Warning; We are not a politically correct site. Don't like us? Don't read.

Thursday, July 31, 2014

Exposing feminist stupidity...No Longer Politically Correct to be a Gentleman???

Being a Gentleman ‘Sexist’, say Feminists

Chivalry is demeaning towards women and a sign of ‘sexism’ in men, feminist psychologists now claim.
The controversial claims follow a report for the Psychology of Women Quarterly which asserts that there is a cluster of behaviours called ‘benevolent sexism’ which manifests itself in everything from opening doors for girls to men offering to help women.
-------------------------------

Feminism= stupidity, idiocy, irrationality, radicalism, inferiority complex...
Don't worry you cat loving feminists, we men can smell a feminist a mile away and as you have noticed, we do not hold doors open for ya, pull a chair, and we make sure you to pay half the bill when going to the restaurant for dinner...after all this is what you want isn't it?

As for the ladies, they know holding a door, pulling a chair, so on, is a sign of respect.

Wednesday, July 30, 2014

A good read by Barbara Kay...

For TV moms and dads, two different standards

Post originated from Real Women of Canada.
July 30, 2014 at 2:50pm
In the past, television ad-makers rarely have dared make fun of moms. But dads usually have been seen as fair game for satirical commercials portraying fathers as immature slovens or domestic incompetents.

Lately, though, I’ve noticed an uptick in ads — for diapers, gum, cereal, detergent and the like — featuring dads as personable, smart and sensitive. The hands-on parental engagement demanded decades ago by equity feminists, now the norm in bourgeois families, is on full display in these ads. For a moving example of the type, Google “Extra gum, origami birds.”

Another example is a new online ad for Peanut Butter Cheerios, fathers-targeted because apparently dads aren’t eating as much cereal as they used to. It’s getting positive attention for its peppy depiction of a nurturing dad who singlehandedly shepherds his cluster of kids from morning wake-up through breakfast without breaking a sweat, including a split-second loving aside to his wife, who appears to be watching this performance with benignly detached amusement. Bottom line: Dad is fun, but demands respect (“being awesome isn’t about breaking the rules; it’s about making them”).

What’s not to like? Well, parenting author Kathy Buckworth’s July 25 column in The Toronto Star found something. She doesn’t like that the dad is so awesome (she wondered at first if it was a parody). “I think it’s overkill,” she writes, meaning she believes it’s over-compensation for all the ads that have portrayed dads as idiots. “I think it’s almost daring moms to be offended.”

Well, I don’t think moms (apart from those teaching Gender Studies) offend that easily. I think ordinary women welcome images of fathers acting like the kind of men – their husbands, brothers and sons — they love and esteem.

At least the dad pictured here is simply being a dad. Contrast the Cheerios ad with a recent Proctor & Gamble ad entitled, “Thanks Mom.” It was made to commemorate the 100-day countdown to the London 2012 Olympic Games, and celebrates the special bond between mothers and girls who grow up to be Olympic athletes. In it, you see touching scenes of moms at early-morning training practices, cheering their daughters on in games, consoling them when they lose, high-fiving when they win. You see the anxiety on mom’s face when the stakes are high, the relief when a new technique pays off, and of course the “money shot” of the daughter succeeding at the Olympics and the big, teary, triumphant mom-daughter clinch.

But where is dad in this scenario? He seems not to exist. Don’t dads support their daughters’ athletic dreams? Of course they do, even if their role is confined to working their butts off to pay for the insane training costs. Since P&G wasn’t marketing any particular feminine product, why aren’t both parents featured? Proctor & Gamble must have concluded that sharing the spotlight with dad would have diminished the ad’s appeal for women.

In the Cheerios ad, the father is simply performing ordinary household tasks for ordinary children. Nothing heroic. Just doing what average parents do. But the P&G mom is doing something only an infinitesimal percentage of moms do. What was the thinking behind it? Perhaps P&G was channelling our era’s subliminal cultural message to women that mothering alone is not in itself a worthy project unless it includes a payoff that wins (them as well as the child) the world’s admiration.

The ad featuring the dad didn’t feel bound to puff up the egos of men at women’s expense. Yet, paradoxically, the modest narrative of a man being nothing more than a great ordinary dad to ordinary kids radiates 100 times more authenticity to the average father than the “Thanks Mom” ad does for the average mother.

So we have two ads, both about parenting. One is entertaining, reality-based and features mom-appreciative dads. The other is emotive, fantasy-based and ignores the existence of fathers. Between the two, then, in which ad is the protagonist so “awesome” as to be, in the opinion of a Star writer, almost parodic? Which ad is “almost daring” the other parent to be offended?

Which one, in short, is “overkill”?

by Barbara Kay, National Post,  July 30, 2014
------------------------

Businesses have noticed the importance of adding caring, attentive dads to the family equation. Feminist say men's right, father's rights, family rights, women against feminism site don't matter or that it is against a certain gender, the recent commercials such as the one above shows we are making a difference and in order to be "competitive", businesses are taking note that pandering to feminism on how family life should be, might not be such a good idea.
Are we making a difference? damn right we are....

Dog passes out from overwhelming joy

A pet dog's reaction to a family member returning home after 2 years...
which in fairness is 14 years in dog years.

Don't worry, they brought the dog to a vet and he said it was fine.

WomenAgainstFeminism- Response to GTHQ and All Pissed Off Feminists


Well said...
Girl talk HQ representative is begging to much.lol.
Women against feminism are making feminists crawl aren't they
and exposing what they really are.

Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Women-Only Restaurants Are Now Opening Worldwide.

The latest trend in dining all over the world including Dubai, Las Vegas, London and Zhengzhou, China is women-only restaurants, where men are not allowed.

Wooo hooo! You know what, come to think of it, I have nothing against this. This will give us the right to again open the men's only tavern under these rules....I use to love going to those after a hard days work at the scrap yard. It was dirty work, most of us would gather there to talk about work, and all that, (Yes women included, just like the ladies talk about men in their women only restaurants) without having to watch out for the local feminist who suffers from an inferiority complex.. If they can do it, so can we, it's called equality... Long live equality...lol.

Why do feminists look down on the stay at home moms?

Feminist icon, Simone de Beauvoir: No woman should be authorized to stay at home to raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.”

Feminist Ellen Herman explained the roots of modern feminism: “… the family, especially, the western patriarchal, bourgeois, and child-centered, nuclear family – as the most important source of women’s oppression.”

Before she was raised to the high court, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg expressed herself on the issue of motherhood:  “Motherly love ain’t everything it has been cracked up to be. To some extent it’s a myth that men have created to make women think that they do this job to perfection.”


Feminist Amy Glass...I Look Down On Young Women With Husbands And Kids And I’m Not Sorry.  (Then tries to backtrack a few weeks later....)

Want more?....
Feminist E. Wurtzel, mothers can't be feminists if they step off the career ladder even for a moment to take on full-time parenting duties. Feminists, earn their own money and don't rely on men. And since motherhood isn't a paying job, it's not a real job; therefore, it logically follows that stay-at-home moms can't be feminists.

