Warning; We are not a politically correct site. Don't like us? Don't read.

Sunday, June 22, 2014

Another idiot from family court exposes her stupidity and her anti father agenda.

Dad ordered to appear in court for custody hearing on Monday by judge or face arrest even though he is deployed on a submarine thousands of miles away
-Navy submariner Matthew Hindes is thousand of miles away on in the middle of the Pacific  Ocean
-He is supposed to be at a custody hearing on Monday for secure rights to his daughter Kaylee
-Michigan judge won't move the date of the hearing so little Kaylee, 6, may end up living with  his ex-wife Angela

A U.S. sailor from Washington State has been put in an almost impossible situation after being asked to appear in court as part of a custody battle to keep his six-year-old daughter, despite being thousands of miles away under the sea.

Navy submariner Matthew Hindes is serving on a submarine in the Pacific Ocean, yet he has been ordered to appear in a Michigan courtroom on Monday - or a warrant for his arrest will be issued.
 Hindes is in a custody battle with his ex-wife Angela involving their daughter, Kaylee.
Although he was given permanent custody of Kaylee in 2010, she was removed from his ex-wife's home by child protective services and went to live with her step-mother on the other side of the country.(This means child protection must have found a big problem with the mother and the mothers house in order for them to take the child from the mother)

Even though there is no way he can physically be present at the custody hearing, a judge has ordered Hindes to appear in court or face contempt.
Hindes’ lawyers argue he should be protected by the Service members Civil Relief Act, which states courts in custody cases may 'grant a stay of proceedings for a minimum period of 90 days' to defendants serving their country.

The judge hearing the case, circuit court judge Margaret Noe, disagreed, adding, 'If the child is not in the care and custody of the father, the child should be in the care and custody of the mother.'

Noe denied the motion for a stay, ruling that he could have arranged for his wife to bring the child to her mother.

'At this point, I don’t think I have any alternative but to enter a bench warrant for his arrest,' Noe said.

'If the child is not in the care and custody of the father, the child should be in the care and custody of the mother,' Noe said.
Remember democracy depends on a fair justice system, this jackass sitting on a bench owes her position to soldiers willing to put their lives on the line to defend said democracy...
This is why we should NEVER let feminists man haters have any power...
This "thing" threatened to have him arrested for contempt when he is on duty in the pacific???
This is just another way to use this situation to return this child to the mother which lost custody in the first place, it's not about the child's welfare but an ideal that under any circumstances should fathers have custody, simply because they are dads....
This is just fucki*g disgusting...
And they wonder why the MRA even exists, well this is why...for the protection of children against radical man hating feminism, who use kids for their own agenda...

No comments: