Warning; We are not a politically correct site. Don't like us? Don't read.

Monday, March 31, 2014

Chimps, my little dog and feminism, a comparison...

Are Chimps smarter than Feminist?
Jane Goodall first observed a chimpanzee, David Greybeard, using a tool in November of 1960. She watched from a distance as David poked pieces of grass into a termite mound and then raised the grass to his mouth. After he left, Goodall approached the mound and repeated the behavior because she was not sure what David was doing. She found that the termites bit onto the grass with their jaws. David had been using the grass as a tool to “fish” for termites!
Soon after Goodall’s initial discovery of tool use, she observed David and other chimpanzees picking up leafy twigs, stripping off the leaves, and using the stems to fish for insects. This change of a leafy twig into a tool was a major discovery. Before this, scientists thought that only humans made and used tools, and that this ability was what separated humans from other animals. This discovery caused famed anthropologist and palaeontologist Dr. Louis Leakey to write this famous line in a telegram to Goodall:
Now we must redefine tool, redefine man or accept chimpanzees as human.

But now fifty years later chimpanzee may once again redefine mankind, it has been observed that chimpanzee when ‘fishing’ for termites can in fact significantly speed up the process and the quantity of termites they catch if they broke open the termite nest, but this technique is unsustainable, would destroy a continual food source and result in a counter attack by the termites.
The chimps have demonstrated an ability to conduct their parasitical relationship with termites in a sustainable manner as to not exhaust the termite nest and thus increase chances of survival, this survival instinct is not present in feminist.
Feminism a social movement for white women believe that men are the perpetual oppressors of women and that violence against women, rape, aggressive behavior,
are all symptoms of masculinity, thus the feminist movement has made it its primary objective to eradicate masculinity. Ironically women in their 30s who are childless, unmarried and on a steady supply of anti-depressants are now questioning “Did we overdo it”
An alarming amount of men have started to stay single and as a result they work fewer hours because the money they earn does not go towards women, this has also resulted in less tax going to the government and ultimately less money on government subsidies for women. There are even rumours that men are actually asking to split the bill on a date. Sadly women like Clara Strongwoman are finding it hard to find a man to support her “I just want to have kids, I was willing to be a good wife, cook and clean while the man bought home the bacon, but you lousy feminist had to ruin it for all of us with your endless victim-hood, outrageous demands and out of control sense of entitlement. We made it so hard for them, they simply gave up”

Researchers say that men may actually be rationally making decisions because they have been exhausted to the point that there is no benefit in them to be the providers of women.
Top feminist from different organisations were secretly recorded by an anonymous user called Agent Orange on a debate with each other if they exhausted their parasitical relationship on men.
Terry O’Neill: We were well aware that men had a breaking point but since the arrival of the internet men have become well aware of the indentured servitude that has kept them under all this time, it is not feminism fault at all, it is the Internets, we need to monitor and censor the internet if we don’t want this country to collapse!
>Gail Dines: We pushed them too far and now there’s no going back, we had men right where we wanted, they worked long hours while we could play hide and seek in our pajamas with the kids, they went to die in wars, while we did easy house chores with our washing machines, dishwashers and vacuum cleaners.
>Gloria Steinem: I agree with Gail we even had chivalry, a fu**ing social etiquette that was heavily enforced which disposed men to heroic actions for the benefit of women, but now chivalry is being associated with beta behaviour.
 Of course I agree with everyone in this room that emasculating and degrading men was the right thing to do, but we should have left a little bit of dignity in men so that they were still useful to us

>Bonnie Grabenhoffer: We could try shaming tactics but even the dumbest men still have an adequate survival instinct
 We are trying very hard to rebuild society by removing male spaces but now we have things like Men Going Their Own Way and male rights groups popping up

>Gail Dines: Why? We cant even shame men into doing things anymore, they have little masculinity, how can a man even sink lower? I think what we need to also do is destroy the male survival instinct. Then they will start marrying women again.

>Terry O’Neill: Our only hope is to dupe enough beta males into marrying these women, once they sign the marriage contract they belong to women. I say we bring in a single man tax?
When news came out of the secret recording of the feminist, Steinem issued this statement without taking any questions.
“This war on women that men are waging by doing nothing has got to stop! Now that they are opting out of marriage and fatherhood there is no one to provide cash to our hard earned entitlements we gained through equality, women are human beings we shouldn't have to work long hours like men”
Intelligence according to the Oxford dictionary is defined as the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills.
Feminist did not at any moment in their history demonstrate an ability to apply their knowledge and skills to be aware of their parasitical relationship on men, this would mean that chimpanzees have a superior survival instinct to feminist as chimps are not only aware of their parasitical relationship with termites but realize if they want to survive they have to be sustainable.

Thus chimps are smarter than feminist.
--------------------------------
We had a similar post a while back, most of it was sarcasm meant for the local feminists of Lanark county Ontario, who troll and monitor this site in the desire to see us, me especially, threaten or write something that might be considered violent, or a threat.(good luck with that)
It made fun of a comparison between feminism and primitive humans.

HagAsaurus Parasiticus PetAcatOsaurus.(lol) AKA;Feminism;
Definition:
This creature never takes responsibility for her own words, she will blame others for the trouble she causes, a creature who hates herself, her male counterpart and even those of her own sex if they do not sign on to her philosophy and idealism. One must tread lightly around the HagAsaurus Parasiticus PetAcatOsaurus, she is one with low self esteem, sub intellect, a gigantic inferiority complex and is extremely jealous of other peoples happiness, therefore must be treated with caution. If allowed to multiply she will cause extreme damage to society and families around her.The irrationality of HagAsaurus Parasiticus PetAcatOsaurus's idealism and her hatred of the male of her species shows her evolution took a different path than those around her, whereas normal evolution shows dependency of male and female on each other made them prolific, HagAsaurus Parasiticus PetAcatOsaurus's dependency on cats for companionship on the other hand made her very lonely and resentful, hence producing a being different from the norm and very dangerous to those around her. If not kept under control, HagAsaurus Parasiticus PetAcatOsaurus can destroy relationships, families, children and even in the long run, nations themselves.

We received many emails, stating this was extremely funny; and that's what it was meant for, to point out how ridiculous and dangerous this type of idealism is, if it is allowed to continue, with a little comedy.

I think the point to all this is, feminism as it stands now, is very disruptive to society, their policy of division, the blame game, victimizing women, even the inferiority complex attached to it makes men and women shake their heads at some of the idiotic thing they say, let alone what they actually do to promote such a ridiculous concept they seem to live with.
The very idea that all men bad, or we rape for power, or we beat loved ones during sporting events or even that we would actually send our daughters to a college if a rape culture did exist, as if we are total morons, shows who is the moron in that argument.