Elisabeth Badinter, french author. proclaims; stay-at-home mothers to be equivalent to animals and a danger to the modern woman.

Frederick Engles, a Karl Marx’s collaborator, wrote: “… It will be plain that the first condition for the liberation of the wife is to bring the whole female sex back into public industry, and that this in turn demands that the characteristic of the monogamous family as the economic unit of society be abolished."
"We are now approaching a social revolution in which the economic foundations of monogamy as they have existed hitherto will disappear”  (so its about putting women into the work place??? At the expense of children, been raised by...stranger in a state controlled daycare??? And destroying monogamy???)
------------------------

Destroying the traditional family, the rights of women to chose their own path is not only crazy feminist and mangina corrupt idealism, this is a concerted effort to bring about a socialist, communistic, bolshevik hive policy into our system, the very policy that failed terribly and brought those nations who did adopt such crap to their knees financially.
It's not enough to expose what they really think of men, fathers, husbands, sons, it is of great importance to point out, what they really think of women, stay at home moms, and those who do not subscribe to their stupidity.
This is not recent behaviour, this has been going on since the radical man hating feminist took over women's rights, their hate for the male species is obvious, but so is their hate of the woman who follows her own path instead of theirs.
There is no way we can advance or evolve when these people are at the throat of natural laws of behaviour, and freedom of choice. Some say they are not important enough to worry about, yet the family, the nation itself is slowly disintegrating little by little because of such negative forces inside our lives. Their numbers might not be increasing, but the damages they are causing is. One only has to read what they say, to see they are describing the hate that's eating them up, trying to pass it on to the rest of us.
We will not achieve anything positive as long as we look the other way when stupidity is before us, evolution demands the co-operation of man and woman, we have an obligation to work together as we have always done in order to make things better for the next generation. We can look at past mistakes, but we can't live with them, we can only learn and advance ourselves towards a better world.
Feminism and manginism is the weakness of humanity, if we listen to the weak, deal with only the mistakes of the past as they do, that doesn't bode well for the future does it.
When we have idiotic statements like " men achieve power through rape" this is not only against men, they are saying all women are victims of men. it's an attack on both genders, and if anyone listens to this crap, without taking the time to realise it's true meaning then what does it say of them? It's a sub-concious message, which by all definition... (and adopted by josef goebells minister of propaganda for nazi germany)... is propaganda through lies and manipulation.
This is our world, mom and dad, man and woman, not their little personal playground of negative thoughts, but the positive we can achieve by identifying and pointing out the stupid, the irrational and especially...the idiotic.

Monday, July 28, 2014

All Citizens Will Soon Have RFID Chip Implants???


I can only speak for myself but...
Never gonna happen...
A cold day in hell they will tag me as they tag a dog, a cow, a wild animal.
And here we have the msm talking about it as if it's a normal thing.
There was a time when the msm was the protectors of freedom against the power of the state,
Those days are gone.

Have a technology which is based on numbers implanted in my skin...
In order to be able to buy things, health care or having access to life itself?
Jezz, where did I hear that before?
"Small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, 
to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, 
so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark."

Ask yourself, where is the most logical place to put a tiny microchip that is injected under the skin, used for payment, and only operates within a couple inches of a reader? The hand is obvious. Literally payment with the wave of the hand.

I'm not preaching but I have a philosophy in life...
"I don't take chances when it comes to my SPIRITUAL health"

I am looking forward to seeing those who have gone before me, to take my place in the Spirit World, amongst my family and friends in the great Circle. One of the laws is to care for those around me before the materialistic world, before greed and to understand there are limits. We where given individual thoughts, to help out each other, to care for one another, not to be part of the hive as in a wasp or an ant.
There are many "warning" in going against natural laws, yes we can be whom we choose to be, that is the concept of freedom, but it must be aligned with been responsible for ones actions. 
I f you depend on others to tell you what's right or wrong, you already failed yourself.
Part of that responsibility is to care for ones Spiritual health;
Oh, Great Spirit,
whose voice I hear in the winds
and whose breath gives life to all the world, hear me.
I am small and weak.
I need your strength and wisdom.

Let me walk in beauty and make my eyes
ever behold the red and purple sunset.
Make my hands respect the things you have made
and my ears sharp to hear your voice.
Make me wise so that I may understand
the things you have taught my people.
Let me learn the lessons you have hidden
in every leaf and rock.

I seek strength, not to be superior to my brother,
but to fight my greatest enemy - myself.
Make me always ready to come to you
with clean hands and straight eyes,
so when life fades, as the fading sunset,
my spirit will come to you
without shame.

I have no intention to hang my head in shame...

Sunday, July 27, 2014

#BBCtrending: Meet the 'Women Against Feminism'


Watch the feminist with the pink background "begging" for these young ladies to come over their side...
Trying to make a point feminism work alongside men...lol...
(I laughed at her so much I almost died with a smile on my face, not a bad way to go.)
She goes on to say, true feminists should ask these women"why do you feel this way?"
Well, here's why...
Maybe it's because "real women do not feel threatened by men???"
Or have an inferiority complex as feminists and manginas do???
Don't you just love seeing feminists on the defensive???
Show support for...
Women against feminism.
Tumblr
Facebook

Saturday, July 26, 2014

Verizon demonizes parents, promotes feminist false statistics.

First they begin this commercial hinting that telling your baby she`s a pretty girls is demeaning to the child's future...Telling a baby she is pretty does not refrain her from been who she wants to be, it is an expression of love by parents.
How many times have we as parents said don't get you clothes dirty, either boys or girls, and then think of the time we let children play in the mud, grass, and everything in between, a heck of a lot more than saying don`t get your dress dirty, which could refer to "we are going to visit Grandma?"
It goes on and on promoting the idea parents limits the outlook and capability of their daughters with restrictive control....and sure enough they put the father telling his daughter to give the tool to her brother.(surprise, surprise)
This is by far one of the most pro feminist false statistics I have ever seen...
I can only speak for myself and from what I have seen other parents do, and that is, we look at what our kids do, see what they are interested in and do everything we can to nurture what they are interested in. 

I don`t know about everyone else, but if my daughters were interested in marine biology, maths, or mechanics, I would be happy as heck...as would any other parent and do everything in our power to make sure they had everything they need to follow their dreams. The very idea that we restrict our daughters future by saying your a pretty girl or don't get your dress dirty, show how disconnected Verizon is from reality..

This video perfectly explains the real world Verizon seems to forget...

So, tell your daughters they are pretty, all the while continuing to advance their dreams, their future, as we have always done. The past is gone, the future is theirs, and today is a gift, that's why we call it the present.
And tell Verizon to stop pandering to false statistics promoted by radical feminists like jezebel...

Friday, July 25, 2014

Exposing feminist stupidity....Promoting humanities extinction?

This is what a feminist sounds like....
Women who have sex with men 
are gender traitors.
Tina Rosenberg is a Professor of Gender Studies at Lund University in Sweden. She was formerly professor of Theatre Studies and lecturer of Gender Studies at Stockholm University. She received her Ph.D. in 1993. She currently works as a rector of the University of the Arts Helsinki. Tiina Rosenberg defines herself as a Queer Feminist and was instrumental in introducing Queer theory in Sweden.She is a founding member of the feminist party Feminist Initiative and was formerly a member of the party's executive board.
Also...
Andrea Dworkin and Catharine MacKinnon have long argued that...
In a patriarchal society all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not in a strong enough social position to give meaningful consent.

Both these quotes have basically the same meaning, one might be promoting lesbianism in her own way, re-classifying it as "queer feminists, queer theory"(whatever the h*ll that means), but eventually, adding a little hate or dislike for the male species, it's results, if we were to listen to such stupidity would be the extinction of the human race....
Considering how many actually listen and follow such an ideology, I am not sure that wouldn't be such a bad idea, and let some other species evolve, maybe they'll do a better job...(yes I am been sarcastic)

Such quotes from people who obviously suffer from an inferiority complex versus men, unlike real women, show a disturbing pattern, parts of humanity always had, it's weakness to believe in ones worth in the circle of life. 
If it's not the desire to be ruled by the few, to be told what to do and what to think, how to raise kids, how to spend and buy, when to live and die(i.e.Wars), then it's the idea that as a species we should point to each other and bitch about our place in life....

A little reality for just one minute....
It's not men's fault, as these feminists seems to point to, if the biology of the human species is what it is, the female sexual organs are on the inside and the males outside, this is not just in humans but all life on Earth, that doesn't mean one is better than the other, it's just what is. 
Such a divisive nature from these "people"(and I use the term lightly), has one inevitable conclusion for all of us, even us "normal thinking people", the eventual extinction of humanity...it is inevitable under those circumstances. (If we were to follow their rules)

There is a simple answer to idiocy and self destruction, and that is to do what we are doing now, gather all these dumb-ass into a circle of their own by exposing the stupidity of their idealism, combine those who support them (i.e. the lowly mangina), and let them live in their own little, limited, world...Under those simple rules, if they continue on the path they have chosen for themselves, it is them who will eventually die off...they can't survive as a group if they fully implement the idea that sexual contact between males and females is....rape or treason.

There was a time these "whatever they are" could say anything idiotic and get away with it, even thrive, assembling those who suffered from complexes or where known to be weak, into a neat  little package of negativity. But that time has passed with the advent of the web and the p.c., men's sites, women's sites, are now strong enough to push these dividers of the genders into a neat little circle of their own, pointing to what they say and do, and simply ask..."is this what you believe"?.

Men's rights is not about dishing on women,  and women's site like "women against feminism or women for men" is not about been treasonous to their gender, it is about equality, these are people who always understood we can't have it unless we work together, and as we see, bitching about "it's all men's fault" did not stop there, now it's all "women who have sex with men's fault".

We can't debate the stupidity and inferiority complex of the weak. Feminists and their manginas are those who feel inadequate towards the rest of us, statements like those above or "all men are born to rape, and achieve power through rape", is after all a direct attack on the women who become mothers and raise boys and girls, when dad is at work. Whether that mother is a stay at home mom, or a working mother, the point is, let's not forget the early stages of a man is with his mother. Whenever a feminists backed up by her mangina opens their yap, they fail to realise they demonize not only man, but the woman who carried him, nurtured him, and guided him to boyhood, which will stay with him for the rest of his life, then dad takes over part of the rearing, pointing him to manhood.
And the same goes for girls, it is a father, through his behaviour at home, who shows his daughter the true value, heart and identity of a man. Both need and learn about morality and self worth from mom and dad, if one is missing, the true identity of that person will be incomplete.

NOTE;
Yes there are single parents who do a good job at raising kids, we are not trying to demonize those who have been thrown into that situation, men or women, so don't freak out, the point is not against the single parent but the demonization of genders by those who have a twisted view of what the world should be like.

To close;
Feminist and their manginas ideology is a direct threat to human survival, by the way, ever noticed those who try to demonize the stay at home mom have no kids of their own, or if they do, they have them raised by the state in state sponsored day cares? 
If we continue on looking the other way while the very continuation of the human race is at stake, then as I said, do we have the right to be here?
Either way, our best defence against those who thrive on division of the genders for personal gain, is to expose what they represent, put them in their own circle, let them become extinct, the world will be a better place for it.
The rest of us will do just fine without them....

Thursday, July 24, 2014

Female police officer charged with voyeurism and distribution?

Voyeurism
Web definitions
A perversion in which a person receives sexual gratification from seeing the genitalia of others or witnessing others' sexual behaviour.

Now, before I post the story, let me remind everyone what lanarks county ontario's feminists believe men do...

After an investigation Const. Luanne MacDonald, 44, an eight-year member of the OPP, was charged with the following offences:
Three counts of breach of trust by public officer.
Obstructing justice.
Voyeurism.
Distribution of voyeurism material.
Theft of telecommunications service.
Fraud.
Kind of destroys their anti male rhetoric doest it?

And if we would follow the crap local feminists dish out...It would go something like this...
Recognize that female power is upheld by...voyeurism and distribution of voyeurism material???

Unlike them we believe everyone is innocent till proven guilty....
And we do not subscribe to the idea that all women hold power through voyeurism...
Boom baby!!!!

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Michigan proposes a law protecting servicemen's families against corrupt family courts.

Active-duty military parents would get extra protection under new Michigan Senate proposal.

As you read on, the judge in the specific case this relates too, says she didn't know he was at sea?
"The judge in the case said she was not aware Hindes was on active duty and at sea until a scheduled hearing date where she had ordered him to appear in court with the child".

Buuut....according to this, sounds like she knew all along...
Even though there is no way he can physically be present at the custody hearing, a judge has ordered Hindes to appear in court or face contempt.
Hindes’ lawyers argue he should be protected by the Service members Civil Relief Act, which states courts in custody cases may 'grant a stay of proceedings for a minimum period of 90 days' to defendants serving their country.
The judge hearing the case, circuit court judge Margaret Noe, disagreed, adding, 'If the child is not in the care and custody of the father, the child should be in the care and custody of the mother.'
Noe denied the motion for a stay, ruling that he could have arranged for his wife to bring the child to her mother.

If we can't protect the families of servicemen while they are on active duty, why should they fight for the freedom of others???

Trash talking against the male species is what exposed feminism for what it has become, a hate group.

erin lee todd

 When some go about life blaming everyone else but themselves for their failures, everything they believed in once, becomes irrelevant. If the world does have failures, and it has many, it is because of all of us, not one group or one gender. If we allow hate and division, under the guise that it is none of our business, what does that say?
Not all men are bad, not all women are feminists, and for God's sakes, the beer store does promote domestic violence by hiring more staff....

