Warning; We are not a politically correct site. Don't like us? Don't read.

Monday, June 30, 2014

Lanark county Ontario feminist and mangina underwear. To protect themselves against rape and the urge to rape.

In this area, our hags(aka;feminists) have one thing in common, "ALL MEN BAD", this policy is supported by the few manginas who have insecurities towards their fellow real men, and in order to feel needed and wanted, they side with local feminists who make statements such as...
men achieve power through rape,
men beat their wives during sporting events,
violence increases during Xmas time,
All with the help and co-operation of the L.C.B.O. (liquor control board of Ontario), since during these event their "hire more staff".
Those of us who live in reality, (local men and women) shake our heads in amazement, that men who are accused of basically been rapists and all around bad creatures would side with such disturbing and hateful comments by those who have such an inferiority complex toward the opposite sex that they live their lives in fear and hate of any males...

Therefore, since they believe "ALL MEN BAD" we recommend all area feminists and manginas alike get their own underwear to protect themselves, or stop their urges by adopting this little gem of a product...
Local feminists can wear it to give themselves a secure feeling that the men of lanark county will no longer be able to rape them.
And their manginas can wear it, give the keys to local feminists,(aka old hags), so that their urges to sexually assault and rape women to achieve power can be kept in check.

Now that is...sarcasm with a bit of comedy...lol

Because there is nothing more funny than a mangina siding with those who demeans him simply because he is a man.

In lanark county Ontario...
This is what our hags(aka feminists) want you to believe we do to our women....

This is what they want us to be...

This is who we "really are"....



I am pissed because I have to pick up the pieces of the damages "they did", financially or otherwise...
They made multiple statements against me, caused problems inside my family, and they will learn, one way or another, they should never stuck their ugly noses in my affairs and said; "there is something wrong with a father loving his daughter". 
I love my daughters so much, I have to put myself in the hole to help one of them....
And according to these losers, I am the bad guy....
.

Sunday, June 29, 2014

The international conference on men's issues.

Credit to Exposing Feminism
The Anti-feminist wrecking-crew also known as The Honeybadgers at the men's conference in Michigan this weekend. This is why people fear the men's rights movement. It's not just men who are fed up, we have a brigade of take-no-prisoners, ultra-intelligent women backing us up as well. If you don't know who these women are it's time to play catch-up.

https://www.youtube.com/user/HoneyBadgerRadio/videos

The international conference on men's issues.
Radio link.

News flash...Radical feminists and their manginas heart attacks on the increase....

As we have said before, it's not only men who are involved, women have also had enough of statements like "men get power through rape, all boys potential rapists, mothers raise sons to be abusers" so on....
We are all in this together, for our families.

Men and women will correct the wrongs, one way or another.
http://www.falselyaccused.co.uk/

On a quiet day....Greed will fade away.

The corporate establishment will collapse,
If we refuse to buy into what they are selling...
Their greed makes them blind to reality,
Their ideals, their immorality, their wars,
Will all come to pass. 
Remember, we are many, they are few,
They need us more than we need them.
A better world is not only possible,
It is on its way.
On a quiet day, she will awake.

Saturday, June 28, 2014

A world of cowards...People watch and tape while child tries to defend mom from attack.

Toddler tries to defend mother from violent attack
A disturbing video making the rounds on social media shows a fast food employee ferociously beating an unidentified woman as her child tries to stop the violence.
The assailant is wearing what appears to be a McDonald’s uniform. Notably, the video shows multiple people also recording the confrontation, with no one but the victim’s young child stepping in to stop the assault.
Local police have identified the suspect as 25-year-old Latia Harris, who is believed to work at the McDonald’s restaurant near the scene. Her whereabouts are currently unknownPolice Chief John Pelura III said she would be charged with aggravated assault and two counts of terroristic threats when she is arrested. In the video, the fast food worker can be seen taking the victim – who remains unidentified – to the ground and repeatedly punching her in the face, even kicking her in the back at one point. The victim’s toddler is the only one at the scene who tries to stop the violence, and he can be seen crying for his mother and kicking at the attacker to no avail.
After the fast food employee kicks the woman in the back, she also yells, “You better get your son before I kick him in the face too!”

By the time the assault ends, the attacker spits on the victim and asks those recording the incident not to post it on social media. The video ended up on Facebook, however, and police managed to obtain a copy.
"There is a moral and social breakdown in the fabric of our society which is clearly evident when a woman gets pummeled in broad daylight in front of her child while a dozen people pull out their phones to record the incident instead of calling for help," he told NJ.com. "There is so little regard for human life — by the perpetrator and the bystanders."

----------------------------------- 
This is the world according to feminism and manginism, a world where low lives and cowards are too stuck on their cell phone and video cameras instead of getting involved...
How the hell can a "man"or a woman for that matter, just stand there and tape the whole thing, when you see a child crying and trying to defend his mom...
If this is the world them want, they can have it.
We are in a society where you have to make a choice, the world according to old hags and cowards, or the real world where we all look out for each other....

Two train of thoughts in this story...
First, the justice system; there has to be a law that protect those who would instantly get involved and make sure they are protected against been charged with a criminal act if they defend those who are oppressed.... many do not get involved because they know damn well if they do, they risk a criminal charge of assault, it's even hard to prove self defence these days let alone defending someone else who needs help...
as in this mom and her child.
Second, the more we sit back and say nothing against old hags (aka feminists) who continuously promote the idea that only men are violent, this type of twisted society will not only continue, but get worse....

Theoretical situation...
You are attacked, 2 men are across the street from ya, one is a pink shirt wearing mangina coward who tapes the act, and calls 911 while your getting pummelled, the other is (not a white knight but a real man) anti feminist, mangina hating, beer drinking, female loving, hard working mother f*cker, who runs across the street to help you out, even putting his life on the line....
Which "man" would you rather have in your society??? Which one makes you feel safer???
Don't call yourself a feminist, stay away from these old self hating hags whose inferiority complex makes them hate anything male and realise they are putting you own safety in jeopardy....
As for the mangina, who associates with feminists who claim men achieve power through rape and beat out loved ones at Xmas and sporting event like the superbowl, your skirt is showing, and we know your insecurity towards real men makes you side with haters in order that you may feel accepted...
As for the rest of us, (real men and women) we are sick of you, you are the cause of cowardice, where are the feminists and manginas when something like this happens, not one word.... Of course not, it would show, some women are just as violent as some men, it is a human trait not a gender one, and that would reduce their worth as haters of men in our society, so they can't have that...
Idiots.