Many of the sites now online, speak out of experiences with these "people", not male privileges as they vehemently aim to as their main arguments. I personally am not a professional writer, never claimed to be, though I am trying to write a book on these matters, what I do put on here is not for fame or money, but based of personal experiences with the feminist population of Lanark county Ontario. (which by the way, would never exist if they only would of talked to me instead of "trying" to demonize me to my own kid and at every turn).

Those of us who are rational, understand full well that the human race, never went in the direction they seem to point to, we all suffered together at the hands of those who would think of themselves as privileged enough to rule over life and death, aka kings and queens. We fought together to get kids out of mines and manufacturing plants, to give our women the vote and equality, equal pay, to end slavery,so on...not to mention all the men who died in wars, (started by the privileged), to ensure freedom for all who came after us...namely our kids.

So, when we do look deeply at what they say, their arguments, their idealism, we have to shake our heads and ask where the hell do these "people" come from, or simply point out the lack of intelligence involved in their arguments.
One cannot debate someone who has an inferiority complex, or a hate on for a group, you can't debate nazis about Jews, you cant debate the kkk about blacks and we cant debate feminists about men or stay at home moms. The only thing we can do is show what they represent, what they say, ridicule it with a little comedy and inform people as to their real identity.

As I said, this site is monitored deeply by: the interval house in Carleton place Ontario, feminist lawyers at the legal clinic in Perth Ontario, some of their girlfriends from the local constabulary have also done it in the past, we have offered debate, welcomed their opinions, but the only thing we did get is comments about promoting hate about women, or putting in question our Native identity.
I dare anyone who reads and supports this site to direct us to when we promoted hate against women, I have 2 daughters, if we where to promote hate, then we would also do it to our daughters, hence the stupidity of their comments. That is the answer of someone who has...an inferiority complex, as in; men all bad, no need to debate that issue.

Are chimps smarter than HagAsaurus Parasiticus PetAcatOsaurus (lol) (aka;the feminist)?

For that matter, are those who listen to statement such as "recognize that male power is upheld by rape and sexual harassment", or believe that there is a rape culture in our universities, or that there is a war on women, and accept this "CRAP" as reality, smarter than, let's say my little dog?
After what they put me though and from what I have heard them say about me in the past year(s)....
Nope!
My Little dog does not bite me for no reason, the way I have been bitten by those I thought to be in my circle.
Case in point.
lanark county interval house
Here is an open challenge to the local feminists, take this "hate message" off your website and I will stop using it.(forever)...Fair?
It is not very "intelligent" of you to have this on said site, while going to males mpp, mp, mayors, counsellors, county counsellors, while sticking your hand out for more money, and they do know about it.
Neither is it very smart of you to have this hate message when you go to females politicians since they do not believe they raise their sons to be power hungry rapists is it?

Sunday, March 30, 2014

Feminists loosing the argument on their rape culture argument...Feminists moking the word rape.

Barbara Kay: A bump in radical feminism’s control of the gender agenda

The CBC’s Jian Ghomeshi is the most amiable, open-minded guy in the world, with a good sense of humour to boot. The perfect radio host. His weekly show, Q, frequently provides proof of his willingness to explore both sides of a gamut of issues in the classic liberal tradition.

Unfortunately, amongst doctrinaire feminists, amiability, intellectual curiosity and even (especially?) a sense of humour don’t cut it when their pet theories fall into Q’s crosshairs. Ghomeshi had the temerity on Monday to host a debate about the veracity of “rape culture,” between Lise Gotell, chair of Women’s and Gender Studies at the University of Alberta, and conservative researcher Heather Macdonald of the Manhattan Institute.

A storm of indignation erupted, describing Macdonald as a “rape apologist” for expressing the perfectly sensible view that if girls did not “drink [themselves] blotto” at parties, the entire phenomenon called rape culture would virtually disappear. She is not wrong, but it is politically incorrect to “blame the victim.” No, the only correct view is that “Drinking doesn’t cause rape, it’s the decision of rapists that cause rape,” in Ms Gotell’s words.

If that were the case, then not only is one in four (or five, depending on your source) campus women the victim of a rape or rape attempt, there must be thousands of would-be or actual rapists roaming our campuses, who mysteriously stop being rapists once off the campus, since nobody is suggesting that our society as a whole is a rape culture. They can’t, because if, as Ms Macdonald pointed out, the risk were really that high on campus, nobody would send their daughters to coed campuses. And if the risk were that high in society, no woman would leave her home without an escort.

The rape culture myth had its origins in a September 1992 questionnaire in Seventeen magazine,
called “What’s Happening to you?” Among the questions posed after an introductory “Did anyone do any of the following to you when you didn’t want them to in the last school year”: “touch, pinch or grab you” “lean over or corner you,” “give you sexual notes or pictures,” “ “make suggestive or sexual gestures, looks, comments or jokes,” and “pressure you to do something sexual”? Only one – “force you to do something sexual”- related to actual rape.

Seventeen had 1.9 million subscribers at the time. They received 4,200 responses– or 0.2% of their market. Of the 4,200, 10% reported they had been forced to do something sexual.

Not only were the respondents not representative of the U.S. population, they were those who felt most strongly about the issue. But, with manipulation from women’s groups, this entirely unscientific SLOP (self-selected listener opinion polls) transmogrified into headlines like “A U.S. survey shows wide harassment of girls in school.”

By contrast, a credible survey conducted by Louis Harris polling took a random sample of 1,500 boys and girls in grades eight through 11, and asked them about harassment. Four out of five students, male and female, reported being harassed. What? Boys being harassed as well as girls? Gee, that doesn’t fit feminist theory. Some intrepid media people nevertheless dug a little deeper than was their feminism-indulgent wont and published skeptical stories about the original survey. An expert on sexual harassment, Billi Dziech, noted the imprecision of terminology, stating “There is a difference between something I would call ‘sexual hassle’ and ‘sexual harassment’.”

The rape culture meme always harks back to bad methodology, linguistic legerdemain and moral-high-ground entitlement. In the spring of 1993, nine women, art students at the University of Maryland distributed posters and fliers around campus, naming dozens of male students with the heading: “Notice: These men are potential rapists.” The women had chosen the names at random from the university directory as part of an art project. How did they get away with such irresponsibility? If you have to ask, you don’t know your feminist history.

We’ve made progress of a sort. (By “we” I mean objective, reasonable observers of the culture wars.) Those innocent men would not take such egregious defamation lying down today. And if the CBC isn’t afraid to touch this third rail of feminist dogma, there is reason to believe we have turned the corner on radical feminism’s control of the gender agenda. We’ve come a long way, baby.

