Warning; We are not a politically correct site. Don't like us? Don't read.

Saturday, May 17, 2014

The 1 in 4 rape myth, misinformation tool that dates back to the begining of civilised history.

A while back, Heather MacDonald  wrote about what would happen if 1 in 4 college women were actually victims of sexual violence:
If the one-in-four statistic is correct—it is sometimes modified to “one-in-five to one-in-four”—campus rape represents a crime wave of unprecedented proportions. No crime, much less one as serious as rape, has a victimization rate remotely approaching 20 or 25 percent, even over many years. The 2006 violent crime rate in Detroit, one of the most violent cities in America, was 2,400 murders, rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults per 100,000 inhabitants—a rate of 2.4 percent. The one-in-four statistic would mean that every year, millions of young women graduate who have suffered the most terrifying assault, short of murder, that a woman can experience. Such a crime wave would require nothing less than a state of emergency—Take Back the Night rallies and 24-hour hotlines would hardly be adequate to counter this tsunami of sexual violence. Admissions policies letting in tens of thousands of vicious criminals would require a complete revision, perhaps banning boys entirely. The nation’s nearly 10 million female undergrads would need to take the most stringent safety precautions. Certainly, they would have to alter their sexual behavior radically to avoid falling prey to the rape epidemic.

None of this crisis response occurs, of course—because the crisis doesn’t exist. During the 1980s, feminist researchers committed to the rape-culture theory had discovered that asking women directly if they had been raped yielded disappointing results—very few women said that they had been. So Ms. commissioned University of Arizona public health professor Mary Koss to develop a different way of measuring the prevalence of rape. Rather than asking female students about rape per se, Koss asked them if they had experienced actions that she then classified as rape. Koss’s method produced the 25 percent rate, which Ms. then published.Koss’s study had serious flaws. Her survey instrument was highly ambiguous, as University of California at Berkeley social-welfare professor Neil Gilbert has pointed out. But the most powerful refutation of Koss’s research came from her own subjects: 73 percent of the women whom she characterized as rape victims said that they hadn’t been raped. Further—though it is inconceivable that a raped woman would voluntarily have sex again with the fiend who attacked her—42 percent of Koss’s supposed victims had intercourse again with their alleged assailants.
Read here: http://www.city-journal.org/2008/18_1_campus_rape.html

False information, false statistics, or inflated numbers have always been a primary tool for those who want to manipulate the public for personal gains(or as we know them as the weak minded)...heck, we look at history, the same process was used to create wars, and destroy countries the few elite(kings queens, dictators) didn't like or where pissed at...sometime they didn't have to demonize their enemies, just point to someone and say "they are bad" and sheoples would go get killed for no reason at all...
There is no difference here, the same policy still exists, this time it is used by old hags who do not like men, or had a bad experience with "one individual", claim to be experts and promote their hate through misinformation...they simply point at men and say "all men bad" and the sheeples or better known as the lowly mangina, follow.
The difference now is, we have the internet, and we can dispute these ridiculous claims...
And let's face it, when it comes to colleges, if this 1 in 4 was true, there would be no women there too speak of. Girls are not stupid.
Girls and the parents that send them there would have to be complete morons to throw them or themselves in the lions den and be sacrificed to the God of the patriarchy...as if...
I, personally, still hold to the belief that if there was such a thing as 1 in 4, you would see more fathers playing baseball with boys that raped their daughters. You see, contrary to what they try to make you believe, fathers (and brothers for that matter) are still the number one protectors of their daughters honor, and we do not pass this responsibility to others...
And we never will...

That said, divide and conquer is alive and well for personal gain, and will continue till we, the people, decide this has gone far enough...in order to have a good society, the good have to be recognize more than the bad, we have to build on the reality that there are more good people, (men) than bad and work together to weed out those "individuals"(male or female) who would do harm and that includes those who promote false information for personal gains.
More can be achieve with honesty and co-operation than demonize half the population, and victimize the other....
As long as men are used as fodder for promoting hate, things will never get better, society will always be at each others throat, we are not morons, we don't just sit there and say "yes, we are bad" unless one is a mangina of course, but otherwise one would have to be a total idiot to accept been tagged as bad, when the safety of a nation totally depends on good men...

Coming back to this 1 in 4 bullsh*t, we don't deny there is crime committed, and that is crimes of all kind against all people, but wouldn't it be more beneficial if we would treat it as crime by bad individuals(male or female) instead of tagging half the population. Working together would achieve more than letting some old cat loving man hating hag(aka the feminist) dictate what her idea of a society should be...
Have we not yet passed the "let's follow the leader" and evolve enough to make things better as a whole instead of grouping one against the other, or are we still at the "whatever you say because your better than me" mentality???
 
Finally...the 1 in 4 is attracting some pretty strange statements as of late...case in point...
‘Paranoid Activity’ Actress Says She’s Been Raped By a Ghost
I thought this was a joke when I noticed it, but no, she did claim a ghost raped her and she said....
"I felt something entered the room. I couldn’t see anybody. Suddenly I could feel that somebody touching me. Their hands were pushing me against my will and then I could feel the weight of their body on top of me but I couldn’t see anybody. At first I was very confused then I decided to relax and it was really pleasurable, I really enjoyed it.”
I think this confused little girl read too many exotic books before going to sleep or watched to many invisible man movies, took her paranormal activity film to seriously or some sexual fantasy?
Either way, sh*it men are so bad, they now rape women as ghosts?
Where's the ghostbusters when you need them?

Oh and by the way, if you want respect and to be treated with respect....this is not the way to do it...
Self respect works a hell of a lot better than claiming to be a slut.

No comments: