Warning; We are not a politically correct site. Don't like us? Don't read.

Saturday, August 31, 2013

Sexting, a problem promoted by the education system...

Feminists, manginas, and all in between have been promoting sex in schools as if it is something as fun as an xbox game, no were did any of these cat lovers even took the time to explain that sex is related to love, and that it is a moral issue between a man and a woman. A personal thing to be used as connection in a healthy relationship, not something you do to pass the time.  And as a teen, how important it is to talk to parents about it, since they have more experience on this issue than anyone else, including lonely feminists who have nothing but their cats to go home to.

So, now we have teens who look at sex as a fun thing without the moral implications, resulting in more std's, HIV, aids. But the really sad thing is a lost generation, where teens should be enjoying those years, they are stuck raising kids, usually on welfare, in housing, promoting job growth in those fields and child protection.

When you have people like weiner texting his weiner to women, and the media making fun, without talking about the implication to the young, then people get desensitized to it..

Sexting to young people can be extremely dangerous, it might be seen at the time as a personal thing between girlfriend and boyfriend, but relationship at that age usually do not last, and someone down the line might gets upset at the breakup. When this happens the pictures sent to one or the other can make it on the internet were all can see, and when it does, it stays forever, never to be deleted. This causes depression, shame, and in some cases suicides. 
All because, sex depraved cat lovers (aka feminists and their manginas) refer to sex as a fun thing to be used as an everyday thing just like eating lunch...
Parents have to get involved more, stop listening to these fools, take back what is ours, throw away those who have stuck their noses into our affairs and become more aggressive against spinsters who see our kids as a product for their ideology...If we don't ,we, unfortunately and God forbid, will see more and more suicides amongst the teens and all their gifts to the world will be lost. At 16 years old one is just a few years away from playing with trucks or barbies, it is not the time to be an adult, it's time to be a teen...

Teaching sex to kids at such an early age, kindergarten, grade one in some cases, by the education system, without going to parents first is a bad idea, it by-passes the authority of families and when the kids are in trouble, the only talk they had about the birds and the bees was from some college educated, women's studies, radical feminists who has no idea that sex is related to love and relationships.
Because the only thing they learned in college in those women's studies is not how to handle such a situation, but to blame all problems of the world on,,,,wait for it...here it comes....
Which has never existed in the context of the way they look at it...
Since patriarchy and matriarchy means the Elders.
Feminism and manginism is a small minority of sexually frustrated old hags who use little girls in colleges, another minority and never take responsibility for who and what they are, or the trouble they cause, their character of inferiority complex is then passed on to others...this group is and always has been a minority used by those higher up to manipulate and control. In the meantime the suicides, teen pregnancy, abortions, depression, drug abuse, generational welfare they are responsible for is further use to increase their self worth by making up more and more social programs to deal with the increasing problem, that is one hell of a way to promote job growth, at the expense of the youth.

Dr Phil and the Feminist Inquisition

Anyone they fell is a threat, they attack. No reason is given, they do it just because it's a man...or a stay at home mom, or...well, the list is too high to list it all.
Which is fine, because the more they do it, the more they feel embolden, and the more stupid they get...
The more people they attack the more people fight back.
Feminists want to be popular, in the limelight, chasing arguments that usually would not make sense to anyone with the smallest of education. We know now that they have no interest in really helping anyone unless it promotes their idealism, whatever that may be, their self importance, and to hide their self impose inferiority complex they have vs men...They feel so inadequate against the rest of the population that the only thing they have left is attacking anyone they "chose" as an enemy.
So far we know the feminists enemy is anyone, male or females, who are not feminists or manginas, that is what is left of their arguments.
So, I say let's give them what they want, they want to be popular, let's make them popular....
Every time they open their mouths, let's inform people what they say....
 Daddy must be proud his money went to educate his little girl in women's studies...and this is what he got.

This is above is definitely one of my favorites; "in co-operation with the liquor control board of Ontario, when the big game arrives, we drink beer and beat our women"....Lanark county rational feminism...lmao.

Now let's continue....

Hear no opposing views, see no opposing views and speak no opposing views.

Revisiting the Iraq war, in Syria...Poodles, sheeples and a leaderless western world...ww3?

Before we support blindly war, we must be informed...

I can't believe what I heard today, first, former general Mackenzie was on cbc and actually said that if America hits Syria it's because of obama saying there was a red line and to save face. So they are going to risk all out war, since they will have to do it alone, against an ally of Russia TO SAVE FACE???? Or credibility, obama's credibility...WOW...
Lewis Mackenzie: "this will be the first war I ever seen fought over credibility"...
Then we have the dufuss kerry, he comes out with a number of victim of these gas attacks, 1500, with about 500 kids death...Were the hell are these numbers coming from? All numbers till now was around 400. Then he says there is undeniable proof, it's confirmed it came from the Syrian government, the proof is there....Bullshit, No proof was shown, actually the excuse was...we can't tell where the proof came from because it would put our sources in danger....How convenient. The american support for obama and kerry's war is at 9%, that is lower than congressional approval...

Obama's vanity?

Who gassed these people, since the rebellion is now controlled by alqaida type of organizations, funded by the Saudis because of their fear of Iran, would they gas people and blame it on others? damn right....

"You better understand how serious this is" 

Rebels claim responsibility for gas attacks...

Would the Syrian government do it, doubtful, they are wining the war and they had their own troops in the area, they have backing of some powerful allies, Russia and Iran, if they did gas people, they knows it would cause more problems, and if they did use them, it would not be against children but in the front lines, what reason would they have to gas kids and civilians, they would at the least loose Russian support....and it would be all over the media, internet and the world.

Now, when the Iraq war came about, the same people involved in this crap were against it, calling bush all kinds of names...saying he needed congressional approval, remember obama saying he would never do this, how about kerry in the 2004 election...
They are actually repeating what they were supposedly against. And to have that duffus kerry who threw away his medals, an anti war protester...dead set againt the Iraq war, now telling us we should believe the same intelligence that lied about it, and again follow like good little sheeples, is by all mean the most idiotic thing I have ever heard. And to make this even more comical, they had g.w. bush on tv giving his support to these same people who called him hitler....

Just because kerry said there is proof, it should not be taken as a sure thing(remember all those pictures of powell and his Iraqi trucks at the U.N.).,...are people stupid enough to fall for this shit, a second time. Seems the media has, according to them, even here in canada, the proof is there....WHERE???? Just because kerry says so doesn't make it intelligence....
Show me these conversation between Syrian government officials about the gassing and them talking about gas mask...please...