Also....
Feminist 'consent toolbox'
Thats worth listning too...a feminist toolbox before sex....consent panties...lol.

Saturday, March 29, 2014

Oh! That bad ol' patriarchy that ensures freedom and security...

Feminist Huffington Post blogger Anne Theriault says the Men's Rights Movement is garbage this week and she uses the "Don't Be That Girl" posters as "proof". And the following part where she claims that the feminist movement is trying to help men by eliminating the evil omnipresent patriarchy takes the cake:

"Our patriarchal culture and its strictly enforced gender roles which, hey, happens to be exactly the same power structure that feminism is trying to take down.

The patriarchy has some fucked up ideas about masculinity, ideas that make men less likely to seek help for issues that they perceive to be too feminine -- such as being hurt or raped by a female partner, not being able to provide for themselves, or not seeking help for health issues like depression and anxiety...

Yes, the patriarchy overwhelmingly privileges the interests of men, but it also hurts men. It hurts men in all the ways that MRAs are apparently so concerned about, which means that you would think that MRAs would be totally on board with dismantling the patriarchy, but they're not. Instead, they would rather blame women for their problems."
story originated from Exposing feminism...
 Why the Men's Rights Movement Is Garbage by Anne Theriault.Feminist blogger

Let's make it "simple" for this feminist blogger...and her inferiority complex.
The bad ol'patriarchy(which is not what she describe it as) is responsible for...
Her right to write such trash
Her right to free speech...
Her right to live in a secure society...
on and on and on...
Take this down, as she says feminism is trying to do....
and there goes her rights...
This site and others DO NOT blame women for our problems, that is stupidity, our mothers, sisters and daughters are women...we blame feminists like her who spew propaganda a la josef goebells.
"Tell a lie often enough and people will believe it".
As for the women of our society, 85% do not consider themselves feminists and only 15% and falling consider themselves feline lovers...

So, here is instances of that bad ol'patriarchy which overwhelmingly privileges the interest of men...
Oh! that bad ol'patriarchy....
I feel so fuck*ng privileged.
 
 
And by the way, this is what patriarchy really means.
The family Elders.
and for that matter...the matriarchy.

Friday, March 28, 2014

Everytime I see women exposing the truth about feminism, it gives me that fuzzy feeling of gratitude...

Referring to the equal right amendment past in 1972, 42 years ago.

Isn't it refreshing the ladies are now pointing out that they do not need the hatred of feminism or their inferiority complex and that the majority of them consider feminism to be an organisation that do not speak for them....?
This site and many others love and support all the ladies who do not consider themselves permanent victims, or a tool for false statistics by women's shelters, especially here in lanark county ontario, and support the idea and "fact"that we all fight for each other, men and women, for the betterment of life and the next generation.
Without the co-operative nature of men and women, we cannot have advancement, which is what feminists want since the division they promote produces a constant flow of victims needed for fake statistics and inflated funding and salaries.
Which basically is called corruption...
In good ol'lanark county here we have the local women's shelter in carleton place ontario promoting statements like in "men uphold power through rape", organisation like the legal clinic in Perth ontario obviously supporting it since they say nothing against it and expect us to believe they are "unbiased", we have those who openly claim they do not weed out false claim because it would "limit" funding, (the hell with the men who are falsely accused?) and they expect blind support...
That, to me anyway is called an inferior intellect...people who cannot with the power of simple understanding and compassion understand or comprehend the damages they cause to the real victim and to those who are falsely accused. And because of this they are loosing support, they think all women are stupid enough to follow such idiotic policies.
Since it is never a good idea to post without proof of what one is saying...for your viewing pleasure.
erin lee todd
Sarcasm aside...how many father have been denied access to their kids because false claims are "not weeded out", how many husbands or boyfriends have been unduly demonized because of this policy, this is why women no longer recognize feminism as a voice for women....


Thought of the day....Honor, family and friends.

Sometimes one must realize life is not about money but about the strength of a persons heart, not about money but strength of family bonds, not about money but about a simple thing as a name.

Many have lost the capacity to understand the meaning of honor or respect, the way it dictates a person's path, a stand against an enemy for the protection and love of family...

To defend the honor of a name is the most honorable of battles, for that battle is only recognized by the individual who fights it, there are no medals, no recognition, no parades.

The defense of one's honor does not depend on others, but yourself; life, freedom and the pursuit of happiness has always depended on the very few who understand that philosophy.

Unfortunately, many have lost this important perspective, failed to appreciate the value, or simply lost their belief in the role model to the young. History, whether personal or civilisation itself has always depended on the understanding, that without honor, without personal respect, there is no future, not for the individual not for society itself.

If you find yourself alone, outnumbered, look at the mirror....
if you are satisfied in what you see, if you did your best, then your battle is won...

Honor can only be upheld by the one, no one will give it to you, it must be earned, most will fail because of their misinterpretation of it's meaning, but the few who succeed, have found the way of the Warrior...

And that is what life is all about....
-------------------------------
Are these words living in the past....Maybe...but then again.
When I look around me, the anger, the rage, the vendetta minded, the revenge seekers, or simply those who pray to the new gods, namely money, material goods, control. I see pain in their eyes, emptiness in their heart, loneliness in their lives and they are always searching for contentment, not knowing it is in front of them. People like that will never understand the value of a friend, someone who will put it all on the line for you or the importance of family, the sacrifice we must do for others.
I have learned a lot these past few years, and especially these past few days, from those who stood by me and those who "tried" to cause me pain for no reason other than money and power. Family used and abused for financial benefit, statistics, and power over other.
It most definitely made me more reclusive, but I am secure in one thing, I know who I am thanks to them, I know who is real family and who is my friend...
They may be few and far between but at least, finally....
I know who is who....

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

Monday, March 24, 2014

Working women must stop blaming men for their troubles.

Says Sunrise presenter Natalie Barr who has ‘never been discriminated against’

It takes a lot of guts to come out and say that in the current climate.

I don’t remember the other junior male reporters being given better stories than me.
They were learning too. Some days I got a good story, other days the boys did. They were the days where the producer yelled at you if you stuffed up a story, and I can tell you it was ­definitely equal opportunity yelling.
I yelled back when I thought I was right, and I went home with my tail ­between my legs when I missed something the other journos had in their stories.
When my contract was up I forced myself to walk in and ask for a better deal.
Not a lot of women I know jump for joy when they have to negotiate with the boss but I don’t think that’s the boss’s fault.
Isn’t it ours? I chose to take just a few months off after I had each of my boys.
I wasn’t earning much but I sat down with my husband and we decided that it was worth taking a financial hit, paying a big chunk of my wage on childcare.
Our reasoning was if I kept working and was able to climb up the ladder, I might get paid more.
I’ve always thought that if you take years off work to raise your kids, whether you’re a man or a woman, it’ll be hard to get back into the workforce and certainly at the level you were before.
It’s great that many ­people have the choice to stay home with their children, but I also personally ­believe each choice we make comes with consequences that we have to live with.
For 11 years I’ve worked with some exceptional men on Sunrise.
I don’t know what they get paid.
They don’t know what I get paid.
But if I felt undervalued and ripped off, I’d leave.
I know there are many women out there who are trapped in situations where they do feel disadvantaged, discriminated against and overlooked because they are women.
In no way am I underestimating their pain and frustration and helplessness and the need for change in ­industries where that’s ­happening.
In the past few weeks though, I’ve felt that there has been a growing tide of women attacking men in general.
I’m starting to wonder if many of us need to find a better drum to beat than the one that blames men for most of our problems.
Isn’t it about time we took some ownership?
If a man got the job ahead of you, was it because he was better?
That can’t be impossible … can it?
Should we be brutally honest with ourselves and ask if we need to change the way we approach things?
I just don’t think “us” against “them” helps anybody in the long run.

Natalie Barr is the news presenter on Channel Seven’s Sunrise.

Sunday, March 23, 2014

Now, It's all babies fault. A perfect example of the disgusting evil nature and hatred today's feminism has endorsed.

Amanda Marcotte
Amanda Marcotte is a freelance journalist living in Brooklyn. She focuses on feminism and other things, depending on her mood.
 
We give women more opportunities to leave work early for their mothering duties and some gold-plated day care and perhaps some re-education camps (don’t say that out loud) and eventually, they will succumb to our soft coercion and know that having a baby is what they really want, like they should, because all ladies love babies—and all ladies want a baby right now because they are so cute—because they are ladies.
Well, let me just put a stop to this shit right now. You can give me gold-plated day care and an awesome public school right on the street corner and start paying me 15% more at work, and I still do not want a baby. I don’t particularly like babies. They are loud and smelly and, above all other things, demanding. No matter how much free day care you throw at women, babies are still time-sucking monsters with their constant neediness. No matter how flexible you make my work schedule, my entire life would be overturned by a baby. I like my life how it is, with my ability to do what I want when I want without having to arrange for a babysitter. I like being able to watch True Detective right now and not wait until baby is in bed. I like sex in any room of the house I please. I don’t want a baby. I’ve heard your pro-baby arguments. Glad those work for you, but they are unconvincing to me. Nothing will make me want a baby.
And don’t float “adoption” as an answer. Adoption? Fuck you, seriously. I am not turning my body over for nine months of gaining weight and puking and being tired and suffering and not being able to sleep on my side and going to the hospital for a bout of misery and pain so that some couple I don’t know and probably don’t even like can have a baby. I don’t owe that couple a free couch to sleep on while they come to my city to check out the local orphans, so I sure as shit don’t own them my body. I like drinking alcohol and eating soft cheese. I like not having a giant growth protruding out of my stomach. I hate hospitals and like not having stretch marks. We don’t even force men to donate sperm—a largely pleasurable activity with no physical cost—so forcing women to donate babies is reprehensible.
This is why, if my birth control fails, I am totally having an abortion. Given the choice between living my life how I please and having my body within my control and the fate of a lentil-sized, brainless embryo that has half a chance of dying on its own anyway, I choose me. Here’s another uncomfortable fact for anti-choicers: Just because a woman does want children doesn’t mean she wants them now. Maybe she’s still got some fun-having to do. Or maybe she has a couple already and, already well-educated about the smelly neediness of babies, feels done with having them. Either way, what she wants trumps the non-existent desires of a mindless pre-person that is so small it can be removed in about two minutes during an outpatient procedure. Your cavities fight harder to stay in place.

She goes on with some pretty unrealistic comments on what society is, according to her and people like her, having babies is a fu***ing disease that's imposed on women. It is amazing we have Neanderthals like her still in a society that finances, helps, support, and show deep understanding and respect for parenthood, especially motherhood with all the programs offered by all of us(keeping in mind no one is forcing anyone into anything). Nothing we do, or say will ever satisfy these feminists, its not enough men, according to them are all bad and those who choose life instead of death are imposing, but now it all baby's fault. Or as she makes it perfectly clear, women are been bullied into been "stay at home moms..."
Is there a reason that we should bully women into pretending that they’re more interested in being selfless and eternally nurturing than they actually are, even at great cost to themselves?
Is the pressure that’s dished out to women to serve at great cost to themselves just oppression, an attempt by society to extract labor and other goods out of women without giving them compensation and respect for it?

Full post here...
-------------------------------
In her follow up she perfectly explains what we have been saying about what radical feminists really think of the majority of women...especially stay at home moms...
Frankly, the more traditional, conservative argument against abortion—no, they’re not going to lift a finger to help you with your unwanted baby and you should have thought about that before fucking, you stupid slut who deserves to suffer—at least has the refreshing scent of honesty to it.
No one in their right mind would agree with this bull shit, as a matter of "fact" help for mothers and mothers to be, has greatly advance in our society and is something to be very proud of... Not that feminists have noticed or would acknowledged any of it...
We have plenty of "Real women" who donate their time just like Joseph's house for women who offer support for unplanned pregnancies....amongst many other programs outside of abortions which causes extreme difficulties and mental anguish feminists seem to avoid talking about.(and they say they care about women?)
The psychiatric establishment is now taking seriously the possibility that abortion is a cause of anxiety, depression, alcoholism, drug abuse and suicide.
Shows the reality that feminists are so afraid of, women can and have the ability to provide moral leadership outside of the rambling of the local cat lovers crap.
-------------------------------------
 
What can one say about this shit, other than, isn't it convenient that everyone who is a baby hating feminist has already been born?
This is what the education system (women's studies) is producing?
 
Ironically, this "feminist" was a loud, smelly, demanding, needy,lentil size, brainless embryo, mindless pre person, time sucking monster herself at one time.
 
The very idea this cat lover is been paid to write such crap is simply amazing...
Whats next, the Elderly is a post persons which cost the health care system too much and should be euthanized...?
 
We have to be aware that these people who bow to the feline deity are inside our society, they have more than shown their hatred for the male of the species, the stay at home mom and now are going after the ones that assures the prolongation of said species, Babies.
The reason we exist is not only for ourselves but for the human race as a whole. In order for us to continue we depend on families been healthy, especially babies. Without the capability to endorse this reality, this "person" and people like her are on a path to the annihilation of the human race on this planet....
There is no other way to look at this, the evil that exist must be eliminated and this evil resides inside the feminist movement.
 