The mrm, mra,  mhrm, or this site, a frm(family rights movement, we do associate ourselves with the mrm because men are an inherited part of the family as fathers and husbands), women against feminism, women for men and all those who have decided to fight back, does not demonize any specific gender to promote the other, we exist because of radical anti male statements as those we see above...
There is no proof of increase violence on xmas day or when we watch the superbowl, and I am sure, president obama or prime minister harper, did not achieve power by rape and sexual harassment. 
It is these type of ridiculous childish statements that gave rise to this and so many sites which now dispute the hate some have shown towards the male species and even the stay at home moms, the traditional family. What we, men and women, moms and dads want is the right to provide for our families, raise our kids without outside interference, especially from feminist controlled organisations.

We got comments on this site once from the local shelter staff in Carleton place Ontario, claiming feminists do not hate men...OK....I took into consideration, what they did to me, my family, what they openly say and promote, and came to the realistic conclusion they where enforcing what I was saying, not only by denying what was in front of them, but the personal attacks they always fall upon, men all bad, I was promoting hate, I was not a real native, so on....
What "we" write is based on our traditions, we have never demonize men, women, children, the Elders, as they do, we promote the value of people in the circle of life, moms, dads, grandparents, the family unit, as a healthy and needed treasure to ensure the next generation has a better life than we had....
And may I say: This is not the domain of native people alone, it is the domain of all of us on Mother Earth.

We have to take into account why so many decided to fight back, and who it affects, sites such as avfm, men's right help, women against feminism, women for men and so many others are the inevitable balance that came against statements such as the one above, because the future belongs to all of us, and as the old saying goes...We do not inherit the Earth from our Ancestors, we borrow it from our Children.

So what are we going to leave them, division? The belief all women are victims, all men are animals?
Every woman's son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman." -- Andrea Dworkin
Is this what we want to leave behind?
Or are we going to fight the evils of this world to make sure our children understand "one cannot survive without the other", together they will achieve more, and especially, co-operation in life is better and more evolved than the primitive notion that we do better if we war against each other?

Children are our invincibility as a species, our individual immortality, we will be remembered and judged as a generation by what we teach them, what we leave behind.
Do we want to be known as dividers and the generation who hated each other....
Or the generation who once and for all said...enough? 
We, as a species are at a crossroads, tribalism, wars, disease, starvation, hate, seems to be the path too many are following, or looking the other way instead of speaking up. We have to start thinking about what our words, our action will produce, do we continue on allowing a stage to those who promote division and hate, or do we take it from them and show the next generation that fighting for what is right directs us to a better life?
It is after all...up to us.

If feminism does not want to be identified as a hate group, then they have to...first, drop the word itself, it has been dirtied by hate which will be with us forever, next they have to admit they made a terrible mistake going after and demonizing the male species, the stay at home mom, the traditional family, they also have to expose and go after those who make false accusations, not admit them into their statistics for personal gain, in other words....join the rest of humanity in making life better for those who come after us....
(Note; Don't hold your breath)

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Monday, July 21, 2014

The evil amongst us...Pigs, dogs and chimps r more valuable than a newborn???...

This came up on my timeline on facebook, had to check if it was real...
Sure enough...

Infanticide  

Peter Singer- Introduction
In 1993, ethicist Peter Singer shocked many Americans by suggesting that no newborn should be considered a person until 30 days after birth and that the attending physician should kill some disabled babies on the spot. Five years later, his appointment as Decamp Professor of Bio-Ethics at Princeton University ignited a fire-storm of controversy, though his ideas about abortion and infanticide were hardly new. In 1979 he wrote, “Human babies are not born self-aware, or capable of grasping that they exist over time. They are not persons”; therefore, “the life of a newborn is of less value than the life of a pig, a dog, or a chimpanzee".
And he is not alone.....

These are the same intellectual elite who had the gull to call us savages???

This site supports the stay at home mom..

This site as many others, unlike feminists and their manginas, support the free choice women make, 
whether this be a stay at home mom and wife, working mother or otherwise.
Photos from womenagainstfeminism.
Freedom of choice is the basic principle behind any democracy...
Those who demonize people for that freedom are anti democratic, therefore enemies of the people.

More feminist quotes against stay at home mom.
JANUARY 15, 2014
I Look Down On Young Women With Husbands And Kids 
And I'm Not Sorry
You will never have the time, energy, freedom or mobility to be exceptional if you have a husband and kids.
Feminist Amy Glass


Being a housewife is an illegitimate profession,
The choice to serve and be protected 
and plan towards being a family maker 
is a choice that shouldn't be...
The heart of radical feminism is to change that...
Feminist vivian gorninck,

Sunday, July 20, 2014

Feminists and their manginas on the defensive and freaking out? Read this...

'Women Against Feminism' generates backlash among students

A social media movement called “Women Against Feminism” has been making headlines recently both nationally and internationally, generating a wave of backlash and discussion on the definition of modern feminism.
Pictures are shared on the movement’s primary social media outlets, Facebook and Tumblr, of women holding up pieces of paper with reasons on them as to why they do not believe in or need feminism — the primary reason being the victimization of females and the demonization of males by feminists.

Juliana Rose, a rising senior at the University of Montana, says she was “frustrated” when she first heard of the movement, adding that their arguments are “uninformed” and respond to the more radical, stereotypical side of feminism.
(No need to be frustrated juliana, just go pet your cat, you'll feel better)

“Feminism is about equality. The majority of moderate feminists want equality, and that is it. I think the women of this movement are misinformed and heartbreakingly so,” she says.
“These women are not only uniformed, but dangerously so.
(Equality? hehehehe, hahaha, stop your killing me, who is uninformed little girl? Your feminists say all men are rapists, real women do not subspecies to this b*llshit)

Local mangina Daniel Greinke, a recent graduate of California Polytechnic State University, considers himself as a feminist, says...
 “The perceptions that these women have about feminism is [sic] grossly misinformed. ‘Women Against Feminism’ paints feminists as man-haters who like to play the victim,” he says. “Feminism is not about oppressing men or playing the victim.
(listen my mangina friend, "recognize that men achieve power through rape and sexual harassment" is not exactly about loving men is it, and that includes you, when you leave the room)

Hannah Cowan, a rising freshman at the University of Wyoming, says the modern feminist movement is “full of faults” — adding that it is a fight for “entitlements and supremacy” rather than equality, that it shames men and does not take into account how men also have issues, and that feminists are “manipulative people” playing the role of a victim.
(well said)

Cowan, who will be pursuing a pre-law track, says she finds “Women Against Feminism” to be a positive movement that sheds the truth about modern feminism, which holds up equality and creates an “unnecessary wall of tension” between the sexes.
“I am an anti-feminist, because feminists have attacked me for my political, personal, and religious views more than the ‘patriarchy’ ever did for my gender,” she says. “I absolutely loath the stigma feminism is placing on women as being ‘weak,’ ‘delicate,’ or ‘oppressed by the patriarchy.’ As a female living in the U.S., I am in no way ‘oppressed’ and I pity the women who are dull enough to believe the feminists lies.”
Cowan says “Women Against Feminism” is based on facts and that the discussion fostered by the movement should occur beyond social media. She adds that because Western women already have the same rights as their male counterparts, feminists should shift their energies to issues like sex trafficking in Europe and not concern themselves with “ridiculous crap here like worrying about clothes that boys ‘hate.’’
While Cowan was “delighted” to see the movement expand as well as the attention it gained, she says that this attention has not been entirely positive — with members of the movement having been name-called and personally attacked in addition to receiving death threats even.
(that's feminism and manginism for ya, threaten if one does not follow the line, even the writers of this blog have been...threatened)

“The way feminists treat the women who disagree with them proves feminism is not as ‘pro-women’ as they would like to believe,” she says. “For as long as I have been active on social media, feminist have dominated it with their whining, constantly attacking me for my conservative, non feminist views. I was delighted to see the movement expand, knowing that I am not the only one who felt this way.”
-----------------------------

They, and that's feminists and their manginas are loosing the arguments because of their open policy of hate, and if they don't get their way, they act like spoiled brats who are not getting that toy they want....
They can stay in their small hate filled world, the rest of us understand full well what they represent...
How can anyone defend statements such as this.....and say they are not anti men????
No! my cat loving disturbed numb-nuts, women against feminism are fully informed and know exactly who you are....say what you want, but realise you have been tagged as a hate movement. Live with it.

I can only speak for myself but there is nothing more uglier than a feminist and nothing in this world more beautiful than a strong, secure, woman.
This site fully supports the secure women of women against feminism.

A good read on why feminism is dead...and let's be careful not to take their place.

How True Feminism is Dead BY STEPHANIE DOLCE

In today’s society Feminism is something that is shoved down our throats that we are not being treated well.
BUT if you see the progress from the 50′s until now, everything that has happened in history has been totally taken out of context. The media has played a very strong part in trying to make it seem as though women are not being treated right, we need to look and act this way, women are victims, etc.
This movement was designed for equality between the sexes, but instead in 2014 Feminism equals hating and bashing men. Man-hating is now a part of that goal: “Men are bad and women must stick together so one day they might be President…. yada yada yada…”
And some women wonder WHY they are single and no man is biting the bait they are throwing out? Not to say it, never mind, I’ll say it, your negative attitudes toward men could be the number one reason why.

As a woman in 2014, I am not oppressed, neither is any other woman today! I can be whoever I want. I can date whomever I wish. And I never dress for men, I dress for myself. I want to be treated as a lady, but I also don’t want to be treated with kid gloves either. Here’s what these feminists of today seem to not know or don’t want to admit:
Men have as MANY issues as WOMEN. Did you know that men made up about 40% of domestic violence victims; not attackers. Men assaulted by their partners are often ignored by police, see their attacker go free, because women are seen as the victim, not the perpetrator. Men are largely silent on the issue because of the perception that men are physically stronger and should be able to subdue a female attacker easily. Those men who do report physical violence are more likely to be ridiculed–both by law enforcement and by the public–than women are. 1 out of every 33 American men has been the victim of an attempted or completed rape in his lifetime.
Women are more brutal than men when it comes to emotional abuse. In most cases men are more affected by being emotionally abused than women are. For a man, being humiliated in front of others, even in the privacy of their own home, is more devastating than being physically abused. Many men live up to the code, of “never hitting a woman.” However, being emotionally abused by a woman, can have far more severe consequences. Men who are being abused emotionally always feel that they are “walk on eggshells” in order to “keep the peace,” instead of talking about their feelings. Then tend to shut-down totally and remove themselves from forming bonds with other women. If you are a guy and this sounds like your relationship, you are very likely in an unhealthy, controlling, abusive relationship and need to get out now.

Everyone, male or female deserve to be treated with respect. Everyone deserves love and everyone deserves a chance to be who they wish to be. That was the initial goal of feminism back in the day until the man-bashing women took over the movement. Just like I have learned that not all men are the same, the same can be said about women. All women aren't into this man-bashing thing. Some of us are good-hearted, sweet, kind and understanding. So to all those men who have given up on finding someone who wants to give you the world, don’t. She is out there, I swear.
Everyone deserves true, real love that is given from the heart. Don’t ever doubt that you deserve it.
Life can be hectic, confusing, painful, unpredictable and who knows what may be around the next corner. But eventually you learn that the human spirit prevails, hearts open and love surprises-–often when we least expect it. And we don’t need “feminism” in order to know that.
----------------------
The thing we have to remember is, she is right, the point she is making is feminism does not represent the majority of women...Most ladies are secure and do not suffer from an inferiority complex as does the feminist, the lowly mangina and those who suffer from PVS, (permanent victim syndrome, aka; the corrupt lawyers money bag)...
When we post stories about the abuse of the system by man hating feminists and the insecure manginas, if were not careful we might have a tendency to think that everyone around us is like that, because that is what we deal with day in and day out, me included. So it's important to have a realistic outlook on what real life is all about...and that's men and women trying to make things work and not hurting those around us doing it...

It's important to point out hate, or what I came to understand what most feminists and manginas really are...not someone who works for the betterment of others, but themselves...especially their deep resentment of those around them, whether they be women or men. This points to the fact that a deep inferiority complex thrives inside these people, should we feel sorry for them? Not one bit, because it is self inflicted.

Maybe we can pity them, they do live in an imaginary world created by their negativity, they make statements most of us find pretty disturbing and to some degree disgusting, they don't see it, they are laughed at, even ridiculed behind doors, yet they are so separated from reality that they actually think they are respected even loved for it...
Case in point...
I have referred to the local feminists making statements such as "all men achieve power through rape and sexual harassment, and during sporting events and Xmas with the co-operation the the l.c.b.o., (aka the beer store) men beat their wives". These kind of idiotic statements alienates them from the rest of us who do not subscribe to such hate, men, women and everyone in between who live in the real world. Such statements are not directed at the individuals who did nasty things to others, whether they be men or women, but to all, and when they do this, they alienate themselves from the very people they are trying to reach; the stay at home or working woman with sons, a husband, a father, a brother, and the man who has some power through hard work and tries to make the world around him a better place for all, none of these people have acted or imposed such disturbing policies as rape to achieve power on one another, yet they are accused of it, even if it is indirectly. 

Been anti feminist is fine, it's a just cause because they do thrive on division through hate and this eventually trickles down to families and kids, even the stability of nations themselves, but we must not be taken over, dealing with such hate and negativity day in and day out, the way they have. As the writer above says, it is true that not all women are like that, we must realise that the majority of us respect each others place in the circle of life. They (feminists and manginas) are the lowest of us all, any time someone demonizes a group for who they are, to achieve power and financial gain or for hate and resentment, or an inferiority complex, must be identifies as such, these people are the minority, they are not the rest of us....
Women like the idea of a gentleman, they are not crazy about the mangina who forgot his place, you don't have to be a white knight, just a man....
And men love the idea of a feminine woman, this doesn't mean she is weak on the contrary, it is someone who knows who she is, strong and secure, believe it of not, she does not have to be in the kitchen, washing dishes, barefoot and pregnant. She just has to be who nature intended for her to be, what nature intended all of us to be....
To be able to walk side by side, loving and respecting each other, and working together to sweep away those who would thrive on dividing that very reality.
Under those simply rules, we achieve more together than listening to a bunch of know nothing who have only a hate filled heart, a cat, or a mangina to go home to.