Noticed the only man there, was a man child defending his mom?

Friday, June 27, 2014

Exposing feminism...one pervert at a time.

Apparently McDevitt was a student in the RA Widener PhD program, but quit. Her PhD is from an undisclosed but admittedly unaccredited program.
Here's one to add to your "fake degree" red flags: You can find naked pictures of the person more easily than you can find where they got their alleged doctorate.

Also she owns a sex toy shop, but  she claims......'I would say that the retail only makes up about 10 percent of my business,” McDevitt said. “If you buy a piece of high quality lingerie or a toy it’s going to last you a long time." Ok, great sales pitch, long lasting candy pasties...lol. I have nothing against these kind of shops but to claim it's only 10%, while your whole business is concentrated on selling sex?

Lets move on...
McDevitt also teaches a class aimed at parents on how to give “the talk.”
“I think every person can benefit from a class,” McDevitt said. “There’s always more to know.”
This is where it gets interesting, how would you like to be told how to give THE TALK to your kids from someone who teaches that people who engage in bestiality, incest, accepting money for sex is....normal and we must have “understanding” and “compassion.”
Yale hosts workshop teaching sensitivity to bestiality (story is a little over a year old, but we still find it disturbing)

"People do engage in some of these activities that we believe only for example perverts engage in. What the goal is, is to increase compassion for people who may engage in activities that are not what you would personally consider normal.”
McDevitt referred to the range of activities discussed in the workshop as “sexual diversity.”
Yikes, So having sex with....a monkey, a donkey, a dog, a chipmunk is sexual diversity????? Incest is sexual diversity???? How about having THE TALK to your kids on how normal and sexually diverse it is to sell sex for money?

“It tries to get people to be more sensitive … to sexual diversity,” McDevitt told Campus Reform in an interview on Monday. “We’re not all heterosexual, able-bodied folks who have standard missionary sex.”
During the workshop, McDevitt taught the approximately 40 students that just because people think something is deviant does not mean that it is bad.  (f*cking right it does)
“It’s sensitivity training,” McDevitt told Campus Reform. “Don't judge other people, because we all have something we are embarrassed about.” (speak for yourself toots)

I don't know about you but...Someone who engaged in bestiality, incest, so on, is not normal, weird and a f*cking perv, and so is anyone who promotes it, we don't have enough std's in the world let's had more...
The more pervs we have who promote immoral behaviour to the young, the more we are going to have paedophiles who will claim their sexual preference is as normal as bestiality and incest...
How about the academics who promote paedophilia as Inter-generational Intimacy.
There is a lot more of these, "university professors, even politicians" who have openly defended paedophilia and perverse behaviour, to put them all here is impossible. But here is a few...Strangely enough this is all promoted in...the western world...
Italian high court finds ‘romance’ in 60-year-old man’s sex with 11-year-old.
Furor in Greece over pedophilia as a disability

We have to have limits, our way of life depends on it, we are all for freedom of expression, choices, criticism of each other, it's called democracy, but to promote incest, bestiality, selling sex for money at a place like Yale, does offer immoral behaviour as "normal" and as we see, the cockroaches come out of the wood works when radical feminists such as this mcdevitt, uses the dark side of humanity as "understanding and compassion", to benefit herself financially.
Does she practice what she preaches? I doubt that very much, but she does say it's normal?

Mcdevitt is a radical feminist, and most of them have no personal conviction other than destroying the traditional family under the guise of men are all bad. They are there for one reason only, to screw with the weak minded and tell them abnormal and perversion is OK...The make speeches to that effect and collect their salaries, go home and laugh at all those who actually listened to her...

Let's not be fooled by anything feminists, supported by their manginas, claim to stand for, their main objectives is and always will be the destruction of the family, through perverted messages and their hatred of men...
What if we said...
Women should not kill their kids and call it infanticide or Post-partum depression...
Women should not kill their husband and fake a claim of abuse as a defence...
Women should not make false accusations for custody purposes...
But unlike the lowly cat adoring hags out there(aka feminists) we do not blame all women for the actions of a few individuals.
We are all in this together, in order to make a better world for the next generation, this site believes men and women together can achieve a hell of a lot more, than to bitch at each other the way feminists and manginas promote...
We know what's weird and we despise perversion, because eventually it always is directed at and affects....children.

Thursday, June 26, 2014

Statement just made about Indian reservations; was it racism, misinformation, moronic thing to say....???

I just got back from canadian tire in Perth On. As I was paying for my items I saw a sign that said, "if you have a status card, present it to the cashier before......yadda yadda."
So I asked, "how much do you save if someone presents their status cards?"
She answered "just one tax".
All of a sudden it went in a surprising direction, the cashier said; "I think everyone should pay the same".
Of course I responded; "ya maybe, but remember, this was all ours at one time, been exempt from one tax just offers some recognition of that", I didn't want to push the discussion, picked my items up and then.....
She said; "it's not right everyone should be the same"
I said; "Every little bit helps, have you ever been to a reservation?"
She responded; "They live right up there", and lifting her arm above her head...
My jaw just dropped......
"Have you ever been to a reservation?" I asked again, gave me a dirty look and said "no".
I said "Who have you been listening to" and walked away.
You have to be either misinformed, total moron, or a racist to believe the territories, or reservations, are places where people live right up there, it's been on the news, online, demonstrations, Idle no more, on and on....
To still have that perception that the people of turtle island live in luxury on reservations is beyond comprehension. This is why we have so much trouble in negotiations with governments, some still believe we have it made, we are lazy, and money flows from the local trees, and government just dish out tax payers money so the people can reside "right up there"....
So, what do you think, was it misinformed, racism or a moronic statement?


We care about your experience in our stores. If you would like to speak to someone at this store, please contact :
Associate Dealer: Pierre G. Hofstatter
Phone: 613-267-3412
Fax: 613-267-0024
45 Dufferin Street
Perth, ON
K7H 3A5

When women attack men! Recent study shows "some" women are worse than men.

Are you an intimate terrorist? Controlling, aggressive... and women are worse than men
 -Psychologists found more women are verbally or physically abusive to partner 
-Within partner relationships, women are just as controlling as men 
-It suggests 'intimate partner violence' may not be motivated by patriarchal values, as previously thought
This report basically destroys any arguments self proclaimed "EXPERTS" staffing women's shelters, that men are the root of all domestic violence.
 