What is Russia gonna do, hopefully nothing, hopefully...what about Iran...Shit I really hope they walk away too, because if they don't, this will roll out of control, and all this because of obama, biden, kerry's credibility?
Russia's President is not exactly happy with the threats the Saudis threw at him, the athlete and civilian during the Sochi winter games.either...
"Saudi Arabia threatened Russian President Vladimir Putin with Chechen terrorist attacks during the Olympic games if he doesn’t back off U.S. intervention in Syria."

 So far even NATO doesn't even want to get involved, there is a reason if they don't, they do not declare wars over someones credibility...
No problem let's all go to war...wooo hoo.....But...
obama, biden, kerry....you first....

Oh and remember this also, during the Iraq war, changed french fries to freedom fries, french cowards, France is a pussy...so on....
Now, a left wing anti iraq war socialist government who supported the decision of the government of the time to not get involved is in on it...lol
From Blair, Bush's poodle, to obama's French poodles...
Well at least this time, it fits..

The media has...Want to see what propaganda looks like, go watch greasy wolf blitzer and cnn...

Friday, August 30, 2013

KFC takes down “Hot Shot” ads.

(Washington D.C. August, 28 2013)  Stop Violent and Abusive Environments (SAVE)  announced today that Kentucky Fried Chicken has ceased their “Hot Shot Bites” Youtube ad campaign.  While KFC has made no official statement regarding the ads, it appears that they took them down in response to a swell of outcry concerning their capricious depiction of violence directed at men.  SAVE is taking credit for the development.
The ads, depicting a woman slapping a man in the face and then taking his “Hot Shot Bites,” which were introduced several months ago, sparked outrage in the men’s rights community.  SAVE responded with a petition as well as sending activists to KFC restaurants to complain. Facebook ads were placed in and around Louisville  KY., the location of KFC Headquarters, and several radio interviews with SAVE operatives were held concerning the ad campaign.  An email sent to SAVE supporters stated “the horrible ads were removed due to the efforts of thousands of individuals” and that the “removal occurred right after a week of intensive publicity and advocacy efforts, including radio interviews, emails, and restaurant visits around the country.”
First, it's important to note, even if kfc repeatedly defended the adds as fun and non violent, the point was, which they took their time to understand,  "what if it was the other way around", a man slapping a woman for fun and non violent.
Nonetheless, the important factor is, the men's right movement is here and powerful enough to make a world wide corporation fear it enough to figure out they will loose profits. And make no mistake, they did not pull the adds out of respect for men, but for lost of profitability, it's all about the money.

What if we would blame all rapes on all mothers?

Blaming all mothers for all rapes is as dumb as blaming all men for it...
If mothers, women, do not like to define as such, why do they let feminists do it to their sons?
Understand why men's rights is around, when they are done with us, they will come for you.

Thursday, August 29, 2013

Huffington Post Contributor Suggests women with different opinions should Be Raped

The Huffington Post has not condemned the attack. Surprise., surprise...
 Pascal Robert @probert06
@DLoesch I know you would look lovely with thigh high stockings and would love to have .................................. Wouldn't you? sexually disgustingly explicit...

We know the left is filled with feminism, manginas, accusing anyone who do not follow their bullshit as hate mongers, (as my site was), misogynists, patriarchy, abusers, rapist, rapist apologists, men hold power through rape, so on, so on, so on.....
Dare to have an opposing view and right away if it is a woman then she should be...raped?
Fu...in hypocrites.

I strongly suggest to the left they disassociate themselves with these hypocritical groups and media because they are dragging you down.

To pascal roberts....your a douche.
This douche also made this statement...Allah will deal with bother of your souls nicely.

This is what progressive left wing's tolerance looks like.

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

The female pedophile...repost.

Cry havoc and release the dogs of war.

Putin Orders Massive Strike Against Saudi Arabia If West Attacks Syria 

Evidence: Syrian Rebels used Chemical Weapons (not Assad)

Is It Possible The Syrian Rebels (Not Assad) Used Chemical Weapons?

Russia: No Proof Syrian Government Behind Chemical Weapons Attack

STOCKPILING WMD'S Syrian Rebel Chemical Lab Uncovered Near Capital Damascus

Syria and chemical weapons attacks: “Just trust us,” says everybody.

Russia and Iran Warn Against Intervention in Syria

Syria: The predictable and false "chemical" attack

 Syria's rebels: 'Enemies of Allah will die like rabbits'
UN'S Carla Del Ponte 'stupefied by Syrian opposition sarin gas use'

Stand down: The United States has no place in Syria's civil war

 UN Official,Syrian Rebels Used Sarin Nerve Gas, Not Assad’s Army

Not taking sides but been informed about the realities of what is going on might prevent war...and if we do go to a final confrontation, because the next world war will be just that, final, then let's do it for the real reason, not invented propaganda pushed by a subservient media.
I don't like dabbling into international affairs, because the propaganda for war is so obvious that it would take a sheeple not to figure it out.
We now see how far they are willing to go, there is plenty of evidence that this has a lot to do with pipelines from the middle east going to India and China and to avoid at all cost the building of said pipelines.
Our illustrious leaders even here in Canada, (where is Chretien when you need him) are thumping the war drums even when there is no proof of who used these chemical weapons, none whatsoever as of yet. What were supposed to believe the same intelligence that said Saddam had wmd's??? Are we that dumb?
Why not leave the U.N. do their work first and let's see where it goes. We know through videos the rebels have used them in demonstrations on rabbits.Even Carla Del Ponte, who is not known to side with dictatorship has admitted the rebels have used them.
Did the other side use them, who knows, but I know this and it does not take a rocket scientist to figure it out, after Iraq, Libya, why would Syria openly use said weapons on the civilian population and have dozens of dead children plastered all over youtube?
After all, they are winning the civil war, the rebels (alqaida) are on the run and the use of chemical weapons would invite nato to take the rebel sides.I don't thin Assad is that stupid.
It is amazing, when we claim to be so advance that sheeples, sorry, people, are still capable of been stirred into a frenzy of war with only a few b.s. words from anyone who simply say "these are my words and you must believe ".
Do we have a free press, even here in Canada, you be the judge and listen to see if the other side is given a chance?
I am not taking sides, don't care, both sides in the Syrian civil war are nuts, but when it comes to war, where allies and enemies are facing each other and putting lines in the sands, then this is getting a bit to dangerous.
They are by-passing the security council, because of Russia and China, nato seen to have taken it's place, and when you replace a civilian body with a military, well...
Are the Russians and Chinese going to back down again, will Iran go home with their tails between their legs, or will the leaders of the western world go to far, just like past wars...
It did happen before...the Rhineland, Austria, the Sudetenland, Czechoslovakia, then one step too far, Poland..the rest is history.
Ever noticed those who beat the drums of war are those who will never participate in it?
I  have seen what war really is and it is not as clean as an Xbox game, not as heroic as Rambo.
Who dictates policy when it comes to war, we now have the internet, so we can be more informed that we used to be, no excuse there, is there two entity in a nation, with different paths? Governments who see's their own road and the people who are told to follow?
What the hell happened? We seem to be lacking true leaders in the western world, they call france poodles, what does that make us in Canada when even the media is dancing to the tune of war drums without looking for the truth.
So far we have been "lucky" Bosnia, Kosovo, Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, now Syria?? Some of these were allies to Russia and China, thank God they backed down on  the defense treaties they had with these countries, but will they always?
We are siding with people who seems to have used wmd themselves, who have openly called for the rape of women and children,  who have cannibalized the bodies of their enemies, eaten the liver of dead soldiers, whose "religious leaders" have said that raping the enemies females is ok according to sharia laws or whatever it's called, do we really want to side with elements of alqaida? I also would rather have Assad in control of Syrian chemical weapons instead of terrorists. Or are we willing to give up a few thousand citizen to an attack just to get rid of him? If the terrorist win this war, they will control these weapons.
As I said, those who are beating their chest for war are not the ones who will volunteer to fight it...
Smells like a false flag operation to me...

Feminist ideology; all acts of love is a act of violence against women.

I had to post this, because it is the stupidest thing ever said if you think about it...
Remember ladies, this thing claims to speak for you....
Making love with your man is an act of violence....against you.

To all the women I made love too, I am sorry I did not know....lol...

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Who is responsible for the evil some women do?

I really don't know what the hell happened to the human race anymore, I have to admit I do not feel a kinship with what is left.
If women cannot bring themselves to behave in a respectable manner according to their gender and find themselves more important than the life of others, then the human race is done.
Men will put their lives on the line against anyone who endangers the freedom of the individual, this has always been, but the individual does not represent only women, it encompasses men, women and children.
The idea is that feminism and their manginas with all it's evil policies as of late, seem to believe only women count, and when this is acted upon as a "it's done and it's over policy", some will take it to account as if it is the way of things, well it isn't.
We, men will not defend a system that puts adults ahead of children, we will certainly not war against those who threaten freedom if freedom is not given to all...
More and more we see this shit, more and more we die a little as a race everyday...

Mom charged with homicide after giving birth in sports bar bathroom, dumping baby in toilet before returning to watch wrestling match

I hold feminism and manginism responsible for this, because they do not have a balance in their message, which is "all women victims" all men and children do not count. You never see them condemn such  behavior.Go back to your cats you old hags, the world is about to change because we have had just about enough of your crap.

When this blog speaks of women doing wrong, it is pointed at the story of the post, not at all women. We do not believe the majority of women, mothers, subscribe to this type of behavior and as do men, are disgusted at such ideology.
We as adults are here for one reason, to give, with our hard work and moral values, a better life to the next generation than we had...when we fail this we fail life itself, life cannot continue by pandering only to one group.

Are false accusations against men for revenge or financial gains starting to be noticed?

Ontario sisters must pay uncle $125K for false sex abuse claims
Making false accusations is beginning to get some attention, not enough for my taste, but it is a start...
Anyone making false accusations, whoever it would be, or those supporting false accusations even when they know it not to be true should start to get a bit nervous...that would include the unscrupulous who see this as a chance to make money...or increase their statistics for funding purposes, specifically women's shelters.
This is good news for fathers, husbands, men who have always been at the proverbial end of some revenge minded individual female who thinks she can get way with it, and it is also good news for the real victims, how can you believe instantly such a crime, when so many are using it for financial gains and vengeance purposes.
In my opinion, the crime of false accusations can not only destroys a man reputation, but what about the name, the family, the people around him, i.e. his kids, what the future holds, and lets not forget in this crazy society, putting into consideration the medias propaganda against men who are falsely accused, his name plastered all over the left wing ass kissing pro feminist pages. Once that is done, half will believe, half will not. Because this is so rampant, no one's name should be published until it is definite that they have been found guilty without a doubt, that includes appeals.
More stricter laws should be in place giving the ones who have been falsely accused the chance to sue the ass off of anyone and everyone involved, no one should be immune. Especially not any feminist organization who is behind this type of attacks.
Original story found on legally kidnapped.

Monday, August 26, 2013

No Charges for Dad Who Killed Daughter's Molester

A Texas rancher who beat his daughter's accused molester to death moments after he discovered the man raping the 5-year-old girl, will not be charged with his homicide, officials said, as they released chilling 911 tapes of the father calling for help as the other man died.
A grand jury Tuesday decided not to indict the 24-year-old father who beat ranch hand Jesus Mora Flores to death with his bare hands, after finding the man abusing his daughter behind a barn.
"I need an ambulance. This guy was raping my daughter and I don't know what to do," the father is heard telling dispatchers in a frantic call to 911.
The attack happened on June 9 at an isolated ranch near Shiner, Texas. A witness saw Flores "forcibly carrying" the girl into a secluded area and ran to find the father, according to court documents. Running towards his daughter's screams, the father found Flores and the girl, both with their underwear removed, according to police reports.
He pulled Flores off the little girl and "inflicted several blows to the man's head and neck area," according to documents.
Authorities who examined the girl and Flores' body confirmed a sexual assault had occurred.
ABC News does not identify the victims of sexual assault, and is not identifying the father in an effort to protect the minor girl's identity.
The father called 911 from a cell phone and did not immediately know his exact whereabouts, making it difficult for emergency personell to find him.
"Come on! This guy is going to die on me!" the man yelled at the 911 dispatcher. "I don't know what to do."
The father was never arrested, but Flores' death was investigated as a homicide.
"Under the law in the state of Texas deadly force is authorized and justified in order to stop an aggravated sexual assault or sexual assault," District Attorney Heather McMinn told reporters.
"All the evidence provided by the sheriff's department and the Texas Rangers indicated that's what was occurring when the victim's father arrived at the scene," she said.
We applaud the justice system of Texas in recognizing the right of a man, a father's right to defend at all cost the safety of his children and family...with deadly force if necessary.
If this would of happened in lefty Ontario, a father who went through this horror would of been charged, had to hire a lawyer, and gone broke for defending his own child...
But when this, God forbid, happens, a man's instinct kicks in and the results would be the same, to kill that who endangers your child's life with your bare hands.
Nothing in this world can change that...
Not a feminist, 
not a mangina
not a coward
In every society, the strength of a man, a real man, ensures the safety of the population either by been a good police officer, an honorable soldier, or a simple father going about making sure his family has the safety and comfort they deserve, without those men, we have no freedom or safety...
Man is the ultimate protector of the right to be who we want to be...
Not a feminist
not a mangina
not a coward.

The cold hearted attitudes towards autistic kids. A personal perspective.

Neighbor tells mom to ‘Do the right thing and…euthanize’ autistic 13-year-old

This is sick in all it's form, to have someone tell that to a parent is not only demented but pure evil.
One might think that this is not rampant but one would be mistaken. There are many instances where autistic kids have been abused by those who should be there to help them, most of them coming from schools by teachers, 
I have not hidden the fact that I believe, schools are under the control of radical feminism, and that they are at best, self serving instead of, as they claim to fight for equality, which by now, any informed person, whether be male or female, know damn well that this is not true.

The majority of us are caring of children, especially those who need our help and protection, this is incontestable. Yet, there are those who "claim" to be here to make our lives better, who do the total opposite.

The story above is signed..."One pissed off mother". The first thing that came to mind when I heard this story was, how the hell could someone who is a mother, say such things, what if this would of happened to one of her kids.
The letter in question...

The offensive words that was said on this letter came from a sick twisted individual without a heart, that's for sure...But it is what was said that hit me...
“You selfishly put your kid outside everyday and let him be nothing but a nuisance and a problem to everyone else with that noise polluting whaling he constantly makes!!!”
“That noise he makes when he is outside is DREADFUL!!!!!!!!!! It scares the hell out of my normal children!!!!!!!”
“When you feel your idiot kid needs fresh air, take him to our park you dope,” 
It goes on calling the boy a “hindrance to everyone” the letter writer states that “no employer will hire him, 
no normal girl is going to marry/love him and you are not going to live forever”.
“Personally, they should take whatever non retarded body parts he possesses 
and donate them to science," the letter said. "What the hell else good is he to anyone!!!”
“You had a retarded kid, deal with it…properly!!!!! 
What right do you have to do this to hard working people!!!!!!! 
I HATE people like you who believe, just because you have a special needs kid, you are entitled to special treatment!!!"
The letter ends by asking the mother to move or have her child terminated.
“Do everyone in our community a huge favor and MOVE!!!!
Go live in a trailer in the woods or something with your wild animal kid!!! 
Nobody wants you living here and they don’t have the guts to tell you!!!!!”
Do the right thing and move or euthanize him!!! Either way, we are ALL better off!!!”

Now there is a reason why I underlined those specific words...
Because the same thing happened to someone close to me, a family member....who has 2 autistic kids..
Greed, jealousy, perverted reaction,(I don't know what else to call it), name calling, and insults that would of made anyone with a heart cry...She was told by her own sister in law, brothers wife, her kids were retards and animals that barked like dogs, and she would never want them around her normal kids, because they scare them..
All this came after she received financial help from the government for her children, they got jealous about the amount and this crap started.
A sick jealous little girl who brags that her mother raised her as...yes...a feminist...surprise, surprise. 

It is bad enough children have autism, it is hard work for the parents and they have to be strong to raise such children, but this person and her husband, like so many other parents of autistic kids have one thing those who are low lives enough to call these children such cruel name will never have, class...love...and family strength.
So, this is what this "feminist raised" idiot did to a mother with autistic children...
the parallels between the two stories are quite disturbing...
Right now they are lucky their names and faces are not put up, but if they "ever" do this again, or go anywhere near these kids, not only will their faces be all over this blog, but they will have their own web page.

Feminists vs the Simpsons

By bowing to one group we are damaging others, especially in schools.
Though this is considered comedy, the message is proper, they have divided the education system so much that the results are, learning is secondary to political grouping the future generation. So far in history, this is new, usually it starts within the political system, but in this case, they went after school children first, so when they grow up, all the crap they were fed will filter into society. The division they were thought will not bode well for the future.
Children should  never be used for political purposes, yet they openly do it, even to a point of trying to advance one group over the other, boys vs girls, and since the feminists are involved, boys are always the ones to suffer, so much for equality.  Now that we know what they stand for, why are some still listening to this hate group?
If the producers of the simpsons have noticed it, why  haven't the politicians?

Sunday, August 25, 2013

The fall of the western empire, through it's birth rate and feminism.

It's amazing isn't it, I always supported the right of my daughters to be who they want to be, outside the destructive ideal of cat loving feminists with an inferiority complex, but it looks like the ones that tried to say it was all our fault are now responsible for the slow death of western society.
There always has to be a balance when we try to change nature, with feminism there is no balance, only the policy of family destruction, victimization, false accusations, hatred of man, desensitizing young people and promoting lewd behavior. We know how far they will go in promoting lewd behavior with the 18 vaginas on the cover of some magazine, which means there is nothing sacred to them and showing some class for ones self is now also a negative...They want everything that parents, traditional family, mom and dad teach out the window, and to do this they invite confused little girls to expose themselves....
The destruction of society as we know it is their main goal....
Well guess what, it's working, whereas men can claim to have build this world, it seems that men can also put an end to it...not because we want women back in the kitchen, that's bullshit, but because the corrupt system of anti family policies of the western world brought on by hateful feminists and their manginas has actually alienated real men from wanting a family...and can you blame them, who the hell would want to raise kids under these circumstances.
It is now "fact" that western based society, whether in Europe or in the Americas, men are having none of the crap feminist policies and the manginas have installed in order to destroy the traditional family.
They can claim they have put forward daycare, after school programs, over rated babysitting programs like junior kindergarten, so on, to help women, but it has not worked that way. Actually, these programs are there to get more people out in the workforce and to spend, so the few can make more profits. Women, even with the financial intensives like tax break and bonuses has gone the other way, it has provided the reduction of the birth rate.

In europe for instance, men have decided, because of pro feminist policies, to stay single and have no kids, because it is to damn dangerous for their health, or they just had enough of all this shit and are going to put an end to what they fought and died for, western civilization.
Everything is against us, the second government (aka the bureaucracy, )family courts, false accusations, child alienation, the list goes on, the thing is, these idiots, actually believed this would work, that we would accept this with open arms...
So the result is the reduction of the individual countries population.
This is also happening in the Americas, both canada and the u.s. are experiencing a reduction of its european descendent population.
Eventually, this will change the nature of these countries where the new population, middle east, asia, and others do not follow the same values as those in their adopted countries, eventually demanding changes that will conflict with the rest and this will cause major problems down the line...
Some of these countries have had to even adopt such things as sharia law to please some of it's immigrant population, which did not rest well with others and eventually will demand their own laws recognizing their values.. The ontario government actually tried to pass that here also...a few years back.
But all this is political...the point here is men have had just about enough and are rebelling against these policies that have done nothing but demonize them simply for been men.
(no I am not bitching about immigration, just trying to make a point)

In a study of european men, Germany for instance...
If you want to understand how truly deep Germany’s problems run, consider this:
In 2005, Europe did a Population Policy Acceptance Study which looked at a broad range of demographic indicators.
One of these indicators was “ideal fertility”—that is, how many kids an individual thought was the ideal number.
Twenty-three percent of German men—that’s not a typo, 23 percent—said that “zero” was the ideal family size.
And that was in 2005....
A better explanation can be seen here...
Page one
Page two.