Let's face it once and for all, when they attack new life, they represent anti-life, the hatred of life itself, and it embodies a danger to the continuation of humanity.
There is an evil amongst us, and you don't have to be religious to define it, you just have to read...
 
I am glad to say the majority of the ladies do not subscribe to the shit that comes out of amanda marcotte's mouth. If someone would be tagged as a hater, it would be her.
What's important is to expose them all, what they really think, believe and promote, even if it's one hater at a time.
Trying to convince, debate or rationalise people like her or any feminist is a lost ot time, one cannot debate stupidity, the only thing we can do is point it to all those who are quiet about what is been said in their names and ask...
Is this what your supporting?


Saturday, March 22, 2014

Fake rape culture story exposed.

Georgian First Grader Beaten and Sexually Assaulted by Male Classmates…School Says Boys Just “Rough Housing”
Valdosta - Three first grade boys kept a female classmate outside after recess by hiding in the woods, pushing her face first into the ground. The victim, whose name is being withheld, has suffered scarring to the right side of her face from broken tree branches and rocks that she was allegedly assaulted with both physically and sexually.
The victim was able to escape the male classmates after fifteen minutes of torture, running into a fifth grade classroom and alerting a teacher of what had happened. The principle of the elementary school said he had a “man to man” talk with the boys and their parents, giving them two days of suspension. He neglected calling the local authorities claiming “it did not seem like a police matter, just simple rough housing gone a little too far”.
The parents of the victim are looking to press charges on the boys for sexual and physical assault, as well as a possible law suit against the school district. District superintendent was not available for comment.
This is called rape culture you guys. The girl was 7 years old and they called it “rough housing” between boys.

This is the "fake" rape culture story that was posted online on tumblr, though it is no longer on the website, "deleted" we can clearly see by searching the title that it used to be there...it does pop up on google.
http://dropmycumberbritches.tumblr.com/post/79911534991/georgian-first-grader-beaten-and-sexually

This fake rape culture story was exposed by this website,  the fake post even had the picture of a little girl who was scared in the face, this picture was taken from Australia, from a story of her been attacked by a kangaroo.
thebearqueen:

affabulous:

untrue-posts:

dropmycumberbritches:


Georgian First Grader Beaten and Sexually Assaulted by Male Classmates…School Says Boys Just “Rough Housing”
Valdosta - Three first grade boys kept a female classmate outside after recess by hiding in the woods, pushing her face first into the ground. The victim, whose name is being withheld, has suffered scarring to the right side of her face from broken tree branches and rocks that she was allegedly assaulted with both physically and sexually.
The victim was able to escape the male classmates after fifteen minutes of torture, running into a fifth grade classroom and alerting a teacher of what had happened. The principle of the elementary school said he had a “man to man” talk with the boys and their parents, giving them two days of suspension. He neglected calling the local authorities claiming “it did not seem like a police matter, just simple rough housing gone a little too far”.
The parents of the victim are looking to press charges on the boys for sexual and physical assault, as well as a possible law suit against the school district. District superintendent was not available for comment. 

This is called rape culture you guys. The girl was 7 years old and they called it “rough housing” between boys.


This is called “I want a popular text post, and I think that if I make the source say CNN then people will just assume that it’s legit even though there’s no actual link to an article.”
This is a fake post. The source link is just a link to CNN’s main page, not to an article about anything like what OP describes. Go ahead, google the headline. The only result is this post. Try searching the story on CNN, where it supposedly came from. Again, you’ll come up empty.
If authorities were not naming the girl involved, a picture of her certainly wouldn’t accompany any article on the subject. In fact, that photo is of young Makayla McEvoy, an Australian girl, after she was attacked by a Kangaroo on New Year’s Day of 2012.
For some reason, dropmycumberbritches threw caution (and their integrity) to the wind and made something up, apparently thinking that nobody would take the time to check their story. While it’s very true that tumblr is full of incredibly gullible people, there are those who understand the virtue of fact checking posts like this before spreading them around.
But if I’m judging by the statements made by people who have already reblogged this post, the fact-checkers are vastly outnumbered by people who believe everything they read.

It takes two seconds to do a reverse google search on the photo to see it’s a little girl who got attacked by a kangaroo… What kind of messed up, sick person would make up a story of a little girl being sexually and physically abused and pretend it’s real for notes on tumblr? You are seriously fucked in the head. 

I really hope OP is ashamed of themselves, holy shit. Talk about trivializing rape.Don’t make shit up to prove a point. Just don’t. It makes your cause look weak and sensationalized, and it makes you look like a cunt.Stay classy, tumblr.

It gets better: in one of her most recent posts, Cumberbritches expresses outrage that a middle aged woman who repeatedly raped an eight year old boy is going to prison (for 12 months), claiming that it’s the evil patriarchy punishing her when she did nothing wrong.
http://www.centralwesterndaily.com.au/story/793373/roo-attacks-girl-at-wyangala/

We have seen and read many stories of false rape accusations, false sexual assaults, assaults and many others online, men falsely imprisoned, (brian banks comes to mind), so on...
Some of the accusations are so ridiculous that one wonder why the hell they even make the light of day outside of personal revenge or mentally disturbed women who have nothing else to do...whatever the reason it is a major problem in our society, not only does it destroy instantly the reputation of any man that goes through it, but it also has a tendency to make said man guilty first, especially with the co-operation of the main stream media's insistence on printing the names of the accused before they are even found guilty(freedom of the press?). In these case, it's always guilty till proven innocent, that's not the way it's supposed to work.
Those who have suffered under this new way of searching for justice is men, we have not seen as of yet women been falsely accused of rape; but also the "real victims" of "real crimes" since we now have to go on the assumption they might be lying, and the justice system, investigators who also have to look at this possibility to try to get to the truth.
It's bad enough that we have to go through fake accusations, some out of revenge, financial gains, or some overnight drunken wing ding, but now they are posting fake rape culture stories online...
Some of them are even demanding that we make criticizing feminism illegal, Really?
How about starting with prosecuting those who report, make, and print false accusation shouldn't this take precedence since it is already illegal to do it....
Here is the site, again that initially made this false report....
http://dropmycumberbritches.tumblr.com/post/79911534991/georgian-first-grader-beaten-and-sexually
Pass it on, let's shut them down.

Personal thoughs...
There is no such thing as a "rape culture", true there is the act of evil individuals, and that is both genders, but to say a rape culture exists is to insult all, fathers, brothers, husbands and sons....
How can there be a rape culture in a society that has a majority of men who simply do not allow it, fight against it and pursue it as a crime against our women?
This is like the ridiculous notion of "the war on women", I can only speak for myself but go ahead and try to make war on my daughters see what will happen...
Men as a whole are AGAINST inequalities for our women...we fought together to get our kids out of manufacturing industries, coal mines, the vote, equal pay for equal work, this is not the private domain of feminism or any other self serving organisation.
Faking such things only help those who thrive on it for financial gains, shelters, feminism, some of the elite, the power hungy greedy few, it keeps us divided and at each others throat while we should be going after the few "individuals" who do harm.

Friday, March 21, 2014

March 21st; Happy World Down Syndrome Day...

Happy World Down Syndrome Day!

We celebrate with YOU!

Spread the Word that ALL Life is Precious!
 
We all have a place in the circle of life, the gift of the individual enriches all of us.


Man is an imposter...Make feminists dictators.

1922.....
2014....
We concluded a while back that feminism has a dislike for the male species....(duhhh!)
This conclusion is also based on experiences.
One says men are parasites and slaves, subdue males, women superiority, men and that is fathers, sons and fathers of women are an afterthought of nature..oook, no hatred here...(sarcasm)
And the other, which is supported by local feminists in Lanark county Ontario, says, men sexually assault and rape women for power....(still on their site to this day)
Which in it's definition basically says men are animals to be controlled and hated....
and we are horn dogs.
Same shit isn't it.....
First of all, besides the clownish definition of humanity by the cat lovers, local or otherwise, humanity, males and females, cannot survive without each others co-operation. Life is as simple as that, therefore statements like those above are based on hatred by a hate group.
It is recognized as such not by simply listening and defining them that way, but by pointing out their wacky, idiotic, stupid, low intellectual reasoning of the world around them based of an inferiority complex.
This site as so many others, where created not by hatred of feminism or something to do; if they made any king of sense and if their message was honest, it might be different...emphasis on might...
But that is not reality, anti feminist sites are created and pop up every day, (by men and women) outnumbering pro feminist ones because of our individual experiences with them, our investigation in what they represent and where they came from, as we can see above.
We realise this hate group did not start by only demonizing men, but races also...which is borderline nazism, before nazism was around...
They (feminists of the day) bitched about male dictatorships
and wanted to replace it with females ones?
We have had female dictatorships in history,
Queen Mary I - known as Bloody Mary
Catherine de Medici orchestrated the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre
Elizabeth Bathory bathed in the blood of young girls
There is many more but you get the point.
Turned out they were as "gifted" as any dictator...
Makes one snicker at the statement some of them made;
If women ruled the world.....
Not trying to demean women, just pointing out, different side of the same coin.
Power is power and power corrupts....male or females.

They have created for themselves a fantasy world that could never exist, based on hatred for half the population, the very half that ensures their freedom to express said hate freely. (men, warriors, soldiers, cops...so on). Does that mean men are better and in control, hell no, because "we understand" there is no existence without women, it's a balance of nature. We are "dependant" on each other, we compliment each other, we "exist" for each other survival. One cannot be free or exist without the other.

Women's shelters; manipulation, false statistics, anti male policies, parental alienation, radical feminist idealism, at the expense of families and children.

We have exposed inconsistencies by the shelter or interval house here in lanark county and nationally, the targeting of teenagers in schools, on and on and on...We have even got comments from the staff of the local shelter in Carleton place, saying we were promoting hatred....that alone shows they do not read what we post since we have shown support and defended women, stay at home moms, working women, and the rights of women to be what they want to be...
which is more than what they do. According to them all women are victims.
Their site claims men hold power through rape, this one defends the rights of families, working women, stay at home moms, fathers rights, children's rights and were promoting hate????
Yaa! OK.
 
Recently we lured them out of hiding by pointing out they were staying away from making ridiculous anti male statements, for fear of been exposed on this site. It's called playing with their over inflated egos...lol.
Sure enough, after almost a year of silence, and with the local media's co-operation, they are trying to explain their importance to the community and yes, asking for more money....we will never deny the need for such organisations, but not under the policy of hatred they seem to think is acceptable...

They have this recurring theme...
Yes again, the feminists only issue as of late...the death of the ladies in Montreal. They use this one so much for their anti male purposes that they are disrespecting those who died that day......
marc lepine (aka;Gamil Rodrigue Liass Gharbi) has become the feminists best friend and that is disgusting.
Of course! we should never forget...but there are many other problems we should bring up than constantly dealing with the past....
Like...
The safety of all depends on eliminating poverty, not constantly using an act by some nasty individual in the past, this does not help anyone in the present.
But then, what to expect from people who promote the vagina monologues and the rape of a 13 year old child as a "good rape".
 
The anti male policy, which we have brought up time and time again by this group of people, with this "all men bad", and "recognize that male power is upheld through rape and sexual harassment", or during sporting events like the super bowl and play-offs, we beat our loved ones with the help of the l.c.b.o.", can still pull in support. From some men???? Talk about suckers for punishment, or maybe it's just the mangina in them, you know, those who feel inferior as males and try to feel good by finding their feminine side or associating with feminists to boost their confidence.
erin lee todd
These guys are supporting those who are accusing them of been power hungry rapists 
and they have their faces on the poster...lol. 
 
They have a poster, I have a t-shirt worn by "real women".
 
Admittedly, some of them might not be "informed" to what these feminists represent or say about them, but this is no excuse for blindly supporting the staff of an organisation that thinks they use rape to hold on to power...
In the link above they say; a transition support program that helps women successfully re-establish themselves and their families in safe housing, they will even accept false claims of abuse,(as we see below, pic; the shelter), taking needed housing for those in need. 
Shelters are used for custody of kids against fathers, luring teen girls away from parents (i.e.; single fathers), false accusations based on the most ridiculous of statements...and when this is done, it takes funds away from those who need it...it also has a side effect like an addiction for the staff of these shelters, the more these policies are in use, the more money they need....it's always about money....not people.
In another statement they claim;
we offer two children's programs; one in the shelter and one from our outreach offices. These programs work directly with children who have either witnessed violence in their homes or have experienced it directly. The children benefit from direct counselling to help them process their experiences and to eventually feel safe again
This is scary, how would you like to have these "people" who thrive on demonizing men, fathers, husbands counsel your kids....
There is no benefit to a child if the claim made by the mother is false, and their policy is to accept any such claim as truth, according to one of their friend, they do "not" investigate,(see pic; the shelter)therefore as the video below exposes, children go though a counseling session about how their dad is bad.
Now there's a mistake that could last a lifetime.
Even if it is true, and some are, would they ever mention that not all men are the same and that not all men are bad, not bloody likely, turning a child into a permanent victim to be a future client and possible statistic...
 