Saturday, July 19, 2014

Male Feminists= Mangina? A Native look on the issue.


At 2.27 a mangina is introduced as someone who works at, get this; re-imagining masculinity,
and end gender based violence...at a slut walk. From my perspective, why would any woman call herself a slut, isn't that in itself degrading women? 
I couldn't listen to the whole thing, feminist and mangina propaganda is just that...propaganda...
And that specific policy of disinformation has historically been used to lie and bullsh*t their way to personal power by demonizing a specific groups...
Re-imagining masculinity is extremely dangerous in the type of world we live in, whereas we should be in a position to have evolved as human beings, thanks to the beta-humans who thrive on division, we live in a more divisive society than ever before.
What these low brow people do not realise, their freedom to spit on masculinity, depends on the males of their own society to be masculine and willing to put their lives on the line for their freedom to speak. 
The good cop, the brave soldier, the men who will cross the street to defend someone who is been assaulted instead of watching and calling 911, the hard worker who does is all for his family.
The man who loves his woman for who she is, and vice versa.
The feminist and the mangina cannot exist without the very people they bitch about at every turn...
Ironic isn't it. 

As for gender based violence, it does not exist the way they explain it, men do not perform violence on the weak, individuals do, and they are as likely to be males or females.
Where is their caring for the elder based violence performed by those who work at seniors home, which the majority are...females? Or child abuse, which statistics show that it is an act performed by majority females...
Do we go around blaming all women, of course not....These are bad individuals.

Feminism and manginism is based on an inferiority complex, they wonder why such sites as women against feminism, I don't need feminism, real women of Canada, ladies against feminism exists, all of which by the way are run by women and more popular than any feminist and mangina website.
It's fine to have women cops, soldiers, hard workers, freedom is for everyone, the choice to be who one wants to be is a right, but it must be done with respect, not at the expense of others, when this happens, we have the un-informed and the sub-intellectuals aka;the sheeples, running around like chickens without their heads, as we can see in the video spewing ridiculous notions of re-imagining masculinity....
And if they think this is what real women or real men wants, so be it, it's their right to live in their own little world where reality does not exist. 
In the meantime, the rest of us will continue on existing for each other without arguing which one is better and make a world that is beneficial for all, especially the next generation.
We can't debate stupidity, or those who want to reinvent the circle of life, the only thing we can do is point them out to be aware of their idiocy.

The union of a man and a woman aka; a family, with mutual respect for each other's place in the circle of life can achieve more than anyone who suffers from an inferiority complex, who is angry at everything and see the negative in all.

This site promotes the good in people, not the collective, but the personal gifts all of us are born with. If we have faith in ourselves, accept these gifts we are all given, and respect the person next to us, and their place in the circle, we can change the world into a place we can be proud of.
Doubting each other opens the door to the weak minded, the divider, and especially the corrupt who see's an opening for personal power and financial advancement.
This is what I was thought, to be who you were meant to be, not try to be better than the person next to you, but to walk...side by side, respecting and defending their place in the circle of life...
And if that makes me the SAVAGE, so be it, I would rather be that with respect for those around me than be knows as a feminist or a mangina.
We do not compete,
We complement one another.
That is what brings us to perfection.

When we watched comedy...without dirty words.

Times long gone.
Nowadays, nothing is funny unless the word f*ck is in it.

Friday, July 18, 2014

Found this classy feminist statement on facebook...don't like facebook so, I'll comment here.

Yes Lisa it is better, 
Personally not attracted to feminists,
Damn inferiority complex breaks the mood...
Oh and while your doing that, enjoy your cat.

This is how cops get to be the good guys...thumbs up.




Is the dark side of feminism infesting the liberal party of Canada?

Due process on ice at the University of Ottawa
Allegations that some members of the University of Ottawa’s men’s hockey team committed sexual assault in Thunder Bay earlier this year are deeply disturbing. If they prove to be true, the young men involved are guilty of a serious criminal offence, punishable by up to 10 years in prison. But the university’s recent decision to suspend the entire hockey program for a full season is hasty and unjust to those players whose only fault is one of circumstance: They happen to play on the same team as the three alleged offenders. Twenty-one players are innocent of any crime – even an alleged one – yet they are being treated as though they are guilty by association. It’s a kind of collective punishment.
It’s a surprising verdict, coming from Allan Rock, the University of Ottawa’s president, who once served as liberal justice minister.............

Would it have made more sense to wait for the police to lay charges, and for those charges to be proven (or not) in court? It’s called due process, and one would think that Mr. Rock would get that.

The university’s suspension of the hockey program doesn't just mean a couple of dozen players don’t get to play their sport. A group of people who had nothing to do with the alleged incident – some of whom weren't even in Thunder Bay – have had their reputations tarnished, job offers revoked, and have been ostracised by peers. Mr. Rock should have waited; if any players are ultimately found guilty, the university can punish them (after the justice system does). But based on the evidence that’s publicly known, at least 21 other players have done nothing wrong. They deserve something else from Mr. Rock: the presumption of innocence.
------------------------

Then we have statements such as this; 
Male legislators should not have a say in matters of women's right, specifically abortions.
OR,
Pro life candidates have no place in the liberal party...
Made by the liberal leader J. Trudeau...

We can see the dark shadow of radical university feminism in all this; First, A. Rock suspending all of the Ottawa U. hockey team smells of trying to please said radicals, after all, these hockey players were all men, and as we know, all men are rapists, even if most men find rape to be an abhorrent act...For someone who used to be justice minister, one would expect "innocent till proven guilty" to be important in his decisions, even as the reporter said in his post...the presumption of innocence, not to mention the right not to be punished for the actions of other.

Then we have good old Justin himself, the irrational statement he has made as of late, seem a bit strange at best, if male legislators have no say in the matter of women's rights, then all laws, including the rights to abortions are null and void according to his way of thinking, since when they were passed and made into law by the supreme court and governments way back then, there were more males legislator and judges than today....
It would also mean that since there are more female legislators and judges today, they have no right to pass laws in the matter of...men's rights? Like alimony, child support, so on? This would be the domain of male legislators only?

As for pro life candidates not been welcomed into the liberal party of Canada, I guess that also means if you are pro-life, and yes there are people who have that belief, are not welcomed to vote for them?

Say what you will about the conservatives and PM Harper, at least they allow the conversation. Harper. does not want to bring it up for a vote, but he does allow the freedom to talk about it, to run under that banner, hence inviting those who are pro life or pro-choice to vote for him. That is true democracy, giving the voter the right to a voice....

Pro-life, pro-family, even pro-fathers have no voice in the federal liberals and the n.d.p. for that matter, because the issue is close? That is not the way it works in politics, one must accept opposing views, and not close the door to those who have different opinions, when you do this, you limit your vote and depend only on your base, that does not put you in power.

These kinds of radical positions never turns out well for those who "impose" their will on the population, we seen that as of late with the 2 provincial elections, one was the destructive 100,000  job cuts, scaring the crap out of those who work, which allowed one of the most corrupt governments to be re-elected, Ontario, the other was the lack of realism when they tried to demonize religion, not realising their supporters all have a catholic cross in their home, Quebec.

Either way, the choice is ours to make, we control who gets to be in power, J.Trudeau is the product of the radical feminism infecting our universities, one sided policies forgetting the rest, the open anti male rhetoric which seems to have stayed with him. Whether he does what he says once in power, we will see.
But I know this, his policies would not advance the traditional family, it would further destroy it with his pro-feminist views. If your a man, you would have no say in abortions, (takes 2 to tango the last time I checked, and if not, my parents did not tell me the whole story), unfair alimony and child support by the courts will continue and might even get worse, and forget the idea of free and just access to your kids or kids to their fathers.

What about the stay at home mom, will she be under pressure to look at it as feminists describe it, slaves to their husbands? Will laws or pressure be put on her to put her kids into state sponsored day care, having strangers raise her kids, in order to push her in the work place and hence collect more taxes for undeserving bureaucrats salaries?
They seem to have forgotten their power totally depends on the traditional family, this is where freedom is thought, hard work, self dependency. The state under radical feminist views sees the traditional family as a bad thing, fathers are abusive and husbands are slave drivers. Maybe we should follow governor moonbeams of California's direction, ban the words husband and wife....
Heck let's ban the family altogether while were at it, let the government license adults for having kids, the result of all this will be...depopulation. This should make thing a hell of a lot better.
Family is the guidance to a prosperous life for kids, not the state, it is the unequivocal strength of a free people and the stability of nations....
A democratic society has a simple rule for continuance, respect for diverse opinions, and accepting the fact that not all think the same, find a balance by not "imposing" radical views on each other.

Note;
We are not trying to take sides politically, just trying to inform and make a point.

Thursday, July 17, 2014

This is disgusting...Adopted child returned because he cried.

Socialite returns adopted boy because he kept her awake.
Monica Columbeanu, 26, whose friends include Paris Hilton, vowed to give three-year-old Alex Gabriel a life 'in which he would want nothing'. But she took him back after spending just one night at her mansion reportedly because his crying kept her awake.

I just don't know what to say about this, other than...what an assh*le?
What is a socialite anyway other than a parasite, thriving for a pat on the back at parties...
The only good thing about this is, the child did not have time to bond.
You have to be one hell of a cold human being to do this to a child.
The "elite" they call themselves....time to take out the trash.

If women ruled the world, things would be different???

How many times have we heard this, if women ruled the world there would be no wars, and things of that nature...
It's compatible to saying if men ruled the world all would be great right? The one reaction would be, "but they already do", well if we look at history, women have also had power...
Margret Thatcher
Indira Ghandi
Catherine the great
Tz'u-hsi
Golda Meir
Elizabeth 1
Queen Isabella of Spain
How many women have started wars?
How did that turned out?

We have to accept wars are not gender based, heck, even chimps go to war against each other, so it's not a human thing either. Ants have also been known to go to war.
True, the women in power who did go to war where sometimes forced into it, but then again, so were the men.
To say wars are caused by men is a total misinformation of facts for propaganda purposes. After all it took men to stop the likes of the hitler's of the world. Not all men want war, so it goes to say, not all women want it also...But there is always the few who rattle the cage with cruel intentions and vile world.
Case in point...
Mothers of all Palestinians must be killed: Israeli MP (noticed, it's not a man who said this?)
Some would point out she is part of a fringe party, not that important, well, neither were the nazis in the 1920's, till they eventually got power...
Wars, evil intentions, is not the domain of men, obviously, as feminists would like us to believe, women can also be as nasty as men, once they have the smell of power. It's not all men who thrive wars and neither is it all women, it only takes a few, or as we experienced in the 1940's, one person, with the help of a good portion of followers, males and females, can throw the world into chaos.
The point is, as we have said before, men and women are different side of the same coin, once they have the semblance of power, they are equally as capable to go to war, cause pain and suffering, starve people, abuse, as anyone....Usually hate is used to achieve that direction, and the Jews and Palestinians have enough hate in their ranks to assure people like her above get followers that will look at anyone to make them feel safe...
Not all Jews and Palestinians want to kill each other, most want to live in peace, raised their kids and family in a world that looks after each other, but with the few who are allowed to say "all those we hate must die" under the guise of freedom of speech, twisting it's true meaning, we will always have those, male or females, who will use this to promote the worse in us, instead of looking for that one opportunity to respect the worth of every individual to have a life we all look for, a life of peace.
So, "if women ruled the world" has the same meaning as "it's a man's world", if women are in business and have political power, under their own rules, isn't it a woman's world also?
So why do we have statements like; men achieve power through rape, all men are dildos, reduce the male population to 10%, all male children are born rapists,  #killallmen twitter, on and on by feminists?
Isn't that, hate promoted by some women? Under their own rules, should we not say "all women are evil"?

Wars, pain, abuse or power, starvation is not caused by all men, as feminists cackle about, just like the statements above is not caused by all women, it is caused by the opportunists who see a crack open to advance their personal hatred and if we want to see ourselves as evolved, then we had better show it. otherwise we are no better than the chimp or the ants...
------------------------

Feminist claim patriarchy is the cause of all evil....Some have identified traditional native life as a matriarchal society, it's not, were not going to go into details but to put it simply, when did anyone ever heard us say, "matriarchy is the cause of all evil?"
We have an understanding that all have a equal place in the circle of life, as does any of the other sacred colours, (white, yellow, black or red). Women are as important as men and vice versa, the Elders, the Warrior, all must give part of themselves for the betterment of the whole, especially for the next generation, that's what's important, not personal power at the expense of other as some wants us to follow. There is not on gender better than the other, either one can bring on the good or cause pain, it is up to us to identify the individuals who will advance division for personal gain.

Statements like the ones we posted can and will attract the weak, those who depend on others for their well being instead of themselves. History is full of individuals who used fear as a source for power, feminism walk side by side with the nazi, the communist, the dictator, the totalitarians, the king and queen, all have one thing in common, divide and conquer.

We are giving you a warning, speaking from personal experience, take a good look at what happened to the nations of turtle island, (native people of the americas), division and hatred against each other landed us on reservations in our own lands, called savages and non believers, nations wiped from history, millions dead, all because we listen to the ones who divided us and promoted one over the other...Thing would have been different if we would have lived by the laws passed down by those before us, stood our ground together and not listen to the few who saw greed as a way to benefit themselves, not all Europeans believed in the destruction of the people for advancement, many wanted to live with us, but reason and co-operation took second step to fear and hate....
It's right there in front of you.......

Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Exposing feminist stupidity...one narcissistic idiot at a time.

No need to analyse this feminist bullsh*it.
It say's it all.

Rape Accuser Admits Making Story Up ‘To Get Attention’. False accusations and how to deal with them.

"I'm truly sorry for all the pain that I caused,” writes Bright Eyes singer's accuser...

“The statements I made and repeated online and elsewhere over the past six months accusing Conor Oberst of raping me are 100% false. I made up those lies about him to get attention while I was going through a difficult period in my life and trying to cope with my son’s illness. I publicly retract my statements about Conor Oberst, and sincerely apologize to him, his family, and his fans for writing such awful things about him. I realize that my actions were wrong and could undermine the claims of actual sexual assault victims and for that I also apologize. I'm truly sorry for all the pain that I caused.”
-----------------------
And all this makes it OK? All is forgiven?
Are you kidding me?
When false statements and accusations are made, you go after the person, don't matter who they think they are, what power they think they have, you expose them....I hope he sues the crap out of her and those who supported her.
False accusation are so rampant that it's used for all and any reason, whether revenge, vendetta, custody, corruption, "greedy lawyers and shelters(personal experience)".

I personally decided not to give 2 sh*t about their rules, this site was started, not because we dislike women or want them barefoot in the kitchen washing dishes and pregnant, on the contrary, our policy is be who you want to be...
It was started because of false statements, false claim, false accusations, a bunch of idiots using my family for funding purposes and the corruption behind it. They used all the rules at their disposal to try to shut us up, threaten us and try to shut this site down.
The irrationality of these people (lanark county ontario shelter staff and legal clinic of perth) was to use their non existent power to basically say; "we can do anything we want, your a man, a father, and therefore your bad", didn't work well for them because they forgot one little rule, not all of us follow the rules of their twisted corrupt system.
Some of us have our own way of looking at things, "you have your rules I have mine" and my rule was to look and wait for that statement that would contradict and exposed what and who they are, and sure enough with patience, they are the ones who handed it to me.
Everything they did, they did out of revenge, vendettas, lies, and if one has patience, lies have a tendency to expose the truth, as strange as that sounds. The more they lie, the more they have to add lies to back up what they say, and that is their weakness.
To me it was never their process that counted, it was that one moment which exposed who and what they were, hateful, vendetta minded anti male radical feminists.
Many statements, false accusations where made, including...get this...I could manipulate cops for my own benefit...lol. I mean, I have many talents, but that is not one of them. lol.

The point I am trying to make is, false accusations are so easy to make nowadays, because of a corrupt system (which ironically depend on men to exist and be defended), that anyone with a vendetta can yell out abuse and all of a sudden your tagged. Well you can only be tagged if you play their games, and I refused to.
As I said, I by-passed their rules and played it by mine and that was to look for that one thing that would point them out to be corrupt vindictive jackasses. The only person you truly have to depend on is yourself when something like this happens, don't go half cocked, wait, patience, look, listen, as I said, lies will need lies to support the lie that was said...
Don't get me wrong, it is not easy, false accusations can make one extremely upset, loose you cool so to say, but remember, they are false, lies, bullsh*t, it will get to you, that is inevitable, because there is nothing worse than to be accused of something you didn't do, but unlike feminists who live with hate in their souls, we are not like them, we have what they do not have and never will...patience.

Traditional native music.



Feminsm and their hate of "priviledged white men"...


Now imagine for one minute if this thing would have spoken about some other colour?
The media and everyone in between would be up in arms...
How many of you feel privileged, and since when is it a sin to be a certain color?
Cackling frigin hen....
 
If we are to find a balance to live with each other in peace, and offer our families the best Mother Earth has to offer, this type of hate has to stop...
If it's not all men are bad, it's the divisive nature of only white men are and everyone one else is a victim, their "all women are victims of men" isn't working, women are turning against them, so now they switch to race division....

So hide ones dislike for a group by calling it...Poetry?
What a strange society.....

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

Amen and thanks to Guinness....

The choices the few amongst us make, ensures all of our freedoms.
Thank you...Guinness.

Feminist msm in full panic mode over, conference for men and women against feminism.

After watching this video from msnbc (are they still around?) and listening to the hate about the men's rights conference in Detroit and the latest target (women against feminism) of those cackling hens over at the house of the falling feminist, we see the panic mode they are experiencing.

Feminists make the point for all mrm's, mra's, fra's, THEY DO NOT ALLOW CRITICISM, or debate, and when one takes that route, one proves the point that they are anti males even anti women. They are trying to pass off men's rights as a anti woman hate group, plainly seen in the msnbc video when they claimed men's rights sites advocate the rape of women by saying, "women like to be raped"... I mean f*ck, really?
What men wants their mothers, sisters, wives, daughters raped or would say they like to be raped?

We can clearly see feminist panic over women against feminism, basically describing them as as poor little girls who don't understand the "men all bad philosophy". Women against feminism perfectly understand that philosophy, they just do not subscribe to the idea the men in their lives are all bad.
This is why the feminist times fell apart and could no longer be financially feasible after only 12 months, women no longer want to be part of a "toxic culture", and the contradiction it promoted.

Strong majority of pickpockets are...women??? NNNoooooo!!! LOL.

92 per cent of Metro pickpockets are women
When one thinks of pickpockets, one would usually imagine a shady-looking fellow, loitering around at a public place eyeing his target.
However, according to recent data released by the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), 92 per cent of the total pickpockets nabbed in the Delhi Metro in 2013 are women.
The CISF has caught a total of 451 pickpockets from Januray 1 to November 20 this year, out of whom 415 are women, and only 36 men.

In June, a total of 115 female pickpockets were nabbed, as opposed to one man.
In October, 26 female pickpockets were nabbed, while no male sneak thief was caught.

Most of these women are well-educated, well-dressed, carry laptops, backpacks and look like any other commuter, making it extremely difficult to identify them and can only be nabbed in action.
"There is no specific look which can help identify them. They look like another harmless lady travelling alongside you, but statistics prove that they aren't that harmless. In fact, some of the ones we have nabbed were dressed in business formal (branded clothes), usually carrying a conference bag and pretending to work on their laptop," a CISF official said.
Many of them even carry a baby, and wear salwar kameez or sari to avoid any suspicion.
"They operate during rush hours for obvious reasons and take advantage of crowded trains. These women are mostly active on the Yellow line (Jahangirpuri to Huda City Centre). While, one wouldn't expect a sneak thief to speak fluent English, these women do. And hence can easily be mistaken as a working professional or a college student," he added.
----------------------
Sneaky little sweethearts...lol

Wait for it, wait for it....Waaaait for it.....
Feminists will claim these are really men dressed in women's clothing, or male transgenders????
This site does not promote the idea that all women are pickpockets...
Just that crime has no gender.