was expressly denied his request to be represented by counsel or even to have an attorney outside the door of the room. The questioning, he said, ran far afield even from the vaguely stated allegations contained in the so-called notice. Questions from the distant past, even about unrelated matters, were flung at him with no opportunity for him to give thoughtful answers.
The many pages of written documentation that my son had put together—which were directly on point about his relationship with his accuser during the time period of his alleged wrongful conduct—were dismissed as somehow not relevant. What was relevant, however, according to the committee, was the unsworn testimony of “witnesses” deemed to have observable knowledge about the long-ago relationship between my son and his accuser.
That the recollections of these young people (made under intense peer pressure and with none of the safeguards consistent with fundamental fairness) were relevant—while records of the accuser’s email and social media postings were not—made a mockery of the very term. While my son was instructed by the committee not to “discuss this matter” with any potential witnesses, these witnesses against him were not identified to him, nor was he allowed to confront or question either them or his accuser.
Thankfully, I happen to be an attorney and had the resources to provide the necessary professional assistance to my son. The charges against him were ultimately dismissed but not before he and our family had to suffer through this ordeal. I am of course relieved and most grateful for this outcome. Yet I am also keenly aware not only of how easily this all could have gone the other way—with life-altering consequences—but how all too often it does.
Across the country and with increasing frequency, innocent victims of impossible-to-substantiate charges are afforded scant rights to fundamental fairness and find themselves entrapped in a widening web of this latest surge in political correctness. Few have a lawyer for a mother, and many may not know about the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, which assisted me in my research.
There are very real and horrifying instances of sexual misconduct and abuse on college campuses and elsewhere. That these offenses should be investigated and prosecuted where appropriate is not open to question. What does remain a question is how we can make the process fair for everyone.
I fear that in the current climate the goal of “women’s rights,” with the compliance of politically motivated government policy and the tacit complicity of college administrators, runs the risk of grounding our most cherished institutions in a veritable snake pit of injustice—not unlike the very injustices the movement itself has for so long sought to correct. Unbridled feminist orthodoxy is no more the answer than are attitudes and policies that victimize the victim.
By Judith Grossman
Women Against Feminism UK
We hear a lot from feminists that feminism is a perfect movement made by perfect women (feminists), who don’t hate men, who would never lie about domestic violence, the wage gap, patriarchy, the “rape culture,” etc. Lies. Lies. Lies.
This is what happens when a sacralized victim group gains power. These blind social justice warriors talk nonsense and hate common sense and logic. What’s about a good investigation?
The feminist Judith Grossman should be ashamed of herself. She was always oh-so aware of injustice except when it was done to others and when it was done by those on “her side.” 
It’s only when her son is attacked that she wakes up temporarily and sees what she and her comrades have wrought over the years.

Monday, July 6, 2015

A petition to remove chaiman Pao as Reddit CEO has added more than 100,000 signatures in 3 days

The petition was started earlier this year, but its signature count has skyrocketed over the weekend. It reads, in part:
After Pao lost her gender discrimination case against venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins she was appointed CEO of Reddit Inc and Reddit entered into a new age of censorship. A vast majority of the Reddit community believes that Pao, "a manipulative individual who will sue her way to the top", has overstepped her boundaries and fears that she will run Reddit into the ground. ... Action must be taken to prevent Reddit from being further run into the ground.
It now has more than 132,000 signatures total.
Read the rest. 

TNC has quit reddit because of chairman pao's radical feminist ideals of censorship and will not return until she is gone. 
We also recommend that all be done to "explain" to reddit, radical feminist censorship will not be "profitable".

Chuckles!!! Anti feminism at it's best.Loneliness with a cat or happiness with a man

Woman Gets Boyfriend, No Longer A Feminist
By: Laura Meyers

These women were feminists before they found a man. See how that works?

I say kudos to this girl for not being afraid to express the truth about her revelation. And maybe, just maybe… a mutually respectful and selfless relationship doesn’t have to be synonymous with oppression from the patriarchy, ladies.

In other words, it's life with a cat or an exciting life with a man.

Feminists who live with cats...
eron lee todd

Sunday, July 5, 2015

CBC; power and politics, NDP, rape culture, all men bad.