Convention has it that women are the gentler sex. 
But when it comes to relationships they are more likely than men to be controlling and aggressive, a study claims.
Increasing numbers of women can now be classed as ‘intimate  terrorists’, meaning that they are verbally and physically violent towards a partner.
Psychologists at the University of Cumbria questioned 1,104 young men and women using a scale of behaviour which ranged from shouting and insulting to pushing, beating and using weapons.
They discovered that women were ‘significantly’ more likely to be  verbally and physically aggressive to men than vice versa. 
They concluded that violence was linked to controlling behaviour such as checking up on partners and persuading them not to see certain friends.
The term ‘intimate terrorism’ was coined in the 1990s when US sociologist Michael P Johnson used it to define an extreme form of controlling relationship behaviour involving threats, intimidation and violence.

Crazed Woman Attacks Man for Flying Drone on Beach

Female Attacks Man on Train


Girls who attacked a homeless man
Drunken mob of girls are asked for change by a homeless man as they walk down the street.
Turning on him, they shout ‘get a f****** job’, but it does not end there.
A fight breaks out and the women drag the man to the ground and punch him in the face and body.
Victim of attack was left with bloodied nose
As he cries out in pain, a young woman kicks him in the face,
while others yank down his trousers and underpants.

Remember, these are not thugs, but university students..."future leaders"


Do you agree with what Woopie said;
"If I slap a man he has every right to slap me back".
or maybe..
Bob Beckel; The time he punched a woman.


Do "some women" now take advantage of the laws on violence against women? As those bozos obviously did? They attacked a man, what if he would give back the equal rights feminists demand...
We all know the guys would have been the one who would have been charged instead of the girls...if he would had decided to defend himself against an attack by a mob of drunken girls....or any violent woman.

This site does not promote the idea that all women are violent and the same.
But to point out, as humans, some women can be equally violent towards men and each other...
And to concentrate only on one group, namely men, gives a free hand to the other.
Violence comes in many ways, making false accusations, psychological, as in turning kids against their fathers, no matter what the case may be, as humans it is entrenched in us, it is needed for defence or offence, it's not something only men do, or women, it is something "humans" do.

Personally, I am f*cking sick and tired of feminists and their mangina trying to make us out to be the bad guy...We fully understand most women and men do not subscribe to their bullshit, but if women do not speak up, then they are as responsible for the disintegration of society as feminists and their manginas are.
Thankfully, we see more women taking the sides of men, especially on the web, than feminist idiots demonizing us at every turn. The very idea that if a woman, drunk or not hits you, your supposed to turn the other cheek seems to be seen as a weakness that some are taking advantage of...

Because I am a boy...


It is disgusting the way they treat kids these days...
it should never be a gender issue when it comes to kids...
Their policy of division, and that's what it is, and their pandering to that corrupt, 
out of touch organisation known as the U.N., shows the real side of western politics...
Corrupt and decadent....
Feminism and those who support such a "hate group" are so separated for reality,
they can't see the storm coming...

Wednesday, June 25, 2014

Equal parenting for fathers

In order for fathers
to be treated fairly,
Those who oppose it, 
must have a conscience.
 





Nobody ever accused feminists
and their manginas to have a....
Conscience.


Feminists, manginas, media, up in arms against Peter MacKay.

Peter MacKay thanks moms for changing diapers, dads for shaping minds

Is his message sexist as feminists and their mangina would want you to believe, you be the judge.

Mother’s Day Message

As we take the time to celebrate Mother’s Day this weekend, I’d like to take this opportunity to recognize our colleagues who have two full-time jobs: as hardworking Department of Justice employees during business hours and as dedicated moms and caregivers around the clock.
Now as a father of an active toddler myself, I have a new appreciation for how busy and hectic a parent’s life can be.
By the time many of you have arrived at the office in the morning, you’ve already changed diapers, packed lunches, run after school buses, dropped kids off at daycare, taken care of an aging loved one and maybe even thought about dinner.
Yet you come to work every morning ready to make your contribution as a public servant for the benefit of all Canadians and their families. And for this, we are all thankful.
For all our colleagues who are mothers, or have mothers, I hope this weekend is full of love, appreciation and lasting memories!
Best wishes,
The Hon. Peter MacKay
Minister of Justice

Father’s Day Message

As we pause and take the time to celebrate Father’s Day this weekend, I wish to take this opportunity to recognize our colleagues who are not only dedicated Department of Justice employees, but are also dedicated fathers, shaping the minds and futures of the next generation of leaders.
Watching my young son grow, learn and change a little more every day, I marvel at the tremendous gift that my family and I have received. Yet, needless to say, it can also be daunting to consider the immense and life-long influence we have over our children.
Our words, actions and examples greatly mould who they will become. We can only hope that the moments we spend teaching, guiding and loving them will sustain them throughout their lives.
From my family to yours, I hope you enjoy this special day with your loved ones, complete with lasting memories to be cherished.
Best wishes,
The Hon. Peter MacKay
Minister of Justice

--------------------------------
OK, here is the way we see things, and we have defended many times over....
We must recognize that moms and dads have different gifts, donate part of themselves to their children...Raise them and nurture them in different ways...sometimes it's mom at home, sometimes it's dad...
IF, we did it the same way, as feminists and their mangina promotes, we would loose the individual gifts mom and dad bring to the family table, these differences give children more outlooks on life, and a better chance to be ready for it than to suppress each other as parents....
Mother's do it one way, fathers do it another, but put them together and they offer more choices, if, as we said, they are not suppressed....it is called parenting.
Now, what did he say that is not true, in most cases mothers raise the kids while dad is at work, our society still has that majority, mothers change diapers, pack the lunches, wait for school buses, go to daycare, wash the clothes, this is also guiding and shaping the minds of kids by showing responsibility, caring, loving, on and on...is this sexist, or is it something we must recognize, respect and admire. And let's give him credit, he did say, "two full-time jobs: as hard-working Department of Justice employees during business hours and as dedicated mom's and caregivers around the clock.", this is not easy.

And when dad is at work, doesn't he have something to contribute when he gets home, teaching, showing, guiding, and even change diapers and pack lunches when mom is busy or to help her out.
By bitching about sexism, feminists, manginas and the media (CBC) are demonizing the stay at home mom who freely chose this life, and the working dad who  provides for his family...

The only thing he did is offer recognition and respect to those parents who chose this family life. Yes we can offer our good wishes to the working mom, the stay at home dad, but for once, let`s recognize the facts that there are many more that decided to sacrifice their all for their kids....differently than what feminists dictate.
This is not sexist, its been respectful to a good portion of our society....

As for the media, especially the cbc and it's commentator jumping all over this, I have a question for them...
"what do they have against the stay at home mom and the working dad families????
It might not have been the message they wanted to hear, but I guaranty that many appreciated it...

This is just them looking for something that is not there.....
This site will always support the stay at home mom and the working dad family, because it is dedication unmatched.
And also the working mother, the stay at home dad, as long as there is a parent in the home and kids are not raised by the state in state funded daycares.

American economy contracts to -2.9%...not good.

  • GDP Q1: -2.9% vs. -1.8% expected, -1.0% previous.
They expected a growth of 1,8%, it contracted to -2.9%...they were only wrong by what? 3000%...

Left wing liberal economics has never worked in the history of economics, whether communists, socialists, liberalism (except the Chretien government in Canada during the 90's, but then again, this was not left wing economics rather centrists and it worked just fine, let's spend what we can afford policy), we can see this in Ontario, the massive spending, the corrupt policies, the waste, 1.2 billions,(and guess what, they got re-elected..lol)
Since we in Canada are so tied into the american economy, it's not good for us either....
Spending like a drunken sailor is irresponsible and unlike the last recession, will the money be there to prop things up if the bottom falls out again...Considering the debt of the western world, it does not bode well.

Canada's debt is now higher than it was in 1993 when Chretien and the libs came to power, they went to the world bank or imf, and asked for a loan to restructure the debt, they said we would have to do massive cuts, including our health care and the P.M. said no, we would do it ourselves....and we did...

Who will the left blame for all this...
Bush, saddam, bashar al assad, gaddafi, isis, iraq, iran, russia, the weather, little green men, gremlins, goblins, 2012 and the mayans???? Anyone, anything but....themselves.

This is what happens when we elect people for who they are instead of what they can do....
These people actually think tax payers money is theirs to do with as they wish...We are all for helping out with social programs, or other nations, but how many billions if not trillions have been sent overseas to prop up governments that eventually laugh at us or turn on us...Egypt, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Ukraine, the list goes on...

But all is well, we in Canada are so known for our politeness, we do not complain, even when the rich get richer, and the rest of us suffer...Seen the price of gas lately...and this when Canada is the 6th oil producing country in the world....at a little over 3.5 million barrels a day.
Food is too expensive for some, rents are out of control, the bare necessities for most are out of reach...but we do send millions to the U.N. and other countries, government gets a pat on the back and we get the shaft......
Many warning were there, Ireland, Iceland, Greece, Portugal, so on, if it happened to them, it's on the way here.

I think it might be time  for a re-organisation of our priorities, don't you think? For the sake of our kids, our families, shouldn't they come first????

Feminism; they claim to speak for all women?

Women Wear White Pants Stained With Menstrual Blood, to make Feminist Statement
I'd put up the pictures but it's too f*cking disgusting and disturbing...
I don't think anyone, men or women have ever forced these ...... to be hygienic, if they don't want to be, so be it.... I can't speak for everyone, but I do know this, never have we ever thought we where oppressing feminists with kotex and tampax, after all it is their choice...but I do know what stupidity and idiocy is, and this is definitely it...
They want to say it's patriarchy oppression to have female hygiene product out there, hey all the power to them, as for making a statement, yes they are...they are showing how ridiculous, irrational, stupid, idiotic, dirty, the feminists have become...
Personally, I have never come across any man, forcing the ladies to wear hygienic products, I can safely say they decided on their own, millennia ago, to make this a personal choice without men's help...

Sarcasm aside, this is a women's issue, whether to promote women's right this way or not, so it is up to them to stop it or go with it....
We wash our hands of all this.
And may I say...that is the most disgusting thing I have ever seen from feminism, but not surprised.

Tuesday, June 24, 2014

Exposing feminist stupidity; Watching soccer is sexist?

Is it anti-feminist to watch the World Cup?
There's no women to aspire to or root for because these events include male competitors only.
There is women's world cup, I believe it will be in Canada next year...We will be watching, and the young ladies can aspire all they want then...

I predict there will be little fuss made of the Women's World Cup in Canada next year.
This is her idea of aspiring to something and respecting the hard work the female player have to go through? Demonizing it before it even started????

British men's football is so deeply sexist that even the boss of the Premier League engages in email conversations where women are referred to as "gash". Male footballers are boys' role models, yet have been openly violent towards us.
So Again, the words and acts of a few individuals, makes all soccer players....violent towards women?

Instead of boycotting football, the presence of women is key to breaking the uninterrupted circle of sexism.
Is this feminist suggesting women play with men on the soccer field???? Or maybe against them???
What will become of the women's world cup if this happens, and it won't, would the ladies playing their best in the world cup next year, representing their native country like that idea??? Not likely...

Anyway, I watch soccer, love it and can't get enough especially the world cup, also love women's world cup and suggest anyone to watch it next year. It got me going when Canadian ladies did well and in the u17 series a few years back.

That said, now if we looked at all this as sexist male horn dogs, as this cat loving feminist seem to suggest, which one would we prefer, watching sweaty, grunting males, or sweaty grunting athletic females???? DUHHH!
Ok, women's soccer is not as popular as men's, but hey don't blame us, after all, half the worlds population is female...can't force anyone to watch it if they don't want to. Let's enjoy what's there, and stop listening to those who BITCH for no apparent reason.

Soccer is not sexist, it a f*cking sport, and let's be realistic, women that do watch this sport also like the idea of watching the men, doesn't mean they are sexist either...
It simply shows, feminists are lonely, envious, hateful, anti males, and also anti women since they do not seem to promote women's soccer as much as they are dead set on demonizing anything male.

Feminism, what a f*cked up concept....

Just too funny to pass; The Hillary Clinton Fund for Broke Politicians


Basically, they take the rest of us for...Idiots.

True love....and the celebration of gender differences.

Instead of trying to demonize gender differences,
Let’s celebrate them...
The feminine and the masculine,
Each have their own "equal importance",
In the circle of life.

The same way they showed us.....

When we let fools criticize everything about our past, we let them insult our Elders, they gave us so much, maybe it's time to look, listen and learn from them.
Let men be men, women be women and we will get along just fine.

What do Russian students learn compared to ours?

While the western "democracies" go out of their way to demoralize our society claiming all is well and we can sing kumbaya in a circle, the rest of the world teaches a reality we seem to forget...
It's not pretty out there, and it's better to be ready for the worse than hope for the best.

The western world is having difficulties filling their ranks in the military, no wonder, who the hell would want to defend immoral policies they do not agree with....
The Chinese, Russians and many other countries do not have that problem....
Is our way better, is theirs? Who the hell knows, but I know this...
Our system will not survive under the rules we live by today....
Of course it's not something we want, to teach kids how to dismantle an ak47...
but it is definitely something we should be aware of.
What are other society doing, and how would it affect us...

Monday, June 23, 2014

Ted Hsu, "liberal MP, and why he voted against shared parenting. Kissing feminist ass.


According to this thing, shared parenting is not in the best interest of kids??? at 2.50 minutes.
So he voted against the bill??? And lectures men to pay child support...OOOOKKK!!! 
According to him, the best interest of the children is the current principle, or laws???
That's where fathers are pushed aside by family courts and told to pay even if they can't see their kids???
Add this to their leader's comments recently that those who are pro life are not welcomed to run for his party, and women's right should not be legislated by male m.p.'s, THEREFORE we say; women m'p's should not have the right to legislate anything to do with men, fathers rights and we have a radical feminist women's studies university educated controlled federal party...
Keep in mind both liberals and ndp voted against this bill...
There is something wrong when gay pride is celebrated over children's rights to have access to their fathers and shared parenting...
 Will a political party that goes left towards anti father feminism ever achieve power??? We will see soon enough....

According to feminists, women, mothers, raise their sons to be rapists and abusers???

“Why have any men at all?” wrote Sally Miller Gearhart in a 1982 manifesto titled “The Future, If There Is One, Is Female.” Gearhart is an advocate of ovular merging, a process that involves the mating of two eggs, which has been successfully accomplished with mice.  Only female offspring are produced.
A 75 percent female to 25 percent male ratio could be achieved in one generation if one half of a population reproduced heterosexually and one half by ovular merging,” according to Gearhart. “Such a prospect is attractive to women who feel that if they bear sons, no amount of love and care and nonsexist training will save those sons from a culture where male violence is institutionalized and revered. These women are saying, ‘No more sons. We will not spend twenty years of our lives raising a potential rapist, a potential batterer, a potential Big Man.’”
---------------------------------------
I'm not putting a link because I certainly don't want to give credit to a low life, under the barrel idiot who promotes hate...
Now, I can associate this, with what was written by our very own hateful cat loving hags here where I live,"men achieve power through rape". The 2 basically mean the same thing, "WE HATE MEN".
Or some other feminists who suffer from an inferiority complex, as in these dumb asses...

We can't associate all women with this crap, after all, 80% of them do not consider themselves as feminists...
Should we say, all women raise their sons to be...potential rapists? Potential batterers? or a Potential Big man, whatever the f*ck that means...Since Man haters seem to put all of us in the same basket?
Of course not...
So why the F*CK would any woman call herself a feminist since they accuse them of raising rapists????
Who is more stupid in all this, those who live with such hate, or politicians and anyone else who pander to this type of idiotic idealism??? After all, don't they have mothers who raised them and did they raise them to be potential rapists, abusers and to achieve power through rape???
And what about female politicians, do they think of the males in their lives and family as rapists???

Let's go further into the analysis of the comments up there, just for the fun of it, not that it would ever come to being....a 75 to 25% ratio of women and men would be welcomed by who? Any potential aggressive nation who does not subscribe to such idiocy. Considering the way the world works, such a nation and it's natural resource would be a welcoming site.
Then what, an army of feminists with pink flags yelling out "PATRIARCHY" is going to protect their idiotic idealism????

The danger in these cases is to believe this is main steam thinking, it's not, we must deal with what is real and sweep away stupidity by exposing it, while keeping an eye on destructive policies that endangers our way of life, our freedoms and our families; for freedom depend totally on MEN willing to defend it, raised by? Yes, women, our mothers....to demonize us is to advance a nations own demise.
And that is the idiocy of their arguments, the exposure of hatred. Feminism is so vile, they would destroy our own society before admitting they are wrong.
So, remember ladies, feminism openly say you raise rapists, abusers, who according to my local hags will eventually achieve power through rape and sexual harassment....
 
erin lee todd

Is that's what you think when you pick up the son you gave birth to...because that's what they are saying and they do claim to speak for you...

Sunday, June 22, 2014

Another idiot from family court exposes her stupidity and her anti father agenda.

Dad ordered to appear in court for custody hearing on Monday by judge or face arrest even though he is deployed on a submarine thousands of miles away
-Navy submariner Matthew Hindes is thousand of miles away on in the middle of the Pacific  Ocean
-He is supposed to be at a custody hearing on Monday for secure rights to his daughter Kaylee
-Michigan judge won't move the date of the hearing so little Kaylee, 6, may end up living with  his ex-wife Angela


A U.S. sailor from Washington State has been put in an almost impossible situation after being asked to appear in court as part of a custody battle to keep his six-year-old daughter, despite being thousands of miles away under the sea.

Navy submariner Matthew Hindes is serving on a submarine in the Pacific Ocean, yet he has been ordered to appear in a Michigan courtroom on Monday - or a warrant for his arrest will be issued.
 Hindes is in a custody battle with his ex-wife Angela involving their daughter, Kaylee.
Although he was given permanent custody of Kaylee in 2010, she was removed from his ex-wife's home by child protective services and went to live with her step-mother on the other side of the country.(This means child protection must have found a big problem with the mother and the mothers house in order for them to take the child from the mother)

Even though there is no way he can physically be present at the custody hearing, a judge has ordered Hindes to appear in court or face contempt.
Hindes’ lawyers argue he should be protected by the Service members Civil Relief Act, which states courts in custody cases may 'grant a stay of proceedings for a minimum period of 90 days' to defendants serving their country.

The judge hearing the case, circuit court judge Margaret Noe, disagreed, adding, 'If the child is not in the care and custody of the father, the child should be in the care and custody of the mother.'

Noe denied the motion for a stay, ruling that he could have arranged for his wife to bring the child to her mother.

'At this point, I don’t think I have any alternative but to enter a bench warrant for his arrest,' Noe said.

'If the child is not in the care and custody of the father, the child should be in the care and custody of the mother,' Noe said.
-----------------------------
 
Remember democracy depends on a fair justice system, this jackass sitting on a bench owes her position to soldiers willing to put their lives on the line to defend said democracy...
This is why we should NEVER let feminists man haters have any power...
This "thing" threatened to have him arrested for contempt when he is on duty in the pacific???
This is just another way to use this situation to return this child to the mother which lost custody in the first place, it's not about the child's welfare but an ideal that under any circumstances should fathers have custody, simply because they are dads....
This is just fucki*g disgusting...
And they wonder why the MRA even exists, well this is why...for the protection of children against radical man hating feminism, who use kids for their own agenda...



When a "MAN" defends his woman...


Some local feminist asked me recently what my definition of a mangina was...
Basically I told her it was someone who forgoes his responsibility as a man...
The video on the other hand is the definition of what a "real man" is...
"FU*K WITH MY WOMAN AND I'LL KNOCK THE 3 OF YOU OUT...
This is not a white knight, it's a man defending his woman's honor.
Don't let fools tell you the definition of what or who you are...
Forget the pink shirt, calling 911, and be who nature intended you to be...
Women love that, and guess what...
They expect it of us...
And I'm talking about "REAL WOMEN", not feminists.
They wouldn't know what a man is unless he has a pink shirt and a cat at home. 

Saturday, June 21, 2014

'Women ogle more than men'? Tsk tsk...lol.

WOMEN are worse oglers than men, a study suggests. Scientists used eye-tracking technology to pinpoint what people looked at when shown a series of sexy photos.

WOMEN are worse oglers than men, a study suggests.

Scientists used eye-tracking technology to pinpoint what people looked at when shown a series of sexy photos.

They expected women to be more interested in faces, and men in genitals.

But to their surprise, they found almost the reverse was true. Men were more likely than women to linger on the face before diverting their attention to other parts of the body.

Women also spent longer poring over images of couples performing sexual acts.

Face Study leader Dr Heather Rupp, from The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction at Indiana University in the US, said: "Men looked at the female face much more than women and both looked at the genitals comparably.

"The eye-tracking data suggested what women paid most attention to was dependent on their hormonal state. Women using hormonal contraceptives looked more at the genitals."

The findings, reported in the journal Hormones And Behaviour, support previous research suggesting that men and women have different patterns of brain activity when viewing sexually stimulating images.
-------------------------
LOL...What this shows is what we have said before, men and women are different side of the same coin, We all have the same wants and desires.....We might do it differently but in the end....well...lol.
Which pretty well destroys the lowly feminists view of things, that all women are victims and all men achieve power through rape....
So, don't worry, when you look at the "opposite sex" and say..."mmm", guess what? your normal...
Unless your a feminist or a mangina then the only thing you have to look at is your...cat.


Friday, June 20, 2014

"MAN UP", what does that saying really mean?

A man who won't stand up
for what he believes in,
isn't much of a man.
The first thing "man up" means is exactly what is written up there, standing up for what you believe in, not blindly, but for those who deserve it...We as men know full well that this world is not evolved enough (as we can plainly see if one just watches the news lately) to hold hands in a circle and sign kumbaya, it is a vicious place with many evil deeds. The only thing that keeps us safe, is the willingness of a very few " GOOD men", warriors, soldiers, peacekeepers, to put their lives on the line to protect that peace for those who are "under our protection", and those are women, children, the Elders and yes even feminists and their manginas...like this guy...
chris gethard...the feminist's very own mangina.

Still spewing feminist ideology that has been debunked time and time again...also forgetting in his rant against mhrm, that women are also deeply involved in that movement...
Who is, as he says, scorned by women??? Well I do believe he is explaining his life, which is composed of him going home to his HDTV, his xbox and of course his cat...

Don't get me wrong, women have the perfect right to be anything they want to be, whether it be soldier, cop, working person, stay at home mom, so on, but we must realise and "accept" the undeniable fact that everything depends on men willing to put their lives on the line to defend those rights. This does not make one chauvinistic or misogynistic, it simply make one realistic.

Wars of conquest from our history shows the danger if men are weak, demoralised and do not fight back; nations, tribes, civilisations have totally disappeared from Mother Earth from these acts of conquest by aggressive empires. What keeps us safe from aggression is the conviction of men, that freedom is more important than their own lives...
The mra, mrm, mhrm, is an expression of those who have been insulted by feminism and their manginas which have tried to dilute through lies and deception, what man has sacrifice and achieved with his own blood...We do not claim perfection, we simply claim our rights, given to us by Creation.

They, (feminists and manginas) have been identified as a danger to liberty, a disease of weakness that might, one day, cost us the freedoms we enjoy. Any democratic society depends on the willingness of it's men to shed blood to protect them, yet if they keep on alienating the male population, why should that population defend the rights of those who demonize them simply for been men?
Now more than ever, we see aggressive nations eyeing each other's natural resources because their own are gone, anger and hate, terrorism, so on....

Of course there are strong women who deserve to be soldiers, cops, business leaders, politicians, to deny this is to deny our daughters the right to be what they want to be. But we also have to accept, there is no such thing as a women only army, without the support of the majority of men, for the foreseeable future...
Therefore the defense of our way of life totally depends on men. To demonize the very group whom feminists and manginas depend on to spew their venom, actually weakens their arguments. These groups, whether they be mra, mrm, mhrm, are not anti-woman, they are pro, if anything; they understand the importance of keeping everyone safe and free, women, children, Elders. In return, men only want to be recognized for the significance of their place in society, one does not exist without the other, we compliment each other, we need one another, especially to advance the next generation to a better life than we had. And guess what? FREEDOM IS NOT FREE!

Man up !
For those "under our protection".
 
As we have said before, debating feminism and manginism is like debating monkeys, it just doesn't make sense and can achieve absolutely nothing, to expose what they represent, "weakness", on the other hand is important, let's all remember that their rights to live in a free society totally depends on the very men they cackle about...
They do not have rights without men willing to fight for the ones they enjoy, what really pisses their weak arguments is when we remind them of that reality...
They can be whatever they want to be, but only because we defend and believe in freedom of speech, if they persist on attacking the very group they depend on, maybe we should no longer risk our lives for such a society?


Thursday, June 19, 2014

Recently had a run-in with a lanark county feminist...

 
 It was like debating a monkee,
No matter how good I was...
 
Showed fustration,
When she knew I was right.

Scratched at her butt,
To divert the conversation,

Picked her nose,
To cause confusion.
 
Eventually, with her local friends joining her,
Danced in glee.

Claiming victory...
 
So I let her,
For the sake of her inferiority complex,
And her cat.
 
The moral of the story???
Debating a feminist is like debating a monkee,
you know how it's going to end up,
so why bother?
LOL


Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Feminist ideology 101...criticize anything that protects the unborn...

Tennessee Makes Controversial Decision To Criminalize Pregnancy Outcomes

As we read...
Against the advice of numerous doctors, reproductive health groups, and addiction experts, Republican Gov. Bill Haslam has passed a law that will allow pregnant women to face criminal assault charges if their fetuses are harmed by illegal drug use.

Let`s put this in it`s exact feminist meaning...
Against the advice of feminists who work in abortion clinics, and women`s shelters, the bad ``ol republican`` gov. went against our demands and had the gull to passed a law that respects all life...

If you do drugs while pregnant you should go to jail, since you jeopardize life, as long as the correction facility has an addiction center to help these mothers to be...the 2 must go hand in hand.
This would help the addict get a better life since no one who is addicted wants to be and would prevent complication to the child, at birth and later on.
We have seen what an addicted baby look like at birth, and we fully support such a law...
And anyone against this is promoting addiction, forgetting the addict is a human being who doesn't want to live the life they are living and would appreciate this in the long run.

Something Justin Trudeau liberal party leader should take heed from...The Feminist Leader Who Became a Men's-Rights Activist

Karen DeCrow, the feminist attorney and author who served as president of the National Organization for Women from 1974 to 1977, died of melanoma last Friday at 76. Although her passing was widely noted in the media, most the obituaries and tributes overlooked the more unorthodox aspects of her work. A lifelong champion of women’s rights, DeCrow was nonetheless skeptical about many key aspects of latter-day feminism, including its focus on sexual violence and male abuse of women. She was also, for much of her career, a men’s-rights activist.
DeCrow raised eyebrows in 1981 when she served as defense counsel to Frank Serpico, the former New York detective and whistleblower, in a paternity suit. Serpico claimed the plaintiff had used him as a “sperm bank” and lied about being on the Pill while knowingly trying to conceive, and asserted that he had a constitutional right not to become a parent against his will.
DeCrow, by then a lawyer in private practice in Syracuse, New York, endorsed Serpico’s argument on feminist grounds. “Just as the Supreme Court has said that women have the right to choose whether or not to be parents, men should also have that right,” she told The New York Times, calling this “the only logical feminist position to take.”
Quite a few feminists disagreed. Marjory D. Fields, then co-chair of Governor Mario Cuomo’s Task Force On Domestic Violence and later a family-court judge, described the defense tactics in the case as “almost a classic antiwoman presentation: that women seduce and entrap men with their feminine wiles.” DeCrow was unfazed. In a 1982 letter to the Times, she wrote that since men have no legal power to either veto or compel an abortion, it is only just that they shouldn’t have to pay for a woman’s unilateral decision to bring the pregnancy to term: “Or, put another way, autonomous women making independent decisions about their lives should not expect men to finance their choice.”
DeCrow also championed men’s rights as fathers, arguing for a “rebuttable presumption” of shared custody after divorce. She worked with the Fathers’ Rights Association of New York State and joined the board of the Children’s Rights Council, a pro-joint custody group. More recently, she was on the board of Leading Women for Shared Parenting.
Full story...
--------------------------
 
My Grandmother was a personal friend of P.E. Trudeau, I remember him coming to her wedding anniversaries, it was a mutual respect that lived for a long time and the man was extremely polite to her and respectful...
So, when his son took over the reins of the liberal party of Canada, I believed it was a good thing...till now.
Justin is a product of the radical feminist controlled universities, his latest comment about those who want to run for the liberals have to be pro choice, and recently, male legislator do not have the right to make decisions over women's right and abortions shows clearly the results of his university days...

First, he seems to say if your a pro-life supporter we don't have a place in his party, that itself alienates a lot of people. The liberal party of Canada does best when it puts itself in the center, to try to adopt the NDP's policy is a bad idea, if I want to support NDP policy I will vote for them, not someone who doesn't have it's own.

Second; he seems to be confused about procreation, which is kinda strange since he has kids himself...it takes a male and a female to make a child, so why would he push the idea that it is only a woman's issue? isn't it better if we all, as a nation, respect each others opinions and place in society, instead of just one group, namely feminists, to make the right decisions about any ones rights, after all we are all human beings, man and woman are mom and dad, the essential part of a stable life for any child...
When it comes to the rights of people, he should listen to what his fathers policy was, universality, treat everyone the same, if as he seems to believe men have no rights to discuss women's rights, then women legislator have no right to discuss men's rights...
And when it comes to the rights of the individual, he must remember it affects kids, and kids are both male and females, therefore for the sake of making the right decision, men and women legislators must get together to make the right decisions for the coming generations...

Politically, the center now belongs to the conservative party of Canada, Harper doesn't want to bring up the abortion issue, but he does not prevent the discussion of it, or stop pro life candidates to run for his party, hence inviting Canadians of all walks of life to look at what he represents. I agree with this path, it gives people the right to at least talk about it and have a place to park one's vote...

As for Trudeau, with his pro-feminist stance, he has alienated many people and is dividing his support with the NDP, maybe that's his plan, take NDP support, go into opposition in the next election, then try for power....but that would take at least 8 years...
And in the meantime, if one supports free speech and opposing views, your welcomed into the conservative party...I do not believe the conservatives will open the abortion debate, but at least you know they will listen to what you have to say, instead of "imposing pro feminists" views on you...
That is centrist politics Canadian style....which keeps one in power.

We just seen what can happen if a political party goes to far to one side, the Ontario pc's claim they would cut 100,000 government jobs, this alone instantly lost them the province from the get go. When you claim to cut that many jobs, you freak out the other 1 million or so government workers thinking they are on the chopping block and that's a lot of votes. Combine this with the media and their fake polls(as we have seen so many times recently) they pushed in support of their liberals, reporting the bogeyman was coming to power with their cuts and you scare the population against the pc's and take votes away from the provincial ndp in order to stop them, the result was inevitable...
And now, Ontario has the most corrupt government in it's history. And what does wynn and the liberals have to do? Make massive cuts to balance the budget as they promised...lol...The exact same thing the p.c. said they were going to do...