They get over a million yearly, from governments, donations, sales, promotions, and still it's not enough....
Lanark county interval house
Now I'm not a math genius but I believe I see 1. 245 million...
and if you look at their site, they need and ask for...everything...
Lanark county interval house
Goes to wonder, what the hell do they do with all that money?

They will follow any means necessary to get as much funding as possible, even to a point of "not caring" if the story of those who crosses their path is true or not...but don't take it from me, take it from someone who is attached to this shelter...
Lanark county interval house
Now, I might be just a man, not been "picky" means they know there are false accusations...
But that would limit their funding?
How about weeding out the false ones so they can have the funds to help the real ones?
(shit, its a good thing she's on my side, I would hate to see if she wasn't)Sarcasm.
 
One of their favourite accusations is "men locking women up", whether be in basements, or closets....
I know someone who was "coached" into saying she was locked in the basement, and another in the closet...
But again, don't take it from me...
Lanark county interval house

Thing is, men have been and still are under constant attack from radical feminist controlled shelters, not to mention the most important aspect of all this, the alienation of children from their fathers(see video bottom).
This site was started because I found out they believed they could do anything they want, send as many of their friends to threaten anyone who dared to oppose them, try to demonize fathers to their children, or grandchildren, use their position to harass, without repercussion. 
Well, that is not the way things work any more, they might have the failing main stream media on their side, or insight fear on any politicians if they do not tow the line, but we have, the Internet...
And as long as we can show what we say is true, point to their dislike of the male species and ridiculous statements about men, we will show they are no help to any women and children, as they claim, and are a detriment to those who need help and a danger to the rest of us...
We to this day, demand the resignation of Erin Lee Todd and her staff, because they are attached to the site that claims all men hold power through rape, that statement alone shows they have no respect whatsoever for the male population of lanark county or Ontario, and these kind of policies have the distinction of keeping families apart and especially, keeping fathers away from their kids since false allegations are rampant.

As for the local politicians, those who "hold power", remember the next time they come begging for money, what they think of you.
And even if your a woman in power, they're accusing you of raising your sons to hold power through rape?

What it comes down to, I hold the same position Erin Pizzey does, women's shelters have been taken over by radical feminists who have an inferiority complex, who show disdain for men, and transfer these belief to those who go to them for help, keeping someone who could call themselves survivors into permanent victims....
Then again, by keeping someone as a permanent victim assures of a constant flow of funds...
(hence the false statistics)
There are many other organisations who co-operates with these policies and know full well, some of the claims that comes out of shelters are false.
 
Shelters must be taken out of the radical feminist and into the hands of experienced people, males and females who believe the act of the few does not encompass the whole. Those who can pass along the "facts" that men or women are not violent by nature and what happened to them was the act of an individual.
I do believe that if there were male examples, male workers in shelters, it would integrate the strength back into the people who needs a boost of confidence; show that men, as a whole are understanding and caring. But since they only have workers who have brought their hatred with them, how does this make them "experts" and how does this help a victim get her strength back when she is blasted with messages that can only be described as one sided.
In closing, the women's shelter program has become an industry, and their policy is to get as much money as possible at the expense of the victims, to accept any story, whether it is true or not, invites false statement in order to get on the top of the emergency list, quick custody against fathers, or just simply...revenge. 
Under these circumstances, no one gets the help they need, as a matter of fact it causes more damages than good.
Shelters have also been known to coach children against their fathers...

This video is from a child's own mouth, quite disturbing....
The most touching was her statement; "I don't think it's fair, they're wrong, we need a father"...
This is why this site exists, no one has the right to "use " kids against their parents....
No one! 

I will start making my own videos of interviews with people who have had experiences with shelters.
(coming soon)

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Open doors (smiths falls ontario), A place to avoid as parents of teenagers.

As of late, anti parent, anti family social programs in the neighbourhood(lanark county Ontario) have stayed away from the media and making ridiculous online statements. Why? who knows....(lol).
They use to be in the media (EMC-COURIER) every  week. After this site opened and pointed out their misgivings, they practically disappeared.
We found it difficult to criticize anything they claimed since they hid and refrained from offering this site any kind of statements that we could debate...we had to go back to previous posts on and on, and that gets "boring".
So, we had to lure them out with pressure to their "over inflated egos" by taking credit for their silence saying they were "afraid" of this site...
And sure enough....

Two of the local social programs, (deeply controlled by radical feminists and their manginas) interval house in Carleton place on. and open doors in smiths falls on., have started to make media statements about their "needed existence to the community" again, and maybe they are needed, but not the way they see it that's for sure.

Let's start  with open doors...
Open Doors offers network of child, youth mental health services

One of the worst mistakes we can make as parents is going to those who have no idea about the workings of your family home, the mistake they can cause could be irreversible and dangerous to your kids especially your teenagers.
They will claim to be experienced, but if we really think about it, if they never stepped into your shoes, how can that be...they certainly cannot gain that experience about your kids in universities, because everyone is an individual with separate individual character. Teenagers are a breed of their own, the raging emotions, rebellion, are not some thing that can be diagnosed by someone who have not been with them day in and day out, as parents have, this is, as we know, a passage of life for these kids and to identify it as anything other than that, by those who depend on how many kids go through their doors for funding is not exactly the smartest thing to do...
I know, I made that mistake....
When I went to these manipulators, I asked them first not to mention what I was telling them to my teen  once she came into the office, she was extremely rebellious, had medical problems and would have a bad reaction to it, especially towards me...I even told them that I was willing to accept that it could be me and I simply wanted an outside opinion...
As soon as I got my teen into the office one of the two "counsellors", a female, started right away with "your father said this and that about you"(does that sound like experienced people you want around a rebellious teenager?). needless to say, that shocked the hell out of me. I got one of the dirtiest look from my daughter, the "you told" look. Of course when we got home, as I predicted, things got worse.
Then the male "counsellor" as he saw I was not happy with what had just happened, gives me a frigging pen and told me to pretend it was a speaking feather...."Excuse me?"
First of all they were not native and had no idea on how that works and if they would have been, they would not of taken that rout. Native counsellors take a different road when it comes to family difficulties.
These two bozos had one policy in mind, it is always "the parents fault", and when they take that direction, the only response you get from your kid is "see I told you it was your fault" and when that happens, as we know, things just get from bad to worse.
Most teens as they grow, which most doctors will tell you have a chance of having a chemical imbalance in the brain, I know that mine had that and other medical problems. Because of their(open doors) inexperience they did not look at the possibility that this was something that they had to tread on carefully, to them they knew all and where better than the parent or the medical field.