A resolution to this problem was offered by Anti-Feminism on facebook..
The only things that would truly increase domestic birth-rates is by making it beneficial enough for men to have a family again.
That would heal the divide between men and women which was created by anti-family feminist policies.

1. This can be done by minimizing the high risks of divorce (lose half your assets, high alimony, child support without seeing your kids).
2. Shared Parenting as default after divorce for good parents.
3. Reform the secret, corrupt family courts.
4. Severely punish false abuse allegations
5. Lower taxes to make it more affordable to raise kids.
6. Send all feminists and manginas to Iran. (ok, that one is mine)

Eventually, the feminists and the mangina will be eradicated, we simply have no choice, they have caused so much trouble that everything is falling apart, so far it's a little at a time, but eventually it will be more apparent in coming generations.
Men's site such as anti feminism, anti-misandry, men's rights help, avfm, and so many many others that are created each day are not promoting the return of women to the kitchen as lowly cat petting feminists told you, on the contrary, they are promoting "real" equality without the demonization of other groups. This site for instance, always differentiates between a woman and a feminist or feminist supporters, there is one hell of a difference between women and feminists.  Secure women speak for themselves, understand men, and want their kids to have the best, without blaming other groups. Feminists on the other hand have the audacity to believe their speak for all women. Case in point, A local feminist lawyer referred to this site as "we know what he thinks of women", believing when I point out feminist wrongdoings I point out all women, which I do nothing of the sort. She believes feminism speaks for all women of lanark county, ... and that is arrogance in itself and it shows someone who is out of touch with reality.
What do men's site really want, well some of us are really pissed off, me for one because of what the local woman's shelter did or tried to identify me as something I was not, tried to use my kids against me, lied, abused their position and used fund dedicated to victims to do it.
What we want is stability in our families, for them not to be used by this group to attack us at every turn, we want to eradication of feminism and manginism, we want equality for all, so that it will be passed on to the next generation. We do not want "boys are born potential abusers" as a point of reference to identify all men...What if we would say: "all girls are born potential false accusers".
We will not put up with those who have an inferiority complex to dictate what is ours and always will be, our rights, to protect and provide for our families, we will never accept the state and its second unelected government, (bureaucracy, social programs, family courts) to re-organize families according to their left wing radical views, we want our women to be who they want to be, not what feminists dictate they should be....

If feminism thinks we will roll over and play dead, they are sorely mistaken and have missed the lessons of history, as they have realized and complained about lately, men's sites are overtaking theirs, supported by women's sites on youtube and others.
Even this site, the native canadian, has overtaken all feminist site in lanark county and most of Ontario in ranking. I was looking it up last night and I was terribly pleased with what I saw. We are even higher in ranking than their main anti male site...that describe all men in ontario as power hungry rapists..
All men's site in Ontario are more popular that theirs...especially those I mentioned above...Noted, this site is not up there with them, nor do I stride to be.
It simply means they are loosing the battle, a long way to go, but eventually, politically it will be more advantageous for politicians to look at what we are saying instead of cat lovers if they want to keep their jobs.

Finally, and without adieu...
I do believe it is time for "some women" to chose, which most have already done....
it's feminism or us, you can no longer have it both ways....
Otherwise, those who do support those cat lovers will realize, unlike popular belief, we can go it alone if this continues....

The character of a man is to care for his woman, and I do believe women in general enjoy this and expect it...
Ours is not to control, or to use but to love, protect and provide...

Women simply have to decide for themselves what they really want, a feminists view of a man...
Or the love of a real man....with all it's faults.

We do not stride to demean anyone, if this site has offended anyone, (other than cat lovers) I can assure you it was not our intention. What we do "recognize" is this, men and women are two different sides of the same coin, what we have to do is support each other, as we have always done. Majority of us anyway.
One bad apple does not mean the whole basket is rotten, if we look at life that ways then we throw out the good ones because of one bad....
And that is ridiculous and a lost for all.

Israel; Child Support Ruling is ‘Very Good News for Divorced Fathers’

 The one sided greed and anti father, anti male policies of what is left of the feminist movement is starting to be recognized in some places. The realization that something is wrong is been recognized in some circles. Automatic child support and alimony even when the mother makes more is seen by far as uneven and unjust, now the only thing left to do is get rid of the feminist's mangina on the bench and install judges who see things under the veil of justice instead of political ambition, or should i say bowing to masters.
And since Israel is considered part of the western society, this is very good news indeed.
 I'll say it again, a little at a time we are seeing the reversal of anti-male policies, we still have some ways to go, and we will hear more and more "the war on women" from these cat lovers, as they realize they are loosing their strangle hold, but the march to a true equal society is within sight.
We just have to keep pushing....

 Judge makes unprecedented ruling freeing father from all child support obligations due to joint custody, salary gap.

A Tel Aviv judge has ruled that a father from Rehovot does not need to pay child support – setting a precedent that could change child support arrangements for many divorced parents.
Judge Yoram Shaked ruled that the father in question does not need to pay support because he shares custody of his children with his ex-wife, and because she has a higher income and more disposable income than he does. Were the father to pay support, he would need to pay only 300 shekels a month, Shaked found – a finding that led him to decide to waive the obligation to pay altogether.
Attorney Aviv Harel explained the significant of the verdict. “Until today, most judges set minimum child support payments for Jewish fathers that stood at 1,350 shekels per month per child or more,” he said.
“This revolutionary verdict is very good news for divorced fathers, but much less good for divorced mothers in Israel,” he noted.
Courts normally look at two aspects of child support, Harel explained. The first is “essential support,” which includes the cost of food, clothing, housing and healthcare. Fathers are automatically viewed as responsible for paying for “essential support,” regardless of their income, he said.
The second aspect includes “extras” such as vacations, entertainment, and extra-curricular activities. These costs are normally split by divorced parents based on their respective incomes.
Judges usually rule that fathers who share equal custody of their children with the children’s mother must pay 75% of the cost of raising the children, Harel said, while fathers who do not have custody at all must pay 100% support.
In the case in question, the divorced parents share custody of the children. The mother earns more than 18,000 shekels a month and owns a home, while the father earns over 13,000 shekels a month and rents his home. The mother had sued for over 13,000 shekels a month in child support, arguing that she bears primary responsibility for the children and so deserves financial support.
The court found that because the children are with their father half of the time, he is essentially already paying half the cost of “essential support.” The mother, who has significantly more disposable income than her ex-spouse, should legally pay proportionally more for “extras,” Shaked ruled.
Therefore, the father’s obligation to pay 100% of “essential support” is balanced out by the mother’s responsibility to pay proportionally more for “extras,” he said, and the arrangement the two currently have in which neither party pays support to the other is just.
“In light of the tiny sum that the father would be giving the mother, and in light of the fact that in effect the children spend more than half of their time with the father, I saw fit not to obligate the father to give the mother any payment. So the two parents will continue to equally share the costs,” he wrote.
Attorney Harel said the verdict joins several others that indicate a trend toward splitting custody and child support equally in divorce cases.
The case could lead to a reduction in the amount some divorced fathers must pay in child support, he said. However, he noted, the situation in question, in which the mother both earns more than the father and owns a home while he does not, is relatively uncommon. 