This site is non political, we do not take sides, but analysing the views of politicians is important to the direction nations take...
Been a PRO-FAMILY site, it is important to defend men and women, mom and dad, kids and grandparents equal rights. Feminists and manginas have long yapped about patriarchy this, patriarchy that,(which does not exist the way they say, since patriarchy and matriarchy is associated with the Elders wisdom in our families), well now they want to change it to a feminist one? Where men, fathers have no right to discuss the issues surrounding their kids? So with that b*llshit, we stay in the same direction they complained about, one side over the other, divide and conquer, does that make sense?

The liberal party should realise Justin is now limiting his power base, going to far left means sharing the the vote with the NDP. They will never achieve power dividing it between them, there is enough Canadians who believe in the pro life, pro choice and combine that with those who also believe in the right to free speech, and the conservatives could be in power for a very long time if they stay in the center.

The true path to equal rights, especially of the family, which is the initial strength of a nation, is what Karen DeCrow stated, if women want equal rights, then they must respect the rights of men, whether it's about abortion rights or family rights, men must have a say, since it take 2 to tango, so to speak...
One cannot have an abortion if a man was not involve can they, so how, as Justin claims, can it be only a woman's rights????

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

Another reason to keep feminists away from any kind of power...Victimizing the victims of female criminals.

Judges ordered to show more mercy on women criminals when deciding sentences
Judges have been told to treat female criminals more leniently than men when deciding sentences.

New guidelines declare that women suffer disadvantages and courts should ‘bear these matters in mind’.
The rules say women criminals often have poor mental health or are poorly educated, have not committed violence and have children to look after.
Women’s experiences as victims, witnesses and offenders are in many respects different to those of men,’ according to the Equal Treatment Bench Book.

‘These differences highlight the importance of the need for sentencers to bear these matters in mind when sentencing.’
The latest guidelines have also caused anger, this time among campaigners for male victims of domestic violence.

The Bench Book tells judges that the problem ‘consists mainly of violence by men against women’. It adds ‘the reality is that some of the most physically violent incidents are committed by men on female partners’.
The document also suggests that aggression against men by women is rare, saying that ‘men and partners in same-sex relationships might also be victims of domestic violence’.

However, campaigners for male victims of domestic violence claimed that men are being treated as second-class citizens by the new guidelines.

They also point to analysis of official figures by the Parity campaign group which last week concluded that four out of ten victims of domestic violence were men.

Mark Brooks, of the ManKind campaign group, said: ‘For a document that claims to be about gender equality, it clearly leaves the impression that male victims are seen as being second class when, of course, all should be seen the same.

‘It is unacceptable that men, often suffering in silence at home, are being shown to be second-class victims by those running the legal system.’

He added: ‘To say grudgingly that men might also be victims is sweeping their problems under the carpet, when the Government’s own figures show hundreds of thousands of men every year are suffering.’
The campaign group said that the average proportion of domestic violence victims who are men has been 40 per cent.
It told judges: ‘Women remain disadvantaged in many public and private areas of their life; they are under-represented in the judiciary, Parliament and senior positions across a range of jobs; and there is still a substantial pay gap between men and women.’

On women accused of crime, the guidance quoted Judge Baroness Hale, the only woman among the 11 at the Supreme Court, who describes herself as a ‘soft-line feminist’.(Oh! big surprise there)

She said: ‘It is now well recognised that a misplaced conception of equality has resulted in some very unequal treatment for women and girls.’

The rules were prepared by a team headed by High Court judge Dame Laura Cox.
 
------------------------------------
 
This "crap" was written 4 years ago, by those who live a posh life on elevated tax payers salaries and estates in the country side...but back then, feminists where at the peak of their power, backed up by their manginas. Things are starting to change, slowly.
Though, radical feminists like those above are still in positions of power, they are on the defensive for exposing their blatant sexism against the male gender, but that is not all they have exposed themselves as...
Irresponsible, irrational, hypocritical, radical,  personal agendas, greed, not to mention their love of personal power and taste of hate has shown they cannot be trusted, not to mention their love of the feline species,aka;cats...
As for treating males as second class citizen, unfortunately, we are use to it, after all, we die earlier working our asses off for our families, then are told we have no say in the raising of our own kids or their murders,(aka;abortions), and if we even dare to show we want to be involved in our children's lives, we risk false accusation in order to keep us away from them, suicide is above 90%, and ironically, these same feminists who live posh lives and have time to dictate such bullshit owe their positions to...men, after all, we get ripped up and mangled and die in wars to assure them of a life of freedom...
 
But the major point to this piece of nasty idiocy is this....
Female criminals should be given a free pass for their misgivings, because they have children????
Are these people total f*cking morons????
The thing that struck me was...what about their victims??? Don't they have a voice in this utopia of feminists ideology and kumbaya singing circle? What stupidity will come out of their yaps next, declare the cat their new deity?
 

They said, Women’s experiences as offenders are in many respects different to those of men.
Really???
This should never be about women criminals having it worse off, it should be about the victims of their crimes....
This is just "a few" from 2014 I just searched and this is what came up...
Imagine going back 10 years, how many victims, and that's not searching for men, Elders, who have been abused and murdered. So what do we say about these women, "jezz, poor women, they were raising children?".
Are they f*cking serious????
 
By promoting the idea of treating female criminals more lenient, they forget the victims of those who commit the most atrocious of crimes, but then feminists as we have it today, have never shown any degree of intelligence when they open their yaps...they are so stuck in their idiocy that those who have suffered fall between the cracks...forgotten.
We should never care about the gender of a person who commits a crime against an innocent person, the first and foremost should always be about the victim...not the perpetrator....male or female....
 
Note;
This site will never judge all women (or men) to be the same, we still promote the idea that people in general are good with the belief in the rights and freedoms of all individuals, no matter the gender or nationality. We are not trying to say all women are bad, on the contrary...
What we try to do is expose the stupidity of those who use their position to promote an agenda that divides and destroys our chance at a just and fair society.
This world was given to us by our Elders, we borrow it from our children, let's make sure, we have done the right thing when we give it back.