Was watching cbc power and politics, sept. 10 2014, 6.00 pm., sure enough they could not resist the NFL story about domestic abuse. And where did the NDP representative(ian capstick) go, looking for the woman vote, directly to, we live in a rape culture...Excuse me????
He said; “we live in a society where women can’t wear what they want, put as much make up, and walk down the street without been raped or look behind their shoulder...In what world does this fool live in???
Coming from the NDP, this is not surprising since it’s infested with radical feminists.
Now, to “inform” this mangina, we do not live in a rape culture, women can wear what they want, paint their faces the way they want and walk down the street in safety...and if anyone tries to rape them we will take care of this individual, instantly.
BUT, there is, male and female individuals who have evil intent on other humans, it has been with us since the dawn of time, and most probably will always be around, unfortunately. The thing is, to be aware of this and to fight it.  This under any circumstances does not define the strong majority of men and women, moms and dads, brothers and sisters, husbands and wives as rapists as this “mangina” was insinuating.
If a man looks at a woman who looks so fine, and does it with respect, it’s not stare rape and I’m sure women will appreciate the “compliment”. Why else would they dress fine?
The idea that the NDP spokesman would accuse all men of been rapists, and that is exactly what he did, is disgusting and repulsive, not only that but it make all women victims. Looking for votes with the wrong message will put this leftist party back where it belongs, in the third row after the next election.
Since the advent of the internet and especially recently with the birth of the mrm, women against feminism, we now have clear information on what and who is raping whom, and some female individuals have been doing it also, more than ever, yet, this person from the NDP preferred to blame men only. So, with the increase of female teachers having sex with under-age male students,
... should we instruct our sons to not dress manly and look above their shoulder every time they go to school and are thought by female teachers, or is it that according to feminists and manginas, boys don’t matter???
Again, we do not live in a rape culture, it does not exist, the act of the individuals on the innocent does not reflect on our society, especially the honor of real men, or women. It does on the other hand; reflect on the elitists who use this bullshit of a non-existent rape culture, to advance their positions, at the expense of truth.
We will never be better than we are if we keep on listening to idiots who thrive on demonizing a whole section of our society, in this case men.

Politics and power has switched from honesty to division, they seem to believe as long as they pit one against the other, they will achieve power, they are so behind the times that they forgot who votes and who really hold power, not them, but us.
As for the NDP, I hope they like their third party position after the next election, because no sane "man" would vote for those who considers all men, rapists...This is a feminist and mangina party, without an understanding of the realities we all live with...

Saturday, July 4, 2015

African American child theft; women suspect babies they were told died are actually still alive

ST. LOUIS (AP) – Eighteen black women who were told decades ago that their babies had died soon after birth at a St. Louis hospital now wonder if the infants were taken away by hospital officials to be raised by other families.
The suspicions arose from the story of Zella Jackson Price, who said she was 26 in 1965 when she gave birth at Homer G. Phillips Hospital in St. Louis. Hours later, she was told that her daughter had died, but she never saw a body or a death certificate.
No one is sure who was responsible, but Price’s daughter ended up in foster care, only to resurface almost 50 years later. Melanie Gilmore, who now lives in Eugene, Oregon, has said that her foster parents always told her she was given up by her birth mother.
Price’s attorney, Albert Watkins, is asking city and state officials to investigate. In a letter to Gov. Jay Nixon and St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay, Watkins said he suspects the hospital coordinated a scheme “to steal newborns of color for marketing in private adoption transactions.”
Gilmore’s children tracked recently down her birth mother to mark their mother’s 50th birthday. The search led them to the now 76-year-old Price, who lives in suburban St. Louis.
In March, an online video caused a sensation when it showed the moment that Gilmore, who is deaf, learned through lip reading and sign language that her birth mother had been found.
The two women reunited in April. DNA confirmed that they are mother and daughter.
“She looked like me,” said Price, a gospel singer who has five other children. “She was so excited and full of joy. It was just beautiful. I’ll never forget that,” she said of the reunion.
After the reunion, Watkins started getting calls from other women who wondered if their babies, whom they were told had died, might have instead been taken from them.
Read the rest of the story here. 

Is anyone surprised by all this?
Posted by Nubian Queen.

Friday, July 3, 2015

If A Conservative Interviewed Lena Dunham

It's official, she's an idiot and everyone is making fun of her.