As I looked further into this situation, I investigated other families, talked to parents, especially when some of them told me their kids had uncontrollable anger issues.This is usually seen between the age of 10 to 15.
The pattern I found is, alcohol and drugs....did the mother drink or do any kinds of drugs while pregnant, did the father drink or do drugs at conception? (and that includes pot, which has THC...that is a chemical which enters the bloodstream...male or female)
I am not knocking pot, just offering an opinion...

I do not claim to be an expert, but there was a pattern, either the mother drank even a little or did drugs before or during pregnancy, and if she did not, the father did at conception...and that was in every case...
Therefore, uncontrollable anger amongst kids at that early age might not be all emotional but medical, hence the chemical imbalance I was talking about. Which adhd can also be attributed to.
Teen help organisation will never offer you to look at the possibility of your child's behaviour been medical, they didn't with me anyway, by not looking at this issue, a parent might take their advice and goes home with the wrong information.
Not every anger issue is based on the point I made, it's just one possibility, I am a big believer that growing teenagers have this imbalance as they grow from childhood to adulthood, the pressure of changing habits, can cause stress and depression. Add the stranger in some office trying to tell them what and how to behave and the stress increases because now they see their parents cant handle them, believe it or not that is hurtful to a teenager.
Also teen girls are more than twice as likely to suffer from depression as teen boys.
Bad eating habits, fast food, too much sugar, some foods can negatively impact the balance of the body.
As parents we also have to be aware, depression in teens is different than depression in adults and can be triggered by events, situations or physical causes that would not have the same impact on an adult. Parents need to be familiar with the symptoms of teen depression and not ignore these warning signs if they occur.
The best way to handle this, is to be informed, not to throw your teen to the first snake oil salesman out there, promising a quick fix.

In the link above they call the medical field, "a "patchwork" of psychiatric services for kids in hospitals, who fail to consider the extensive network of child and youth mental health services available throughout Ontario from community-based agencies, like Open Doors for Lanark Children and Youth.", trying to convince us that they know more on this than doctors do. It is true that some kids go through emotional confusion while growing up, but that's all it is. The point is, what if it isn't, what if it is medical, and it is treated as simple teenage rebellion. Under those circumstances the kid and the parents are going in the opposite direction thanks to these people who try to demean doctors and pass themselves off as the answer.
Severe mental heath problems as they describe it, cannot be handled by people who turn on the parent the way they did to me, or pass off a pen as a talking feather, it has to be looked at by those who actually have experience in that field, and no, pills are not the answer either. The answer is to look at all possibilities, parenting, family, to recognize that kids need a role model, to have patience, to always be there and most importantly to accept that outside help is only an opinion, to be looked at and to decide if it is something you can adapt to your situation.

What really stand out, to me anyway, was this statement....
"The answer is clear: expand our network of community-based services and make them available to kids and families. Among other advantages, these community based services are far less costly to deliver and can avoid the pressure on expensive hospital based services in future years"

When they say "expand our network and less costly" they mean give us more money and that is what all this is about, funding....always funding....even at the expense of trying to demonize the medical field.
You don't have to be a rocket scientist to know Psychiatry and the medical field is better able to handle a chemical imbalance that someone who sees our kids as a tool for increase funding...

The whole article written by the chairman of open doors himself, Robert Laidlaw of Open Doors for Lanark Children and Youth was about trying to divert your attention away from going to the doctor and going to them, while it should have been explained that "both" must be looked at....
As I have said, if it is a chemical imbalance in the brain, there is "nothing" open doors can do, as a matter of fact, and from a personal perspective, they can actually cause more damages....

This post is based on research and personal experiences, I did find out that the best way to handle such a situation with your child is not to depend blindly on others for the welfare of your family, but to look at all opinions, yes even open doors, and see if it is something you can use to make things better....
Understand why such organisations exist, ask questions, look around, see if others have a similar problem. I did and got the same analysis I came up with, they(open doors) made things worse. The best person to correct a child is the parent, not some university educated person who believes they are a gift from the Creator to society.
Eventually, my daughter came back, why? Because I, as a parent never gave up, she apologized for listening to others and her behaviour, "you have always been there for me", and told me everything they did when she was lured away from home by unscrupulous people who looked at her as one more statistic for funding increase.(Local women's shelter and open doors)

I was having problem with my kid, asked for help, even contemplated it might be the way I look at things, and with a stab in the back by one, and a pen as a talking feather from the other, they made things worse, because they had this belief they knew more than anyone else....
In my honest opinion, when parents depend on teen help organisation of any kind, instead of having faith in their abilities, love and strengths, they have lost the connection with their child, that's what a stranger in your mist does, it waters down your position, because it is shared with someone else, and when that happens, the trouble can get even worse.
The other thing we have to be careful about is these people can and will by-pass parents and try to access your child with the co-operation of schools. Always be aware of who is around your child's life and this way, you have a chance.

Finally, remember this; As a parent stop depending on others who have never stepped a foot in your home or shoes, realise this is nothing new, it has happened to our parents, to us and eventually when they have kids of their own(that's when they will come to you and say; you were right).
If your lucky you will not go through this, but if you do, it's just a passage of life for them and if you go to strangers your passing on your responsibility to raise your own child to strangers. Your kids are between childhood and adulthood, that is a difficult time for them and you, they want to be treated as adults, you know they are not ready and that cause friction.
They are not little adults, they will be grown up when you decide they are, not some pen holding numnut who passes it off as a talking feather....

This came from a judge a long time ago and applies today...
 In other words, tell you child they have a responsibility to themselves and to others, teaching kids about responsibilities might not be learned over night, but it will stay with them, and if you do not teach it to them, who will? Certainly not "here is a welfare check if you want to leave home" social programs.
 
Keep in mind, they are our children, not a disease some try to pass on to others or try to find a cure for...from know nothings who look at them as a statistic for funding or inflated salaries.
We as parents, from time immemorial have build this civilisation with our love for them, teaching and passing on values that will help them in life...
They are not our best friends, they are our responsibility, there is a time for spoiling and a time for discipline, if you do not believe in discipline and let them grow on their own, don't ask why things are going wrong. Children respect and want this, it shows love and attention, they thrive on it, might not instantly show, but it will reward you in the long run...


I am a parent, just like all of us, the difference between us and organisations like open door, we know we make mistakes and we learn, they don`t, and that's what make them so dangerous...
I am not telling anyone not to look at these places, just to be aware and dictate what you expect of them, and that you are there for an opinion...they work for you, not the other way around.
If they refuse these condition then you know they are not the experience people they claim to be...
We as parents have given enough of our God given rights to the state, compare to before, things are getting worse because of it.