Warning; We are not a politically correct site. Don't like us? Don't read.

Thursday, April 17, 2014

Feminist lawyer tries to set-up cab driver.....

You gotta watch the video, this is a feminist lawyer, trying to set up a taxi driver, in the video he expresses his loyalty to his girlfriend, but she keeps on pushing...trying to set him up?
This is why men have to be very careful, because feminists, and in this case a "lawyer", knows damn well how easy it is to falsely accuse a man of sexual advances, even if he shows respect, he still can get charged, thankfully, the video saved him, but...what if he didn't have a camera....
Me think it would of ended a whole lot differently.
My guess is, she would of advanced her status, career, if she would of been identified a victim?

When feminists say or claim, because of their experiences, "they are the experts", one has to wonder...
Especially when we hear those in the shelter industry making such claims. Personally if they would say this in front of me, I would ask them to prove it. False accusations against men is so prevalent and easy in our society, it puts the real victims and the constabulary in a precarious position, while investigating the alleged crime, the cops have to investigate to see if it's a lie...
Do we hear condemnation about this from the shelter industry and feminists, nope...not a frigging word...but then again, false claims and accusations helps them to falsify statistics for funding, inflated salaries and funding....

Another thing, feminists claim only 2% of rape accusation are false, if this is true, then why is it so fu***ing easy to find them.
Again, the story above is about a lawyer, this reveals how easy it is to make false accusations against men, when a feminist lawyer tries to do it.
Carry a recorder at all times??????
I know it's silly but under the circumstances, not a bad idea anymore.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

I seen a comment at the NP on this article;
"If this is the new women’s movement, it’s no wonder girls don’t want to call themselves ‘feminists’"

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2014/04/15/robyn-urback-if-this-is-the-new-womens-movement-its-no-wonder-girls-dont-want-to-call-themselves-feminists/



outdoors

Anonymous said...

This is the comment;

Zed • 43 minutes ago
Feminism, Totalitarianism, Nazism - all 3 are pretty much corresponding.

Feminism - We demand equality of rights for women in respect to men.

Nazism - We demand equality of rights for the German people in respect to the other nations (2nd point in Program of the NSDAP)

Feminism and Nazism have both -

- Discriminated against individuals on the basis of their genetic code.
- Promoted the view that the targeted group was inferior genetically and behaviourally
- Promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being labelled as 'parasites'
- Promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being constantly ridiculed
- Promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being laughed at even when mutilated .
- Demonised the target group by labelling them as perverts and sexual criminals,
- Sought to break the target group away from their families
- Promoted the view that the targeted group was responsible for most of the major ills in society
- Disseminated lies and disinformation about the targeted group in order to further promote their own ideology
- Disseminated lies and disinformation about historical matters
- Used intimidation, threats and coercion to prevent their opponents from speaking out
- Promoted the lie that the privileged group consisted of innocent 'victims' of the targeted group e.g. "women have been oppressed throughout history."

Anonymous said...

- Demanded special privileges in the workplace for members of the privileged group
- Discriminated against the targeted group in educational matters and in the workplace
- Perverted the justice system so that members of the targeted group were easily discriminated against in the law e.g. in family courts;
- Arranged matters so that accusers from the privileged group could be shielded by anonymity in the courtroom
- Arranged matters so that defendants from the targeted group had to 'prove' their innocence e.g. in sex-assault and domestic violence cases;
- Arranged matters so that members of the privileged group could capriciously define what, legally, was to be deemed 'a crime', e.g. where nowadays the 'feelings' of women rather than the behaviours of men are the determinants of what constitutes 'a crime'
- Arranged matters so that members of the privileged group could capriciously define how the law was to view certain matters e.g. a fetus inside a woman can now be deemed by her - at her whim - to be a worthless piece of tissue or a prospective baby - with all the ramifications of this - regardless of how the father might feel about it all
- Arranged matters so that the law punished members of the targeted group more severely than members of the privileged group for the very same crime .
- Arranged matters so that members of the targeted group were made responsible for the choices and behaviours of members of the privileged group e.g. in paternity fraud cases where duped fathers still have to pay child support
- Arranged matters so that members of the privileged group who harmed, or even murdered, members of the targeted group were shown undue leniency - and were often actually applauded for their actions,.
- Arranged matters so that the law punished members of the targeted group severely for even trivial offences -
- Arranged matters so that members of the privileged group earned a right to the property of members of the targeted group for no other reason than that they were members of the privileged group
- Arranged matters so that certain speech or attitudes directed against the privileged group were criminalised
- Punished those who protested against the prevailing ideology; e.g. for being politically-incorrect.
- Effectively controlled the mainstream media and the academic institutions and arranged for them to present a dishonest and dishonourable point of view in support of their ideology
- Consistently highlighted and exaggerated the achievements and the suffering of the privileged group while downplaying the achievements and the suffering of the targeted group
- Ran government-funded educational courses in universities and in schools to promote the privileged group at the expense of the targeted group.
- Persisted in a long term campaign of hatred toward the targeted group,

Bar the heavy violence and the gas chambers - feminism and Nazism are pretty similar.

The Native Canadian said...

I do believe the more we point this out the more feminism will become more irrelevant,we also have to take away their power base, schools, shelters, child protection, and any other social programs they have their grubby mitts on...then maybe, a rational society can take root, with the respect for all point of view and human rights.

Govardhan Avvaru said...

Great site, It is simple but very accurate info… the quality of information that you are providing is simply marvelous. Many thanks for sharing this.
Regards, cabs in hyderabad

The Native Canadian said...

Your very welcomed...and thank you.