Warning; We are not a politically correct site. Don't like us? Don't read.

Friday, July 11, 2014

The corrupt domestic violence "industry".

How feminists corrupt Domestic Violence research

Methods Used to Conceal and Distort Evidence on Symmetry in Partner Violence

Method 1. Suppress Evidence
Among researchers not committed to that ideology, many (including me and some of my colleagues) have withheld results showing gender symmetry to avoid becoming victims of vitriolic denunciations and ostracism (see Method 7 below). Thus, many researchers have published only the data on male perpetrators or female victims, deliberately omitting data on female perpetrators and male victims

Method 2.  Avoid Obtaining Data Inconsistent with the Patriarchal Dominance Theory
In survey research, this method of concealment asks female participants about attacks by their male partners and avoids asking them if they had hit their male partner.

Method 3. Cite Only Studies That Show Male Perpetration
I could list a large number of journal articles showing selective citation, but instead I will illustrate the process with official document examples to show that this method of concealment and distortion is institutionalized in publications of governments, the United Nations, and the World Health Organization.

Method 4. Conclude That Results Support Feminist Beliefs When They Do Not
The studies cited above, in addition to illustrating selective citation, there are also examples of the ability of ideological commitment to lead researchers to misinterpret the results of their own research.

Method 5. Create Evidence by Citation
The Kernsmith study, the World Health Organization report, and the pattern of selective citation show how ideology can be converted into what can be called “evidence by citation” or what Gelles (1980) calls the “woozle effect.” A woozle effect occurs when frequent citation of previous publications that lack evidence mislead us into thinking there is evidence.

Method 6. Obstruct Publication of Articles and Obstruct Funding Research That Might Contradict the Idea that Male Dominance Is the Cause of PV
I have documentation for only one case of publication being blocked, but I think this has often happened. The more frequent pattern is self-censorship by authors fearing that it will happen or that publication of such a study will undermine their reputation, and, in the case of graduate students, the ability to obtain a job.
 An example of denying funding to research that might contradict the idea that PV is a male-only crime is the call for proposals to investigate partner violence issued in December 2005 by the National Institute of Justice. The announcement stated that proposals to investigate male victimization would not be eligible

Method 7. Harass, Threaten, and Penalize Researchers Who Produce Evidence That Contradicts Feminist Beliefs
Suzanne Steinmetz made the mistake of publishing a book and articles (Steinmetz 1977, 1977-1978) which clearly showed about equal rates of perpetration by males and females. Anger over this resulted in a bomb threat at her daughters’ wedding, and she was the object of a letter writing campaign to deny her promotion and tenure at the University of Delaware. Twenty years later the same processes resulted in a lecturer at the University of Manitoba whose dissertation found gender symmetry in PV being denied promotion and tenure. My own experiences have included having one of my graduate students being warned at a conference that she will never get a job if she does her PhD research with me. At the University of Massachusetts, I was prevented from speaking by shouts and stomping.

Also Erin Pizzey; She became internationally famous for having started one of the first women's refuges (called women's shelters in the U.S. and Canada) in the modern world, Chiswick Women's Aid, in 1971, the organisation known today as Refuge. Pizzey has been the subject of death threats and boycotts because of her claim that most domestic violence is reciprocal, and that women are equally as capable of violence as men.
Pizzey says that it was after death threats against her, her children, her grandchildren, and the shooting of her dog, all of which she states were perpetrated by militant feminists, that she left England for North America. She returned to London in the 1990s where her insights were sought by politicians and family pressure groups.

Amazing listing. We are awe-struck. With such faulty research based dirty methods, world politics are changed. The legislation of nations and continents are changed. Victimization theories, harassment laws, rape legislation, and sexist laws like Violence against WOMEN act are justified. Family courts victimize men and prevent the healthy development of their offspring. All this justified by systematical falsification of research!

Concluding Comments

The seven methods described above have created a climate of fear that has inhibited research and publication on gender symmetry in PV and largely explain why an ideology and treatment modality has persisted for 30 years, despite hundreds of studies which provide evidence on the multiplicity of risk factors for PV, of which patriarchy is only one.

On may occasion we have put forward this type of false information by many organisation that deals with domestic violence. The reason they do it is for a few well established ones, hate for the male gender, access to higher funding, inflated salaries, self importance, political power, idealism, whatever the personal reasons are, and each one involved has their own, they all have one thing in common, a terrible misplaced complex of inferiority towards men and even strong self assured women..

One of those openly false statistics was from the local shelter staff claiming well over 2200 reports a few years back, in the meanwhile local provincial police only reported 59 calls of domestic violence that same year....How many of that 2200 claim was false?

We can also see the pattern of ongoing false statistics by their own claims...where as those who do make such fake claim are not weeded out, even if they know about it, since it would reduce their funding...
erin lee todd,perth legal clinic, lcih,
In such cases, not weeding out those who do make false claims for personal reasons, whether vendetta based or custody of the kids against fathers, openly takes away funding from those who are in real need....(whether they be men or women) Hence, the path they follow makes shelter's main mandate look for more funding, by using the funds they do get, to increase it(does that make sense).... All this under false pretences.... It becomes something like a drug, addicted to lies in order to make one more relevant than they really are.
All this with the help of local feminist lawyers....who will take cases they know to be superfluous at best.
It shows, it's not about the victims, when they accept any claims, whether they be true or not. When it becomes about the money instead of their primary mandate, they have already failed those who go to them for help.

This started in the 80's, a woman could ask for, and instantly got a restraining order against the father to get custody of the kids, by simply claiming abuse....all this with the help of shelters and backed up by unscrupulous lawyers who looked at this as an easy buck from legal aid...

When we coined the phrase, permanent victim syndrome, or PVS, it was out of experience and by listening to many men who have gone through the same experiences, either way, whether the false accuser, the shelter staff, the lawyers, family courts, governments, collection agencies, garnishing salaries of fathers, all have an interest in keeping PVS going since it has now, as we can see, become an industry, where there is too much money flowing to stop it.
And that reflects the 7 reasons why feminists and their supporters have a vested interest in keeping all this going, and why they fight so hard to demonize anyone who fights back, we threaten their money bags...and that been...
The false accuser.

Too often there are no consequences faced by women who falsely charge men of sexual assault, while the men they accuse often have their lives completely destroyed. It is mind boggling that people are OK with this. Rape and sexual assault are horrible things. So are false accusations of rape and sexual assault. And saying that out loud doesn't make me a "slut-shammer" and it doesn't mean I'm "blaming the victim." It means I'm using common sense.

This site will never accuse all women to be false accusers for personal reasons, nor will we blame all lawyers, as for shelter staff, there must be those who go there for good reasons, (we've yet to find one) but since they say nothing about this type of corruption, they are also part of the problem.


Anonymous said...

This is all starting to backfire now.Young women who want to get married,can't.
Boy's who have watched their fathers and families get ass-raped by the domestic violence industry will never step on that landmine.
The younger girls are starting to realize that feminism has done them no favours whatsoever except to go out and "work."


The Native Canadian said...

We have a long way to go but the tables are turning and the best way is simply to point out what feminists say in their name and ask the young ladies..."is this what you believe?"