Saturday, August 24, 2013

School Has Become Too Hostile to Boys

School Has Become Too Hostile to Boys

As school begins in the coming weeks, parents of boys should ask themselves a question: Is my son really welcome? A flurry of incidents last spring suggests that the answer is no. In May, Christopher Marshall, age 7, was suspended from his Virginia school for picking up a pencil and using it to “shoot” a “bad guy” — his friend, who was also suspended. A few months earlier, Josh Welch, also 7, was sent home from his Maryland school for nibbling off the corners of a strawberry Pop-Tart to shape it into a gun. At about the same time, Colorado’s Alex Evans, age 7, was suspended for throwing an imaginary hand grenade at “bad guys” in order to “save the world.”

In all these cases, school officials found the children to be in violation of the school’s zero-tolerance policies for firearms, which is clearly a ludicrous application of the rule. But common sense isn’t the only thing at stake here. In the name of zero tolerance, our schools are becoming hostile environments for young boys.

Girls occasionally run afoul of these draconian policies; but it is mostly boys who are ensnared. Boys are nearly five times more likely to be expelled from preschool than girls. In grades K-12, boys account for nearly 70% of suspensions, often for minor acts of insubordination and defiance. In the cases of Christopher, Josh and Alex, there was no insubordination or defiance whatsoever. They were guilty of nothing more than being typical 7-year-old boys. But in today’s school environment, that can be a punishable offense.

Zero tolerance was originally conceived as a way of ridding schools of violent predators, especially in the wake of horrific shootings in places like Littleton, Colo. But juvenile violence, including violence at schools, is at a historic low. The Bureau of Justice Statistics reports that in 2011, approximately 1% of students ages 12 to 18 reported a violent victimization at school. For serious violence, the figure is one-tenth of 1%. It does no disrespect to the victims of Columbine or Sandy Hook to note that while violence may be built into the core of a small coterie of sociopathic boys, most boys are not sociopathic.

On the other hand, millions of boys are struggling academically. A large and growing male cohort is falling behind in grades and disengaged from school. College has never been more important to a young person’s life prospects, and today boys are far less likely than girls to pursue education beyond high school. As our schools become more risk averse, the gender gap favoring girls is threatening to become a chasm.

Across the country, schools are policing and punishing the distinctive, assertive sociability of boys. Many much-loved games have vanished from school playgrounds. At some schools, tug of war has been replaced with “tug of peace.” Since the 1990s, elimination games like dodgeball, red rover and tag have been under a cloud — too damaging to self-esteem and too violent, say certain experts. Young boys, with few exceptions, love action narratives. These usually involve heroes, bad guys, rescues and shoot-ups. As boys’ play proceeds, plots become more elaborate and the boys more transfixed. When researchers ask boys why they do it, the standard reply is, “Because it’s fun.”

According to at least one study, such play rarely escalates into real aggression — only about 1% of the time. But when two researchers, Mary Ellin Logue and Hattie Harvey, surveyed classroom practices of 98 teachers of 4-year-olds, they found that this style of play was the least tolerated. Nearly half of teachers stopped or redirected boys’ dramatic play daily or several times a week — whereas less than a third reported stopping or redirecting girls’ dramatic play weekly.

Play is a critical basis for learning. And boys’ heroic play is no exception. Logue and Harvey found that “bad guy” play improved children’s conversation and imaginative writing. Such play, say the authors, also builds moral imagination, social competence and imparts critical lessons about personal limits and self-restraint. Logue and Harvey worry that the growing intolerance for boys’ action-narrative-play choices may be undermining their early language development and weakening their attachment to school. Imagine the harm done to boys like Christopher, Josh and Alex who are not merely discouraged from their choice of play, but are punished, publicly shamed and ostracized.

Schools must enforce codes of discipline and maintain clear rules against incivility and malicious behavior. But that hardly requires abolishing tag, imposing games of tug of peace or banning superhero play. Efforts to re-engineer the young-male imagination are doomed to fail, but they will succeed spectacularly in at least one way. They will send a clear and unmistakable message to millions of schoolboys: You are not welcome in school.

And this will be the legacy of feminism and their mangina allies...to be remembered by history as one of the most anti male organization the world has ever seen, destructive to a nations evolution, right beside such idealism as nazism and communism...

Here is another thought, what happens historically when a country has to many uneducated men?

Friday, August 23, 2013

Feminism ! Criticize femininity, applaud as liberating, private parts on the cover of a magazine.

Feminists have criticized yahoo's ceo Marissa Mayer for this picture in Septembers issue of vogue magazine.

Yet, these same feminists are applauding this picture of vaginas as freedom for women...from the cover of Honi Soit magazine of sydney university.(be advised the picture does show everything, so don't go puritan on me..lol)
"We are tired of vaginas being sexualized" is what these feminists are expressing.
How can you "not" sexualize the sexual organs of humans?, isn't that what it's there for, other than going to the washroom I guess...I must be missing something.lol.
The hypocrisy here is a decent strong "person" who is were she is in her life because she showed that behaving like a feminine woman is not a hindrance to getting ahead, is criticized as a bad example for women because she showed her strength and femininity on a magazine.

Yet, showing your privates to the world is applauded as freedom for women???

We can analyse this many ways, to me it's simple, if men's private parts would have came out first on some magazine the way they did it with vagina's, there would of been a condemnation from feminists around the world.
They would of declared it as a power move by men against women, and I am sure the words sexual perverts, rape and let's not forget their favorite, patriarchy, would of made it's way out there.

I mean come on, they are complaining on how men sit in the subway as a power move against women, imagine 18 penises on the cover of some magazine...
And that is feminist hypocrisy.....
Oh and by the way, I wonder if mom and dad are proud of their university daughter's privates making it around the world....
Not that it would matter to a feminist...

Toronto big red under scrutiny for her stfu expressions, defended by feminist sites.

I looked it up and yes, radical feminists sites are saying red is scared because she has been threatened for....saying shut the fu... up to men...and if she has been threatened then I and others will not accept this behavior, debate is what we want, not feminist policies of a one sided argument without opposing views.
I don't put up links because I do not want to give radical male hating feminists sites the credit.

First, it is possible, there are individuals who are nasty out there, "of both gender". But what I noticed about these fem pages is they blame men's sites. Well maybe she should not of tried to be so accessible to the youtube generation, she is after all, all over the place. But that's her free choice.
Second, let's not forget, a lot of feminists will open sites, emails so on, pass themselves out to be men and say the nastiest of comments to blame the male population as a whole.
Third, these fem sites keep on referring men are mad because she only tells males to shut the fu.. up...as if she a big hero...wrong again.
I do believe this is a women she is telling to shut the fu.. up...
She has the right to her opinion, without fear of repercussions, we all defend that right, but if she keeps on been arrogant with her opinions without accepting opposing views, then she is not going to be taken seriously and will be posted all over the place as a typical feminist clown.

A Witch Hunt. The Salem ideology of today's feminism.

This is an interesting point, a radical feminist is in an elevator talking to a man, he asks her to go for a coffee and it's referred to as sexualizing women, even rape...
It is the radical feminist who sexualized the man by suggesting that any offer to coffee is a sexual act...
Many points are well made here, in one, it is compared to a time when, if a black man would address a white woman without her talking to him first, he would risk a beating or even worse, lynching.
Though I am not saying it is as bad today, we can see the comparison, in this elevator, the man was not allowed to ask this crazy feminist to go for a coffee, he had to wait for her to mention it first? And since he did not, then it is referred to as rape and the man is tagged instantly, according to the word of a feminist with an inferiority complex.
It is not that women want to be treated this way, women in general do want to be treated with respect by men, they are attracted to chivalry, respect, strength, on an equal basis. They do not want that equality to be recognized as men, nor do they like the idea of men behaving like women, as I have said before, we are different side of the same coin. This is how life offers balance, one strengthens the other with their individual gifts.

This feminist world they have been  trying to create has started to cause major problems in the countries they control, like sweden for instance. The birth rate has gone down in every western country, so much so, that they have been increasing immigration to up the population and workforce. This in itself has also started to cause it's own problems, the values of the respective countries is not exactly the same values of the new immigrants. We seen conflicts of values in all these countries, even in feminists utopia, sweden.

Land of the lost mind... radical feminists always refer to abusers as men...why not women? or individuals?

I  tried to read the whole page, but I have to admit I could not, after reading part of it I realized that the post was comparing abusers to all men, pointing out men and fathers. Forgetting for a moment, that well above 90% of fathers are good providers and loving fathers. They also try their best to demonize men's site, again forgetting or not recognizing that father have feelings and are treated by courts and social programs as expendable trash to be crapped on anytime someone does something wrong, as if we all do it...Men's site are the answer to feminism and their manginas, by constantly attacking fathers as if we are nothing more than animals, they created the movement, they are responsible for it's existence as the lanark county Ontario feminists are responsible for this one, because they actually believed we would sit by and do nothing while they put our families in danger.
I experienced this kind of radical stupidity myself, here in lanark county Ontario, I realize this was so entrenched in the system that the protection of children took second stage to their policy of demonizing anything male, and the manginas, bowing to the demands of their masters in fear like pussies are just going along with it. And who suffers in this screwed up part of Ontario, children, also treating them as expendable to their goals.
Majority of abusers in families are not men, since the majority of men are at work, it is "fact" that children are more abused by bad mothers than bad fathers. Though these kind of statistics are hard to come by in canada, because they are hidden as so not to offend their feminist masters, you can be sure, since the society of both countries parallel each other that the numbers are close to the same.
 The "individual" that fails their own children are the bad part of family life, but the worse are those who skip this issue and put these children in danger by not recognizing the problem.
 All studies points the benefits to children of having Dad in the picture on a regular basis, if they cared more about children and family rights instead of a political ploy to advance feminism then this issue would be looked at better than it is, but since it would advance paternal importance, feminists and their manginas do not want to talk about it, hence putting children at risk.
Feminism is a tool, the fool always gets used for a more sinister end, what the end is, who knows, right now i would guess it is for getting more people to work, more tax collection, more profits...again at the expense of families.

Anyway, here is why the link above pissed me off....Abusers tend to be extremely manipulative and they have had great success in misleading the courts, legislatures and media.  The men who control “fathers’ rights groups are extremists whose goals include eliminating child support, repealing domestic violence laws and in some cases permitting sex between adults and children.  Obviously, if they said this to courts, they would get nowhere.  Instead they disguise their goals by seeking seemingly fair objectives like “shared custody” “friendly parent” protections and equal treatment of parents.  Who could object to such reasonable requests?
Male supremacist groups often refer to sexual abuse allegations as the “atomic bomb” of child custody.  In reality when sexual abuse is alleged, even when strong evidence supports the allegation, the alleged abuser usually wins custody.  In research unrelated to custody, it is well established that by the time children reach the age of 18, one-third of the girls and one-sixth of the boys have been sexually abused.  Although the stereotypical rapist is a stranger in a raincoat, most rape and sexual abuse is committed by someone the victim knows, often the father.

Men are compared to abusers, "father's group rights wants of all things, to permit sex between children and adults???..." Are they fu...ng crazy???
-That in itself does not come from the mrm, mra's or father's rights group, it come from feminism, and anyone who has those kind of thoughts are perverse themselves...
-As for men's rights, they are fathers' right, family rights, and since daughters are involved in our families as do our sons, we want them to live free to be who the want to be, the total opposite of feminist ideology...
-We do not disguise what we will achieve and it is "inevitably"' the destruction of feminism and their manginas..
-Shared custody is not only the right of the parent but of the child.
-There is no male supremacist groups in the mra's, well not here anyway, that would mean i want my daughters in the kitchen washing dishes, barefoot and pregnant....
-As for false accusations, it's real and a danger not only to good men and fathers, but for the child, since they will be alienated and eventually despise the mother for doing it...knowing anger instead of parental love.
-Other stupidity, "the abuser gets custody?"
-And finally, one third of girls get sexually abused, that is bullshit, especially the part where "most of the abuse is committed often by the father". Here is a reality check for this "idiot" put an "individual" who has done this in a cage with a father or a man and sit back as see what happens.

Sex abuse does happen, I don't think you will find no respectable mra out there denying it, what we are saying is it is performed by "individuals" of both gender, and if it is not recognize then there will be more and more victims who go unnoticed.
Mra's are the real men who are trying in their own way, without political support, to change the path this society has taken, we understand it is going in the wrong direction, that one cannot be safe if only one group is promoted over the other, it will eventually engulfed all of us in the long term. Also, speaking only for myself, defending the family at all cost is what we have done since the beginning of time, and we will continue to eradicate those who threatens them, it is the way of things.

The only way to stop any kind of abuse on any person, is for men and women, mothers and fathers, to get together and do it ourselves, if we depend on others the way we have for the past decades, things are going to get worse. The feminist and the mangina had their chances and look what they did with it...
blaming the very group that can prevent this in the first place...

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Swedish feminists afraid of the way men sit....

Sweden has a reputation as having the most equal relations between the sexes in the world—it’s a place where male politicians (manginas) are voted "woman of the year" by feminists, where a preschool can casually ban gendered pronouns. A recent report claimed Sweden is the most gender equal country in the world. (What bullshit-it's the most anti male country in the world)
Yet some Swedish feminists apparently think that the image of the Nordic country as a feminist's paradise is just a veneer hiding deep-seated misogyny. Their evidence? Men slouching and taking up more than one seat on buses, trains, and subways.
To counter this "normalized expression of power" (that’s what they call slouching), a group of firebrand feminists have set up a blog called "Macho in Public Transport", (pure example of feminists idiocy) encouraging readers to send in sneaky snaps of men in relaxed poses. The aim is to spread awareness of a "symbolic and active recreation not just of power, but of a stereotypical form of masculinity."

Do Swedish women really feel threatened by men who slouch on the subway? Can this seriously be construed as a feminist issue? Do feminists today really view women as weaklings who are traumatized by the way men sit?
So, how would you like to live is sweden? They have a site showing that the way men sit is a show of power against women....Holy shit...can they get any more idiotic...There is an effort underway to tell men how to sit....son is not a he, daughter is not a she, they are now hens...
This could of happened here, fortunately it happened first in europe, so we saw it coming, swedish men on the other hand did not have that perception, so they either got caught by surprise or the whole country is full of manginas...either way...

Sweden, Where the nuts rule the roost.

Ghost caught on film...so real, makes your blood turn cold.

Best viewed in full screen...
Look close in front of the car...

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Why women's shelters should never be used as a tool by those with an inferiority complex.

Some of us have been in a situation where we had to either defend someone or make someone feel better about themselves. We don't go out and look for such situation, some of us are no longer white knights, but we all get into a circle sometimes where we realize someone need a pep talk about their importance in the world. To tell them...they matter.
That said...
I was talking to a friend the other day, she is single, raised her 2 boys on her own and now finds herself alone with a few dogs for company, always waiting for her boys to visit.
This person explained to me she was abused as a child, (by a bad individual) and never felt adequate to anyone, that her life amounted to nothing...
We have tea together and we chat about the world and our kids, one day, I explained to her how all of us are important in the circle of life, we make a difference even if we do not realize it, we might not see it in our lifetime, but it is there. We either make a difference ourselves, or it might be through our kids, if not them, grandchildren, so on. We might have to wait a few generations to have made an impact on the world but we do make an impact personally.
It might be something we said, something we did, or the way our children perceived us, the way we raised them, or a well placed word.
Our strength when we go through adversity might be a point of discussion, like; "I remember my mother, she went through hell but always believed in herself and helped me to understand life, to stand up for myself and never depend on anyone but family".
Or we might make an impact through someone generations from now, who finds a cure, creates peace, or saves a person in danger...The difference you made for that life was to have raised kids, and if you did not exist, then that person also would have never existed.

A while later she came to me, and said...
"I never though much of myself until I talked to you, I never felt important to anyone, or felt like I will ever made a difference. Now I feel better about myself and look at life in a whole different way".
You will never find a shelter worker with the brains to explain, life is on an individual basis, we are all responsible for our action, what one does, does not mean all are responsible.... and in this "one" case, this woman who had gone through the woman’s shelter system (Carleton place Ontario) to seek help, never made her feel important, or try to give her back her dignity, instead they made her believe she will always be a victim, always picked on because she is a woman, that she has to be fearful of men...
it took a "man" to give her back her strength...
If a woman goes to a shelter, counseled by those (feminists) who preach hate, permanent victimization, then that person cannot regain her strength, she will feel victimized for the rest of her life, on the defensive and will never achieve her full potential. Simply because she is been used for political purpose, as a statistic and told she will always be someones victim. If we realistically look at what we went through as the human race, we might be a lot of things, but we are not permanent victims.

Feminists are the last people who should be staffing a woman's shelter, they are hateful, resentful, and cannot bring themselves to recognize most men are good men, that the path to redemption and strength is through understanding the "real world" not the world created by cat lovers, (feminists who have no one but their cats to go home too) who dislike themselves and live with an inferiority complex.
Such staff further victimize a person to believe they are not important enough to change the world, and when this happens, we lost another potential Albert Einstein, or Gandhi, because she will pass on her fears imposed on her by an "individual" and the staff of a woman's shelter.

With messages such as that one, promoted by a local and supported by "all" shelters in Ontario, how can any woman regain their self confidence when they are told half the population of the world or in this case Ontario, are nothing but rapist, will look at her as a sex toy, treat her like a disposable rag, remember, if you look deeply at the message they give out, on their own web site, this is "their message" not our, not men, or other women for that matter, since most men are raised by their...mothers.

If we look at who staffs a women's shelter, we can see individuals who themselves have been victimized by bad individuals, (or so some claim), instead of learning the whole story behind what happened to them, that there are and always will be bad individuals, (of both gender) this does not encompass the whole, they bring their hate, and that hate is aimed at those who they believe are responsible, mainly men. That is not an experienced person who should staff and help those in need, since she is in need of help herself.
90% of men do not hold power through rape, that message is nothing other than a hate message directed at part of our community, most men are supportive of the independence and hard work their women do, whether at home, or at the work place, but when these "people" blame all, then they leave out those who could help out and give back a woman the strength she needs to understand that not all men are bad.
 I am not saying only men could do better at a women's shelter, I am saying that men of strong values, (not manginas since these fools also need real men to protect them), and women together can give back a person the reason to believe that the world will not constantly pic on her, but live with her.
And that is something a staff member at a women's shelter could never understand because they are more interested in passing on their hate, their miserably life, and their inferiority complex to others, also, if a person keeps on coming back then she can be added to the statistics year after year.,..

The, "it's all men's fault" is getting old, more and more are realizing that this message is nothing other than personal attacks by those who dislike even themselves. By blaming half the population, when it is the act of only a few, and by the way individuals of both gender can be nasty, (of course shelters will never admit this) then we are limiting the healing and condemning victims to a life of fear...
And that is wrong.